Intermediate sanctions are designed to give judges other sentencing options beside imprisonment or probation. These types of sanctions are less restrictive than imprisonment but more restrictive than probation. Intermediate sanctions are usually combined with imprisonment, probation, and each other.…
Intermediate sanctions tend to overlap the issues that arise when a criminal is released back into society from incarceration. Most often, the offenders, once released, return back to prison within 1-5 years (Fagin, 265). The reasons vary, but most likely it’s because the offender has not had proper preparation on how to ease back into society after being locked up for so much time. Intermediate sanctions are criminal penalties that do not include jail time or probation. Rather, intermediate sanctions fall in the middle of these types of punishments and offer an alternative to them.…
The philosophy of zero tolerance was to deter students from suspension worthy activity or dangerous activity by incorporating police officers into the schools and programs that would suspend, expel and arrest you if you began to stray down the wrong path. This was a reaction to Columbine because they wanted to take preventative measures, not reactive measures. It is stated in the movie that they were scared if they didn’t address the issues in a serious way in the first place, even if the student had no prior record, then something more detrimental could happen. The change within schools to zero tolerance policies that could not only result in school related punishments but actual arrests as we see in this film led to the more placements in the juvenile justice system. Ultimately, zero tolerance rested on the notion that kids are mini adults and thought that a deterrence program would keep them from behaving like…
The documentary begins with a history of the zero tolerance policy. In the 1990's, most schools established guidelines in institutions in order to keep the campuses safe from weapons and drugs. However, schools would soon find themselves deciding which items are considered weapons and what is considered drugs. In today's society, even knives at lunch and ibuprofen are considered hazardous to the safety of our schools. Even kindergartners are being expelled and suspended for playing cops and robbers, using their fingers as guns, or drawing "dangerous" pictures of a man with a gun. Let me address the thought in many minds while watching this film. What 5 year old child is going to cause danger or harm to a school? That's just the issue, it seems our society cares more about safety due to illogical fears, rather than our children's education. That in itself is causing our education system to fail rapidly and increasingly. The documentary also informs us of other incidents occurring in the schools. A 3rd grade student was suspended for a kiss on the cheek, a 5th grader was expelled for bringing ibuprofen to school. Many argue that this kind of action taken by authority is a threat to the basic rights. Forcing students to go through metal detectors, and permitting drug searches without consent is not only robbing…
The intolerable act was passed in 1774. It was a set of 5 laws sent to boston.It was a punishment from the king about the tea party they had. Law one was the boston port act, law 2 was The Massachusetts Gov. act, 3 was the Administration of Justice Act, law 4 was Quartering act, finally law 5 the Quebec Act.…
School institutions simply cannot tolerate misbehavior by students. It is the school’s responsibility to maintain a safe, and controlled learning environment for everyone within the school institutions. Students truly cannot learn and teachers cannot teach amongst disruption and chaos. This is no controversy. So, to try and achieve this goal, schools have adapted and fiercely implemented the zero tolerance policies. Schools feel these policies have made them more effective in handing disciplinary issues. It mandates a consistency of discipline for certain offenses. Parents feel the zero tolerance policies ensures the safety of their children while at school. Others feel removing the disruptive students altogether, creates a better learning environment for behaved students. But it is important to remember the zero tolerance polices do not distinguish between major and minor offenses. While school systems feel, this sends clarifying message to students, it could be sending the wrong message, ultimately forcing children into the prison…
If I had three wishes I would pick to live again, be able to go to a D1 college when I’m older and play sports in college. I would like to live again because life is fun and full of adventures. Living again would be cool because you be able to be a kid again and experience different things. I want to go to a D1 college because they have great education, and are good at sports. If I went to a D1 college and earned my master’s degree I would have a good oprotunity to have a good job as an adult that pays good money. I would like to play a sport in college because would be a great experience in life.…
There’s people who support the idea, in the middle, and those who are against it. David L. Stader in his article, “Zero Tolerance as Public Policy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, partially leans on the side of keeping the zero tolerance policy. Stader tells us that drugs, physical assaults, and weapons are generally minor or not huge problems with less than 2% of schools ranking them as serious problems. Stader follows up with more statistics such as from 1993-1999, students in grades 9-12 had a percentage of 12 of carrying a weapon. The percentage then falls down to 7% down the road. Stader agrees that zero tolerance sends a powerful message to the school community that violent behavior will not be tolerated. Schools need strong, effective policies to protect our students and to help them feel…
References: Carr, S. (2012). Do zero tolerance school discipline policies go too far? Time, Retrieved…
Several species of Anolis lizards live in the same types of trees and have a similar diet.…
The punishment does not always fit the crime. Zero tolerance was initially defined as a policy that enforces automatic suspensions and expulsions in response to weapons, drugs, and violent acts in school. Today these policies have changed to include a range of less serious offenses such as violation of dress code, writing on the desk, and tardiness. Zero tolerance policies began as a way to protect children from potentially violent situations. Over the years, these policies designed to protect are now doing more harm than good. Children are being punished for simply being children. Zero tolerance policies need to be replaced because these harsh policies have resulted in an increasing number of suspensions,…
A big concern of mine after I was no longer in school was if I would still graduate. Studies have shown that suspensions and expulsions have more than doubled since 1974. Denial of education is linked to the increase of school dropouts and the zero-tolerance…
Many people in the world today take things for granted. They are consumed with their day to day lives and forget to stop and take a look around. Ralph Waldo Emerson hit the nail on the head when he said, “Guard well your spare moments. They are like uncut diamonds. Discard them and their value will never be known. Improve them and they will become the brightest gems in a useful life.”…
A zero-tolerance policy was vastly adopted following the 1999 Columbine shooting. It was created in order to make schools safer by giving harsh punishments no matter the circumstances of the issue nor the child. By using this policy, minor mistakes made by students are criminalized and can give them a criminal…
Last year, over “1000 schoolchildren were suspended, excluded or expelled from New Zealand schools last year for drugs or alcohol-related offences, with the youngest aged 8” (Stuff, 2013). The…