Preview

Zzzbest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zzzbest
ZZZZ Best Case Assignment #2
Question 1: 15 points
AU Section 315 Communications Between Predecessor and Successor Auditors .01-.13Using the facts from the ZZZZ Best case and professional guidance from AU Section 315, explain the following:
A. As the successor auditor, what was E&W supposed to do before they accepted ZZZZ Best as an audit client in regards to Greenspan? Summarize in enough detail AU 315.03-.06. In your answer give and support your opinion as to whether or not E&W violated these paragraphs and if you can prove it as a fact.
The first thing E&W should have done, as the successor auditor, was to postpone accepting the engagement until the communications in paragraphs .07 through .10 have been evaluated. (AU 315.03) It is the responsibility for the successor auditor to contact the predecessor auditor and hold any information exchanged about ZZZZ Best confidential (AU 315.06). It is important for the successor auditor to contact the predecessor auditor because they may be able to provide information that will assist the successor auditor in determining whether or not to accept an engagement. (AU 315.07) The successor auditor should request permission from the prospective client to make inquiry of the predecessor auditor prior to acceptance of the engagement. If the client refuses, the successor should inquire as to why the client is refusing (AU 315.08). The successor auditor should make inquiries regarding matters that will help the successor auditor determine if they were to accept the engagement and the predecessor auditor should respond promptly and fully. (AU 315.09 and AU 315.10)
In my opinion, E&W did violate the standards of what a successor auditor should do regarding the contacting of a predecessor auditor in the case of the ZZZ Best audit. I believe this to be true because Mr. Greenspan (predecessor auditor) testified before Congress that E&W never got in touch with him regarding the restoration contract and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Smackey Dog Foods

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In an attempt to expand the business, Sarah has applied for a loan of $150,000 with a local bank. Currently, Smackey Dog Food Inc. already has an outstanding loan of $150,000 which is secured by the production equipment that was purchased with the money from the loan. Smackey Dog Food Inc.’s goal is to secure a second loan that would be secured by the company’s corporate accounts receivable. The bank is requiring a set of audited financial statements before issuing the second loan. Therefore, Smackey Dog Food Inc has contacted my firm, Keller CPAs, to perform the audit. My firm had no prior experience with auditing dog food manufacturers, but we decided to venture out and accept the audit at the end of the year. Assigned to the lead the audit are Pete, Ben and Maureen. Pete is a very experienced auditor that I have worked with on several audits. Ben and Maureen were assigned field auditors to assist myself and Pete. Ben has been with my firm for one year with no prior auditing experience to Keller CPAs. Maureen has 5 years prior experience as an auditor before joining our team. We at Keller CPA have researched and benchmarked the industry to qualify a knowledgeable opinion of our new client, Smackey Dog Food Inc.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Data Trappers Inc.

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Using these guidelines to evaluate whether or not B&T should be permitted to serve as the independent auditor of DTI it is somewhat apparent that B&T would not make a good independent auditor. B&T worked for Data Chips, a wholly owned subsidiary of DTI, in July and August of 20X8 providing bookkeeping services. In August of 20X9 DTI filed an 8-K with the SEC naming B&T as the successor auditor to Wilkers--this happened without the completion of new client acceptance procedures, signing of an engagement letter, or B&T actually beginning any actual audit procedures. Not only does this appear to be unprincipled, but it was done merely a year after B&T had been working for DTI.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    billy beats

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When considering whether or not to accept a new audit client, the successor audit should make specific and reasonable inquiries of the predecessor auditor regarding matters that will assist the successor auditor in determining the acceptance of the engagement. Matters subject to inquiry include: information that might bear on the integrity of management, disagreements with management as to accounting procedures, or other similar significant matters, and communications to audit committees regarding fraud, or illegal acts by clients. The engagement team of Billy’s Beats Inc. relied heavily upon management’s assumptions and integrity. By not communicating with the predecessor auditor, the successor auditor is blindly trusting management’s integrity and accounting policies.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billy S Beats Inc

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, the above procedures taken by auditors were not adequate to determine the appropriateness of the management’s estimates. First, Billy’s was a new client to the audit teams, which meant the engagement team should take some actions to obtain some understandings towards the new client. The engagement team should contact the predecessor auditors to obtain knowledge of Billy’s. If the engagement team failed to gather enough information about the client, the control risk of Billy’s should be automatically set at maximum. In this situation, the engagement team would choose to use substantive tests of details at year-end to test controls. Large sample size would be adopted as well. However, in the case, auditors did not get contact with the predecessor auditors. The only audit evidence the engagement team gathered was the inquiries of…

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conclusion: AU-C 510.05 defines a predecessor auditor and AU-C 210.A27 provides guidance as to discussion with the predecessor auditor. However, a CPAs performing compilations and reviews are not predecessor auditors. Nonetheless, Tom may still wish to meet with him to discuss “problem” encountered during this review engagement…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - It appears that a healthy transition from predecessor auditor to successor auditor will occur. This will allow for ease of access to any documents necessary in a successful audit. It also mentions that any management that the firm might need information from is willing and able to give it. This is also a good sign as to why our firm is accepting this audit. The other reason for agreeance to perform this audit is taken directly from Oceanview’s financial statements. Their financial…

    • 774 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NextCard

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page

    4. The auditing standards violated by E&Y auditors in this case they failed to following the plan they set out to achieve and they were not properly overseeing what was going on in their company.…

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Throughout the audit process, W&P failed to exercise due care in their performance of professional services. Professional skepticism was not able to be finally exercised due to ethical pressure.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    d. Read the complaint against the audit engagement partner, who served as the 2001 and 2002 engagement partner. What factors caused the audit firm to recognize Bally as a high risk audit client for 1996-2003?…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. There are numerous differences between performing a review and actual audit on the financial statements, but the major one is that the review does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of internal control structure. Also, a review does not assess control risk, tests of accounting records and responses to inquiries by obtaining corroborating evidence through inspection, observation or any other audit procedure. It can point out significant matters of the financial statements but does not provide assurance of their accuracy. The issue with ZZZZ Best case is that the auditors review was not sufficient enough to review any misstatements on the financial statements. Ernst & Whinney never questioned the internal control, reviewed contractual agreements or made comparison of the previous statements. If they had done any of the above, they would have revealed a glitch in the system. In addition, the review does not provide the assurance that an audit opinion would do on the financial statement.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Workshop 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This case implies that no auditor with the firm of Abernethy and Chapman has an in-depth understanding of the consumer electronics industry. Is a CPA firm allowed to accept an engagement without having established the necessary expertise to oversee the audit? The first general standard of Generally Accepted Auditing Standards is that the auditor must have formal education in auditing and accounting, adequate practical experience for the work being performed, and continuing professional education (Kursh, Lant, et Al, 2014, pgs. 32-33). Therefore they should not accept the engagement. Would the knowledge required to audit a consumer electronics company differ significantly from that needed in the examination of a car dealership? The knowledge required to audit a consumer electronics company is significantly different than that needed to audit a car dealership. Does the auditor have an obligation to discuss his lack of expertise, or his plans to obtain the expertise with the client? The auditor does have an ethical obligation to discuss his lack of expertise, as well as discussing if he plans on hiring someone with expertise specifically for this client.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    .01 This section provides guidance on communications between predecessor and successor auditors when a change of auditors is in process or has taken place. It also provides communications guidance when possible misstatements are discovered in financial statements reported on by a predecessor auditor. This section applies whenever an independent auditor is considering accepting an engagement to audit or reaudit (see paragraph .14 of this section) financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and after such auditor has been appointed to perform such an engagement. .02 For the purposes of this section, the term predecessor auditor refers to an auditor who (a) has reported on the most recent audited financial statements1 or was engaged to perform but did not complete an audit of the financial statements2 and (b) has resigned, declined to stand for reappointment, or been notified that his or her services have been, or may be, terminated. The term successor auditor refers to an auditor who is considering accepting an engagement to audit financial statements but has not communicated with the predecessor auditor as provided in paragraphs .07 through .10 and to an auditor who has accepted such an engagement. [As amended, effective for audits of financial statements for periods ending on or after June 30, 2001, by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 93.]…

    • 3745 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Simmons & Simmons, 2002. Case Focus: Auditors – Duty of Care. Professional Liability. Issue no 26, September 2002 edition. Retrieved from:…

    • 3128 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment 1 1

    • 1504 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jimmy Chung is the president of the Peninsula Company, a retailer and distributor of consumer electronics based in Hong Kong. Although Lam & Company, the audit firm had previously audited Peninsula, Jimmy has recently become aware of the CPA firm of Zhou & Company from his friend. His interest in the firm was heightened when he discovered that Zhou & Company audited the primary bank with which he did business. During March of 2015, Jimmy contacted his banker who arranged for Jimmy to have lunch with one of the CPA firm’s partners. At that time, a wide-ranging conversation was held concerning Peninsula as well as Zhou & Company. Jimmy discussed the history of the consumer electronics company along with his hopes for the future. The partner, in turn, described many of the attributes possessed by his audit firm. Subsequently, Jimmy requested a formal appointment with Peter Zhou, the managing partner of Zhou & Company, in hopes of arriving at a final conclusion concerning Peninsula’s 2015 audit engagement.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    AUDIT MGMT

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Q2) As an auditor, how would you react to the following situation? The company produced…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays