Preview

ZZZZ Best Company Inc.: Audit Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ZZZZ Best Company Inc.: Audit Study
ZZZ Best Company Inc.

ZZZ Best Company, Inc. is good example for being explored by accounting students regarding audit field. In this case, ZZZ Best Company, Inc., which is established by Barry Minkow, became a tool for its owner i. E. Barry Minkow to get money by lying to thrid parties via fictitious insurance restoration project. Difficulties in developing carpet cleaning industry made Barry Minkow think to get money in wrong way. Collaborate with Tom Padgett and also extensive social network, made this big scheme to deceive big investors became easy.

After success in cheating investors, Barry Minkow think bigger to make more money. He think to make ZZZ Best Company go public. For company which want to go public, it must fulfill many requirements of SEC. One of requirements is audited by accounting public officer. To fulfill that requirement, ZZZ Best Company Inc. hired George Greenspan to perform audit for 12 months. According to his testimony regarding ZZZ Best scandal to congressional subcommittee that investigated fraud in ZZZ Best Company, Inc., Greenspan insisted that he has proprtly audited Minkow’s company although finally Greenspan admitted that he had not inspected any of the insurance restoration sites.

Next audit company which audited Minkow’s company was Ernst and Whinney. From Greenspan confession, he already communicate with Ernst and Whinney as predecessor auditor who audited ZZZ Best but this statement was rejected by Ernst and Whinney. Ernst and Whinney signed an enagement letter as a proof that Ernst and Whinney had right to audit ZZZ Best Company Inc. In that contratc, ZZZ Best Company Inc., asked four services to Ernst and Whinney that the audit firm intended to provide ZZZ Best, that are: review’s company financial statement for three months period, assistance in the preparation of a registration statement to be filled with SEC, a comfort letter to be submitted to ZZZ Best;s underwriters, and a full scope

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Zzzbest

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A. As the successor auditor, what was E&W supposed to do before they accepted ZZZZ Best as an audit client in regards to Greenspan? Summarize in enough detail AU 315.03-.06. In your answer give and support your opinion as to whether or not E&W violated these paragraphs and if you can prove it as a fact.…

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A review report does not assess the control risk of a company, which means Ernst & Whinney could have not gotten the proper risk that a material misstatement could occur within a relevant assertion. The report could have pointed out problems in the financial statements but it would not give the audit teams assurance of their accuracy. Ernst & Whinney never investigated ZZZZ Best’s internal control either, if they had done so they may have caught onto some of the fraudulent acts that were being committed. The main difference between an audit opinion and a review is an audit opinion provides assurance on the financial statements that they are accurate.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study 7.8

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The critical issue is that Ernst & Ernst, who were First Securities auditors for more than two decades, failed to utilize appropriate auditing procedures which in consequence led to Ernst & Ernst failure to discover poor internal practices of the firm. Thereby, this prevented Ernst & Ernst from completing an effective and efficient audit of the brokerage firm, First Securities Company of Chicago. The discovery of the inappropriate procedures within the brokerage firm could have led to the uncovering of other fraudulent practices done by the firm; which could have been prevented and saved investors’ investments.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 5.1

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Description: Smith is the Chairman of Cardillo Travel Agency, he just involved into a case that whether to sign the affidavit with United Airlines. Because he inspected that there is something wrong with the affidavit concerning Cardillo’s stockholders’ equity, so that he refused to sign affidavit. Just for this reason, he was kicked out from his position. Moreover, the other two of his executives Rognlien and Lawrence, just approved the $203,000 adjusting entry recorded link to Airlines-Cardillo transaction. Afterward, Helen Shepherd, an auditor of Touch Ross, found the mistake that the money cannot be recorded for the payment to Cardillo was refundable under certain conditions and thus not immediately as revenue, so she questioned Rognlien and Lawrence, but they still insisted the entry of the money has been properly recorded. And one year later, R and L just dismissed the Touch Ross accounting firm and hire KMG as their public accounting firm. After the turnover of KMG, they just founded this matter too, and resigned as the independent audit firm.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Audit and Soups Inc.

    • 4884 Words
    • 20 Pages

    and related products. Simply Soups Inc. products are sold in 120 countries around the world. The…

    • 4884 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The contracts themselves that were fictitious failed to identify common items, such as job location. Many of the contracts were only a page in length. Most multimillion dollar contracts over multiple pages in length and would include specifics on what was to be done. The Internal Controls of ZZZZ Best were almost nonexistent. Since, Frauds like ZZZZ Best internal controls have become a very important factor of an audit.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Who are the firm’s auditors? Do they provide a clean opinion on the financial statements?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crazy Eddie Case

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main critical issue in the Crazy Eddie case is the incompetence and lack of professional skepticism of the company’s audit team and their inability to successfully comply with the standards of GAAS. The auditors failed to exercise the fundamentals of the substantive audit plan which would have uncovered at least some of the fraud. Furthermore, this inability and lack of knowledge on how to properly execute an audit threatened the independence of management and internal auditors as well as the outside auditing firm.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will define the corporate scandals of the past decade using Enron and their auditors Arthur Andersen as a case study. The paper will focus on the financial statement misrepresentation involving Enron and their auditors. The paper will further define the effects that these scandals…

    • 3268 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Waste Management fraud

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What was the relationship between management and the auditors? Why didn’t the auditors prevent the fraud?…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are 11 people in the board of directors and 9 of them were external member, which called no-management directors. The directors are full of experience in different aspects; they are closely working together to ensure the company is in the right track.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company’s quarterly statements for the three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit, particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by the auditor’s report?…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 1.9

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A review report does not assess the control risk of a company, which means Ernst & Whinney could have not gotten the proper risk that a material misstatement could occur within a relevant assertion. The report could have pointed out problems in the financial statements but it would not give the audit teams assurance of their accuracy. Ernst & Whinney never investigated ZZZZ Best’s internal control either, if they had done so they may have caught onto some of the fraudulent acts that were being committed. The main difference between an audit opinion and a review is an audit opinion provides assurance on the financial statements that they are accurate.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper explores the ZZZZ Best Company which was begun by a 16 year old individual who was able to pull the wool over the eyes of many customers, investors and auditors. This paper will define the difference between review and audit when it comes to financial reports, comments on the procedures provided with regard to the management assertion of occurrence, verification of payments for jobs and how they can lead auditors to improper conclusion, the purpose of predecessor-successor auditor communications, as well as whom needs to initiate the communication and information that needs to be obtained. The paper also addresses the limitations of the confidentiality agreement and how and when client-imposed audit scope limitations affect the type of audit opinion used as well what procedures professional standards require auditors to perform when reviewing a client's pre-audit report and post-year-end earnings press release. Accuracy, honesty and integrity are both keys to the success in auditing and following the rules of GAAP are a must for all those involved.…

    • 3666 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At an early age, Barry Minkow was introduced to the carpet cleaning industry by his mother who worked part time as a telephone solicitor for a small carpet cleaning company. This insight of the industry allowed Minkow to understand that the carpet cleaning industry was one which had very few barriers to entry, no licensing requirements, and required only a small amount of capital to enter. Also, because of these few barriers to entry, the industry has historically attracted a larger number of faulty startups in comparison to other industries. At 16 years old, Minkow started his carpet cleaning company under the name of ZZZZ Best Company. Right away he had a difficult time with customer complaints, stringent competition, and the inability to collect all checks, and vendors insistent on collecting payments. These all combined together prevented ZZZZ Best from becoming anything but marginally profitable, which was a red flag for banks who wouldn’t lend Minkow money. The fraud started when Minkow started to come up with his own innovative ways to finance his business, including: check kiting, credit card forgeries, and the staging of thefts to fleece his insurance company. Minkow was smooth and had charm which allowed all of these false financing options to be possible. Minkow’s success at beating the system encouraged him to further exploit fraudulent activities in different areas. Minkow befriended numerous friends whom aided his fraudulent activities, including an insurance claims adjuster. Minkow promised to pay this adjuster $100 per week if he would confirm to banks that ZZZZ Best was the recipient of occasional insurance restoration contracts. Minkow used these phony insurance restoration contracts to generate the paper profits and revenues that were needed to convince bankers to loan his business money. Minkow also created phony financial statements in order to complete these loans. Soon, insurance…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays