Michele Hanlon
Texas State University
CI 5390 Spring 2007
Dr. Nancy Langerock
Abstract
This is a case study of a preschool reverse inclusion program implemented at an elementary school in central Texas. This preschool class consists of 11 children with special needs ranging in severity. There are 4 typically developing students enrolled full-time in the class for a class total of 15 students. They are between the ages of three and five years old. There are two full-time lead teachers, two assistants, and one extended day teacher. This study consisted of parent surveys, teacher interviews, and student observations. The observations were done during non-structured times during the school day such as recess and centers, and were conducted three days per week for one month. The results were typically positive in that parents and teachers saw improvement in social behavior and language development of the students with special needs. The only negative result was that some of the typically developing children picked up some undesirable behavior by mimicking the behavior of the children with special needs. However, this only occurred with the younger students. Both the parents of the typically developing students and the students with special needs reported a high satisfaction of all aspects of the program. The teachers also reported high satisfaction with the program, and saw improvement in the social behavior of the students with special needs.
Table of Contents
I. Title Page
II, Abstract…………………………………………………………………………..…..1
III. Table of Contents.........................................................................................................2
IV. Introduction and Literature Review………………………………………..………..3
V. Methodology……………………………………………………………………..….6 a. Research Questions………………………………………………………..…..6 b. Operational
References: Barone, T. & Eisner, E. (1998). Arts-based educational research. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed)., Complimentary methods of research in education (2nd ed.) Brown, K. (2001). The effectiveness of early childhood inclusion: Parents’ perspectives. Carter, K. & Carter, M. (2002). The social skills and social status of mainstreamed students with intellectual disabilities Erlandson, D.A., Harris, E.L., Skiper, B.L., & Allen, S.D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry Gallagher, P.A., & Lambert, R.G. 2006). Classroom quality, concentration of children with special needs, and child outcomes in head start Hardin, B. & Hardin, M. (2002). Into the mainstream: Practical strategies for teaching in inclusive environments Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2007, from the U.S. Department of Education Martin, D. (1997). Inclusion: time to rethink. The Educational Forum, 61,232-239. Odom, S.L., Zercher, C., Li, S., Marquart, J.m., Sandall, S., & Brown, W.H. (2006). Rafferty, Y., & Boettcher, C. (2000). Inclusive education for preschoolers with disabilities: Comparative views of parents and practitioners Rafferty, Y., Boettcher, C., & Griffin, K. (2001). Benefits and risks of reverse inclusion for preschoolers with and without disabilities: parents’ perspectives Rafferty, Y., Boettcher, C., & Piscitelli, B. (2003). The impact of inclusion on language development and social competence among preschoolers with disabilities Reynolds, M., & Holdgrafer, G. (1998). Social-communicative interactions of preschool children with developmental delays in integrated settings: an exploratory study Schoger, K.D. (2006). Reverse inclusion: Providing peer social interaction opportunities to students placed in self-contained special education classrooms Smith, B., & Rapport, M. (1999). Early childhood policy and systems: What do we know? Denver, CO: Colorado University. Addendum1 March 2, 2007