Preview

A Case Study on Logic Puzzles

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Case Study on Logic Puzzles
Module 03 Case Study – Logic Puzzles 1. A computer store was robbed over the weekend, and the police have rounded up four suspects. The detective interrogated them and determined that one of them was indeed the robber. Here were the statements:
Shirley: Dennis did it.
Dennis: Alan did it.
Brad: I didn't do it.
Alan: Dennis lied when he said that I did it.
Only one of these four statements is true. With that in mind, who is the guilty party?
I am thinking that the robber is Brad. None of the others said he did it, they blamed everyone else but him. Brad himself didn’t blame any one of the others but did say he didn’t do it. These reasons would lead me to think it was Brad. 2. Shepard was found murdered one night in a back alley. The next day, the police rounded up three suspects, who were interrogated by the toughest detective around, Carly Hearn. The suspects made the following statements to her:
Garrus:
1. I didn't kill Shepard 2. Ashley is not my friend. 3. I knew Shepard.
Ashley:
1. I didn't kill Shepard. 2. Garrus and Talia are friends of mine. 3. Garrus didn't kill Shepard.
Talia
1. I didn't kill Shepard. 2. Garrus lied when he said Ashley was not his friend. 3. I don't know who killed Shepard.
Only one of these suspects is guilty, and only one of each man's three statements is false (the other two being true). Who did Detective Hearn correctly arrest for the crime?
I think Talia was arrested for the crime. Talia didn’t mention that Garrus or Ashley did it, just denied knowing. Ashley claimed to be both of their friends but stood up for Garrus by stating He didn’t do it, which points the finger at Talia without actually doing so. Talia was the only one who denied knowing who did it, while Garrus and Ashley claimed not to of done

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Five minutes later Officer Reilly arrived on the scene and accessed the situation. With diligent research and a thorough investigation, the arrest of the defendants was reinforced by the owner ship of a .38 caliber pistol, a newly registered black Cadillac Sedan as well as a previous criminal record from…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Old Cold Case Summary

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The woman name was Janet Marie Robinson. The case was solved after the man who was responsible was pulled from his coffin to confirm the case.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Police took a statement from Bert at the hospital, and he identified his son, Ben, as the shooter.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    d) Thomas Delaney – A man charged and hanged to death for the murder of Matthew Rhineheart. He had…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Teaser Case Study

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Accounting Theory Issue: When is a "cash-basis method" used within the accounting literature? Do you view such a method as complementary or preferable to accrual accounting in the settings you have identified?…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following suspects were ‘favored’ by officers who were conducting or investigating the murders: Montague John Druitt (August 15, 1857- December 31, 1888); Seweryn Klosowski aka George Chapman (December 14, 1865- April 7, 1903); Aaron Kosminski (September 11, 1865- March 24, 1919);Michael Ostrog (1833- 1904); John Pizer (1850-1897); James Thomas Sadler; and Frances Tumblety. There is a lack of real evidence to link any of these men to the murders, but they all had extreme suspicion again the investigators after the…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An police officer by the name of Mcfadden observed two men standing at a street corner. He noticed that the two men would take turns on looking inside of the window store. This happenedd about twenty four times and each time they did it the two men would have a conversation. After a while a third guy had joined the duo and then left. After the detective witnessed that action he had suspected that they were casing the store to burglarize the store. So he goes up to the suspects and identify himself. He questioned the suspects and got back a mumbled response. Detective Mcfadden subsequently pat down the suspects, removing their overcoats and discovered a pistol which he seized from them. Later on they were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lunchroom murder essay

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think that that Customer C killed Fannin. The first piece of evidence that proves Customer C killed Fannin is that that the cash register had been rung up to 8.75 this is the exact total of Customers B, C, and D. This had to have been done before the murder, because the heel to toe footsteps that belonged to Ernie show that he walked to the cash register after mopping (footstep trail Y.) This was done before the robbery, because the only two reasons that he would’ve opened the register would be to either check someone out, or to give someone money during a stick up. We can tell that he wasn’t getting robbed, because the money’s still there.This allows us to rule out customer A. The second piece of evidence that proves that Customer C killed Fannin is that there was a right handprint on the wall. Common sense suggests that if there is a right handprint on the wall, the shooter pulled the trigger with his left hand. Since C is left-handed, that means that they pulled the trigger. The final piece of evidence that points to C as the murderer is his silverware was on the left side of his platter. His coffee cup was also on the left side of his plate. Usually, if the silverware and cups are placed on the left hand side of the plate, it means that the diner is left handed. So this means that C is left-handed. WHO COMMITED THE LUNCHROOM MURDER?…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So if they had to tell who was guilty or who's not it would go like this. Sawyer tried to kill Mars but he missed so that would be 2nd degree murder because it was intended to do and jack finished it of so Sawyer would be the guilty one because his intention was to killing him and Jack didn't want to see him suffer so he did what he had to do. So whoever tried killing piggy is guilty it was intention of murder so they are guilty.And Simon’s death was an accident because they were having self defense and they didn't know who was…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jason. "Guilty" in this context refers to the person who is responsible for the tragedy of four deaths.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. Based on the definition of deviance, we are all deviant at one point or another.…

    • 383 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The robbers where a couple of young brothers Alan Mender who was 17 and Joey Mender who was 14. Throughout the robbery Joey was super nervous and was somewhat aggressive to the hostages. But Alan on the other hand was calm and trying to keep Joey from doing anything more stupid then what they just did. Their plan was to be a quick in and out job. However when a lady driving by saw the two boy’s guns through the window she drove away and called the police. Now that Alan and Joey are stuck there they need to come up with a new plan, How to escape. During this process the robbers have to deal with Zach and his “big mouth” according to Joey. In my opinion Zach might have been the reason that no one got killed because without realizing it he was keeping the robbers attention on him. He was doing this by questioning everything they said, back talking, and reverse phycology. Alan didn’t mind it at all but Joey was getting very mad and wanted to shoot him. Then the police called to offer them a deal. The deal was if they let everyone go they…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    d. Present a clear statement about a particular crime, something we know to be absolutely true. Illustrate how we know that…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Little Louie claims that Vinnie Bagadonuts was the one that shot the officer and bank teller and that also he was the one that broke into the house, and that along with him.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays