Preview

A Change Must Come

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1388 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Change Must Come
Jeremy Hudson
“A Change Must Come.”
PHI 208
Professor Michael Pankrast

1
Imagine living in a world where you did not know where you next meal was coming from. Could you live life knowing that you would never get that full satisfaction of being full? I do even know if I could do that one. In Peter Singer’s article, “ Famine, Affluence and Morality,” Singer addresses these idea just as such. Throughout this essay I will state Singer’s goal in writing this article while presenting his argument in relation to his view. I then will give u counter - arguments to his points while providing Singer’s response. I will then wrap up by giving you the concept of marginal utility and the concept of Singer’s proposed world of charity and duty. Finally, I will provide you with my view on Singer’s ideas and essay. Singer’s goal in his article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” was to inform the viewers of their moral obligation to people suffering from obtaining their basic necessities. In relaying this to his audience, Singer used East Bengal’s current state of suffering as an example. Right now, people who reside in East Bengal are currently suffering because of lack food , shelter, and medical care. While referring to the current situation in Bengal, Singer argues that relatively affluent countries react to situations like Bengal’s in improper manner and it can not be justified. What Singer wants his audience to understand is that if we can prevent something horrible from happening, without causing more harm, we should do it. Singer not only believes that we ought to do it but he also feels that it is something we should , morally. In other words, it is the right thing to do to prevent anything bad from happening. Singer strengthens his claim by giving us a scenario involving a person a drowning. Okay so imagine your yourself walking by a pond, and all of a sudden out of
2
nowhere, you see a child drowning. What do you



References: Irianeyjfry. (2013, 3 Jan). General format.Retrieved from . Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 1, No. 3 (Spring 1972), pp. 229-243.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After times of famine, war and economic dislocation, poverty increased with close to 80 percent of a region’s population was faced with possible starvation each day while almost 50 percent of Europe’s population were living on the subsistence level, barely having enough food and shelter to survive. The attitudes of those in the middle class and the more elite ranged from pity to distaste, proposing different solutions like punishing the poor, regulating them, or giving them help out of sympathy.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The singer Solution to World Poverty” Singer talks about the American movement and its connection to world poverty world poverty. Where he claims that the only solution to world poverty would be by donating money to charity and gives he point out amount of dollars that could save a child’s life. He talks about how people should not spend money on luxuries while they are children dying in the world and he says that those luxuries shouldn’t be more valuable than people’s lives. In His essay he talk about the two examples of how people should save a child life tends not to do so.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer is the author to the “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” article. Singer 's essay argues that there is basically no reason why Americans should not be donating their extra money to those in need. Singer addresses the urgency to donate by appealing to the reader 's sense of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, Peter Singer’s purpose is to draw attention and bring apprehension to the fashion the world’s people are being tormented directly to natural disasters and poverty. He also analyzes the amount of people struggling to survive in account to living under the poverty line, a few on a single dollar a day. Singer constructs the point that we need to be doing a greater job at helping those not in the status of being able to help themselves. By using Bengal as an example of how the countries that are rich respond to a disaster, Singer is capable of proving his point (Singer, 1972).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer’s Solution to World Poverty. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is an article by Peter Singer which presents a compelling argument for the American people to take responsibility in addressing the global poverty issue. Though Singer employs a variety of rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen his argument, Singer fails to persuade the American people to his side, instead alienating his audience due to his extreme use of pathos and a lack of adequate ethos and logos. Throughout the article,.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world consists of different people, civilizations, and ways of life. There are many situations that call for different ways of handling them, like poverty, overpopulation, resources, and famine aid. Two very different points of view about these issues are espoused in two very different essays written decades apart, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift. Hardin’s view of civilization and the world, although harsh, has facts that could help improve the issues. Even though Swift’s opinion has personal perspective, it isn’t very realistic.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He uses a serious and stern tone to show how serious the matter of overseas poverty is and how easy it would be to solve this problem. His tone is offensive at times, directly accusing the reader of the death of children outside of our borders, in places such as Brazil. (Singer) Singer shifts the target of the essay to not just the individual reader, but to the American people as a whole. He accuses the American people, who most citizens feel are relatively generous and willing to help people in need, of extreme selfishness, which helps discredit his argument.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems as if Singer isn't giving us an obligation or choosing whether or not one has too. He makes it clear that if one wants to save the lives of a kid then one should give away all the money one has to offer and not use the money to use on themselves. Lets just say, one can't help but save innocent children's lives, one agrees one should, but one also agrees what if one needs money for an emergency but can't help the kids out because one is helping themselves out instead, would one still be a bad person? For example, in paragraph 23. Singer says, "Then, if we value the life of a child more than going to fancy restaurants, the next time we dine out we will know that we could have done something better with our money." Arguing towards this, one would say, the thing is that we have to give all our money to saving a child's life instead of going to dinner or spending any money for themselves. One completely disagrees, how would spending a little money for themselves making one a bad person, rather then saving some money for them, and giving some money away to help the kids. Why not do both, rather then give away all the money one worked hard to get. Another example of this would be, in "World Poverty and Our Obligation" Peter Singers argument is that "people are continuing to have luxurious items without helping other in need. we are not doing what we are meant to…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer's position on our moral obligation to aid the world's poor is characteristically frank and rests on three premises. The first premise states that ‘if we can prevent something bad without sacrificing something significant, we ought to do it.’ The second premise simply declares that ‘extreme poverty is bad’. Finally, the third premise claims that ‘there is some extreme poverty we can prevent without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance.’ Ultimately, the sum of the premises’ yield the conclusion that ‘we ought to prevent some extreme poverty.’ The premises are wisely formulated; it’s put forth in a fashion that…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phi 208 week 2 assignment

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Singer argues the fact that most of us help out or would be more likely to help out someone near us. But he argues why not help others even if they are far. Why only help those who are near us. The fact that a person is physically near to us, so that we have personal contact with him, may make it more likely that we shall assist him, but this does not show that we ought to help him rather than another who happens to be further away. If we accept any principle of impartiality, universalizability, equality, or whatever, we cannot discriminate against someone merely because he is far away from us (or we are far away from him).…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," by Peter Singer, he is addressing the subject of charity, morality in general, and giving us a different insight in the thoughts about famine relief. Singer points out some interesting things in his article. I do agree that people, espeically the rich, should do more than what most of them actually do. This paper will explain Singer 's goal, his counter arguments, his concept of marginal utility, and the ideas of charity and duty.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He argues that people have many different reasons to [delete] why they do not donate. His vision is that the people and the government should take care of the problem. He uses a great illustrative imaginative scenario. Basically, let’s say you are walking down the path by the local pond. You have just purchased a brand new pair of running pants worth $100. You see a young child drowning and screaming for help. You have a moral obligation to save that childs[‘s] life and you will sacrifice your brand new pants without question. The child’s life is worth more than your new pair of pants and you do not hesitate to ruin them for the child. Singer says it best, “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it.” (Singer, 1972) He is basically saying that if by saving that child you do not sacrifice anything, in this case the rescuer’s life, of equal moral importance you should do it.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main concern addressed in this essay is the analogy Singer makes when he compares the ease of saving a drowning baby to the ease of making a donation to a country in poverty (Singer, par. 6). Singer’s analogy is only correct on the basis that the baby and people living in poverty are both in circumstances out of their control. The difference though, is that the baby he describes is moments away from death, while people living in poverty are mostly not on the brink of death. I believe the vast majority of people would save the baby, yet only a small percentage of people will take the time to donate. Furthermore, I rule out Singer’s argument for proximity (par. 8). Walking around a city like Toronto, one may walk right past homeless people in very dire circumstances, and many people still do not bother to give any assistance. Thus, since being in a very close proximity will usually not yield a donation, in most likelihood, witnessing someone…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics