Many theorists, by contrast, have argued that one of the trends of globalization is depoliticization of publics, the decline of the nation-state, and end of traditional politics (Boggs 2000). While I would agree that globalization is promoted by tremendously powerful economic forces and that it often undermines democratic movements and decisionmaking, I would also argue that there are openings and possibilities for a globalization from below, and that globalization can thus help promote as well as undermine democracy.11 As noted, however, globalization from below can implement and inflect globalization both for positive and progressive ends like democracy and social justice, as well as destructive ones like terrorism. In general, globalization involves both a disorganization and reorganization of capitalism, a tremendous restructuring process, which creates openings for progressive social change and intervention. In a more fluid and open economic and political system, oppositional forces can gain concessions, win victories, and effect progressive changes. During the 1970s, new social movements, new non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and new forms of struggle and solidarity emerged that have been expanding to the present day (Hardt and Negri 2000; Burbach 2001; and Foran 2003). And, as noted, destructive forces are also unleashed like terrorism and the sorts of civil war apparent in Africa and other parts of the developing world. The present conjuncture, I would suggest, is marked by a conflict between growing centralization and organization of power and wealth in the hands of the few contrasted with opposing processes exhibiting a fragmentation of power that is more plural, multiple, and open to contestation. As the following analysis will suggest, both tendencies are observable and…