Preview

A Learning Framework for Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Learning Framework for Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement
Gan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2007). A Learning Framework for Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement in Virtual Learning Communities. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (1), 206-226.

A Learning Framework for Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement in Virtual Learning Communities
Yongcheng Gan
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1V6, Canada Tel: +1 416 923-6641 ext 2454 yongcheng.gan@utoronto.ca

Zhiting Zhu
Educational Information Network Center, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China Tel: +86 21 62232654 ztzhu@dec.ecnu.edu.cn ABSTRACT
This study represents an effort to construct a learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in a virtual learning community (VLC) from the perspectives of system wholeness, intelligence wholeness and dynamics, learning models, and knowledge management. It also tries to construct the zone of proximal development (ZPD) of VLCs based on the combination of Vygotsky’s theory of zone of proximal development and the trajectories of knowledge building. The aim of a VLC built on the theories of constructivism, situated learning, and knowledge building, etc., is to apply individual intelligence to online learning, bring the advantages of collaborative learning and collective wisdom into play, solve difficult problems in independent learning, and lead to the integration and sublimation of collective wisdom through long-term individual interactions, collaborative learning and knowledge building.

Keywords
Collective wisdom, Knowledge building, Virtual learning community, Collective intelligence, Knowledge management

Introduction
Educational Challenge in a Knowledge Society The greatest challenge to education in a knowledge society is not how to effectively help learners to acquire a defined set of knowledge and skills, but in helping them to learn how to manage, work creatively with ideas and to contribute to the



References: Ahern, T. C., Peck, K., & Laycock, M. (1992). The effects of teacher discourse in computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 291-309. Anderson, D. K., & Reed, W. M. (1998). The Effects of Internet Instruction, Prior Computer Experience, and Learning Style on Teachers’ Internet Attitudes and Knowledge. Journal of Education Computing Research, 19 (3), 227-246. 222 Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world, New York: Plenum Publishing. Barron, T. (2000). A Smarter Frankenstein: The Merging of e-Learning and Knowledge Management, retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/aug2000/barron.html. Beinhauer, M. (2000). Collective Knowledge Management via Virtual Communities. In Han, J. & Smidova, H. (Eds.), The Modern Information Technology in the Innovation Processes of the Industrial Enterprises, Pilzen: University of West Bohemia, 40-46. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), the handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 485-513. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems, New York: Oxford University Press. Brown, R. E., (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5 (2), 18-34. Carr, A. A., Jonassen, D. H., Litzinger, M. E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good Ideas to Foment Educational Revolution: The Role of Systematic Change in Advancing Situated Learning, Constructivism, and Feminist Pedagogy. Educational Technology, January-February, 5-14. Charlton, J. P., & Birkett, P. E. (1999). An Integrative Model of Factors Related to Computing Course Performance. Journal of Education Computing Research, 20 (3), 237-257. Cropley, D. (2004). A knowledge management approach to change management in systems-of-systems. In D. Wright (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, Toulouse, France, 1-11. Daniel T. (2006). Application of a Systems Approach to Distance Education. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, California: Sonoma State University, July 9-14, 2006. Galbreath, J. (2000). Knowledge Management Technology in Education: An Overview. Educational Technology, 40 (5), 28-33. Gan, Y. C. (2003a). Internet Collaborative Learning and the Application of CSCL. Distance Education in China, 1, 54-57. Gan, Y. C. (2003b). Technologies for Personal Knowledge Management in e-Learning. China Educational Technology, 6, 20-24. Gan, Y. C. (2005). Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement in Virtual learning Communities: Perspective on the Integration of Knowledge Management and e-Learning, Beijing, China: China Educational Science Publishing House. Gan, Y. C., & Wang, W. (2005). Analysis and Study on the Multiple Implications of Virtual Learning Community Strategies Based on Social Constructivism. Modern Distance Education Study, 5, 10-16. Gan, Y. C., & Tao, Z. (2006). Virtual Learning Community, e-Learning and Knowledge Management. e-Education Research, 1, 18-22. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: the theory of Multiple Intelligences, New York: Basic Books. 223 Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Networked Intelligence: How Can Human Intelligence Be Augmented Through Artifacts, Communities, and Networks? retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://www.lime.ki.se/uploads/images/517/Hakkarainen_Lonka_Paavola.pdf. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In Harasim, L. (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment, New York: Praeger, 39-64. Harung, H. S., & Harung, L. M. (1995). Enhancing organizational performance by strengthening diversity and unity. The Learning Organization, 2 (3), 9-9. Heylighen, F., & Bollen, J. (1996). The World-Wide Web as a Super-Brain: from metaphor to model. In Trappl, R. (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems’96, Austrian Society for Cybernetics, 917-922. Heylighen, F. (1999). Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Computational and Mathematical Theory of Organizations, 5 (3), 253-280. Heylighen, F., Heath, M., & Van Overwalle, F. (2004): The Emergence of Distributed Cognition: a conceptual framework. In Proceedings of Collective Intentionality IV, Siena, Italy, retrieved December 16, 2006, from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/Distr.CognitionFramework.pdf. Hughes, M., & Daykin, N. (2002). Towards Constructivism: Investigating Students? Perceptions and Learning as a Result of Using an Online Environment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39 (3), 217-223. Jansen, W., Hooven, H. M. van de, Steenbakkers, G. C. A., & Jägers, H. P. M., (2002). The Added Value of Elearning. Informing Science and IT Education, Cork, Ireland, 2002, 1-14, retrieved December 25, 2006 from http://proceedings.informingscience.org/IS2002Proceedings/papers/Janse124Added.pdf. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Cooperation in the Classroom (6th Ed.), Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Kim, K., Isenhour, P. L., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., & Dunlap, D. R., (2003). TeacherBridge: Knowledge Management in Communities of Practice. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3, International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics, 2003, Irvine, California. Kuhn, O., & Abecker, A. (1997). Corporate Memories for Knowledge Management in Industrial Practice: Prospects and Challenges. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3 (8), 929-954. Lamon, M., Reeve, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2001). Mapping Learning and the Growth of Knowledge in a Knowledge Building Community. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Meeting 2001. Seattle, Washington, retrieved December 7, 2006, from http://kf.oise.utoronto.ca/lamon/mapping.html. Lave, J., & Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press. Law, N., & Wong, E. (2003). Developmental trajectory in knowledge building: An investigation. In Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (Eds.), Designing for Changes, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 57-66. Lévy, P. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace, New York: Plenum Trade. Lévy, P. (2004). Online Definitions of Collective Intelligence, retrieved December 9, 2006, from http://www.community-intelligence.com/blogs/public/archives/000288.html. Marshall, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Lally, A. M., Shen, R., Fox, E., & Cassel, L. N. (2003). Convergence of Knowledge Management and e-Learning: the GetSmart Experience. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Houston, Texas, 135-146, retrieved December 16, 2006, from http://ai.bpa.arizona.edu/go/intranet/Publication/JCDL-2003-Marshall.pdf. 224 Nellen, T., (1999). Education and community: the Collective Wisdom of Teachers, Parents and Community Members, retrieved December 21, 2006, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_2/nellen/index.html. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘ba’: Building foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40 (3), 40-54. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2000). Using situated learning as a design strategy for Web-based learning. In Abbey, B. (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of we-based education, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 178-191. O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education, 10, 361-373. Pór, G. (1995). The Quest for Collective Intelligence. In Gozdz, K. (Ed.), Community Building: Renewing Spirit and Learning in Business, San Francisco, CA: New Leaders Press, retrieved December 9, 2006, from http://www.visionnest.com/cbw/Quest.html. Rasmussen, K. L., & Davidson, G. (1998). Hypermedia and Learning Styles: Can Performance Be Influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7 (4), 291-308. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 249-268. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith, B. (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society, Chicago: Open Court, 67-98. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003a). Knowledge Building. In Guthrie, J. W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education (2nd Ed.), New York: Macmillan Reference, 1370-1373. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003b). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In Corte, E. De, Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merriënboer, J. (Eds.), Powerful learning environments. Unraveling basic components and dimensions. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. Shedroff, N. (2001). An overview of understanding. In Wurman, R. S. (Ed.), Information anxiety 2, Indianapolis, IN: Que, 27-29. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization, New York: Doubleday. Seufert, S. (2002). Design and management of online learning communities. European Academy of Management Conference, Stockholm, retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://www.sses.com/public/events/euram/complete_tracks/management_education/seufert.pdf. Smith, J. (1994). Collective Intelligence in Computer-Based Collaboration, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Smits, M., & Moor, A. D. (2004). Measuring Knowledge Management Effectiveness in Communities of Practice. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '04), January 5-8, 2004, Big Island, Hawaii. Stahl, G. (1999). WebGuide: Guiding collaborative learning on the web with perspectives. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/publications/conferences/1999/aera99/. 225 Susi, T., & Ziemke, T. (2001). Social Cognition, Artefacts, and Stigmergy: A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Frameworks for the Understanding of Artefact-mediated Collaborative Activity. Cognitive Systems Research, 2 (4), 273-290. Tolmie, A., & Boyle, J. (2000). Factors Influencing the Success of Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) Environments in University Teaching: a Review and Case Study. Computer & Education, 34, 119-140. Ubon, A. N., & Kimble, C. (2002). Knowledge Management in Online Distance Education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Networked Learning 2002, University of Sheffield, UK, March 2002, 465-473, retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/mis/docs/km_in_olde.pdf. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In van den Akker, J. Nieveen, N. Branch, R. M. Gustafson, K. L., & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic, 1-14. Vasilyeva, E., Pechenizkiy, M., & Puuronen, S. (2005). Knowledge Management Challenges in Web-Based Adaptive e-Learning Systems. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management, retrieved December 25, 2006, from http://i-know.know-center.tugraz.at/content/download/387/1538/file/Vasilyeva_paper.pdf. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wang, L., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2001). Probe into the relationship between learners’ personal factors and distance education. e-Education research, 6, 28-32. Wang, L., Yang, H., & Liu, W. (2002). Research into the correlation between learners’ characteristics and Computermediated Communication. e-Education research, 1, 24-28. Watanabe, T. (2001). Knowledge Management Architecture of Integrated Education Support. In Uskov, V. (Ed.), Proceedings of Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Calgary, Canada: IASTED, 1138-1141. Willard, V. B. (1981). Information Networks. Future Life, 12, 34-38. Wilson, E. V. (2000). Student Characteristics and Computer-mediated Communication. Computer & Education, 34 (2), 67-76. Wu, G. (2001). Curriculum conception and reform in the network age. World Education Review, 1, 26-29. Zhu, Z. T. (1996). Cross-Cultural Portability of Educational Software: A Communication-Oriented Approach, Enschede: University of Twente. Zhu, Z. T., & Zhong, Z. X. (2003). Modern educational technology: Foster the development of multiple intelligences, Shanghai, China: East China Normal University Publishing Press. 226

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Web Centric Education Inc. (2002-2008). Quantum Leap Strategies: Quotes on Vision. Retrieved July 9, 2008 from http://www.quantum-leap-strategies.com/motivational_quotes_vision.html…

    • 3456 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, the substantial data gathered by Nagel et al (2009) in their research describe the potential consequences of success and failures were documented. Therefore, a successful completion of a online module they concluded the following: foremost, modules that had discussion forums allows a scholarly proactive interaction with fellow scholars and the professor. Subsequently, this type of module facilitates and /or enriches the online learning environment of the scholars by generating queries and replies (e.g., in the form of posts, assignments, etc) of high critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the third aspect we must consider when improving communication on our online module forums to enhance the online environment is creating rapport as well as wholesome interaction. Last but not least important of all, is the supportive and wholesome interaction with the instructor that is enhanced within the online environment provided substantial responses to the inquiries formulated by the instructor and fellow scholars with substantive answers. Finally, the lack of communication within the…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article discusses how communication, or lack thereof, affects student outcomes in the online learning environment. The author is trying to communicate the importance of communication, teamwork, and quality input in online learning. Beaudoin proposed that online students can learn and master content even if they appear “invisible” in the online community (Beaudoin, 2002). The idea is that a less skilled student would “lurk” or watch other students more experienced and skilled and learn from them. Nagel on the other hand proposed that most “successful” students actively participated in the online environment (Nagel, 2009).…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an online community, the community the students build can become what the student chooses for it to become. A student can get the most or the least amount of information from their course and peers, depending on how active and present they are. Everyone must remember that disconnected students will not be helped, regardless how present the instructor may be (Nagel et al.,…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The researchers asked a lot of questions during the beginning of the project. Some of these investigations were how does online activity and discussion postings relate to learning and course completion. The researchers also investigated how student’s collaborative behavior and integration into the community related to success. “Although the quantitative indices measured shows highly significant differences between the gratifications of student performance, there were notable exceptions unexplained by the trends”. Nagel, Blignant, and Cronje. 2007. Discontent students in the learning community felt for invisible students who were absent without reason from group or who made shallow and insufficient contributions were also noted. Student online visibility and participation like read only participants who skim over or deliberately harvest others was also discussed. Students who had limited access due to poor connectivity, high cost or other reasons can manage their log in time effectively and gain maximum benefit. Absent and seldom contributing students risk forsaking the benefits of the virtual learning community and read only participants disrupt the formation of a virtual…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For complete directions for this assignment, refer to "Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma."…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Davis, Nick. “Restructuring of Educational Systems in the Digital Age From a Co-evolutionary Perspective.” Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning. Academic Search Premier, Oct 2014. Web. October 8, 2014.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One important question in e-learning is regarding why it is not always liked by people. Why are individuals reluctant to participate in e-learning sessions and why do they not like them? These questions, although not applicable to all the students, apply to many (Juutinen and Saariluoma 2006). Nevertheless, it is a real problem for the future development of this mode of teaching. If a large segment of people do not like e-learning, it easily slows down the development of the field and causes divisions between people who will and can benefit from e-learning courses, and people who cannot. Thinking about the future, the mental obstacles for participating in e-learning easily result in losing important opportunities in advancing one's personal…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.…

    • 12295 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communities of practice are everywhere. We all belong to a number of them–at work, at university, at home, in our hobbies. Some have a name, some don't. We are core members of some and we belong to others more peripherally. We may be a member of a band, or we may just come to rehearsals to hang around with the group. We may lead a group of consultants who specialize in telecommunication strategies, or we may just stay in touch to keep informed about developments in the field. Or we may have just joined a community and are still trying to find our place in it. Whatever forms our participation takes, most of us are familiar with the experience of belonging to a community of practice.…

    • 3446 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge Management

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1.What it mean by “communities of practice” in the context of knowledge management? Why is important to have “proven/best practices”? What are the basic functions of communities and associated examples? What are the approaches that make the “communities of practice” work for ConocoPhillips, Fluor, and Schlumberger? (p61-64)…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, there is the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model. This instructional design at least has a stronger structure and potential for practical application for learners and in multiple learning environments. As it approaches creating learning experiences from three dimensions, Social Presence, Cognitive Presence, and Teaching Presence, it offers a semblance of variable emphasis that enable the design to leverage difference degrees of experience and strength of skills to facilitate learning. This model is centric, by nature, on the interaction of individuals. The manner and intention of the group’s interaction provides the determination of the experiences.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, specific theories are discussed: Cognitive Constructivist and Social constructivist. The article tries to organize these theories in a schema, under the constructivism umbrella, comparing and pointing common and unique features. The paper reviews the main constructivist theories that influenced learning mediated by technology, trying to organize them in two dimensions: understanding of reality as objective/subjective, and design of knowledge as a social/individual. The authors argue that they share common beliefs, such as: learning is active, not passive; the learning process; and learning environments should be focused on the learner. The focus of education according to constructivism is not content but process, so educators…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interactive Logbook Sample

    • 37158 Words
    • 149 Pages

    Nielsen, J. & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI '90 Conf. pgs 249-256. Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proceedings ACM CHI '92 Conference pgs 373-380. Norman, D.A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things, MIT Press. Pinkwart, N., Schafer, C., Hoppe, U., Milrad, M. & Perez, J. (2003) Lightweight Extensions of Collaborative Modelling Systems for Synchronous Use on PDAs. Journal of Computer Aided Learning, Special Issue on Mobile and Wireless Technologies in Education. Roberts et al, (1998) Designing for the User with OVID: Bridging User Interface and Software Engineering. Macmillan Technical Publishing, New York Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O’Malley (Ed) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Scardamalis, M. & Bereiter, C. (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in the knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences Vol 1 No 1 pgs 37-68 Schank, R. C. & Osgood, R. (1993) The Communications Story. Institute for the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University. Sharples, M., Jeffery, N., du Boulay, J.B.H., Teather, B. & du Boulay, G.H. (2002) Socio Cognitive Engineering: A Methodology for the Design of Human Centred Technology Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1993) Visual communication and social interaction. In Baecker (Ed.) Readings in groupware and computer- supported cooperative work, assisting human-human collaboration, pgs 153-164 Smith, K. A. (1986) Cooperative Learning Groups. In S. F. Schmoberg (ed.), Strategies for Active Teaching and Learning in University Classrooms. University of Minnesota Smith, R., O’Shea, T., O’Malley, C., Scanlon, E. & Taylor, J. (1991) Preliminary experiments with a distributed multi-media problem solving environment. In Bowers & Benford (Eds.) Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design. Pgs 31-48 Sommerville, I. (2001) Software Engineering Sixth Edition, Addison Wesley ISBN: 0-201-39815X Stanton, N.A. and Baber, C. (1996) Task analysis for error identification: applying HCI to product design and evaluation, In P.W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B.A. Weerdmeester and I. McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry London: Taylor and Francis 215-224 Weiser, M., & Brown, S. J., (1997) The Coming Age of Calm Technology in Denning & Metcalf (Eds), Beyond Calculation – The Next Fifty Years of Computing, New York: Copernicus. Wayne, C. (1993) Wireless Coyote: A Computer-Supported Field Trip, Communications of the ACM, vol 36 no 5, pgs 57-59…

    • 37158 Words
    • 149 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Collective Intelligence

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bibliography: (2012, January 30). Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29. Breslin, J., & Decker, S. (2007). IEEE Internet Computing Magazine. The future of social networks, 11(6), 86-90. Cañas, A., Wilson, D., & Leake, D. (2009). Managing, Mapping, and Manipulating Conceptual Knowledge1. 1. Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Sudzina, F. (2009, July 7). Personal Knowledge Management. The role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organisational levels, 33(6), 1-2. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/1468-4527.htm Sierhuis, W. (2009). Knowledge Management, 2. Valacich, J., & Schneider, C. (2012). In Information Systems Today (5th ed., pp. 264-307). England: Pearson Eduation Limited. Valacich, J., & Schneider, C. (2012). In Information Systems Today (5th ed., pp. 222-263). England: Pearson Education Limited. Valacich, J., & Schneider, C. (2012). In Information Systems Today (5th ed., pp. 264-307). England: Pearson Eduation Limited.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays