Jason Tuttle
Baker College
Lit332
A Nun of a Different Cloth
In Mary E. Wilkins Freeman’s “A New England Nun”, Freeman tells the story of Louisa Ellis, a young woman who, due to circumstances beyond her own control, becomes the embodiment of a nun of a different cloth. Louisa patiently waits 14 years for her fiancé Joe Dagget to return from his fortune-seeking in Australia. During this time Louisa learns to value her solitary life. Her days are spent ripping out seams for the joy of resewing them, distilling her herbs and flowers, and eating her meals off fine china (Baym et al., 2008 p.1621, 1624). When Joe suddenly returns, Louisa’s peaceful way of living is threatened. Through the use of subtle irony and a nun-like character, Freeman demonstrates how a woman forced into a life of independence comes to desire it rather than the socially accepted role of wife.
Freeman uses an understated touch of irony when describing the circumstances which lead to Louisa’s independence. After being engaged for a short time, Joe leaves Louisa to go make his fortune before settling down. Adhering to society’s beliefs that a woman must acquiesce to man, Louisa sends Joe away with a kiss, never thinking his absence would span fourteen years. Louisa waits year after year for Joe and “always looked forward to his return and their marriage as the inevitable conclusion of things” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1624). It is the marriage waiting at the end of this separation which keeps Louisa from being ridiculed by society. However, it is this socially accepted situation which later teaches Louisa to love her independence.
Epitomizing the nun-like quality of purity, Louisa chastely awaits the return of Joe. During this time Louisa was happy on her own and “never dreamed of the possibility of marrying anyone else” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1623). While this may seem to hold romantic notions, it is anything but. Freeman states that “for Louisa the wind (of romance) had never more than murmured; now it had gone down, and everything was still” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1624). Through this quote, Freeman shows that Louisa’s feelings for Joe (the wind) were slight at best, and had since died down to nothing during his absence. Despite her lack of any affectionate feelings for Joe, Louisa embodies purity by remaining true to him.
Seven years into Joe’s absence Louisa is pushed completely into a life of solitary. Louisa loses the last of her family, her mother and brother. Even the dog cannot serve as companionship as he is chained up in the back. “She is all alone in the world” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1623). Left alone in the world without fiancé and family, Louisa has no choice but to assume a life of independence. Without notice, she grows into her identity as a self-sufficient woman as the days pass.
During the extensive time that Louisa waits for Joe to return, Louisa lives the cloistered life of a nun. Rather than going out and mingling with society, Louisa keeps herself sheltered in her home, doing the things which bring her enjoyment. Freeman writes, “Louisa has almost the enthusiasm of an artist over the mere order and cleanliness of her home” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1624). From the sparkling window panes to the organized drawers to the order in which books are placed on top of a table, everything is clean and in its place. Tea is prepared and served as if company was coming; each apron she wears has a specific purpose and is only used at its appropriate time; even her lettuce is said to have been “raised to perfection in her little garden” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1621). Not a single detail is too small to be missed. Yet this apparent domesticity is not a dress rehearsal for married life, it is done solely for her. Further demonstrating how Louisa is like a nun, who also must choose and walk the narrow path (Matthew 7:13- 14 New International Version), Freeman writes, “Louisa’s feet had turned to a path…so straight and unswerving that it could only meet a check at her grave, and so narrow there was no room for any one at her side” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1623). Louisa has no desire to complete the picture of domestic bliss by seating a husband at the head of the table. Fourteen years of an imposed solitary life have firmly paved the way for Louisa’s need for independence.
Unannounced, Joe returns. His visit introduces noise, dirt, and disarray to Louisa’s sanctuary. In just the space of an hour he disrupts the canary’s slumber, tracks in dirt and dust, and stumbles over the rug, spilling Louisa’s sewing basket. During all of this, Louisa is polite but curt. “Never mind,” said she; “I’ll pick them up after you leave” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1622). This statement signifies that there is no room for a man in the house. Only when he is gone will she be able to put everything back in its place.
Despite the obvious obtrusiveness of having Joe back in her life, Louisa carries forth with her plans to marry him. Though appearing to conform to society in proceeding with her plans of marriage, Louisa’s thoughts show her true motivation. “It was not for her, whatever came to pass, to prove untrue and break his heart” ((Baym et al., 2008, p. 1626). Conforming to society’s standards for women was not important to Louisa; protecting the feelings of one who was faithful to her was. It is a testament to Louisa’s virtues that she continued to honor the pledge she made, much as a nun is faithful to honoring her vows.
As a nun must submit to her Lord, Louisa’s submissiveness to Joe is seen in how she readily accepts her new role as his wife, though it means losing her independence, and in essence, her identity. Joe’s return threatens Louisa’s solitary, peaceful lifestyle which he unwittingly created by leaving for such a long period of time. While mourning her impending loss of freedom, Louisa is determinably resigned to the fact that she will have to set aside her “senseless old maiden ways” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1624) in order to perform the duties of a wife and daughter- in- law. While upset about the changes this will bring about- a large home to clean, a husband and mother- in- law to care for, people to entertain, and a loss of time for herself- Louisa willingly accepts her new lot in life. Accepting that her primary role will now be to serve others, she clearly demonstrates her dutiful nature.
Adding another piece of irony to the story, Louisa overhears a conversation between Joe and Lily Dyer. The clandestine interview reveals that Joe is also going along with the wedding, not because of social expectations, but because he “ain’t going back on a woman that’s waited for me fourteen years, an’ break her heart” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1627). Once realizing that Joe is no more in love with her than she is with him, Louisa breaks off the engagement. Freeman writes, “she (Louisa) felt like a queen who, after fearing lest her domain be rested away from her, sees it firmly insured in her possession” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1628). Louisa is able to maintain her independent lifestyle while at the same time remaining true to herself by sparing Joe’s feelings.
In a final subtle stroke of irony, Freeman compares Louisa’s newly won, socially scorned, independent lifestyle to one of the most accepted solitary lifestyles of the era- a nun. “She gazed ahead through a long reach of future days strung together like pearls in a rosary; every one like the others, and all smooth and flawless and innocent, and her heart went up in thankfulness” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1628). The rosary beads are symbolic not just of how Louisa has been spending her days, but are also symbolic of a nun’s lifestyle of simplicity, purity, and prayer. For Louisa, not conforming to society’s roles and expectations of matrimony was not a matter of principle. It was something she had been pushed into, learned to love, and refused to give up. Having saved her independent lifestyle of peace and solitude, Louisa was happy to continue her life “prayerfully numbering her days, like an uncloistered nun” (Baym et al., 2008, p. 1628). In this line, Freeman makes it explicitly clear that Louisa was content to continue on with her celibate lifestyle. Louisa truly became “A New England Nun” of a different cloth.
Through the use of subtle ironies Mary E. Wilkins Freeman skillfully tells the story of her nun-like character Louisa Ellis. Mary E. Wilkins Freeman’s “A New England Nun” exemplifies her belief that women don’t need to be identified by a man. Nor do they need a man to find fulfillment in their lives. This is a theme that is just as relevant today as it was in the 19th century.
References
Baym, N., Franklin, W., Gura, P., Klinkowitz, J., Krupat, A., Levine, R., et al. (2008). The norton anthology of american literature. New York: W.M. Norton & Company, Inc.
References: Baym, N., Franklin, W., Gura, P., Klinkowitz, J., Krupat, A., Levine, R., et al. (2008). The norton anthology of american literature. New York: W.M. Norton & Company, Inc.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In A New England Nun, Mary Eleanor Wilkins Freeman writes vividly about the feelings of her character Louisa Ellis after her breakup with her new ex fiance Joe Dagget. But, the difference between this breakup and the average is the fact that Louisa is now old and seasoned as she has awaited for the averal of her fiance for fourteen years while he was off in Australia, only to have it broken off upon his return.…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although human beings consider love the universal tie that extends and forgives over race, gender, social statuses, habits, and beliefs, sometimes faults prevent them from loving, as Mary Freeman’s “A New England Nun” illustrates. Having faithfully kept their vows of engagement, Louisa Ellis and Joe Dagget have reunited after fourteen years of separation. Prim and proper Louisa has cultivated a content life of quiet, cleanliness, and strict routine. As Joe uneasily recognizes, his fiancé cannot stand even one book lying out of place, and is wearing three aprons really necessary? On the other hand, Joe, with his hulky frame, husky mannerisms, and carefree…
- 311 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Cited: Perkins, George, and Barbara Perkins. The American Tradition in Literature. 12th. New York City: McGrawHill, 2009. Print.…
- 1232 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
In the 19th century, marriage was the sole occupation of women and was the only way for women to rise in social status and to ‘support themselves’. Marriage was a fundamental aspect of Austen’s world and the importance of marriage is highlighted as Emma states that she is “not going to be married” and Harriet exclaims in a shocked tone “it is so odd to hear a woman talk so!”. For Harriet, and most women in the 19th century, marriage was an economic necessity to provide a stable financial future. This is reiterated by Emma’s use of short phrases in “a single woman, with a very narrow income, must be a ridiculous, disagreeable old maid” which expresses her disdain for those women who do not possess fortunes to match hers and reinforces the value of wealth in relation to marriage. Marriage was therefor, not for love but for wealth, as is demonstrated in Mr. Elton’s arrogant proclamation that he “need not so totally despair of an equal alliance as to be addressing myself to Ms. Smith!” The use of the word ‘alliance’ emphasizes the fact that matrimony was for financial benefits. Marriage in Austen’s time was valued unconditionally and was seen as a means to achieve financial and social stability.…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The standard of an ideal woman has changed dramatically over the centuries. And the differences are certainly apparent when comparing the modern expectations to the Puritan’s. The most important difference being that the standards were much stricter and the idea of an ideal Puritan woman was very prevalent in society. Consequently, many readings during the 16th century emphasizes the necessary qualities of an ideal Puritan woman. One of which is Jonathan Edwards’ essay, in which he offers a male perspective by describing his perfect woman, Sarah Pierrepont. Additionally, Anne Bradstreet reflects a female view on how an ideal Puritan woman should be through her poem, “To My Dear and Loving Husband.” Lastly,…
- 966 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“She knew now that marriage did not make love. Janie’s first dream was dead, so she became a woman.” (Hurston 25)…
- 279 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Through the connections made between PP and LA, responders gain a deeper understanding of the purpose of a marital relationship within society, especially its importance in the lives of women. In the patriarchal society of Austen’s context women have no individual rights of their own and since inheritance was passed through the male linage marriage was the economic bases of life and the only option for women with limited fortune and beauty. The subsequent importance of marriage has been supported by the critic Ginger Graph, “the world of this novel; marriage is the market, and the young woman are the merchandise.” Austen has reflected the purpose of marriage as a tool for economic survival through her pragmatic characterisation of Charlotte Lucas who agrees to marry Mr Collins despite his, “conceded, pompous, narrow-minded nature,” she admits to Elizabeth that she “asks only for a comfortable…
- 1562 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Anthology of American Literature. Ed. McMichael et al. 9th ed. Vol 1. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2007. 281- 298.…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Hawthorne, N. (2009). Young Goodman Brown. In M. Myers, The Compact Bedford Introdution to Literature (pp. 325-333). Boston: Bedford/St.Martin 's.…
- 1670 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
(Schweitzer 14). Schweitzer notes that during this time period women forfeited the emotional support that friendship provided once they were married. The main protagonist criticizes marriage in a letter she writes to her friend Lucy Freeman, “Marriage is the tomb of friendship. It appears to me a very selfish state” (Foster 24). It can be noted from Eliza’ view of marriage that Foster is critical of marriage because it kills friendships. Eliza writes to Mrs. Richmond, “Though not less interested in the felicity of my friend than the rest, yet the idea of a separation; perhaps, of an alienation of affection by, means of her entire devotion to another, cast an involuntary gloom over my mind” (Foster 70). Eliza’s view of her friend becoming part of a patriarchal marriage and her husband becoming her sole purpose further demonstrates what Foster thought of marriage and how unfair it was for women to give up the love and devotion she had for her friends. Schweitzer explains, “Even the eminently unromantic Lucy admits ruefully that marriage has removed her from her "native home" and its special joys” (Schweitzer 21). Schweitzer notes that even Lucy who is a character that embodies the social norm, admits that marriage takes away the freedom that a woman…
- 1144 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Reesman, J., & Krupat, A. (2008). The norton anthology: American literature . (7th ed., Vol. 2 p.…
- 1225 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
-spending of money “if it is for only the fun of having another bandbox” (188)…
- 311 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
(Chaucer 160). This shows her lack of following the Vow of Chastity. Along with the vows, the…
- 1369 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Her writings, which primarily offer practical advice, emphasize the moral and theological virtues underscored by convent life. Arnauld heavily emphasized the efficacy of God’s grace. When asked by one of the sisters if she had fears, she replied, “. . . qu’elle n’avoit jamais été plus assure, parce qu’elle sçavoit que nous étions entre les mains de Dieu . . .” Her belief that nothing happens without God’s knowledge and permission reassured her in the face of persecution. According to Arnauld, one cannot do anything but rely on God’s grace, and that “. . . il faut regarder Dieu, l’adorer, & n’en dire pas un mot.” In response to one of her sister’s questions on how to relieve oneself from pointless thoughts, she responded, “Il faut employer…
- 869 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The sexual codes of the Protestant monogamous marriage were the touchstones of Victorian morality. An unshakable faith in the social convention and legal institution of marriage as a source of morality, informs a wide spectrum of discursive articulations in nineteenth century Britain. Sexual fidelity and emotional compatibility between the married partners determine the nature of the domestic ideal towards whose consummation most English novels orient their plotlines. It is the norm whose violation in society is sought to be carefully tracked, statistically understood and administratively contained by governmental and quasi scientific reports, like Engel’s report, The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845) and Acton’s Prostitution Considered in its Moral, Social and Sanitary Aspects (1857).…
- 11506 Words
- 47 Pages
Powerful Essays