Preview

A priori/ A posteriori differences.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A priori/ A posteriori differences.
Explain the differences between a priori knowledge and a posteriori knowledge.

The terms a priori and a posteriori are used in philosophy to distinguish two different types of knowledge. A priori knowledge is independent of experience, for example all bachelors are unmarried men. We know this is a priori knowledge because we only have to understand the definitions in the phrase. From this we can draw out that all unmarried men are bachelors and no married man can be a bachelor. According to Kant all a priori knowledge is analytic which means that any a priori knowledge is true in virtue of its meaning alone. Therefore all unmarried men are bachelors is true by the ways of a priori as the meaning of the word is used twice in the phrase. Galen Strawson wrote that an a priori argument is one in which you can see that it is true just lying on your couch. You don't have to get up off your couch and go outside and examine the way things are in the physical world. You don't have to do any science.
However a posteriori knowledge is different as it is dependent on experience or evidence, for example some bachelors are very happy. The only way we would be able to justify this is by going at talking to some bachelors and asking them if they are happy. A posteriori justification makes reference to experience; but the issue concerns how someone knows the proposition or claim in question—what justifies or grounds someone's belief in it. Philosophers such as Locke and Hume believe that all knowledge is a posteriori and that a priori knowledge simply isn’t possible.
I for one think that in order to have one form of justification you must have the other, this is because without one another you could never fully classify the forms of knowledge that are at the disposal of the mind. I think this because any person that thinks that one is more important than the other is being ignorant as in order to get a full understanding of things that are more complex than just saying all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the standard account, true belief is not sufficient for knowledge. It states that knowledge requires, not only that our beliefs be true, but that we have good reasons for believing them to be true. In standard account, knowledge is justified true belief.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will be discussing two arguments models; one is from a philosopher‘s view and the other is from a psychologist’s view. I will explain how and why these models are important. I will also discuss my understanding of the thinking and justification of each model of argument by compare and contrasting the two arguments.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Quiz 6

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Out of all of the 16 arguments, I think that the first and the eleventh are the most compelling. The reason for this is because freedom of speech is important, and giving opinions would not only be helpful to certain things, but it is only fair. Another reason is that practicality and wisdom are both very good to have, and it would come in handy when it comes to voting and things such as that.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reason-The idea that consistent, logical thinking should be the primary tool used in making ethical decision…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge goes beyond my personal feelings on the matter and involves the truth of things as they actually are. Truth is an indispensable component of knowledge. In this case James did get the right guess so his argument does satisfy the truth condition. Second, one must believe the statement in order to know it. For example, it's true that Elvis Presley is dead, and there is enormous evidence to back this up. But if one still believes that he is alive, he couldn't sincerely say that he knows that Elvis is dead. Part of the concept of knowledge involves our personal belief convictions about some fact, irrespective of what the truth of the matter is. In our case James does truly believe in his statement, so the belief condition is also met. Last is the justified requirement, one must be justified in believing the statement insofar as there must be good evidence in…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas's “Uncaused Cause” argument, I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com's definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect, result, or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the conclusion is true. An inductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that in most cases the conclusion is true. I will argue that the argument is a priori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that can be obtain based…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the time, I have found myself utilizing all of those three argumentation .For professional purposes; I mostly utilize logical and ethical rhetoric. For personal purpose, I use logical and emotional rhetoric.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reason, is the logic upon which decisions can be made with mutual benefit or at least mutual understanding between two or more parties. Reason is what is used to neutralize volatile situations. Reason is also accepting of rational thought. If something is considered absent of reason, then one is expected to be skeptical about it’s worth. If one is convinced that something is reasonable, then it is much easier to consider it a rational proposition.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reason is the means in which rational beings propose specific explanations of cause and effect; with mental faculty that generates conclusions from assumptions or premises. To reason as an abstract noun, is a consideration which explains or justifies motives or causes, even though faith. That which is unique and definitive about being human is the way in which non-humans (animals) appear to make decisions; also, with decisions based upon emotion, intuition, authority, superstition, and faith. It is also a faculty transcending the understanding and providing a priori principles with intuition. Some people use reason to express in logical and/or argumentative form by way of persuasion.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cja 354: Criminal Capacity

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When an individual commits a crime, he or she will automatically begin justifying his or her reasons. The justification or excuse could range from self-defense to a mental illness. In this instance the question remains, is there any reason for the justification or an excuse for one’s criminal actions (K. Randall, Personal Communication, August 16, 2013). Every individual could carry out a criminal act but not the ability in a mental sense to understand the severity of what he or she has done (K. Randall,…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    That is, an analytic sentence expresses a linguistic truth that does not require observation. For example, the sentence “all bachelors are unmarried” is often claimed to be an analytic truth, since meaning of the term “bachelor” contains the concept of being an unmarried male. In analytic judgements, nothing is added through the predicate to the concept of the subject making it elucidatory, however, synthetic judgement suggests that a predicate not thought of at all initially, and that could not be extracted by analysis can have expansive judgements. An example that Kant suggested was if one were to say that “all bodies are extended”, this would be an analytical judgement because we don’t have to go beyond the concept which one connects with the body. If one suggests, “all bodies are heavy”, now we have to go beyond the concept of strictly the body in order to evaluate the predicate, which is synthetic. This attempts to explain that empirical judgements, as such, are synthetic. An analytic judgement cannot by definition step outside its concept or parameters defined by the…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his publication, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant supplies his readers with a thesis that claims morality can be derived from the principle of the categorical imperative. The strongest argument to support his thesis is the difference between actions in accordance with duty and actions in accordance from duty. To setup his thesis, Kant first draws a distinction between empirical and "a priori" concepts. Empirical concepts are ideas we reach from our experiences in the world. On the other hand and in contrast, "a priori" concepts are ideas we reach as an end point of reasoning prior to or apart from any experience of how things occur in the world. Kant then claims that moral actions are supposed done for the reason of morality alone. This train of thought leads to the conclusion that an understanding of morality must be based on "a priori" concepts of reason. Truly moral ideas are then universally valid if and only if they are based on "a priori" concepts.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To use reason is to allow us to make the right / good ethical decisions or choices without relying on the irrationality of emotion alone.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gotfreid Liebniz, although arguing the same point, takes a different approach. He states his principle of sufficient reason in support of…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The way that I justify my thinking to someone who questions my conclusions is by using my knowledge from my past and present experiences, as well as the education I have acquired thus far both in and out of school because not everything is learned in the classroom. I use evidence-based practice and information from reliable sources as well as textbooks to explain my reasoning for someone to better understand my thought process.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics