The strength I see in this argument is that you can see a lot of people who put in hard work however aren’t rewarded as such and capitalism promotes people to be greedy and want more. However sometimes people cannot tell the value of the hard work that is being put in., and make bad choices like getting into to much debt and then blaming the rich and their bosses for their problems instead of being creative and thinking how they can become more productive..
My personal opinion is this struggle of the classes will always continue because it is in human nature to want more therefore makes the argument that 10% of the population have all the wealth is weak. I feel that hard work should be rewarded in a society and taking private property away is not the way to solve the problem, because there are loopholes that can result in this view of communism in which work and rewards is split between people. The negative result would be some people may not work as hard as others and therefore don’t deserve the same amount of reward.
For an economy to work properly reward for the level of work and value that is put in is essential, I truly feel that someone’s mind can prove how much they contribute to society and rewarded as such.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…
- 2030 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Envy is considered to be puzzling and complex emotion when one is in need of a certain object another person or group may have. According to, the article “Envy” written by Justin D’Arms, he classifies this emotion as a form of pain when one’s self-worth or self-esteem is diminished. However, envy is also one of the seven deadly sins according to the Catholic religion, and philosophers have a troubling time on precisely arguing what envy is about. In a way, envy is similar to jealousy, however, there are a few distinctions between the two. To clarify, jealousy involves three specific parts and those are the subject, the rival, and the beloved.…
- 1271 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx is an economical and philosophical ideology that is centered on communism. Specifically, it is centered on the redistribution of wealth so that everyone in a specified nation or State is completely equal in wealth for the “betterment” of the society. This in theory eliminates the class system and as a result is intended to eliminate the oppression that comes along with the class separation and wage gap. Thankfully, for me this literary piece’s brilliance does not come simply from Marx’s economic ideals but instead it comes from the simple fact that it exists at all. What challenges me and forces me to strive towards betterment is that the Communist Manifesto serves as a reminder to me that it is…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Income inequality is something that has been talked about during this political cycle. The gap in United States has risen in the past decades with the upper class brining in even more percentage of the wealth then they previously have in the past. The presidential candidates each have their own tax plan that they believe will help shrink this gap. Marx would say that the proletariat that are making more money for the bourgeoisie and seeing less of the wealth come their way will unite together and revolute in attempt to change the system. The promise in the change in tax plan is a way to keep the lower class laborers or the proletariat optimistic about the future and keep them from revolting. Marx would agree that this works in the short term…
- 230 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In his book, “Communist Manifesto,” Marx stresses the importance of communism or the publication of private property. As stated above, John Locke was the influencer of human basic rights, which included the right to own private property. The development of the Capitalist soon came after this right was made. Capitalists were key contributors to the rise of the industrial revolution but also to the fall of small shop owners. These shop owners were without income and the only way to provide a source was by working for these wealthy owners. A clear distinction between these two types people was their level of income and property which brought on the social classes. There was an oppressor and the oppressed. Before I go further with any explanations, this picture here of classes shows that only one class is progressing. The oppressor is the class that prospers in context of human progression through technological advancements. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other- bourgeoisie and proletariat (Marx 9).” The bourgeoisie were the capitalist while the proletariat was the lower working class. Separation between the two came along with the industrial revolution. Romanticist like Marx would oppose this as human progression because as a whole we aren’t all included in this promotion. It seems as the Capitalists are being set up on a pedestal…
- 2004 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
The capitalist system caused the alienation of the workers, therefore causing them not to be able to live to the fullest…
- 381 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Marx describes the exploitation of the working classes/workers will always be in an inferior bargaining position to the owners when they contracting for wages and working conditions; the results are substance wages and brutal working conditions. “After labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly -- only then then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!” (Marx, “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” Section III, pg.3) Marx’s judgement on solely the proletariat being the oppressed and the bourgeois being the oppressors clouds the positive aspects of capitalism. The fact that one can have the potential to create upper development for oneself while benefiting others along the way is an outstanding idea. Marx misconstrues the idea of a capitalistic system, which is beneficial to both parties as being self-centered, when its actual intent is to keep everything in the workplace productive. I can agree that certain aspects of capitalism can affect those working at the ‘bottom of the chain’ per se, by limiting their ability to pursue leisurely activities when compared to those above them. Yet, there needs to be…
- 1020 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading the Communist Manifesto, I don’t think the political system in the United States mirrors that of a communist at all. We are most definitely a capitalist government as Marx very well mentions and his remarks on this type of government and society we have are very accurate. Sure enough, private companies and high competition in the states are still run by individuals rather than the government, thus, opposing his prescriptions. However, in our country we certainly have a few aspects of Socialism floating around in our system. For instance, the biggest one I can think of are the public schools we have due to the taxes that our government takes from us. But for the most part, we are quite far from having serious socialist or communist features in our political system.…
- 328 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…
- 1464 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Two of the main ideas in the Communist Manifesto is that one, class alienation is a constant struggle within a society, and two that capitalism causes individuals to suffer both financially and socially. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ Communist Manifesto provides examples and explanation of these issues in order to convince the world of the benefits of communism, assuming communism is the solution for these dilemmas. According to the Manifesto the two varying classes have their own problems, whether caused by the system or their own mind sets. The problems of each class is what had led to the course of history, the financial suffering of society, and the negative results of capitalism at work, as well as the need for communism according to the authors of the Manifesto.…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto. The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and it was originally published in German in 1848. The basic premise of the publication is to demonstrate the difference between class structures, primarily the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. It is a hugely influential book, and it is still relevant in today’s modern society.…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Karl Marx longed for the day that he could wake up in the morning and see equality of class, equality of possessions, equality of living standards, equality of everything. By writing The Communist Manifesto, he established the ideology that could create his fantasy; Communism. Although his book achieved popularity and critical praise, there were those who saw flaws and ways to improve Marx’s first ideas of Communism. However, when Vladimir Lenin had the opportunity to make his dream a reality, he does not stray from Marx’s ideas of the poor mixing in with the rich, the cut-down of the rich and a bringing up of the poor, to create an equal class under a government which would provide everything based on the hard work of every individual together…
- 1102 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Income distribution and surplus value, through Marx’s perspective, leads to the downfall of capitalism. The uneven distribution of wealth to the workers and the…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This is a great response. You provided great evidence on Karl Marx’s views on capitalism and understand the views. Marx does have a negative view of capitalism. He did not feel that capitalism would be economically efficient in the long run. Marx believed in communism and he founded it along with Friedrich Engels.…
- 54 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Under pure socialism, classes become indistinguishable—if not nonexistent—due to its focus on equality. Although this may be preferable to the lives of the Industrial Revolution-era lower class, it ignores the human race’s competitive nature, taking key motivations away from the people needed to spur their society’s economy. Pure capitalism, on the other hand, recognizes this need for motivation, stating that when people are given economic freedom, “the obvious and simple system of natural liberty establishes itself of its own accord” (Smith). Despite the motivation that this system provides, it only serves to worsen the class inequality still present to this day. Because capitalist societies are barely under any government economic control, the most successful people continue to be just as successful, leaving the poorest with little to no chance of class mobility. Communism, like capitalism, attempts to provide motivation for its citizens. However, since communism is based mostly upon people being “instruments of labour” working for their societies (Marx and Engels), motivation for the sake of the individual becomes almost impossible. In place of this, communism attempts to provide a more community-focused motivation, but without monetary reward, the work can begin to seem…
- 793 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays