NORM BORIN
California Polytechnic State University
PAUL FARRIS
University of Virginia
A shelf management model was developed to assist retailers with the decision of which products to stock and how much space to allocate to those products. Due to the non-linearities in the formulation a closedfotm solution is not possible. Borin, et al. develop a search heuristic based on simulated annealing and compare the solution against a known optimum. A barrier to the use of such models is the fact that managers typically do not have access to error-free estimates of theparameters requiredfor the model construction (shelf elasticities, search loyalty, and consumer preferences). In this article we analyze the degree of error that may be introduced into estimates of the parameters before the model yields assortments and shelf allocations that are inferior to those produced by the merchandising rule of thumb, share-of-shelf = share-of-sales. The results indicate thatjudgmental estimates ofparameters can vary by as much as 50 percent and still make application of the model useful.
1. INTRODUCTION
With limited shelf space and an abundance of current and new products, retailers must make decisions frequently about which products to stock and how much space to allocate to those products. Many retailers are now turning to shelf management models to help with these decisions. Within the last fifteen years there have been a number of models developed which incorporate some or all of these objectives (Anderson, 1979; Hansen and Heinsbroek, 1979; Corstjens and Doyle, 1981, 1983; Bultez and Naert, 1988; Bultez, Naert, Cijsbrechts and Vanden Abelle, 1989). However, these models suffer from two important problems, which often limit their effectiveness. First, because of non-linearities and complexities, the models must often be simplified before a solution set can be derived, which often reduces the usefulness
References: Anderson, Evan E. (1979). “An Analysis of Retail Display Space: Theory and Methods,” Journal of Business, 52( 1): 103-I 18. Borin, Norm (1992). An Analysis of Space and Assortment Tradeoffs in the Retail Environment. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, The Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia. Borin, Norm, Paul Farris and James Freeland (1994). “A Model for Determining Retail Product Category Assortment and Shelf Space Allocation,” Decision Sciences, 25(3): 359-384. Brown, William M. and W.T. Tucker (1961). “Vanishing Shelf Space,” Atlantic Economic Review, ll(10): 9-13. Bultez, Alain and Philippe Naert (1988). “SH.A.R.P.: Shelf Allocation for Retailers’ Profit,” Marketing Science, 7(Summer): 2 1l-23 1. Bultez, Alain, Philippe Naert, Els Gijsbrechts and Piet Vanden Abelle (1989). “Asymmetric Cannibalism in Retail Assortments,” Journal of Retailing, 65(2): 153-192. Burgoyne, D.G. and C.B. Johnston (1968). “Are Shelf Space and Shelf Location Really Important,” The Business Quarterly, 33(Summer): X-60. Cairns, James P. (1962). “Suppliers, Retailers, and Shelf Space,” Journnl of Marketing, (July): 34-36. Carpenter, Gregory S. and Donald R. Lehmann (1985). “A Model of Marketing Mix, Brand Switching and Competition,” Journal of Marketing Research, (August): 318-329. Corstjens, Marcel and Peter Doyle (1981). “A Model for Optimizing Retail Space Allocations,” Journal of Marketing, 27(July): 822-833. - (1983). “A Dynamic Model for Strategically Allocating Retail Space,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34( 10): 943-95 1. Cox, Keith K. (1964). “The Responsiveness of Food Sales to Shelf Space Changes in Supermarkets,” Journal of Marketing Research, (May): 63-67. -. (1970). “The Effect of Shelf Space Upon Sales of Branded Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7(February): 55-58. Curhan, Ronald C. (1972). “The Relationship between Shelf Space and Unit Sales in Supermarkets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9(November): 406-412. - (1973). “Shelf Space Allocation and Profit Maximization in Mass Retailing,” Journal of Marketing, 37(July): 54-60. Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1965). “An Appraisal of Markov Brand-Switching Models,” Journal of Marketing Research, (November): 347-362. Emmelhainz, Margaret A., James R. Stock and Larry W. Emmelhainz (1991). “Consumer Responses to Retail Stock-outs,” Journal of Retuiling, 67(Summer): 138-147. Farris, Paul W., James Olver and Cornelius De Kluyver (1989). “The Relationship Between Distribution and Market Share,” Marketing Science, 8(2): 107-128. Frank, Ronald E. and William F. Massy (1970). “Shelf Position and Space Effects on Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7(February): 59-66. Hansen, Pierre and Hans Heinsbroek (1979). “Product Selection and Space Allocation in Supermarkets,” European Journal of Operational Research, 3: 474-484. Hogg, Robert V. and Allen T. Craig (1978). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New York: Macmillan, Ireland, John J. (1993). Estimating Direct Product Profit from Inexpensive Data. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Kotzan, Jeffrey A. and Robert V. Evanson (1969). “Responsiveness of Drug Store Sales to Shelf Space Allocations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 6(November): 465-469. Krueckeberg H.F. and P.C. Davis (1966). “Consumer Response to Space Allocation in the Supermarket Dairy Department,” Bulletin #374, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Delaware, Newark. Lal, Rajiv and Marcel Corstjens (1994). “Shelf Space Allocation for Store Brands.” Working paper. Lee, Wayne (1961). “Space Management in Retail Stores and Implications to Agriculture.” Pp. 523-537 in Marketing Keys to Profits in the 1%0’s, edited by W.K. Dolva. Chicago: American Marketing Association, Marketing News (1982). “Pilot Study Finds Final Product Choice Usually Made in Store,” 6 August5. Moinzadeh, Kamaran and Charles Ingene (1993). “An Inventory Model of Immediate and Delayed Delivery,” Management Science, 39: 536-548. Motes, William H. and Stephen B. Castleberry (1985). “A Longitudinal Field Test of Stockout Effects on Multi-Brand Inventories,” Journal ofthe Academy of Marketing Science, 13(Fall): 54-68. Nielsen Marketing Research (1992). Category Management. Positioning your Organization to Win. Chicago: NTC Business Books. Pauli, Hans and R.W. Hoecker (1952). “Better Utilization of Selling Space in Food Stores,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Marketing Research Report No. 30, November. Peckham, James 0. (1963). “The Consumer Speaks,” Journal of Marketing, (October): 2 l-26. Reibstein, D.J. and H. Gatignon (1984). “Optimal Product Line Pricing: The Influence of Elasticities and Cross-elasticities,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21: 259-267. Shugan, Steven M. (1989). “Product Assortment in a Triopoly,” Munngement Science, lS(March): 304-320. Urban, Glen L. (1969). “A Mathematical Modeling Approach to Product Line Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 6(February): 4047. Walter, C.K. and John R. Grabner (1975). “Stockout Cost Models: Empirical Tests in a Retail Situation,” Journal of Marketing, 39(July): 56-68. Walter, C.K. and Bernard J. La Londe (1975). “Development and Tests of Two Stockout Cost Models,” International Journal of Physical Distribution, 5(3): 12 l-l 32. Zufryden, Fred S. (1986). “A Dynamic Programming Approach for Product Selection and Supermarket Shelf-Space Allocation,” Journal Operational Research Society, 37(4): 413-422.