A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management

Darden Graduate School of Business Administration
University of Virginia
Working Paper No. 01-02
A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management
R. Edward Freeman
John McVea
This paper can be downloaded without charge from the
Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection at: http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=263511 A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management
R. Edward Freeman
And
John McVea
The Darden School
University of Virginia
Forthcoming in M. Hitt, E. Freeman, and J. Harrison (eds.)
Handbook of Strategic Management, Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the development of the idea of
"stakeholder management" as it has come to be applied in strategic management. We begin by developing a brief history of the concept. We then suggest that traditionally the stakeholder approach to strategic management has several related characteristics that serve as distinguishing features. We review recent work on stakeholder theory and suggest how stakeholder management has affected the practice of management. We end by suggesting further research questions.
A HISTORY OF A STAKEHOLDER APPROACH TO STRATEGIC
MANAGEMENT
A stakeholder approach to strategy emerged in the mid-1980 's. One focal point in this movement was the publication of R. Edward Freeman 's Strategic Management- A
Stakeholder Approach in 1984. Building on the process work of Ian Mitroff and Richard
Mason, and James Emshoff [ For statements of these views see Mason and
Mitroff,(1982) and Emshoff (1978)]. The impetus behind stakeholder management was to try and build a framework that was responsive to the concerns of managers who were being buffeted by unprecedented levels of environmental turbulence and change.
Traditional strategy frameworks were neither helping managers develop new strategic directions nor were they helping them understand how to create new opportunities in the midst of so much change.

Bibliography: Ackoff, R. 1970. A concept of corporate planning, New York: Wiley. Ackoff, R. 1974. Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley. Ackoff , R. & Churchman, C. 1947. An experimental definition of personality. Agle, B., Mitchell, R. & Sonnenfeld, J. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Ansoff, I. 1965. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw Hill. Berman,S., Wicks,A., Kotha, S. & Jones, T. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter: The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial Blair, T. 1995. Boatright, J. 1994. Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what 's so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly, 393-407. Bowie, N. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Oxford: Blackwell 's. Burton, B. & Dunn, C. 1996. Collaborative control and the commons: Safeguarding employee rights Clarkson, M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance Collins, J. & Porras, J. 1994. Built to last. New York: Harper. Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications Emshoff , J. 1978. Managerial breakthroughs. New York: AMACOM. Evan, W. & Freeman, E. 1993. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Goodpaster, K. 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 53-73. Goodpaster, K. & Holloran, T. 1994. In defense of a paradox. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 423-430. Graves, S. & Waddock, S. 1994 Harrison, J Jones, T. & Wicks, A. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24: 206-221. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. 1966. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley. Kochan, T. & Rubenstein, 2000. Organizational Science. Luoma, P. & Goodstein, J. 1999. Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Ogden, S. & Watson, R. 1999. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K Orts, E. 1997. A north American legal perspective on stakeholder management theory. In F Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper. Phillips, R. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7: 51-66. Phillips, R. & Reichart, J. 1998. The environment as a stakeholder: A fairness-based approach Porter, M. 1998 Schendel, D Slinger, G. 1998. . Spanning the Gap: The Theoretical Principles Connecting Stakeholder Policies to Business Performance Slinger, G. 2001, forthcoming, Stakeholding and takeovers: Three essays. University of Cambridge doctoral thesis, Department of Applied Economics. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill. Waddock, S. & Graves, S. 1990. Wheeler, D. & Sillanpaa, M. 1997. The stakeholder corporation. Wicks, A., Freeman, E. & Gilbert, D. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept Wicks, A. & Marens, D. (1999) Williamson, O Wood, D. 1995.