Preview

A Strong Central Government - Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Strong Central Government - Essay
A Strong Central Government

Patty Saltkill
PPA 601: Foundations in Public Administration
February 20, 2012
R.D. Robertson
Ashford University

A Strong Central Government Government of any kind is set up to make a country run smother and with less problems. The United States government should have less ability to override state policy without proof of why it should be overridden. It should be something that each state has the ability to defend against and with a panel. Federal policy is about an overall problem but not the problem at the state level since each state would face cases of different types of problems.
National Policy Washington should not have greater power to dictate national policy. The power that they have seems to be enough. There is a thought for the overall country and what is good for one is good for all but when you look at the same questions at the state level then the needs of each stated, each constituent is more observable. States have elected officials who should be prepared to fight and stand up for what those within the state need. It seems that those who reside in Washington forget about the different levels inside a state and how the needs would be different. If you look at policies like immigration California, Arizona, Texas, and Illinois have some of the highest number of immigrants and rules, policies and needs for those states would be different than what would be needed for say Kentucky or North Dakota. Nearly half of all the unauthorized migrants now living in the United States entered the country legally through a port of entry such as an airport or a border crossing point (Pew, 2006, Para 1). There should be rules set up and allowances for those states that have the most types of ports of entry such as border crossing points and not just airports. However if the rules are federally mandated then most of the United States would have rules and regulations that would not really

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    B) State government may no limit the federal government’s exercise of powers. Congress may not impair the ability of state government to function in the federal system.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do believe the policy is consistent with federalism. I have no problem with the federal government giving power to the states to set…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In politics everyone has a different opinion and it seems as if they never come to a compromise. This issue has been going on for many years now. As early as when this nation was first being built. Throughout history there have been times when the government has been at conflict. Many of these conflicts include the question as to who has more power and who should. If the states should or the national government. Two important cases in the past that have helped answer these questions are McCulloch vs. Maryland and Gibbons vs. Ogden. Both cases present conflicts that brought among state courts, which later end up being appealed in the Supreme Court and rule differently twice. Both cases ruling clear show a clear example as how the national government has a supremacy over the state government.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Busn 115 Week 1 Analysis

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Generally, federal laws apply to citizens living in the U.S. and its regions. The state laws apply just to residents of the particular state. The president of United States is accountable for implementing and accomplishing the laws written by the congress. The federal courts verify these laws according to the U.S constitution. The authorized federal agency discloses a final rule in the federal register with a particular date for when the rule will become effective and enforceable. State legislatures generate and pass bills and then the state governor converts them into laws. The state courts may analyze these laws according the rules of state’s…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of the United States can be seen over a specific time period. Between 1970 and 1930 the form of government was known as layer cake federalism or dual federalism. There were clear powers divided between the states and the centre and there was sovereignty given in equal measure to both. Between the years 1930 and 1960 the structure was known as Cooperative federalism or marble cake federalism where the state and the central government shared functions and collaborated on issues of national importance and priorities. The 1960s to 1980s were known as picket fence federalism and was characterized by high and overloaded cooperation and regulations which were not only interfering between the powers of the centre and…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution gives certain powers to the federal government, such as regulating interstate commerce and national defense, while reserving other powers to the states, such as education and licensing. This division of powers allows for a balance between national unity and state autonomy, ensuring that both levels of government can operate efficiently while maintaining their respective authorities. The Federal System helps prevent tyranny by spreading power across different levels of government and allowing for diverse policies to address the needs of various…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government has powers that are more general and apply to the country as a whole, while the state government has powers specific to their area. According to Madison in Federalist Paper #51 written in 1788, federalism guards against tyranny because, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) They are able to control their separate areas of government while still controlling the power of the other, ensuring that the other does not accumulate too much power and turn the country into a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1970s regulated federalism began to build up steam as for how our new form of federalism would operate. In this new method, of regulated federalism, congress would pass laws requiring states and localities to follow through with out a choice or say in the matter. This is contrast to cooperative federalism as the federal government did not directly force states and localities to follow through, but if they did not they would not receive government grants and funding in that certain area. However, the government did have good reason for this practice, they wanted to create more unity and uniformity between the states, “The effect of these national standards is that state and local policies in the areas of environmental protection, social services, and education are more uniform from coast to coast than are other nationally funded policies”(WTP 94).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the "role" of the Federal Government? Should the Federal Government legislate (make laws) to regulate personal behavior and the moral behavior of its citizens? Should state governments be able to do this? The role of the Federal government is to enforce laws, collect taxes, control trade, create a unified citizenship law, set up federal courts that report to the Supreme Court, establish and maintain a military, and declare war. Yes, the federal government should be able to make laws especially for the citizens'…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two different plans were devised in a convention. The Federalists, the majority, implemented the Virginia plan, a statewide government based on the population. “The federalists supported the constitution and preferred a strong national government,” (pg. 57). The Anti-Federalists supported the New Jersey plan, where each state gets the same amount of representation. “The Anti-Federalist opposed the constitution and preferred a decentralized federal government; they took their name by default, in reaction to their better –organized opponents,” (pg. 57). Both parties agreed that government should be limited, but they disagreed on what the limits should be. I believe the Federalists will serve better with a government with broad powers that has…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution, they were trying to make an “equal” government where the federal government doesn’t have all control. In order to do that, they delegated certain responsibilities to the states and to the federal government. On the issues that were not covered in the Constitution, the states would take control and make their own laws. What the founding fathers didn’t consider though is how people would interpret the Constitution years after it was drafted. The federal government’s power has increased in relation to that of the states because of such interpretations.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It may not sound very American to say, but the constitution has it’s flaws. The checks and balances of the federal government are only as strong as the integrity of the officials in the three branches. A group with similar ideas can take over all three and make deals amongst themselves. The state governments need more power to keep a check on the National government.Another issue with a strong centra government is that people in different states have vastly different beleifs and ideologies, and many of them even if held by an entire state, may not make it to the federal government. Richard Henry Lee said “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; so that the representatives of the seven Northern States, as they will have a majority, can, by law, create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States.“ And that was just with differences in opinion between the limited number of states that existed them. Now, with 50 states and an ever rising population, there are more differences than ever. A stronger state government would result in more diversity between states, laws more fitting to the beliefs of individual states opinion. Then the small federal government would make sure that these…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States was founded on economic and political freedom. This freedom enables all our citizens to successfully pursue unlimited opportunities to use their god given talents to work, produce, invest, take risk, and grow wealthy while keeping the prosperous fruits of their enterprise. Here we have state governments that are “laboratories of government” and a notional government that has more autonomy than the state government. The state governments have some type of autonomy but the national government is stronger even if they are not close to those individuals the serve.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With Federalism does anyone really know who is in charge? Sure it allows the state to have its own government and rules but the Federal Government can deny the states decisions. Doesn’t the Federal Government really have the final say, and if they want to allow something to some extent they can put stipulations on it. Federalism is here to stay.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays