Preview

Absolutism Essay Example 7

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism Essay Example 7
“Absolutism”
During the 1700’s and 1800’s the nations began to follow a form of government known as absolutism. Absolutism is a form of government in which the sovereign power or authority came from one monarch who was said to rule by divine right. Divine right is the belief that the monarch was given the power to rule by god. This means that only god was above the ruler. This belief would cause the citizens to follow the monarch’s wishes. During this period of time, absolute monarchies were set up in France, Spain, Prussia, Austria, Russia, and England. The monarchs of these nations had there own methods for ruling their Nation, but they shared many ideologies and practices that are common in an absolutist Government.
One common trait of an absolutist government is a single dominate monarch that rules the entire Nation. The absolute monarch needed to have complete control; however, the upper class tended to want to share some of the power. A strong monarch would then have to find a way to increase his power and weaken the nobles. In France Cardinal Richelieu’s power was contested by the Huguenot party. He quickly eliminated their political and military power while he let them keep their religious authority. He also sent out spies to determine if any nobles were trying to conspire against him. He also sent out officials to other provinces to enforce his laws. Lewis IV of France followed up on Richelieu’s practices by taking high offices away from nobles that he believed were gaining too much power. Fredrick William the great of Prussia decided that the best way to keep control was to give the aristocrats positions as officials in his bureaucracy. This gave them enough power that they would be satisfied, but not enough to overthrow him. Since Austria consisted of several different States, Leopold I kept control of Austria by allowing the local and regional governments set laws in their areas, and that they would yield to his authority in any matters that dealt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 10 21 14

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The political effects of absolutism were simple enough, full power. King Louis XIV of France said it best in Document C-“ The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the functions of all the other members consist only in carrying out the commands given to them… The more you grant (to the assembly of the people), the more it claims… The interest of the state must come first.” He states that a member of the government has very limited power and an easy rule to follow, do whatever the king says or orders. It seems he is speaking to his lower counterparts and officials, because of his tone of speaking about the common people and their intents. In Document E, there is a perspective painting of Versailles and all of its glory. The pure sight of the palace makes someone’s jaw drop. The fact that King Louis XIV could just “build” something of that size is unimaginable. It is an exaggeration of his absolute power and showing to the rest of the world as well as his people that he truly has full control over everything.…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is an absolute monarchy ? An absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a ruler has absolute , unrestricted power over his people .The absolute monarch of a country is head of state and government , they are not limited by any kind of constitution or law . Absolutism is mostly passed by heredity but there are some few exceptions. During the 1500 and 1600s western europe was pretty much completely ruled by different absolute monarchs .these monarchs could chose the style of their rule , whether they wanted to be a ruler of respect and trust or fear and anguish . the 16th and 17th century in europe proved to be a time of prosperity even through the absolutism ,shown by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan ,Bishop Jacques and the acts…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the more common forms of government was absolutism. Rulers believed they should have complete control over the country. An excerpt in document 1 states that Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be aggressive and feared and thought that the only way the citizen would follow his rule was if he emulated his power and social status. He thought that if he showed kindness and generosity that he would be overthrown. Most of the monarchs believed in divine right, this meant that they thought that they were chosen by God to rule. One of rulers that believed in divine right was King James 1st, his ideas were expressed in document 2 one of his quotes: “….God has the power…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then they would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. (doc1) King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought that kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective.(doc 2) Another person who believed in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He believed that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He said that to escape the brutish life people entered into a social contract which was an agreement by which they gave up the state of nature for an organized society. He also supported the Stuart kings in their struggle against parliament.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Absolutism is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited, centralized authority and absolute sovereignty, as vested especially in a monarch or dictator. The essence of an absolutist system is that the ruling powers is not subject to regularized challenge or check by any other agency, be it judicial, legislative, religious, economic, or electoral. When Louis XIV was king he proclaimed, “I am the state” (Encyclopedia Britannica). This statement alone made by Louis XIV showed familiar assertion of absolutism. It has existed in various forms in all parts of the world, including in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler and in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin. The most studied form of absolutism would be absolute monarchy. Absolute monarchy originated in early modern Europe and was based on the strong individual leaders of the new nation-states that were created at the breakup of medieval order. The most common defense of monarchical absolutism is known as The Divine Right of…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in their own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them rather than a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 967 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism worked because decisions were made quickly. King Louis XIV of France believed it was easier to have one head who…

    • 739 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq essay

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Age of Democracy and the Age of Absolutism were two different periods of time. The age of Enlightenment had new ideas spreading throughout the world about government and human rights. The enlightenment was a great period of establishment of democracy .A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Throughout the enlightenment there were philosophers who believed greatly in a democratic government. Some of the most familiar philosophers were Voltaire, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each one of these philosophers was humanists and believed in natural rights. The Age of Absolutism was a time of absolute monarchs who had total control of everything. They made laws as they went along and if they didn’t like what the people said the monarchs would throw the people into jail and or put them to death. The Age of democracy is a response or answer to the Age of Absolutism by the new ideas that spread throughout the world. Although democracy and absolutism had advantages and disadvantages, democracy was a more effective type of government for it limited royal power and protected the rights of the people socially, politically, and economically. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, tension arose between the two different types of governments, the democracy and absolute monarchs.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two prevalent monarchies in early European governments were absolutism and constitutionalist. They each have vast and numerous differences, but also share some common factors. These differences include, the amount of power the king holds in the government, the amount of power the subjects hold, and the emphasis on armies. While there are many differences there are some common factors such as; the kings retained the overall power, both monarchs had their nation’s best interest at heart, and both wanted to progress and strengthen their nation as much as possible using different ways.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays