Preview

An Accidental Universe is As Likely As a Created One. Discuss

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Accidental Universe is As Likely As a Created One. Discuss
‘An accidental universe is as likely as a created one.’ Discuss

Stephen Hawking, one of the World’s leading scientists, released a new book in 2010 called, ‘The Grand Design.’ He and his co-author, Leonard Mlodinow, stated that, ‘you don’t need God to create the universe because the laws of gravity and a certain version of quantum physics suffice to make it inevitable that the universe will create itself, out of nothing, in an infinite variety of forms; and given an infinite variety of forms, a segment or sub-universe friendly to mankind is bound to develop, no design needed, grand or not.’ He also later on in the book writes that, ‘spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.’ Both of these quotes are strong evidence that the universe is an accidental one, and there is no such thing as a creator or a created universe.
A strength of this is it completely rules out God, so therefore rules out any questions like, ‘How did God come about’ or ‘Why do we have the problem of evil if God exists.’ If God or any other creator doesn’t exist, then it becomes much simpler and rules out lots of unanswerable questions.
A weakness of this is that it doesn’t really explain how the universe was created accidentally. It just states that it has something to do with the laws of gravity and quantum physics as if they are a given. Quantum physics, itself, is still a hypothesis so cannot be proven itself, let alone prove something else. So, although Hawking makes it obvious that he believes that the universe is accidental, he doesn’t have clear scientific evidence to prove this.
Overall I think that the an accidental universe is not as likely as a created one, as the world is just to finite in detail and perfect to be a fluke.
The creation of the World was just too prefect that it couldn’t of happened by accident. By agreeing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    not. And I believe that we can’t create anything because we are only discovering what the god (creator)…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let us assume that it is true to say that there is a clear existence of purpose and design in nature, the question is whether or not the existence of purpose and design implies the existence of God. The design that is apparent in the world can certainly be shown not to be the work of God, or at least God as an omnipotent (he can do anything), omniscient (he knows everything), omnipresent (He is everywhere) being.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking,” Hawking discusses his vision of the universe and it’s ability to exist. In the episode, Hawking shares his knowledge on how the universe came into existence and how it managed to become what it is today. Hawking also shares the evidence that scientists, such as himself, have collected through the years.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ Assess whether the existence of the universe requires God as a first cause?…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Życiński, J. (1996). Metaphysics and Epistemology in Stephen Hawking 's Theory of the Creation of the Universe. Zygon, 31(2), 269-284…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is unthinkable that we created ourselves or some big band theory of nonsense can ever explain the great handy work God has created in the heavens and on earth. How arrogant we humans have become. This symphony of unison, one accord, teamwork, and movement of stars speaks and coexist across the galaxies clear into the unknown and back again, without a glitch, from the beginning of time. Our bad behaviors are also consistent from the beginning of time as well.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Astronomers combine mathematical models with observations to develop workable theories of how the universe was made. Albert Einstein’s General theory of relativity along with standard theories of fundamental particles. NASA’s spacecraft the Hubble Space Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope continue measuring the expansion of the universe. One of the goals are to figure out if the universe will expand forever or will it stop, turn around, and collapse in a “Big Crunch.” If we were to look at the universe one second after the Big Bang, what we would see is a 10 billion degree sea of neutrons, protons, electrons, anti-electrons, photons, and neutrinos. Then as time passes we would…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    there has to be a creator because even with the big bang, someone or something had to have…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is the most recent development of the teleological argument known as the anthropic principle. The argument claims it is well known that our existence in this universe relied heavily on variables remaining constant and proposes that even the slightest change in the composition of matter would have made the world unfit for humans to develop. The extraordinary probability that all these variables were aligned so perfectly in our favour tells scientists that it is unlikely to have happened by mere chance, but there must be the existence of a designer that has fine-tuned the universe for our existence to cater for our specific needs. This principle was developed by F.R Tennant who supported the existence of a divine designer. He believed that it would be possible to imagine a disorganised world in which no rules applied.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity trends

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This fact may present a challange for modern sceince because this is not a scientific theory as it cannot be experimentally verified or falsified. Once we move into metaphysics the naturalistic assumption of science must be done away with as it is no longer either justifiable or useful. Indeed it is a metaphysical statement itself--as it lies behind science, it cannot be examined scientifically.…

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accidental Universe

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I feel if the multiverse theory is proven to be more then a theory, it would further discredit religion as the reason for life to exist. On the other hand, I feel it is equally as possible for any of the religious views to be the reason why life exists. To me both seem equally as farfetched; I personally do not feel that the scientific universe we live in cares about life. We are such a small blip on the universal scale and even smaller if there is multiple universes. Because of this who, is to say that there was not a Creator or God who manipulates the parameters of the universe to create life. As I personally believe that there is an after life and a heaven I cannot discredit the idea of a creator. But I also cannot ignore science I would love to find out the truth of where we come from but I feel we are as close now as we were when religion was first thought of.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe the second." Hawking adds, "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing." Graham Farmello of the Telegraph writes, "God did not create the universe, Stephen Hawking revealed."[55][56]…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stephen Hawking

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A field of study that Stephen Hawking is known for is cosmology. Cosmology is the metaphysical study of the origin and nature of the universe. A brief synopsis of Hawking indicates that, according to Hawking, "there is 'no place for a creator', that God does not exist." In his quantum cosmology, he indicates, "there would be no singularities at which the laws of science broke down and no edge of space-time at which one would have to appeal to God or some new law to set the boundary conditions for space-time . . . The universe would be completely self-contained and not affected by anything outside itself. It would neither be created nor destroyed. It would just BE . . . What place, then, for a creator?"(Smith 2005)Theists have argued against this position, specifically, "that even if Hawking's physical laws are true, that fact does not entail that the God of classical theism does not exist or even disconfirm the classical theistic hypothesis." It would appear that Hawking did not inhibit himself to simply one theory when asking the question where did we come from and why. Rather, he points out that "if we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people either don’t know what the Big Bang is or misinterpret it greatly. To summarize it, the Big Bang is not the theory of how our Universe was “created” it is the theory of how it expanded or “inflated” into what our Universe looks like today. The theory explains that our Universe was once a singularity (which is located in the center of a black hole) that “sprang” into existence about 13.7 billion years ago. After this extremely hot, extremely small, and extremely dense Universe appeared without reasoning it then inflated and cooled into the Universe we know today (“Big Bang Theory”).…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays