Preview

Antitrust Practices and Market Power Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Antitrust Practices and Market Power Essay Example
Title page

Antitrust Practices and Market Power
Melissa Carey
Melissa_C06@hotmail.com
Content

Introduction………………………………………………………………………….........page 2

Investigation ……………………………….………………….………………………… page 2

Costs and Antitrust Act……………………………….………………….……………….page 2-3 Monopolies Bad for Society…………………………………………………………....... page 3-4 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….......... page 4
References……………………………………………………………………………...... page 5

Antitrust Practices and Market Power
Introduction
This paper will discuss the antitrust law, specifically the Sherman Act of 1870. A claim was filed against the NCAA by the Governor of Pennsylvania for reasons that violate this act. It will also discuss monopolies and oligopolies, given an example of how they can be good and bad for the economy.
Investigation
Governor Tom Corbett had filed the law suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) on January 2, 2013 in Harrisburg, PA. This investigation of antitrust behavior was claimed, according to Gov. Corbett, due to the NCAA being a “money-grubbing, publicity-hungry robber baron” (Miller, 2013). The Governor had claimed a 43 page suit declaring why the NCAA had such harsh punishments on Penn State football team and how these punishments where made without citing any rule that was actually violated. Therefore, Gov. Corbett claims that these sanctions put against Penn State, not only affected Penn State’s culture, but also effected the “commonwealth, its citizens, and its economy” (Miller, 2013) Costs and Antitrust Act The antitrust act that was violated in this case was the Sherman act. According to the textbook, the Sherman Act resides in two provisions that have to do with an act of mistrust or conspiracy being illegal; and how any person trying to monopolize any particular trade is considered guilty (McConnel, 2012). In this particular lawsuit against the NCAA, the Sherman Act was violated due to the fact that the NCAA is a huge

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    egt1 task3

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States antitrust law is a collection of federal and state government laws, which regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations, generally to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers. The four major pieces of legislation known as the Antitrust Laws include: The Sherman Act, The Clayton Antitrust Act, The Federal Trade Commission, and the Celler-Kefauver Act.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Concern in the late 1800s with society’s economic well-being, public pressure and the market control by oligopolist and monopolist also known as trusts the government enacted antitrust legislation.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reputation and image of what the university represented would never be the same. Unfortunately, when you think of Penn State, you do think of the football program and the educational standards, but the sexual misconduct of Jerry Sandusky will also be an underlining memory that many will have of the school. After the conviction of Sandusky, the Administrators who ignored the warning signs and the misconduct reported would face trial themselves (Fitzpatrick, 2012). The victims in the case have filed lawsuits against the University for failing to address the complaints when they were received. The only university official to not face charges…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade.…

    • 3211 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This case study will analyze how according to former FBI director Louis Freeh’s report the most “powerful men at Penn State failed to take any steps for 14 years to protect the children Sandusky victimized” and “never demonstrated, through actions or words, any concern for the safety and well-being of Sandusky’s victims” until after he was arrested. Specifically, I will focus on possible motivations that led to the leadership’s inactions; how the organizational culture of Penn State’s football program impacted leadership’s poor decision making prior to and during this scandal, and the abuse of power in order to preserve success and safeguard the university’s illustrious reputation. Finally, I will present plausible solutions, as a “way ahead” to ensure this type of situation does not happen in the future and promote a renewed positive culture change.…

    • 3496 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ncaa Position Paper

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is my stance that the NCAA overstepped their jurisdiction and punished Penn State for matters that should have been handled by the courts. While everyone agrees that the events that took place by members of the Penn State staff were unspeakable and needed to be handled legally, myself and many within the football community question the NCAA’s authority to place such harsh restrictions upon the PSU football program. The main question put before…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The article also reports that “a reverence for football was largely to blame for a series of missteps by top Pennsylvania State University administrators in failing to report repeated allegations of child sexual abuse by Jerry Sandusky” (1). Obviously, the culture at Penn State involved regarding the football program as more important than the victims of Sandusky’s abuses and the failure of his colleagues to act in the best interest of the children who were being abused. Furthermore, one of the main reasons why the decision makers did not report Sandusky was “that top officials abdicated their responsibilities in the interest of avoiding bad publicity” (The Chronicle of Higher Education 4). The top administrators did not want the program to fail, or to besmirch its good reputation, so they “repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from authorities, the Board of Trustees, the Penn State community, and the public at large” (The Chronicle of Higher Education 4). Basically, the decision makers wanted to avoid bad publicity that would be generated by reporting Sandusky, as bad publicity would hurt the football program and the entire university in many ways. Bad publicity would cause the football program to lose funding and support, destroy their good reputation, create a media circus, cause uncomfortable embarrassment for the decision makers, result in their loss of prestige and status, loss of their high-paying jobs at the university (“Joe Paterno’s total compensation in 2011 was $1,022,794, and Graham Spanier’s pay was $813,000”), loss of respect and support of the students and the entire university as well as people who financially supported the football program, and could also cause them to be sent to jail. In addition, I feel that Penn State cultivated a…

    • 3110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title IX Case Study

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the lawsuit “Cohen v. Brown University,” the president and athletic director of Brown University were being charged due to discrimination against women in the grounds of intercollegiate athletics program. For many schools, men’s football program far exceeds the budget and receives many more sources than any other men’s program in most universities. The law came to existence in response to Brown University cutting off the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams from university-funded varsity status to donor-funded varsity status, in May 1991. Simultaneously, men’s water polo and golf teams were also cut off and in consequence, their lost not only the university’s funds but all other privileges and benefits from Brown’s. “After hearing fourteen days of testimony, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction ordering that the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams be reinstated to university-funded varsity status, and prohibiting Brown from eliminating or reducing the status or funding of any existing women’s intercollegiate varsity team until the case was resolved on the merits” (Thornton, 2011, p.512). Brown had initially 120 days to submit a plan to comply with Title IX, but failed in doing so and the district court modified the order to 60…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Masque of The Red Death” written by Edgar Allan Poe has symbolism throughout the story. Most of the objects and or people in the story symbolized different meanings. The symbolism that stood out the most was the 7 rooms in the castle. Each of the rooms represented the stages of life and the last one being death.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nca Pros And Cons

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As you can see with these examples economics plays a tremendous role in how the NCAA operates and functions on a daily basis. It does not just affect the business side of the NCAA but as well as recruitment and the schools infrastructure. The NCAA provides financial benefits and an overall betterment for students and the schools involved. It is unlikely this will change in the near future as the market demand continues to increase on a yearly basis for their product NCAA sports.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pennsylvania State University is facing several civil lawsuits from the victims of Jerry Sandusky. The University as a whole is put to shame and will be talked about for decades (forde). If the NCAA was to get involved and banned the football program they would be punishing innocent people. Pennsylvania State has not been left off the hook. The NCAA has already made Penn State pay a $60 million fine and caused the University to lose scholarships and grants. Pennsylvania State will always have a bad name and a bad reputation. It wouldn’t be fair to the players, students, fans or family members. They lost their head coach that has been there for over 4 decades and they will be looked at different just because they are from Penn State. Isn’t that enough punishment? The NCAA should not be involved with the Jerry Sandusky Scandal because it is a criminal act which has already been handled by the court of…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Penn State Scandal

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Jerry Sandusky case had a major impact on Penn State. It affected both academics and athletics in a major way. In this essay I will discuss the situation that occurred and the impact that the social media had on this once great school.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Anti Trust Laws in Sports

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By analyzing the 10 sport antitrust cases the author has gathered data that suggest courts have supported the antitrust laws and intervened in cases through litigation which found middle ground between plaintiff and the defendant. The data gathered from these cases researched suggest the private ordering challenged by the antitrust litigation was not in the best interest of the public (Ross, 2003).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in 1953 the NCAA began to regulate the number of college football games that could be televised. It was their belief that if there were too many games televised it would lead to a decrease in fan attendance (Greenhouse, 1984). However, on June 27th, 1984 the U.S. Supreme Court issued their ruling in NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and the University of Georgia Athletic Association, which was a direct challenge to the NCAA’s broadcast regulations of football telecasts (NCAA v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 1984). The decision that day, stating the 1983-1985 NCAA Television plan violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, returned the property rights of football telecasts to individual schools, who could now sell or assign their own broadcast as opposed to the NCAA selling them for the entire association (Bennett and Fizel, 1995). With the regulations lifted, schools began to look for new ways to monetize their broadcast and multimedia rights. This led to what we see today, as universities enter into agreements with third party rights holders who sell the universities' multimedia rights on their behalf. The relationship between the university and rights holder is mutually beneficial, with both parties seeking financial gain from the partnership, and has created a massive market for sponsors…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Market Discipline Essay

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Operationally excellent companies deliver a combination of quality, price, and ease of purchase that no one else in the market can match. They execute extraordinarily well, and their proposition to customers is guaranteed low prices and/or hassle free service. (Treacy, and Wiersema).…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays