Preview

AP Euro Power shift

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AP Euro Power shift
Take-Home Essay #1
After about 1450, the advent of completely sovereign rulers started a shift from divided feudal governments to cohesive countrywide monarchies. The characteristics of the feudal system did not disappear, but merely molded into the shape of the new monarchies. Territorial rulers still existed and representative organizations even grew in influence. Throughout 1450 to 1550, a reformation of the governments of Western Europe created “new monarchies”. These new monarchies contained very distinct characteristics that distinguished them from the old feudal governments, such as the complete power of kings and the massive growth of economic power. All of these characteristics can be seen in the states of France and England.
The feudal system of the High Middle Ages was characterized by the division of governmental power between the king and his vassals. In the time of the new monarchies, however, kings had a large of power over their kingdoms. In feudal monarchies, towns would be governed by representative assemblies, such as the English Parliament and the French Estates of General. This all changed after the Hundred Years’ War and the Great Schism. The nobility and the clergy were in decline and became less and less able to avert the growth of national monarchies. Towns now began to ally with the king and the common citizen slowly began to fill his royal offices. Parliament and the French Estates General slowly became less powerful and began to meet with decreasing frequency. In fact, the only time that the French Estates General met was during times of great crisis. Henry VII managed to raise revenues without going pleading to parliament, which had designated him customs revenues for life in 1485. Rulers did not have complete power over every part of their country, but in the last half of the fifteenth century, they realized the law was under their control.
Another characteristic of the new monarchies that distinguished it from the old feudal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 13 covers Europe’s social and political order from 1600-1715. In the early century, inflation was such that prices were four times what they had been between 1525 and 1550. Three great powers contested for dominance – the Ottoman Empire, the Spanish Empire, and France, under Louis XIV and Richelieu. Each had a mass of about 17 million people. In spite of the presence of these great monarchies, there were still areas all over Europe from southern Italy to Scandinavia and from Scotland to Auvergne where primitive social enclaves persisted, with hundreds of dialects and local, semi barbaric, religious cults. Attempted control of these numerous pockets sapped the resources of the great powers, similar to the drain on the Roman Empire when it was ringed with…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henrys complex financial policies were important in his control of the nobility. For example, he used bonds and recognaisances, which were raised for political and financial purposes, to restrain the power of his nobility. Between 1504 and 1508, £50,000 per annum was collected from the bonds, which shows that they obviously contained power in controlling nobles. Another device that Henry used were feudal dues. Wardships were the feudal due which most irked the nobility since it gave the king control of a nobles’ land and it also gave the king control over the marriage of there children, which if the heir was a female could mean that the family lost control of its land entirely. His careful management of crown lands is another example of how Henry’s power over his nobility rested on his successful financial policies. Henry had more crown land than previous monarchs, some lands were confiscated under the acts of attainder and others were reclaimed after the acts of resumption. This secured control and authority over England, and by 1508 his annual income from royal estates had rose from £12,000 in 1486 to £42,000. Finally, Henry used attainders and fines to avoid wars caused by nobles, which had caused problems to previous monarchs. Henry used Acts of Attainders to declare a nobleman guilty of a crime against the crown. The noble might be imprisoned and the attainted…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1450 1750 Review Copy

    • 1173 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Political Developments in Europe 1450 1750 1st World Wars (ex. 7 Years War) Rise of Nation-States New forms of monarchy Absolute Monarchies Parliamentary Governments What is divine right? Divine right Monarch get their right to rule from God; therefore, this right cannot be taken away…

    • 1173 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VII was very keen to limit the power of his nobility because he saw the great and powerful nobles as dangerous, he thought that if they had a big enough army they could rise up against him and over throw him, this was a constant worry to Henry as he had risen up and usurped the throne himself. Therefore to avoid the possible danger he tried his very best to limit the power which the nobility had. One way in which he attempted to do this was to keep the nobility to a very small number, this was a successful method as it made it very easy for Henry to keep a close eye on each one and their families to make sure they wasn’t planning any revolts which could affect Henry and his hold on the throne. The tight grip allowed Henry to give clear instructions and to make sure they stayed in order and loyal however due to the huge cut in nobles local areas began to suffer due to the fact there was no one there to keep them in order, this led to a breakdown in laws over different towns.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    19th Century and Study

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2005 (#3): Using examples from at least two different states, analyze the key features of the “new monarchies” and the factors responsible for their rise in the period 1450 to 1550.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early modern era, several monarchs, by weakening the feudal nobles and allying themselves with the emerging commercial classes, began to consolidate power. Kings and queens tried to bring all of the people they ruled over and all the territories they ruled over into one, unified body (beforehand, even villages would not have anything to do with each other). This however, was a difficult process and sometimes required violence, as well as taking a long time. This birth of a nation-state also lead to the first signs of nationalism, due to monarchs encouraging their subjects to feel loyalty towards the newly established nations.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A World Lit Only by Fire

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Europe left the Medieval Era and entered the Renaissance, its political system was undergoing a huge overhaul. All political power was practically destroyed by the Huns and the beginnings of Western Countries being divided into countries began. “Europe was ruled by a new aristocracy: the noble” (41). Men would gain a following and then make a claim to land, the bigger the following the more land was received. These land claims were bound together to create the Modern countries of Western Countries, which many hold the same boundaries today, such as England, France, and Spain. Most of these men thanked the divine power and would do whatever the church would tell them to. “By A.D. 1500 most of these sovereign dynasties were in place” (55). These countries were all united under a single man with absolute power in government known as a Monarchy (124). Most Monarchs would have total control over people's lives and in turn their people would serve them first and their religious leaders second. Hence more power was transferred to these rulers as the church was lost power. When new religions started up in Germany (Lutheranism), England (Anglican), and…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Asdfghji

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Feudalism - Nobles were given land owned by the king in exchange for loyalty and military services.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Michael Jones

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. By the fifteenth century, which of the following nations had developed into a strong national monarchy with a centralized bureaucracy and a professional army?…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Which What term is best associated with the unification of European states like France and Spain under all-powerful monarchs, who used their power to subdue the nobility and bring central order to government?…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the medieval era, France had a feudal system of governance where the upper nobility siding with the kings controlled the lower classes. The social structure was fragmented into three unequal hierarchical groups consisting Kings, lords and peasants. The kings ruled the land and were believed to have been granted this right by God that they passed on through heredity. They incarnated the law and were the absolute monarchs. The Lords on the other hand hold fiefs that they rented to peasants in exchange of labor, fees and protection. The Lords consider themselves far more superior than the peasants or serfs and treated them unfairly as a result. Lastly the serfs, representing the vast majority of France population, approximately ninety percent, were the most neglected and most abused of all three classes.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays