Preview

Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example
APA Research and Bibliography Activity

Part One: Assessing the RELIABILITY and Validity of Sources

IN THE SPACE PROVIDED IN COLUMNS TWO AND THREE OF THE FOLLOWING MATRIX, PREPARE A 50-100-WORD EVALUATION OF BOTH THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF EACH OF THE SOURCES LISTED IN COLUMN ONE.
|Source |Reliability |Validity |
|Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |
| |information can be added and changed by anyone. Many of the sources are not |be misleading. The web site is clear on the information but not necessarily accurate |
| |cited accurately or it only contains one source instead of multiple for the |because anyone with internet connection can modify the page, which may cause problem |
| |amount of information given on the paper. At time the sources given have |if someone is bias on some of the information provided in Wikipedia and decide to |
| |nothing to do with the research information written on the page. |change the information to fit their opinion. |
|American Psychological |The APA (American Psychological Association) is a reliable source. It contains |The APA (American Psychological Association) contains validity information. In order |
|Association Web Site |information written by many different scientists, psychologist and more. The |for information to be posted on the site author have to demonstrate credibility to |
| |website contains many copyrights and trademark. The website demonstrates that |their research. As

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    tma03 part analysis

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Yes the sources are reliable since it is an analysis based on some concrete facts.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Sicth Edition ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robert Jones Case Study

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilize at least two peer-reviewed articles that were published within the past five years from the Ashford University Library. Your paper and sources must use APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howto Set Up Apa Style

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia will not be a credible because the information on this site changes all the time and will be wrong at some point.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer wrote this essay to warn fellow college students the dangers of using Wikipedia as an academic research source. No student wants to go through hours of studying and research for a paper and end up using incorrect information. Knowing this, the writer starts by discrediting Wikipedia…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this article Wilson reaches out to fellow scholars to part take in improving Wikipedia for the better good of academics. Knowing that Wikipedia is not considered a legitimate source of information, he provides a logical solution to persuade educators, with facts, logic, and personal experience. I feel that Wilson was effective in conveying his message to his peers.…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Wikipedia a credible and valid source of information? Wikipedia is an online source of information; it is the counterpart of Britannica in the modern computer world. “Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us,” according to the study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica by Daniel Terdiman.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Providing a different approach and data collection and processing, Wikipedia has become a popular method for many to seek out answers. When it comes to the topic of Wikipedia, most of us will readily agree that it’s a great source for information. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of its validity. Whereas some are convinced that it’s a means of presenting facts, others maintain that its accuracy should be highly scrutinized. Although Wikipedia can provide expeditious access to vast amounts of knowledge, it should not be used a thoroughfare between proper research and producing quality written works.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Credibility of Wikipedia

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most popular websites is Wikipedia. Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, was established in 2001. “It is now one of the largest sites on the web” (2007, Carleton College). The difference between Wikipedia and an encyclopedia is Wikipedia is a collaborative effort with articles written by individuals around the world using wiki software that allows content to be added or changed by anyone. All material can be edited. The issue with this method is the authors of the articles may not be experts on the topics they are writing, leaving a lot of room for error and bias. According to the founder, Jimmy Wales, “Wikipedia may not be a suitable source for academic uses”. He also states, “It is good enough knowledge, depending on what your purpose is” (2007, Carleton College.) This displays evidence that Wikipedia may not be credible because there is a lack of…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clandestine Cultures

    • 8031 Words
    • 27 Pages

    A Wikipedia article, or entry, is a page that has encyclopedic information on it. A well-written encyclopedia article identifies a notable encyclopedic topic, summarizes that topic comprehensively, contains references to reliable sources, and links to other related topics. Most articles consist of paragraphs and images, but they may also be formatted as stand-alone lists or tables. These lists or tables are also considered articles for Wikipedia's purposes.…

    • 8031 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Uses a wide range of information drawn from other sources (journals, articles, etc) to address |…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays