Preview

case digest 1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
case digest 1
C.A. No. 299 March 18, 1946

FELIX ADAN, plaintiff-appellant, vs. AGAPITO CASILI and VICTORIA ADAN, defendants-appellees.
OZAETA, J.:
The plaintiff Felix Adan commenced this action in the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur against his sister Victoria Adan and the latter's husband, Agapito Casili, to secure the judicial partition of the estate left by their deceased mother, Simplicia Nepomuceno, alleged to consist of six parcels of land which are specifically described in the complaint. Parcels 1 and 3, however, were subsequently discarded, the first having been sold by the parties to the municipality of Libmanan, Camarines Sur, and the second being admittedly the property of Maria Adan, a half sister of the parties litigant. The remaining four parcels, referred to in the record as lots Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 6, are valued by both parties at P2,783.55.
The defendants interposed the following defense: That the four lots in question were ceded by the deceased Simplicia Nepomuceno to her daughter Victoria Adan as her share of the inheritance; and that the plaintiff has received more than his share consisting of money, livestock, palay, and real property, namely:
Expenses of the plaintiff as a student from 1918 to 1925
P8,000.00
Twelve carabaos received by the plaintiff from his mother, at P30 each
9;360.00
Three hundred cavans of palay, at P4.20 a cavan
1,260.00
Cash taken by the plaintiff from his mother in 1927
1,110.00
Two parcels of land bought by the plaintiff with money he received from his mother
1,220.00
The trial court found that the alleged donation by the deceased Simplicia Nepomuceno of the four parcels of land in question had not been duly proven, there being no written document to support it, and that therefore the said four parcels of land should be brought into collation. It also found that the alleged receipt by the plaintiff from his mother of P1,110 in cash and of P1,220 with which the plaintiff purchased the two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Court analysis of this transaction in light of these eleven factors lead to conclusion that Mrs. Hardman's transfer of the Hale Field property to Hardman, Inc. was a sale rather than a contribution to capital. Since the trial court erred in relying on a sole factor and neglecting to consider fully the several other factors, all of which point to the opposite conclusion. Therefore, the decision of the district court was reversed and the case is remanded for a determination of the amount of excess taxes paid by the Hardmans and Hardman,…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Study 2

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What objective evidence was there to support the defendants’ contention that they were just kidding when they agreed to sell the farm?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts. Plaintiff and defendant lived together for seven years without marrying, with all property acquired during this time taken in defendant’s name. Plaintiff avers that she and defendant entered into an oral agreement where the parties would combine their efforts and earnings and share equally all property accumulated as a result of their efforts. Plaintiff agreed to give up a lucrative career as a singer and entertainer and assume the role of homemaker, with defendant agreeing to provide for all of plaintiff’s financial support. Defendant compelled plaintiff to leave his household in May of 1970, and continued to provide support to her until November of 1971. Thereafter, he refused to provide further support. Plaintiff brought suit to enforce the oral agreement, claiming that she was entitled to half the property and to support payments. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings for the defendant.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    JUAN TAÑADA, plaintiffvs.JOSE YULO, Secretary of Justice, EDUARDO GUTIERREZ DAVID, Judge of First Instance of the Thirteenth Judicial District, and SANTIAGO TAÑADA, Justice of the Peace of Alabat, Tayabas, defendants.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Digest in Land Titles and Deeds

    • 30191 Words
    • 121 Pages

    The trial court issued a Notice of Levy on Execution including property of Talisay-Silay and Ma-ao which were not parties to the case. Talisay-Silay learned of the annotation only when it secured a xerox copy of its title from the Register of Deeds. The owner’s duplicate copy of the title does not bear such inscription.…

    • 30191 Words
    • 121 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defendant is the business adviser of the plaintiff, Marciana Canon and about the same time, Felisa Nepomuceno, the other plaintiff, had an unsecured debt due her of 500 pesos from one Marcelo Leaño. The debtor proposed to give her a deed of conditional sale to a certain tract of land in consideration of 2,000 pesos, she to be credited with 500 pesos on the purchase price and that to advance the balance of 1,500 pesos; that knowing that the defendant had in his hands that amount of money, the property of her co-plaintiff, Marciana Canon, she proposed that they make a joint investment in the land. A Deed of Conditional Sale was executed with a right to repurchase at the end of 1yr and obligating himself to make monthly payments in consideration of the right to retain the land in possession in sufficient amount to bring 17% interest per annum on Nepomuceno and Canon’s investments.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digest

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    FACTS: By a public instrument dated June 11, 1914 plaintiff Addison sold to the defendant Marciana Felix and husband Balbino Tioco, 4 parcels of land. Defendants paid, at the time of the execution of the deed, the sum of P3,000.00 on account of the purchase price, and bound herself to pay the remainder in installments. It was further stipulated that the purchaser was to deliver to the vendor 25 per centum of the value of the products that she might obtain from the 4 parcels “from the moment she takes possession of them until the Torrens certificate of title be issued in her favor.” It was likewise covenanted that “within one year from the date of the certificate of title in favor of Marciana Felix, she may rescind the contract of sale in which she shall be obliged to return to Addison the net value of all the products of the 4 parcels sold, and Addison shall be obliged to return to her all the sums that she may have paid, together with interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. On July 28, 1988, Jose and Dominador Jimenez sold their share consisting of one-half of said parcel of land, specifically the eastern portion thereof, to herein petitioner pursuant to a "Kasulatan sa Bilihan ng Lupa." 3Subsequently, a "Confirmatory Extrajudicial Partition Agreement" 4 was executed by the Jimenezes, wherein the eastern portion of the subject lot, with an area of 8,855 square meters was adjudicated to Jose and Dominador Jimenez, while the western portion was allocated to herein private respondents.…

    • 37874 Words
    • 152 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Law Case Digest

    • 7347 Words
    • 30 Pages

    This case had its roots in Special Proceedings No. 3103 of Branch I of the CFI of Pasig, Rizal, for the settlement of the estate of the deceased Julio Cantolos, involving six (6) parcels of land situated in Tanay Rizal. Amonoy was the counsel of therein Francisca Catolos, Agnes Catolos, Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formida. On 12 January 1965, the Project of Partition submitted was approved and xxx two (2) of the said lots were adjudicated to Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formilda. The Attorney's fees charged by Amonoy was P27,600 and on 20 Jan 1965 Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formida executed a deed of real estate mortgage on the said two (2) lots adjudicated to them, in favor of Amonoy to secure the payment of his attorney's fees. But it was only on 6 Aug 1969 after the taxes had been paid, the claims settled and the properties adjudicated, that the estate was declared closed and terminated.…

    • 7347 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 4965 Words
    • 20 Pages

    On March 10 and 12, 1925, Esperanza Tuazon donated several parcels of land located in Manila to plaintiffs Concepcion Vidal de Roces and her husband, as well as one Elvira Richards. This was recorded in the Registry of Deeds. After subsequently taking possession of the said lands and its fruits, plaintiffs obtained the corresponding transfer certificates. In 1926, the donor died without leaving any forced heir and designated the sum of P5,000 to each of her donees. After the estate had been distributed among the instituted legatees and before delivery of their respective share, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) ruled that plaintiffs being donees and legatees should pay inheritance taxes. These were then paid under protest.…

    • 4965 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Property Case Digests

    • 11325 Words
    • 46 Pages

    In this case, the mere plea of title over the disputed land by Felix cannot be used as a sound basis for dismissing an action for recovery of possession. The testimony of their mother in the action for specific performance proceeding is given weight to…

    • 11325 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suit House Case Study

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The plaintiffs claimed that they are lawful owners and possessors of the suit houses. Bhaskar (PW No.01) in his affidavit of examination-in-chief categorically stated that he and other plaintiffs have purchased the suit houses from their respective predecessor in title under the registered sale-deeds. Thereafter, they have obtained the building construction permission from defendant no. 04 and raised construction of the suit houses. The plaintiffs in support of the above oral evidence placed on the record the certified copies of the tax assessment list (Exh.No.20 to 24). On perusal of the certified copies of the tax assessment list (Exh.No.20 to 24), it is clearly seen that the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit houses. The oral…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Matic obtained from Manila City a concession to provide the lighting system of Manila cemeteries on All Souls’ Day of 1934. The amount was P8,773 to be guaranteed by Luzon Surety Co. Matic then authorized Quiogue to contract with Mora Electric Co., Inc. for the installation materials and labor, and that both are under the duty to pay P8,773 to the City of Manila (which Mora Electric was to take from the payment made to it by Matic and Quiogue).…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays