Preview

Chapter 5 Criminal Law quiz

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter 5 Criminal Law quiz
Chapter 5 Criminal Law
1. What kind of strike does the law not allow to form the basis of self-defense claims?
d. Preemptive Correct
Question 2
The castle exception is an exception to what doctrine?
a. the retreat doctrine
Question 3
Which of the following cases involves the “New York Subway Vigilante?”
c. People v. Goetz (1986) Correct
Question 4
Most defenses are perfect defenses; if they’re successful, defendants are
c. acquitted.
Question 5
The retreat requirement is weakest or nonexistent when persons are attacked
b. in their own homes. Correct
Question 6
The defense of consent recognizes the societal value of
a. individual autonomy. Correct
Question 7
A defense in which the defendant admits the act but claims that, under the circumstances, they aren’t legally responsible is called
b. excuse. Correct
Question 8
A defense in which the defendant accepts responsibility for the act but claims what they did was right is called
a. justification. Correct
Question 9
Circumstances that convince fact finders that defendants don’t deserve the maximum penalty for the crime they’re convicted of are called
c. mitigating circumstances. Correct
Question 10
Which of the following never justifies the use of force against another person?
a. retaliation
Question 11
At the heart of the choice-of-evils defense is the necessity to prevent
a. imminent danger. Correct
Question 12
A person who was the initial aggressor can gain a lawful right to self-defense if they do which of the following from the incident they started?
b. completely withdraw Correct
Question 13
A person can use deadly force against an attacker whom the victim reasonably believes is going to cause them an injury less than death. The attacker is said to be threatening
b. serious bodily injury. Correct
Question 14
What is the heart of self-defense?
a. necessity Correct
Question 15
The general rule is that self-defense is available only against what type of attacks?
b.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis/Reasoning: The defendant couldn’t justify using self-defense because evidence shows that he was the aggressor in the situation. He is the reason that the situation escalated to the point where it did.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    8)Did the court find that there were sufficient parts and instructions available to conclude that the defendant did, in fact, possess an illegal weapon?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With vicarious liability, the acting defendant is NOT criminally responsible for his or her conduct.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (A) No person, while under the influence of sudden passion or in a sudden fit of rage, either of which is brought on by serious provocation occasioned by the victim that is reasonably sufficient to incite the person into using deadly force, shall knowingly cause the death of another.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME: A process whereby victims are faulted for bringing maltreatment on themselves, or extraordinary circumstances are invoked as justification for questionable conduct. (p. 112)…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Jessop v Johnstone (1991) Scholboy hit teacher with jotter. Teacher reacted by hitting him. However, he then hit him again. Court recosnised it was possible to instinctively react to violence and come into contact wioth another. Here. The 2nd blow was not reflexive.…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    person by an unlawful act such as an assault. It is not necessary to prove intent to kill…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A, based on existing evidence, a reasonable person with Y’s history and background would believe that Y face imminent and immediate threat. X hits Y in the face with a firearm, and X has continued to abuse Y in the past, and will continue to abuse Y in the future. Y took the advantage of suspension to act as self-defense against the aggressor. B, Y was subject to continues violent cycle of abuse, X tells Y that X will think over how X plans to deal with this situation after X takes a nap. A reasonable person would believe that the threat is imminent. C, as far as retreat goes Y was not capable to remove from the threatening situation because of imminent fear of danger. As a defense attorney I would argue that Y acted in self-defense because…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    NRA Arguments

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Court approval of common law rule that a person 'may repel force by force' in selfdefense and concluded that when attacked a person 's as entitled to stand his ground and meet any attack made upon him with a deadly weapon, in such a way and with such force' as needed to prevent 'great bodily injury or death's'.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cja 354: Criminal Capacity

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    115). When one has committed an act of violence, he or she naturally wants to justify the reasons. For many who commit a criminal act the best defense is justification. According to the author, some examples of justification can be, “self-defense, necessity, and defense of others (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). Self-defense is when “a person has fundamental right to protect his or her self and that to rationally safeguard oneself from an illegal assault is a natural response when faced with a threatening situation” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 119). Necessity is a claim made by the defense, in which, “the defendant believed it was necessary to behave illegally to prohibit or deter a greater damage or injury” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). The defense of others occurs when one person defends another who appears to be in harm’s way (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). However, as the author states, “defense of others is sometimes called “defense of a third person,” is circumscribed in some jurisdictions by the alter ego rule” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). The defense of others can be tricky because it does not mean one can intervene in an altercation of one’s friend when that friend started the altercation itself. The alter ego rule is accepted in some jurisdictions but not in others. The alter ego rule, as stated by Schmalleger (2010), is that “some jurisdictions will hold that an individual can solely protect a third party under certain conditions and solely to the degree in which the third party could perform for his or her own benefit” (pg. 126). For example, the state of Texas, based on the Model Penal Code ignores acknowledgement this rule by allowing an individual to defend another person if, “he or she has a rational…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law and Ground Laws

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the impact of Stand Your Ground laws on the homicides due to the firearm assaults?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Scottsboro Boys Trial

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Even when all evidence proves a black man's innocence his word seems to be false…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Concepts of Criminal Law

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An example of this would be if your neighbors’ car was burning in a parking lot and you saw it was on fire and sitting next to the neighbors’ car was a car that had three children in it. No one was in your neighbor’s car so no one was in harms’ way but there was no adult in the car with the kids. In order to protect the kids, you went over and jumped in the car and moved the car further away from the fire. The mother came out and saw that her car was not in the spot she parked it and called the police. The police charged you with stealing the vehicle and kidnapping of the three kids. At trial you presented the choice of evil defense stating that you had to move the car with the children in it to prevent them from burning up in the fire caused by the neighbor’s car. If you wouldn’t have moved the car to a safe place, the children would have been seriously injured or killed. In this scenario the judge should allow the defense of the choice of evil because if he wouldn’t have moved the car when he did, the kids would have been severely hurt or killed immediately. He didn’t have time to go try to find the mother of the kids so she could move the car…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics