Preview

Chapter 6 outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
985 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter 6 outline
CASE 6 – ACCIDENT OR HOMICIDE? The shooting of Yoshi Hattori
CHAPTER 6 – PRINCIPLES OF THE CRIMINAL LAW
Factual guilt- guilty based upon the facts, though not necessarily legally guilty
Legal guilt - proof of criminal liability beyond a reasonable doubt by admissible evidence within a court of law.
Criminal liability - the degree of blameworthiness assigned to the defendants as a result of legal adjudication
Elements of a crime – the five key elements common to almost all criminal statutes which must be proven within the court of law beyond a reasonable doubt according to the rules of criminal procedure to establish legal guilt.
THE MATERIAL ELEMENTS OF CRIME
a. “beyond a reasonable doubt” - the standard of proof necessary for a conviction in criminal trials; the highest possible standard
b. Preponderance of evidence – the standard of determining legal liability in civil trials requiring a certainty of more than 50 percent of defendant guilt
c. Actus reus- the physical element of the criminal act
d. Mens rea- the mental element in crime or criminal intent or the guilty mind
1. ACTUS REUS
e. Human conduct rule- the requirement that some human action is required for criminal liability; thought is not sufficient
2. MENS REA
a. Motive- reason a person commits a particular action
b. Degree-the level of seriousness of the crime
c. Specific intent- the thoughtful and conscious intention to perform a specific act in order to achieve a particular crime
d. General intent- state of mind inferred from the behavior or conduct itself to commit the act
e. Criminal negligence- unconscious creation of high risk of harm
f. Constructive intent- the actor doesn’t intend harm but their conduct violates basic standards of responsible conduct
g. Criminal recklessness- knowing creation of high risk of harm to others
h. Strict liability statutes- crimes for which one may incur liability without fault or intent
3. LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF CRIMINAL HOMICIDE
a. Homicide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Standard of Proof: preponderance of the evidence (better than 50% that the person is guilty)—good way to think of this: OJ Simpson Trial – actually found guilty in civil law so he had to pay money damages to his ex wife and her boyfriend’s family…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch 9 Business Law

    • 1559 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In contract law, intent is determined by the personal or subjective intent, or belief, of a party. False, intent is determined by the objective theory of contracts…

    • 1559 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Causation is to prove a criminal charge; the prosecution must show that there is a link between the act and the crime. That is, that it is an act by which an effect is produced. For example, if someone was stabbed and they died on the on the operating table, then this act of the stabbing that caused the person to die, rather than the fault of the doctor. This link is called causation.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Direct Intention: do an act and want the result from your actions. The consequences is the defendants aim or purpose - Mohan (1976)…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Mere intentions do not make a criminal offence – there must be a criminal act or omission…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The accused intended to commit the crime, knowing their actions were wrong (guilty mind). Three types of mens rea:…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Intent is inferred from an accused's behavior. Like a person would have intended the natural and probable consequences of their acts (Mallor et al., 2015). The requirement for the intent is the criminal law's general goal of punishing aware criminals. The proof that the defendant would need to form an intent is a "traditional prerequisite of criminal responsibility" (Mallor et al., 2015). An example of criminal intent would be that Katie and Tally were at the Michael Kors store…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    intent or our acts in general. The difference between them is whether these acts are either…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General intent crimes are crimes that a person knowingly and willingly commits recklessly or negligently ("General Intent vs Specific Intent Crimes - List of Crimes", 2012).…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quizzes 12-23

    • 6799 Words
    • 28 Pages

    10. Causation in fact exist if an injury would not have occurred without the defendant’s act…

    • 6799 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having no element for Mens Rea, consequently permits punishment on those that may be blameless to a crime. With that…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law is a formal system of written law which establishes guidelines to govern human behaviour. It can be boiled down to answer two questions : What behaviour deserves criminal punishment ? And also, what is the appropriate punishment for criminal behaviour ? Criminal law is one kind of social control, one form of responsibility for deviating from social norms, considered as principle. This latter is a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning2 . For a man to be convicted of a crime, it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that a certain state of affairs which is forbidden by the criminal law has been caused by his conduct, and also, that this event was accompanied by a prescribed state of mind. So, most of the crimes will require proof of mens rea, which is the fundamental mental element. But the difficulty that one should appreciate in this subject is the interrelation that can exist between criminal law and offences in which the state of mind of the defendant does…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When is a crime committed? When a criminal act is done with a criminal intent takes place. Crimes such as solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt can be committed a punished independently from prosecution and punishment of the crime that was the intended outcome.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Intention (specific intent) has no statutory definition; therefore it is necessary to look at case law. In Mohan(1975) the court gave a definition to ‘intention’ stating that was a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused power, (the prohibited consequence), no matter whether the accused desired that consequence of his act or not. ‘Thus meaning that a defendant’s motive/ reason for the act are irrelevant but the fact that the defendant decided to bring about the prohibited consequence is. Intent can be divided into two kinds as direct intent and oblique intent.…

    • 4930 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics