According to the “The Birth of Childhood,” Homo erectus developed their brain size and brain matter before birth and after birth. This is because Homo erectus required less developmental nourishing than modern humans. Other information provided by “The Birth of Childhood,” suggests that the Homo erectus died out in 1.6 million years ago. According to “The Birth of Childhood,” suggest that the Homo erectus was the first ancestor to have a similar body plan to the modern human. Such as having a larger brain similar to the modern human.…
H. neandertal speech capabilities have proven in recent years to be a task capturing much of the time and research of anthropologist. In the 20th century it was commonly thought that H. neandertal was too brutish and simple to have evolved into modern humans, and had very little modern behavior or capabilities. As the fossil record grew and the technology progressed the scientific community found evidence of modern behavior and possibly speech capabilities, that would portray H. neandertal as the advance subspecies he was instead of the brutish, unintelligent being that had been reinforced through the 20th century.…
The theory that Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens are cousins focuses on the time period when both existed and the geographic locations of both groups. Homo Sapiens lived in Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and India prior to the third interglacial period, the proposed time of contact. Neanderthals developed in East Asia in the colder…
Click the arrow in the bottom right corner of the screen to proceed to Slide 2 and begin the Click and…
From the moment humans were created to modern times, they made numerous physical and technological advancements. It started when the Australopithecines began displaying signs of bipedalism, freeing two arms for using tools and carrying food while walking at the same time. This was a significant physical change that the hominid species chose to make, as bipedalism was the gateway to hunting, farming, and harvesting. As time passed, the homo habilis began showing up. Their brain size was on a range between 550 and 687 cubic centimeters, whereas the Australopithecines had a brain size between 350 and 600 cubic centimeters, which meant that the homo habilis' brain capacity grew around 50%. This larger brain capacity led to the experimentation with…
How to Think Like a Neandertal is written by Archaeologist Thomas Wynn and Psychologist Frederick L. Coolidge. Throughout the book they dissect the Neandertal way of life, using archaeological evidence and modern comparative studies they try and get into the heads of Neandertals and decipher what they may have been thinking and how they went about their day to day life. Neandertals have been studied extensively, but this book allows the reader to gain a new perspective about who Neandertals might have actually been. Wynn and Coolidge provide a wide array of theories about the inner working of the Neandertal mind. Quite probably, Neandertals were similar to us (modern humans) in many ways; There are undoubtedly many key differences, differences that make us human, but also differences that make Neandertals who they were.…
Many processes have taken place to shape humans from the Australopithecus Afarensis to the modern day human also known as the Homo Sapien. As a result, the two defining traits that occurred by taxonomy are the effects of brain size and bipedalism. Humans, like other primates are considered as Order Primates in the Hominidae family and therefore are a prime example of taxonomy when the two diverged into different species. During taxonomy when humans diverged from their ancestors 6 to 7 million years ago, the result is the differences such as walking upright, brain size and overall skeletal structure are prominent due to the divergence of humans and other primates. Although primates and humans both share many anatomical, behavioral and socialization traits the differences are drastic and are all a result of selective pressures.…
Who were these "brutish" creatures, and where do they fit into the evolutionary scale? As time goes by and the research continues, there is increasingly more evidence that Neanderthals may not have been remarkably different from modern humans. With no conclusive evidence that Neanderthals were "inferior to modern humans" in "locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities," they have been included in the same species as modern humans, Homo sapiens (Trinkaus, 140). However, since there are marked anatomical differences between the Neanderthals and modern Homo sapiens they have also been given their very own subspecies called, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis.…
After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…
Ancient civilizations of Mesoamerica may seem entirely equal at times, but the truth about these civilizations is that the differences may be nearly secret or completely obvious. What comes to mind as two nearly identical cultures from Mesoamerica, the Aztecs and the Mayans have many other differences and similarities that help distinguish one from the other. Factors such as social classes show why a fusion of both cultures may occur in this region. Religion and agriculture are also two other factors that may give a sense of similarity, but also show the difference among them.…
The nature, character, contrast and comparison between the colonies in Jamestown in Virginia, the Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth in Massachusetts, and the establishment of Maryland were all short on supplies and each were mainly focused on surviving in the New World. All the colonies had their own separate goals and desires, but all were very different in the ways in which they set out to establish the needs and laws for their region. The one major factor in the organizing of Virginia is when they lost Captain John Smith and went through the period called the “Starving Time”, which was a horrible time for all. The colonies were all trying to get settled and organized as much as possible with their own challenges and circumstances in which they faced. Virginia settlers were struck with sickness and disease which encountered most of the people in Virginia. There were no laws and people in this region were struggling very badly, they started setting out to define new laws. They became very religion over time and established laws around their Christian faith and ideas. Massachusetts settlers like the Puritans’ led by John Winthrop were very organized and they had a great leader around them. They did not face the same issues that the other colonies had to face because they were very prepared and organized. The Province of Maryland focused on trade and commodities that could be obtained. They looked to trade those commodities to the English and other geographical locations to make a profit. The basic nature and character of the colonies was to establish common grounds and rules for each region as well as gather commodities for their livelihoods to increase trading opportunities. Massachusetts and Virginia were a like and wanted to have a God loving community and share the gospel. The colony of Maryland was set out from the get go to gain trade commodities. (word count:…
In contrast to Homo Sapiens, Neanderthals were of robust stature with broad shoulders and small lower limbs. There is evidence of sexual dimorphism in Neanderthals, with males much larger than female counterparts. There is also intense controversy surrounding the fact if Neanderthals culture & customs, whether they had a language or buried their dead, the use of cave art such as that found in Gorham cave in Gibraltr, as shown below, for decoration would perhaps give precedence to the idea that Neanderthals had complex interactions with each other and their…
Archeologists found new evidence that are answering many controversies, unanswered questions, and new perspectives of the legacy of the Neanderthals. The average lifespan of a Neanderthals was thirty. Through these thirty years, they were trained to hunt and gather basic necessities very quickly. According to the video “Decoding Neanderthals,” they were “brooding and stupid-looking with no personality”. They were seen as unintellegent physically and mentally with a lack of the brainpower that Homo sapiens had. Due to their animal like character, they would endure any physical encounters they had with the animal they were trying to kill hunt for food. In modern physical strength comparison, these Neanderthals were technically bench pressing about 500lbs.…
In an argument that takes the phrase “culture wars” to a new level, a group of researchers says it’s possible that cultural superiority gave human ancestors the upper hand over their Neanderthal cousins.…
Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists most recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited through your parent and when you were told something you didn't learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the 1700's the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900s. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not effectively argued against until 1928 when Watson published his book. This opened up the floodgates for environmental influences studies. Soon the idea of nurture was the popular excuse for behavior. Studies using animals were the most popular was in which scientists used to prove a theory, or disprove a theory. The newest studies use human twins to prove nature vs. nurture.…