Preview

Comparison on Friendship Between Aristotle, Epicurus and Martin Luther King Jr. Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison on Friendship Between Aristotle, Epicurus and Martin Luther King Jr. Essay Example
Friendship is a special relationship a person can have with any number of acquaintances. It is a fortuitous happenstance that occurs in varying levels of intensity between two people. Aristotle and Epicurus believe friendship is a rare commodity as friendship is a treasured bond of trust that has been proven throughout trials which create and strengthen those bonds. However Martin Luther King Jr. believes that everybody should treat everybody and anybody in a neighbourly fashion, a neighbour not only being one who lives near or next to another, but a fellow human. King claims a person should not merely care about one person, or a dozen people, but every person, for humans as a whole are neighbours to one another in this shrinking world. King uses the Bible and the parable Jesus tells of the Good Samaritan as an example of his idea of being a good neighbour. After examination of these articles one needs to ask the questions: How is the view on friendship of Aristotle and Epicurus different from neighbourliness as shown in Martin Luther King, Jr.’s article? Should we, as responsible moral agents, focus our energies on a few good friends, or be neighbours to all in need that we encounter? What then, is the moral difference in how we should treat friends and strangers?

The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.) who studied with Plato wrote a series of books he titled Nicomachean Ethics. From these, the subject of Book VIII is Friendship. Aristotle believes that friends are a necessity of life. People need to have friends. A person with power and wealth needs friends in order to use his wealth for benevolent means. Even so, one needs friends in order to keep them in power. In contrast, a poor person needs a friend to give them a helping hand. When one is young, a friend will keep one from making mistakes, and when old, friends will be there to lend aid when one cannot even perform the most mundane of tasks, and when one is at the pinnacle of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the 1920’s/1930’s, black Americans faced a huge amount of discrimination from the whites and found if very difficult to achieve civil rights. They were at one stage deprived of the right to vote, not being entitled to the same things as whites, and not going to the same schools as whites. In order for blacks to achieve civil rights they needed someone to follow, they needed a leader. Many black leaders did emerge for the fight of civil rights. Two of the most powerful influential leaders of the twentieth century were Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. These two leaders had different methods and strategies, and very different views towards white people, but fought for the same thing.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were both central figures as leaders in the civil rights movement of the nineteen sixties. Although both leaders were striving towards the same goal of achieving equality, they both took different approaches to accomplishing their goals. This is evident through Martin Luther King's Letter From Birmingham Jail, and Malcolm X's speech The Ballot Or The Bullet. Martin Luther King Jr felt the best way to reach racial equality was to keep faith in America. His approach was to preach the words of the Christianity through nonviolent protests, while refusing to conform to laws which provided rights and privileges to whites only. Malcolm X differed from Dr. King in that he was a Muslim that believed that change needed to be invoked through politics, claiming that America had failed African Americans through their inability to treat them like equal citizens. He believed that African Americans needed to stand up for themselves and meet with opposition preferably nonviolently, but violently if provoked to do so. Although both had opposing leadership styles, they both shared a lack of patience to sit around and wait for change to eventually happen. They both refused to be treated like second class citizens any longer and decided to make a drastic change.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King even goes so far as to refer to Jesus Christ, who he describes as an extremist for love and quotes from him, “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you”. Jesus went to extreme lengths to spread his teachings of love, and like Jesus, Dr. King would go to extreme lengths for justice and equality. And he proves this by leading them into the streets to march peacefully, boycotting restaurants and bus stations.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the greatest know civil rights speakers in the United States was Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm x. Both of these men had two very different views on what they thought would be the best way for blacks to get equality. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in his main philosophy which was non violent resistance. Martin used the teachings from Ghandi to teach African Americans how to use non violent resistance as a way to earn equality. He also believed that blacks should try to find common ground between them and the white community and that this is not war it is just injustice vs. justice. The way that Malcolm x put it into perspective made many blacks want to join his side of the fight for freedom because Malcolm x believed that African Americans need to fight for their equality. Malcolm x had a philosophy of black nationalism. Malcolm x made all black nationalists believe that they were at war with the white community and that it was not injustice vs. justice it was race vs. race. Martin Luther King Jr.’s way of non violence paved the way for Malcolm x to use his completely different view on things which was black nationalism.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will focus on Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King jr. because they are both strong representations of two different approaches to a common goal. Perhaps their different approaches of violence and nonviolence stem from their original opinions of how capable the whites are of being good.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Junior and Socrates argue for a different meanings and reasoning’s behind the differences of a single person and the law by which we have to follow. They were written many years apart but they are still very similar to the ideas of justice. The way that the two argue are almost completely opposite depending on the way that they feel towards authority and inner direction or moral guidance to lead you by. In the Crito, Socrates provides a lot of different arguments to understand why he refuses to escape from jail and avoid certain death, even though he believes that his sentence is unjust in its own. In the Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. is speaking to Birmingham’s clergymen who requested that he stop demonstrating…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “No needle is sharp at both ends.” This is a famous Chinese proverb meaning that if people decide to do something, it is neither always good for everyone nor the best idea. People usually choose the end where that is beneficial to most people. In addition, if the needle is sharp at both ends, it will hurt either way you go. A leader is like a needle; guiding people towards either one of the sides. Martin Luther King Jr. and Socrates were both great leaders because they fearlessly dedicated their lives to their countrymen each had a unique vision. Though they lived in different time periods, King, a man who fought against segregation, and Socrates, one of the founders of Western philosophy, had many similarities; their power and influence.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While both Dr. King and Socrates are both great philosophers that will be studied more than likely until the end of time, they carry differing opinions on the issue of civil disobedience. It also must be observed that the two of these philosophical titans both lived and thought in two different ages of history although they faced similarities in the circumstances presented to them, with Dr. king persecuted for his skin color and Socrates for his way of thinking. The question at large is a matter of what would Dr. King’s response be to “The Crito” a work by Socrates by which he argues the law must be obeyed even when it is unjust?…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these two books, Aristotle talked about friendship. He started by stating what the three different types of friendship are. The first type is when it is based on utility. This type of friendship is all about getting a benefit from someone else, and it will change according to circumstances. If a person doesn’t get benefits from the other anymore, the friendship will cease to be present. Benefits don’t have to be the only ground for friendship of this type, but there are definitely clear benefits involved. One example of this type of friendship Aristotle gave was friendships with foreigners. The second type of friendship is based on pleasure. In this type, you find the other person entertaining, and it is more about the experience of being near the person than anything else. This type is common between young people because young people’s lives are regulated by feelings. These friendships come and go often, and the friend doesn’t bring much to the friendship. The last type of friendship is based on goodness. This is when two “good” people are friends for the sake of each other. Both people in this friendship wish for the good of the other, and this type of relationship is most durable. Aristotle considered this type to be the perfect friendship. He didn’t care for the first two types because they are both short-lived, and they are circumstantial (Pgs. 203-208).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, book VIII and IX talk about the different types of friendships and what they mean to the person. The articles I’ve selected provide a better explanation on what Aristotle meant by giving examples and up to date explanations. The other sources help provide a better understanding on what dual relationships is for a social worker and the consequences attached to those actions. The last two sources help understand what a social worker needs to become a certified worker, and the ethical codes they need to follow daily.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the preceding quote by C.S Lewis; Mr Lewis explains what friendship does for a person. To paraphrase it in an understandable way, he seems to have said; Friendship is not necessary to survive, it only enhances life and makes life more interesting. This is my personal viewpoint exactly! Throughout life many people like to have other people close by them, parents have children, couples are married, teenagers have friends…. A lot of life is spent with friends and this many cause people to think that without friends they become nothing.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech “Letter from Birmingham Jail” involves a lot of persuasion to get his point across. This is one of Kings most memorable speeches and for all the right reasons. King was in jail when he wrote this speech, but that didn’t stop him from writing this amazing speech in which thousands of people read.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato vs. Aristotle

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Numerous experts in modern time regard Plato as the first genuine political philosopher and Aristotle as the first political scientist. They were both great thinkers in regards to, in part with Socrates, being the foundation of the great western philosophers. Plato and Aristotle each had ideas in how to proceed with improving the society in which they were part of during their existence. It is necessary therefore to analyze their different theoretical approaches regarding their philosophical perspectives, such as ethics and psychology. This paper however will mainly concentrate on Aristotle's views on friendship and how it impacts today's society.…

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Thunder, David. "Friendship in Aristotle 's Nicomachean Ethics." 1996. Notre Dame University. 27 Apr. 2008 http://www.nd.edu/~dthunder/Articles/Article4.html…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle on Friendship

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    had all of the other good things in life. He also describes friendship as a…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays