Preview

criminal justice fundamentals

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
criminal justice fundamentals
1. What is the difference between retribution model of punishment and the utilitarian justification for punishment? The retributive justification for punishment focuses on what the offender deserves as a result of his or her criminal behavior and the utilitarian focus on the future criminal behavior of both the person being punished and other members of society.
2. What is retroactive justice? Utilitarian justification of punishment that views punishment as a means to repair the harm and injury caused by the crime and focuses on the victim and the community as well as the offender.
3. What is retribution? The amount of punishment imposed on the offender should equal the amount of harm done by the offender the punishment should be proportional to the seriousness of the crime and by the culpability of the offender.
4. What is a byfarquey trial?
5. What is a mandatory sentence? The minimum jail or prison sentence that must be imposed of an offender convicted of a particular type of crime especially common for drug offenses involving use of a weapon.
6. What is the most important factor in determining a sentence? Is the fixed term sentence that may be reduced if the offender behaves himself or herself while incarcerated, the offenders date of release is based on the sentence imposed minus any good time credits.
7. When fines are allocated in usually and conjunction with other kind of punishment? In intermediated sanctions.
8. Are judges allowed to punish repeated offenders harder than first offenders? Yes judges are allowed to punish harder those individuals.
9. What are intermediate sanctions? Are more severe than probation but less severe than a prison sentences example boot camps, house arrest, etc.
10. What are the 4 utilitarian justifications for punishment? Deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation and specific deterrence
11. In the case Furman V Georgia (1972)? The court ruled that the death penalty as it was administered under the existing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Retribution in our current time is being used as the base of the punishment which involves sentencing policies and guidelines. Everything depends on the criminal offence and the criminal’s prior record. Incapacitation eliminates the criminal’s ability to yet again commit another crime by physically restraining him/her. Deterrence is basically threatening to punish someone to prevent them from committing any type of crime. Rehabilitation is all about being able to grab the person that committed the crime and take them back to a stage in their life were they did not commit any crimes. Restoration is about being able to grab the person who committed the crimes in the past and establish that person back into the…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam One Vocab study guide

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages

    8. Continuum of sanctions: which is a range of sanctions or legal penalties that balance punishment, treatment, and supervision concerns with the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s criminal convictions…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wk 8 Ccj220 Essay Example

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    of criminal sanctions that the criminal justice field uses as a form of punishment. The forms of…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Retribution: the purpose of retribution is actively to injure criminal offenders, ideally in proportion with their injuries to society, and so expiate them of guilt. An example of Retribution is the code of Hammurabi, which punishes by the theory of “An eye for an eye”.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 4 Study Guide Sentencing 1. The 5 philosophies of purpose of punishment (purposes, examples, pros and cons): a. Deterrence (specific and general) b. Incapacitation c. Retribution d. Rehabilitation e. Restorative Justice 2. Corporal Punishment 3. History of punishment- banishment, sterilization, transportation 4.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, retribution is focused on retaliation; and is not particularly concerned with mitigating future crime. In contrast, deterrence is focused on preventing future crime, but its effectiveness as a general deterrence remains unproven. Likewise, rehabilitation is aimed at preventing future crime, but historically, it has failed to mitigate crime rates. On the other hand, incapacitation seeks to deprive the offender of his ability to commit future crimes, but, suggests, that offenders are incorrigible. The aforementioned sentencing goals are related to distinct sentencing models. These include determinate sentencing, where “state statues determine the length of incarceration” (Zhang, et al, 2014, 694); and indeterminate sentencing, which sets a range of time of confinement, which is dependent of the offenders conduct while incarcerated. Sentencing models are usually accompanied concurrent and or consecutive sentences. Under concurrent sentences, and offender serves a prescribed amount of time of confinement for multiple crimes committed together. In contrast, consecutive sentences require offenders to serve jail sentences for each crime separately, one after the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment in the United States is always evolving, always changing to meet the different demands of our society. A unique aspect of our society is that we, as members of society, deem what is socially acceptable and what the punishment should be for those who violate our rules. In this paper, we will be discussing the different objectives of punishment at the state and federal level. We will also explain how sentencing affects the state and federal corrections systems overall. Lastly, we will define determinate sentencing, indeterminate sentencing and which sentencing model…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Purpose Of Sentencing

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first one is on the Legislative authority. When the public opinion moves toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, the legislatures have responded to this by asserting their power over the sentencing guidelines. Because they are responsible for making up the laws, they are also responsible for passing the criminal code that will determine the length of ones sentence. Within the Legislative Sentencing Authority, there are three different types of sentencing. First you have the indeterminate sentencing. This is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible for parole. The next type is determinate sentencing. This is when a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. Another name for this sentence is fixed sentence. As the names implies, the offender serves exactly the amount of time to which she or he is sentenced. Another legislative sentencing is good time and truth in sentencing. A good time is a reduction of time served for good behavior. This kind of program promotes discipline within a correctional institution. It is also a way to prevent overcrowding of jails. The truth in sentence is when the legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution, in the form of capital punishment is the execution of the criminal in vengeance for the victim and their families. This ideology is flawed, out dated and irrelevant in today’s civilisation.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some proponents of capital punishment believe that the death penalty is justified because it is a form of retributive justice, where the criminal deserves to die because he has committed an equally horrendous act such as murder or rape. In my opinion, the concept of “retributive punishment” is merely a euphemism for the primal desire of revenge. Two wrongs does not make a right – executing the offender will not revive the victim, nor will it benefit society in any way. Individuals seeking to dish out…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays