Preview

D.C. Mcclain, Inc., Et Al. V. Arlington County, 452 S.E.2d 659

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
D.C. Mcclain, Inc., Et Al. V. Arlington County, 452 S.E.2d 659
D.C. McClain, Inc., et al. v. Arlington County, 452 S.E.2d 659

FACTS:
D.C. McClain, Inc. entered into a contract with Arlington County to build a bridge. A major portion of the project was installing post-tensioning pre-stressed concrete, which required securing an easement from Westfield Realty, Inc. for eight feet of land behind where the bridge was to be built. This request for an easement was denied on February 15, 1988. McClain executed the contract on March 16, 1988 to construct the bridge for $789,755.90. VSL, the subcontractor hired by McClain to perform the post-tensioning, developed an alternative to the post-tensioning that involved creating blockouts in the bridge. Mechanical equipment would then be placed in the holes created by the blockouts to post-tension the bridge. This method failed due to the temporary shoring, which was used for support before post-tensioning, would not support the bridge. McClain encountered other problems during its attempt to construct the bridge, resulting in all work being put on hold. McClain and the County executed Change Order No. 4, requiring the County to pay an additional $365,000 to McClain in return for McClain’s agreement to finish the project by July 1, 1990. This additional payment would constitute “full compensation” for the remainder of the work on the bridge. A few months after Change Order # 4 was signed, McClain informed the County he could not complete construction on the bridge unless the County would pay an additional $180,000, and obtain the necessary easement. The County refused and sent notice to McClain of their intent to terminate the contract. The contract was terminated on July 20, 1990.

ISSUES:
The main issues in this case include breach of contract and wrongful termination of a contract. Breach of contract is defined as a breach of legal duty; failure to do something that is required in a contract. When McClain failed to obtain the easement and then keep up with the schedule and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The same issue was again before the court in 1945 in McClintic v. Dunbar Land Co. The case involved six notes that were secured by a vendors’ lien. The notes were payable on a sequential, consecutive basis with the first becoming payable on November 26, 1920 and the last on November 26, 1925. The plaintiffs filed the action for non-payment of the notes in 1943. The defendants contended that W. Va. Code § 55-2-5 barred action on the first three notes because more than 20 years had passed.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Cain met employee Oliver Dean Emigh (“Emigh”) and owner John Roberts at the Bargain Barn in March of 1998. John Cain (“Cain”) was a self-employed computer consultant. John Roberts (“Roberts”) explained to Cain that he needed documents typed for Republic of Texas (“ROT”) legal matters due to being a member of the ROT. Cain met with Johnie Wise and Roberts the next day at the Bargain Barn to discuss computer related topics. Cain became worried about Roberts, ROT affiliation when he went to work for Roberts on a daily basis. Cain told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about Roberts’ request for secretarial assistance on ROT matters on March 10, 1998. The FBI confirmed Cain’s story by the information that they received through their investigation. Cain said he would contact FBI Agent David Church (“Agent Church”) with any additional information that he gathered. Cain informed Agent Church that Robert’s was asking him to run checks for outstanding warrants against ROT members at which time he advised him that running warrant checks was illegal. Agent Church told Cain that he should inform Roberts that it was illegal. Cain attended a ROT meeting after Agent Church told him to attend the meeting if he wanted. Jack Abbott Grebe Jr. (“Grebe”) visited Cain on a regular basis to make photocopies. Wise started coming with Grebe on these visits to Cain’s residence. Cain contacted Agent Church on March 24, 1998 to discuss talks of obtaining information on explosives from the internet. Cain mentioned that he felt that Roberts was trying to recruit him as a ROT member during the meeting. Cain informed Agent Church on April 29, 1998 that Wise and Grebe asked him to find e-mail addresses of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Drug Task Force (DEA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, White House, United States Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, and Texas…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The Second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1816, amid much opposition from the states. However, following many financial disasters throughout the nation, eight states, including Maryland, passed statutes restricting the “activities of the Bank or imposing heavy burdens on it.” The state of Maryland impeded the operations of the Bank by imposing a significant paper tax on all notes not chartered by the state. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Bank brought the case to the trial court which decided against him. The Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed this decision.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recent criminal Supreme Court case that I find to be interesting is Missouri v. Frye. Actus reus is a guilty act, mens rea is a guilty mind, and concurrence is the equality of rights. Both actus reus and mens rea are both needed in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability. This case was about a guy named Frye, he was arrested for driving with a revoked license. Frye was previously arrested a few times before this incident dealing with the same crime. Missouri state law can give you a maximum sentence of up to four years when arrested three times for driving on a revoked license. The prosecutor sent Frye's counsel a letter that offered two possible plea bargains. If he was to plea guilty the charge could be reduced to a misdemeanor…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -shotguns and rifles could be owned but only if weapons were registered, kept unloaded and dissembled or restricted trigger locks.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mrs. Dula McCarty brought suit against Pheasant Run Inc. for negligence. In 1981, Mrs. McCarty was attacked by a man in her hotel room, beaten and threatened of rape. Mrs. McCarty ultimately fought off her attacker and he fled. The attacker was never identified nor brought to justice. Although Mrs. McCarty did not sustain serious physical injuries, she claimed the incident caused prolonged emotional distress which led to an early retirement. An investigation revealed that a sliding glass door, which was concealed behind curtains, was manipulated and enabled the attacker to gain entry into her hotel room. Mrs. McCarty made multiple claims of negligence against Pheasant Run Inc., including that they should have had better locking devices on the sliding door; more security personnel; the walkway to her sliding door inaccessible from the ground level; better over all procedures for dealing with non guests; posting signs telling guests to keep their doors locked at all times.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 7th, W. Otis Higgs, Jr. of the Peete, Higgs, and Armstrong law firm on behalf of the South Side Church of God in Christ responded to the allegations made by the South Memphis District Alliance of Neighborhood Associations . The Church outlined its binding covenants from Union Planters and provided evidence of its progress towards build a community center containing a gymnasium, kitchen, shelter, and educational facilities. The court again agreed with the plaintiffs at the August 18th hearing. With the reprieve the group sought a way to acquire and preserve the Stax legacy and building. However, they found a populace and city not yet ready to come to grips with its truly unique place as the result of African American and musical…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hiring practices at the cannery were discriminating in nature. These practices labeled the people who applied for the skilled and non skilled jobs. The rehire practices of the cannery should be fair and equal for all jobs. New policies should be put in place to resolve current issues with hiring practices.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the use of peremptory challenges in a criminal trial to remove members from a jury selection solely on the basis of race a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause?…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court analyzed the meaning and extent of the Second Amendment for the first time since 1939. In narrow 5-4 decision penned by Justice that the District of Columbia’s ban on handgun was unconstitutional and thus violates the individual right granted by the Second Amendment. The Justices of the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment as the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, having nothing to do with collective right grant by the service in a state militia. The Court made clear that this right to bear arms has limits, but, as explored in detailed below, the statue of limitations of those limitation remain unclear. D.C.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A taxpayer committing an act “willfully.” In proving tax fraud the IRS looks for behaviors that determined the taxpayer’s willful intent, and conducts that may determine illegal tax evasion such as the existence of a tax deficiency and an affirmation of an attempted evasion. To be prosecuted for tax crime requires a “men rea”, which refers to the intent of the individual. IRS needs to prove the evidence surrounding someone’s intent to tax evasion or in evading the legal duty to pay taxes.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal justice system realizes that inmates do have some rights, however it is also recognized that those inmates do have less rights than free citizens. Taking away some rights of the inmates is a valid punishment and by restricting these rights it helps in maintaining security in prisons. The title of the case that I chose was Wolff v. McDonnell. This case was very important because it uniformed certain rights and freedoms within correctional facilities. “Although inmates received some procedural safe-guards to protect them against the notorious abuses of disciplinary meetings, they did not receive all the due- process rights of a criminal trial” (Clemens, 2002). Nor did the Court question the right of correctional officials to revoke the good time of inmates. In this case, “Robert O. McDonnell, a prisoner, had filed a class- action suit against the state of Nebraska, claiming that its disciplinary procedures, especially those pertaining to the loss of good time were unconstitutional” (Clemens, 2002). McDonnell also complained, along with other inmates, about the limitations on their access to the law library, legal services, and visitation with the inmate legal assistant and that the regulations regarding prisoners ' mail violated the attorney-client privilege” (Keenan, 2005). This case was argued on Argued April 22, 1974 and a decision was made on decided June 26, 1974.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000, the Arlington Police Department received information stating that Earnest Leon Voyles had exchanged emails that contained sexual content with a fifteen year old girl from London, England. According to this informant the fifteen year old girl, “Amy Chang”, had been solicited for sex by Voyles and had arranged to meet with her in London to engage in a sexual relationship. Sergeant James Crouch of the Arlington Police Department was unsuccessful in contacting “Amy Chang” to verify the arrangement but was not successful, however, he was successful in verifying that Voyles was working as a teacher at a junior high located in Arlington, Texas.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays