Preview

Descartes Discourse on Method Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
946 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Discourse on Method Essay Example
Understanding Descartes' Method of Doubt

Clear your mind, if you will, of everything you have ever seen or known to be true. To begin understanding Rene Descartes' method of doubt, you need to suspend all prejudice and prior judgments and start with a clean slate "for the purpose of discovering some ultimate truth on which to base all thought." (Kolak, Pg.225). Discouraged with much skepticism from his own beliefs, Descartes was embarrassed of his own ignorance. He set out to try and accomplish the task of finding an absolute truth in which he would base his beliefs. Placing upon himself a task to find an axiom or absolute truth to base all thought, "he ventured as a youth in travel to collect a variety in experiences to derive some profit in which he would be benefited." (Kolak, Pg.225). When analyzing the method of doubt "you must take complex conceptions into their constituents until the irreducible elements are simple, clear, and distinct ideas, and show that all such basic ideas can be derived from, or can depend upon, the primary consciousness of a being that it thinks." (Durant, Pg.639).

Two types of "knowing"

First, understanding that there are conceptually two types of "knowledge or knowing" aposteriori, and apriori, you can further understand where Descartes is coming from with his representations of his elucidations. Knowledge that is based solely on the sense and reasoning that comes through the senses is understood as aposteriori, and its foil a priori is understanding through reasoning. At this point, Descartes has already discarded aposteriori knowledge on the basis that his senses are deceiving and it is not a credible way to base one's beliefs. (Descartes, Pg.19). On the other end of the spectrum, apriori knowledge ,which is an understanding based on reasoning, is a more efficient way of explaining the method of doubt presented by Descartes.

Method of Doubt Step One

On the journey to find truth to base all thought upon,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a belief that all questions have a scientific or mathematical answer; Rene Descartes in his search for solutions used principles that were already known and sets out to establish specific knowledge or truths. One of his most startling revelations is outlined in his writing “Discourse on the Method IV.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes states that he is certain that he is a thinking think. All thinking beings have ideas. These ideas must have a starting point, a place that these ideas were formed, that these ideas came from. Descartes then continues to explain that although people can be deceived by their senses and their ideas, why would God allow us to be deceived by our senses? For it is this God that has given us these senses and has given us this Earth. If the existence of God is false, then how do we know if we are truly being deceived? This matter of deception is something that Descartes constantly relates back too. He does this in order to provide a starting point so that he can then use deductive reasoning to reach a conclusion. Descartes claims that the cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the idea has objective reality (formal reality meaning what something actually is and objective reality meaning how that something appears to us using our sense). Descartes explains how he, and us, all have an idea of God in our minds. This idea must have come from somewhere. This he explains using deductive reasoning. We have an idea of God, let A represent this idea, and we can say that the actual God can be represented using B. The idea of God (A) must be caused by something, which is at least as perfect or real as the actual God (B). The…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes First Meditation: What Can be Called into Doubt is the first of the six total meditations. He opens this meditation by restating his desire to have only true beliefs. He proposes to systematically follow a process of skeptic doubt. His doubt is not one of simply common sense, though,…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first premise is Descartes brings into this argument is that he can only know something about the external world, arithmetic, and geometry only if he can know that there is not an evil spirit deceiving him (Meditations, pg. 15-16). In other words, Descartes is trying to get at the fact that this so to say God is giving him false perception of the external world, and deceiving him in what he thought he knew was certain. Descartes conception of knowledge is broken into different parts one being truths that can only be known by reason alone, also those that are not known by reason alone, and the other is the empirical part in the natural sciences (Ludwig, 2017).…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I shall argue that Descartes’ argument for scepticism, (Cartesian doubt) conveyed in his First Meditation through three stages of doubt, is the most compelling, and evaluate the reasons for this being so. • Written as a means for us to better understand what we know, not necessarily as a way for Descartes to discuss his own views on why we should be skeptical about everything, however the criticisms the Meditations produced can also be contested. To this extent, Descartes’ argument is most compelling as – despite the obvious criticisms – there are clearly still some elements which remain ambiguous or open to further discussion. In essence, within his first meditation concerning doubt, Descartes argues that we can be skeptical of a number of things, as our ideas of knowledge and existence itself could potentially be brought into question.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yweah

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Now that we know humans are the only ones with minds that can think we can look at Descartes’s method of doubt. Even as a young man, as explained by Rosenstand, “Descartes felt that he was destined to change the course of science and philosophy. One night he had a persistent dream: he was going to invent a new science” (THC 223). He came up with six meditations of…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes (1596-1650), a French philosopher and mathematician, is best known for his Meditations of Philosophy. This form of philosophy is a body of work in which he attempts to wipe away all his presumptions, rebuilding his knowledge from the ground up, and accepting as true only those claims which are absolutely certain. It was essential that the foundations to his beliefs were solid; if any one of them were at all in doubt, he would lose credibility for his entire structure of knowledge. Thus, Descartes created a method in which he would eliminate those beliefs which he could not be entirely certain of. He called this method – the Method of Doubt. By using the Method of Doubt, Descartes questioned everything that…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ontology and God

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Descartes’ Methodic doubt (Meditation 1) leads him down into the depths of skepticism by abstaining from any belief that is not entirely certain and indubitable. After he doubts sense perceptions, whether he is awake or dreaming (dream argument), and whether we can be sure of any belief in view of Evil Genie argument, withholding assent from (doubt) dubious, uncertain opinions, he finds him assenting to the one and only truth that cannot be doubted: he is thinking (Meditation 2). From there he offers an argument for God’s existence (Meditation 3).…

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes recognized, like most people do, that many of the beliefs he held onto throughout his life were discovered to be false later on. He also understood that it was very likely many of his current beliefs were false as well, and he just hadn’t realized it yet. Descartes came to the conclusion that the only way to rid of these suspected false beliefs was to first disbelieve everything. His strategy was to first remove all existing beliefs, examine each belief carefully, and only reaccept those beliefs which he could not doubt. Upon completing this task, he would only believe in infallibly true things.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Meditations on First Philosophy, we find Descartes at a point trying to suspend all beliefs that he held from his youth by destroying his unstable house of knowledge to build a more concrete foundation of certainty. In an attempt to rid himself of skepticism of his own beliefs, Descartes devises the method of doubt to eliminate all his current beliefs that could not possibly be true, leaving him only with the things in which he could be certain of. In this, Descartes doubts all and formulates skeptical hypothesis in pursuit of certainty. In each faculty, there is a set of beliefs one might claim to have knowledge on. Everything that can be doubted is discarded; everything that remains goes through a more powerful skeptical hypothesis until only the truth remains. In this, he examines all aspects of the question and proceeds in an orderly manner to be certain that nothing has been omitted. He uses the argument of deceptions in our perceptions, the proposal that all our experiences may be dreams, and that God or an evil demon may be attempting to deceive us.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays