Preview

Differences between American and British Politics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences between American and British Politics
PARLIAMENT

Parliamentary and Presidential systems

Systems of gov't can be classified as either parliamentary or presidential. The terms refer to the type of relationship between the executive and the legislature.
In parliamentary systems, the executive and the legislature are interconnected. There is no strict separation of powers. The gov't (executive) is normally chosen from the representatives of the majority party (or coalition group, if no single party has a majority) elected to legislature (the Parliament or assembly). The government is accountable for its actions to the legislature and it is dependent upon the continued support of the legislature to remain in office.
In presidential systems the legislature and executive are distinct (a clear separation of powers). The head of the executive, the President, is chosen by the electorate rather than by the legislature. Presidents do not sit in, and cannot normally be removed by, the legislature. The President acts as head of government and as ceremonial head of state.
Most European countries have parliamentary systems whereas the USA has the best known example of a presidential system. Presidential systems can also be found in Latin American states and in some Asian and African countries. Describing a system of gov't as 'presidential', however, does not necessarily that the country has a president rather than a monarch as its head of state. Ireland and Germany, for example, both have presidents as heads of state but they both operate parliamentary systems of gov't.

Differences between parliamentary and presidential systems

The UK
The USA
The executive and the legislature are tightly linked. The executive - the gov't ministers - sit in one of the two Houses of Parliament (the Commons or the Lords). Ministers take part in debate and vote together with the other members of Parliament.
The executive is not independent of Parliament - the HoCs can overthrow the gov't by a vote of no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The executive—the cabinet of ministers headed by the prime minister, who is the head of government—is usually drawn from the party holding the most seats in the Commons; the monarch usually asks the leader of the majority party to be prime minister.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The executive is made up of the Prime Minister (PM) acting in place on the monarch and a group of ministers known as the PMs Cabinet. All cabinet members (including the PM) are members’ of the Privy Council and must also be members of the Commons or the Lord’s, by convention most being from the Commons. Therefore the executive is borne out of the legislature and directly accountable to it. The executive has many functions, such as the power of patronage which is vested in the PM, the setting of the agenda for government and the prioritising of legislation. The close union between the executive and the legislature is prima facie, a potential for abuse as liberal democratic theory calls for a separation between powers.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important to understand the structure of the parliamentary system within which the machinery of government operates. Parliament is known as a bi-cameral legislature where by decision making autonomy resides with the lower house. The House of Commons and the House of Lords exists as a check upon the powers exerted by respective governments thou right it’s debating and ratification functions. In theory, the bi-cameral legislature in British political system exists to ensure that policy and legislation is created democratically and secondly to protect the country from autocracy or the emergence of dictatorships. Although it could be argued that both of these functions of parliament have been apparent in recent history. In this essay I aim to answer the question to what extent is parliament an effective constraint on the executive.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Britain Government

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Prime minister leads the cabinet, which excersises the executive power of the Crown. The Parliament is the Supreme legislative power and its representatives seats for five years unless it is dissolved by specific causes. This parliament has two Houses:…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A presidential system detaches the executive and legislative body in order to implement checks and balances to restrict the powers between both functions of the government. The president,…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A parliamentary system is a system of governing in which there is a close interrelationship between the Prime Minister and the parliament (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). A presidential system is a system of governing in which the president and congress each separately derive their authority from being elected by the people, and has a fixed term of office (Mintz, Close, Croci 349). When dealing with the strengths of a parliamentary system, we must first consider responsible government. Responsible government is when the political executive is accountable to parliament for its actions and mist retain the support of the elected members to remain in office (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). Of course, in the presidential system, there is no form of responsible government. This to me is a weakness of presidential systems. There are three…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PESTLE Analysis of UK

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages

    ensures adequate distribution of power between the executive branch led by the prime minister, the bicameral legislature…

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's government has a presidential - parliamentary system which consists of a dual executive with a president who is the head of state and a prime…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three different types of regimes around the world. The first is a parliamentary regime which develops all power fused together. The executive branch and the legislative branch are combined and brought together into one. Secondly, having a presidential regime leads to a separation of power. There is no fusion of power whatsoever within this regime. The United States of America is a perfect example of having a presidential regime. The executive leader, known as the president, is voted upon the office. Lastly, having a semi-presidential regime leads to a shared power. The president still exists, but he is not the only one with the power to the state. Alongside is a prime minister and a cabinet, chosen by the president. All together they share responsibility for the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government sits in Parliament and the law Lords sit in the House of Lords, there is no strict separation of powers.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three branches of government are very important components to determine comparison between the parliamentary system and the presidential system. The parliamentary system and presidential system of government has the same body but they differ in terms of the division of powers. In a parliamentary system, the executive body is divided into two sections "dignified" and "efficient". “Dignified” or ceremonial leadership centers upon the head of state, “efficient” leadership rests with a team of ministers, headed by Prime Minister and accountable to parliament (Abdul Rashid Moten & Syed Serajul Islam, 2011). President or monarch is a head of states while Prime Minister becomes head of government. In UK, the Prime Minister is the real power of executive whereas the highest member of executive in US is the President. In the UK constitution, the Queen is the head of the three main branches of the government. The Queen has responsible as "the Queen in Parliament" in which he played a role in the legislation concerned with his approval towards a bill that was enacted by the parliament. The Queen also serves as chairman of the State (executive). In generally, the Queen has a very limited jurisdiction in the constitution. Most executive roles held by the Prime Minister. It is called a rubber stamp. The role of the monarch in parliamentary system is merely symbolic and…

    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays