Preview

Differences Between Romeo And Juliet Play And Movie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Romeo And Juliet Play And Movie
It is quite remarkable how Shakespeare’s play of Romeo and Juliet can be so much better than its Movie production. Although the movie production had better technology it left out so many major parts. The play on the other hand had set a better mood, plot and details which made it more interesting and dramatic and therefore a better presentation. The play is set in a fictional city called Verona where two families live. These two families have been having a feud for generations.
One major difference between the play and the movie actually occurs in the mood set in the two. An example is the marriage scene where Romeo and Juliet are in a very serious mood. The reader can tell this from the way the two relate to each other. Romeo says that the holy words the friar speaks can make something without an equal, which is a very intelligent thing to say. In the movie however the two are kissing and giggling the whole time, this portrays a bad image as it shows as though the movie wanted people to think that the characters wanted to look like fools and children and that they could do anything the way its normally done, thus making this scene not look very realistic. In real life young adults take issues seriously because they know it’s a major step in life.
Another major difference is in
…show more content…
Though there are some similarities there is some difference also. One difference is that the movie that stars Leonardo Whiting and Olivia Hussey is set in the modern day. Though this takes place in the present time, the speech and tone is of the original script. The actors therefore speak the same way William Shakespeare would have spoken back in 1500s. These two young actors also made an impact in playing their roles as Romeo and Juliet because the film was very popular among the young

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann reenactments of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet are wonderful and was and still is very famous for its use of words and the plot of the play itself. All though there are many differences between these two films there are many similarities to the reenactments. The characters from the films had many things in common the character were very funny with their acting and put emotions into their part. The plot line between the two films was very different but had many similarities, the plot was the same by the Montague and Capulet running into each other and then starting an argument leading to a conflict many moments later. The family feud is a strong and very hostile emotion between these two…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 1968 film of “Romeo and Juliet” is not completely different from the 1998 film but they do have many differences. Although both films kept to the original story of the play, the 1968 film was more of a traditional interpretation than the 1998 film.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann have both directed a film version of Romeo and Juliet very well, but a movie can not capture everything from the book. So, which movie portrayed the book better? There are aspects of both movies that portray the book better. For example, there could one movie could show the character's personality better than the other one or one movie can show the city of Verona better than the other movie did. Small details of a scene could make a scene in one movie a lot better than on the other. Even the smallest of things like the way the characters are dressed could impact the entire scene. In some scenes, the Baz Luhrmann movie portrayed the book better because of the small details…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between the play and the movie is the Person Vs. Society because it’s only involving The capulets, the Montagues and the people around them. When Juliet saw Romeo Dead, she commited suicide.She had not thought of what could possibly could go wrong. Instead ,this problem had caused a sentimental shock to society and both families to be heartbroken. But had stopped the feuding.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original play by Shakespeare and Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s interpretation of the play are all different versions of the classical tragic story of Romeo and Juliet. When reading the play or seeing Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s film we can observe various differences between them. Juliet, being one of the dominating characters of this story can be seen to be recontextualised differently through her personality, looks and role in society.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settings, however, are very different. The play takes in place in Italy back in Shakespeare’s times, but the movie takes place in the 1990s at a high school in Seattle, Washington. The language, clothing, and technology in the movie is much more modern than in the play. Another thing that is different is how the patriarchal society in the play (which can be seen with lines such as Petruchio’s, 'Women are made to bear, and so are you') changed into more of an equal society in the movie.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Comparison of the Settings and the Moods in the Play and the Movie Versions of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet…

    • 864 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters do have some differences, since they are created in another place and time. For example, Doc is more helpless than Friar Laurence; Det. Shrank shows the dark side (not the wiser side) of the law; the religious side of Maria and Juliet comes from a different motivation. There are also other possibilities for comparison--are the characters Anybodys and Action similar to Shakespeare's clowns in the way they comment on society? Are Rosalia, Velma and the other women Romeo's Rosalind--stereotypes of women by naive men?…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Films are made with the directors different personal opinions based on the original source. In the movie version of Romeo and Juliet (1996, Leonardo DiCaprio), the above illustrates this perfectly. For this essay, I will discuss some of the contrasts between the original play, and the film. I hope you find this essay informative.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primarily, casting decisions had a huge impact on character portrayal and the success of the movie. Romeo was played by a "pretty boy" in both movies to depict sensitivity and youthful attractiveness. Both Leonardo DiCaprio and Leonard Whiting depicted emotions well, but DiCaprio seemed less refined or proper in his movements to put a modern spin on the character. Also, Leonardo DiCaprio's fame aided in the movie's success while Whiting was unheard of in the world of acting. The role of Juliet as played by Olivia Hussey was delicate and graceful. She appeared flawlessly beautiful and fit the classical role perfectly, although her frantic crying fits were played somewhat out of proportion. Claire Danes played the part very well, and was more appropriate for the modern version, her fame aiding in the film's appeal as well. Mercutio was an interesting character in both films, but Harold Perrineau Jr. brought the character's dialogue and actions into today's world. Crazy and loud are some essential ingredients included when most people think about comedy today, and Perrineau depicted these traits to the extreme. His skin color caused the issue of race to be brought up in the movie. It enlightened people into a more modern and open state of mind because black actors were not included in the cast of medieval time films. However, John McEnery's performance in the 1968 version was appropriate for the movie and time setting. He acted like a jester would in…

    • 1907 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's is one of the most read writers ever and his writing was so successful that not just one group of people liked it. He did this by relating to his audience using universal truths. . Human emotions are not something that change over time and they are also known as universal truths; love, hate, revenge, and envy are all examples of universal truths. This play was so successful that many other movies have copied the plot but changed the scenery. Over the past 400 years since this play was written the world has changed drastically, but the emotions and feelings in this play have withstood the test of time. This is why the movies, Romeo and Juliet (1996) and West Side Story (1961) were so successful. Shakespeare's play and the two movies modeled after it have many similarities and many differences, but one thing remains constant in all of them, They all use universal truths to relate to their audiences.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zeffirelli’s and luhrmann’s individual movies on the Shakespearean play of Romeo and Juliet, they show a great deal of focus on the theme of conflict, which had occurred mainly between the two rivals of the play, the Montagues and the Capulets. Although the movies are based on the same play, they differ quite a lot. Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet was set in the 1600s, which was accurate for the play. For luhrmann’s version, he set the movie in the modern era which inevitably causes a drastic difference between the two movies but they both focused their themes of conflict on the help of sound effects, costumes, and visual movements.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From watching the older and more modern version of the killing of Mercutio and Tybalt there are obvious differences, as well as hidden ones. The comparison is between the Zeffirelli version and the more modern version. Watching these movies, paying close attention is important because it is not just the scenery and which characters are played by whom, but what the director was trying to portray in this scene. Both these versions were very different and it is obvious that in both cases the fight probably meant different things or played a separate significant role in each movie.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These works of drama and film have many similarities and differences. To compare them, we have to think about the different time background and different society situations of each. In the original Shakespearean comedy, the main setting place is 1590s Padua, a city in Italy. In the movie, it is late 1990s American at a high school named “Padua High School.” In consideration of ages and identification, there are some dissimilar details between the two versions. For example, the main topic from the beginning to the end in Shakespeare’s play is about marriage, while the main topic of the movie is about a romantic relationship in a high school environment. However, although the type of romantic situation is different, essentially the main idea…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Appropriations are often a reflection of our time’. This can be seen with Shakespeare’s play ‘Romeo and Juliet’, a play which was written almost 400 years ago. Although modern appropriations have been made; with Franco Zeffirelli’s, Elizabethan version (1968), and Baz Luhrmann’s (1996) more contemporary version, the essence of the play, and why audiences appreciate it remain the same. In order to highlight this, comparisons between the ‘Ballroom’ and ‘Balcony’ scenes of each film can be made. Although the setting, costumes and props are very different, the underlying themes remain true to Shakespeare’s original text.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays