Endoscopic Grading of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Essay Example
Endoscopic Grading of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Forrest classification is a classification of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage used for purposes of comparison and in selecting patients for endoscopic treatment.
-------------------------------------------------
Forrest classification
Acute hemorrhage * Forrest I a (Spurting hemorrhage) * Forrest I b (Oozing hemorrhage)
Signs of recent hemorrhage * Forrest II a (Visible vessel) * Forrest II b (Adherent clot) * Forrest II c (Hematin on ulcer base)
Lesions without active bleeding * -------------------------------------------------
Forrest III (Lesions without signs of recent hemorrhage)
-------------------------------------------------
Application
Forrest classification is instrumental when stratifying patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage into high and low risk categories for mortality. It is also a significant method of prediction of the risk of rebleeding and very often is used for evaluation of the endoscopic intervention modalities[3]. A prospective controlled study revealed that "Forrest criteria are essential for proper planning of endoscopic therapy and urgent surgery in bleeding peptic ulcers.”
Presence of shock and type 1 bleeding peptic ulcer carries a rebleed risk of 80% and presence of non-bleeding visible vessel predisposes the patient to a 50% risk of further bleed. Ulcer with a clean base (type 3) and ulcers with red or dark blue spots (type 2c) rarely re-bleed during hospitalization. Bleeding peptic ulcer in the posterior duodenal bulb and proximal gastric lesser curve are located near major vessels and are associated with higher re-bleed rates and are more likely to cause death
Predictors of Mortality
Patient characteristic that have been reported to be associated with increase in mortality are:
Age, onset of bleeding, co-morbidity, hypotension and shock at presentation, fresh bleed in Ryle's tube aspirate, haemoglobin level at presentation and on
Forrest classification is a classification of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage used for purposes of comparison and in selecting patients for endoscopic treatment.
-------------------------------------------------
Forrest classification
Acute hemorrhage * Forrest I a (Spurting hemorrhage) * Forrest I b (Oozing hemorrhage)
Signs of recent hemorrhage * Forrest II a (Visible vessel) * Forrest II b (Adherent clot) * Forrest II c (Hematin on ulcer base)
Lesions without active bleeding * -------------------------------------------------
Forrest III (Lesions without signs of recent hemorrhage)
-------------------------------------------------
Application
Forrest classification is instrumental when stratifying patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage into high and low risk categories for mortality. It is also a significant method of prediction of the risk of rebleeding and very often is used for evaluation of the endoscopic intervention modalities[3]. A prospective controlled study revealed that "Forrest criteria are essential for proper planning of endoscopic therapy and urgent surgery in bleeding peptic ulcers.”
Presence of shock and type 1 bleeding peptic ulcer carries a rebleed risk of 80% and presence of non-bleeding visible vessel predisposes the patient to a 50% risk of further bleed. Ulcer with a clean base (type 3) and ulcers with red or dark blue spots (type 2c) rarely re-bleed during hospitalization. Bleeding peptic ulcer in the posterior duodenal bulb and proximal gastric lesser curve are located near major vessels and are associated with higher re-bleed rates and are more likely to cause death
Predictors of Mortality
Patient characteristic that have been reported to be associated with increase in mortality are:
Age, onset of bleeding, co-morbidity, hypotension and shock at presentation, fresh bleed in Ryle's tube aspirate, haemoglobin level at presentation and on