The reevaluation of a businesses assets is defined as the way in which change values from book to fair value. If there is every any considerable economic changes in the market the process is required to compensate for that. If a company bought a building 5 years ago and due to market value there was a real estate boom, the property can be reevaluated to fair market value. Under IFRS, when an asset is reevaluated all assets in that class must be treated with the same valuation method. This process keeps evaluations consistent in the company (Work Plan,…
Some steps which both the FASB and the IASB have taken in regards to moving the fair value measurement for the financial instruments have come a long way. FASB and ISAB are each individually, for the majority moving forward towards a fair value measurement for the financial instruments areas. Each believes in the fair value measurement rule to be a much more accurate description of how a company’s financial documents stack up. Of course, there is always going to be separate opinions and when it comes to the agreeing on every aspect within the financial world. However, in order to come to a conclusion between their difference, the decision was made to come together and disclose all of the fair value information off the financial statements, and on the notes as well. In addition, they both are willing to allow companies to record their financial estimates and values at a fair value within their financial statements, rather than require them to have this information. Even though utilizing the fair value is simply a substitution from the historical cost method.…
Now reevaluation of the plant assets are defined when the process of the change in values from book value then to fair…
The subsequent valuations are consistent with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards no. 157, defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.”…
2. The company should report the asset at its historical cost of $420,000, not its current value. The main reasons for this position are (1) at the date of acquisition, cost reflects fair value; (2) historical cost involves actual, not hypothetical transactions, and as a result is extremely reliable; and (3) gains and losses should not be anticipated but should be recognized when the asset is sold.…
1.) On January 1, 2010, Ott Co. sold goods to Flynn Company. Flynn signed a zero-interest-bearing note requiring payment of $80,000 annually for seven years. The first payment was made on January 1, 2010. The prevailing rate of interest for this type of note at date of issuance was 10%. Ott should record sales revenue in January 2010 of what?…
Fair value measurements provide users of financial statements with an accurate picture of the value of a company’s assets. Both IFRS and GAAP require firms to include information regarding fair value measurements practices in the notes of financial statements. Under either system, companies will be required to report assets at either book value or fair value, depending on the situation. As a general rule of thumb, all assets in the same class must receive the same valuation treatment. In regards to the value of receivables, IFRS uses a two-tiered method that first analyzes individual receivables, and then looks at receivables as a whole to determine if there is any impairment. (KPMG, 2012).…
1. (Exhibit 1: Total Product) Between points A and B the marginal product of labor is:…
Fair Value measurements provide users of financial statements with an accurate picture of the value of a company’s assets. As part of this ongoing and complex cooperative effort, there is currently a joint project between the FASB and the IASB to develop a common measurement and reporting structure for fair value accounting (Metzger, n.d.). Fair value accounting has been around for many years and has been used for many asset and liability accounts. Due to the expanding use and misuse of financial reporting, the FASB and the IASB have worked to implement a common approach. The first step is disclosure of fair value information in the notes. The second step is the fair value option, which permits, but does not require, companies to record some types of financial instruments at fair values in the financial statements (Kimmel, Weygandt, & Kieso, 2013). Currently IFRS uses a two-tier approach and GAAP does not use the same approach. IFRS and GAAP still differ in the criteria used to determine how to record a factoring transaction. Looking forward, finding common ground and aligned…
ASC 820-10-35-12 fair value if the asset is determined based on the price that would be received in a current transaction to sell the asset assuming that the asset would be used with other assets as a group and that those assets would be available to market participants.…
Fair value bases measurements on the price that would be received to sell assets or transfer liabilities in an orderly…
Penman (2007, p.34) in his research same as Laux and Leuz (2009, p.827) in their article referred to fair value either as defined in IFRS or in FAS 157 – both similarly identifying it as a price at which an asset could be sold or a liability could be paid to an independent, unrelated and well-informed stakeholder at the current date. Whereas historical cost accounting, as mentioned by Marshall, McManus and Viele (2011, p.48), responds to cost principle and indicates assets and liabilities at their original acquisition price not taking into account increases or decreases in their market value.…
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement applies to IFRSs that require or permit fair value measurements or disclosures and provides a single IFRS framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurement. The Standard defines fair value on the basis of an 'exit price' notion and uses a 'fair value hierarchy', which results in a market-based, rather than entity-specific, measurement.…
Gains derived from one-off transactions are never a good indication of a firm’s inherent income generating ability. Sale of assets for one is never repeatable. Similarly, by including a firm’s gains from assets and liabilities, both realized and unrealized, it brings into question how repeatable such earnings can be. Controllability of earnings refers to how much control a firm has over its earnings; Exchange rate differences and market fluctuations affect the valuation of a firm’s assets and liabilities and since fair value accounting states for such changes to be included in a firm’s earnings, the control a firm has over its earnings seem to have waned under the susceptibility of market conditions. The final aspect of quality refers to those earnings that are cash sales based; Sales that can be deposited into the bank. Once again, this aspect is compromised given the large uncertainty of the actual collectivity of the earnings reported.…
SCOPE OF THE STATEMENT Concepts Statement no. 7 includes general principles that govern accountants’ use of present value, especially when the amount of future cash flows, their timing, or both, are uncertain. This might happen when a business sells an asset and receives payments over time. The statement is limited to measurement issues (how much) and does not address recognition issues (when or if). It does not specify when fresh-start measurements are appropriate. Rather, FASB expects to decide whether a particular situation requires a fresh-start measurement or some other accounting response on a project-by-project basis. Concepts Statement no. 7 applies only to measurements at initial recognition, to fresh-start measurements and to amortization techniques based on future cash flows. CPAs should not apply it to measurements based on the amount of cash or other assets an entity pays or receives or on observations of fair values in the marketplace. If such transactions or observations exist, CPAs should base measurements on them, not on future cash flows.A CPA who uses accounting measurements at initial recognition and when making fresh-start measurements should try to capture the elements that would make up a market price (fair value) if one existed. The marketplace is the final arbiter of asset and liability values. The objective of using present value is to estimate the likely market price if one existed. The statement introduces an expected cash flow approach focusing on the explicit assumptions about the range of possible cash flows and their respective probabilities. This means a business would evaluate the cash flows it expected to receive from a particular asset and assign a probability to each one. Concepts Statement no. 7 describes techniques for estimating the fair value of liabilities, taking into account the entity’s credit standing at initial recognition and when making fresh-start measurements, as required under GAAP. The statement also describes…