Preview

four corporate social responsibility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
four corporate social responsibility
Two main theories dominate discussion of corporate responsibility: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. Stockholder theory maintains that profit for stock owners represents the main moral obligation of the corporation. Stakeholder theory takes the view that groups other than the stockholders, such as the community at large, have a vested interest in the management of the corporation. The types of corporate social responsibility typically align with the stakeholder theory that corporations have responsibilities beyond profit.
Environment
Harvard professor and business theorist Michael Porter notes in his seminal text, "On Competition," that businesses need to operate in ways that are not “environmentally wasteful.” Once considered the cost of doing business, pollution and rampant consumption of resources now represent a social and political concern on the global level. Activists encourage corporations to voluntarily alter operating procedures to reduce environmental impact, and government has stepped in to regulate carbon emissions and apply stringent rules to waste disposal.
Fiscal
Even under a stakeholder model, finances play a central role. Businesses that do not yield a profit do not stay in business. Fiscal responsibility, however, extends beyond mere profit generation. The economic catastrophe brought on by the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008, along with several multibillion dollar Ponzi schemes, has highlighted the need for ethical and transparent bookkeeping. Fiscal responsibility also means using the most efficient procedures to minimize wasted capital. This can translate to anything from new equipment or manufacturing processes to using software that streamlines data processing
Human Rights
The globalization of manufacturing has placed corporations in a precarious position with regards to human rights. Even corporations that assemble products domestically frequently purchase parts produced overseas, where child labor and lax safety conditions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of time men fought with sticks and stones. World War I brought a step change in technology with the occurrence of poison gas, machine guns, and armored tanks. Previous to World War I foot soldiers and horses were used to advance on the enemy. Chemical warfare had never been used before World War I. With this deadly and often inhuman use of chemical warfare, those exposed died painful and excruciating deaths. The machine gun was invented in 1884 but wasn't used in warfare until World War I. This invention allowed for rapid firing and therefore was able to kill or injure many more enemies during a single battle. The armored tank led to the advancement of heavy gun fire while protecting the gunman. Poison gas, machine guns, and…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the case study and the e-Activity, determine two (2) key reasons why people value the customer service that Nordstrom provides. Examine Nordstrom’s current corporate social responsibility activities, and suggest one (1) additional action that the company could take to further strengthen its corporate social responsibility efforts.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    he stakeholder theorists smell blood. Scandals at Enron, Global Crossing, ImClone, Tyco International and WorldCom, concerns about the independence of accountants who are charged with auditing financial statements, and questions about the incentive schema and investor recommendations at Credit Suisse First Boston and iMerrill Lynch have all provided rich fodder for those who question the premise of shareholder supremacy. Many observers have claimed that these scandals serve as evidence of the failure of the shareholder theory— that managers primarily have a duty to maximize shareholder returns — and the victory of stakeholder theory, which says that a manager 's duty is to balance the shareholders ' financial interests against the interests of other stakeholders such as employees, customers and the local community, even if it reduces shareholder returns. Before attempting to declare a victor, however, it is helpful to consider what the two theories actually say and what they do not say. Both the shareholder ' and stakeholder theories are normative theories of corporate social responsibility, dictating what a corporation 's role ought to be. By extension, they can also be seen as normative theories of business ethics, since executives and managers of a corporation should make decisions according to the "right" theory. Unfortunately, the two theories are very much at odds regarding what is "right." Shareholder theory asserts that shareholders advance capital to a company 's managers, who are supposed to spend corporate limds only in ways that have been authorized by the shareholders. As Milton Friedman wrote, "There is one and only one social responsibility of business — to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it ... engages in open and free competition, without deception or fraud."On the other hand, stakeholder theory^ asserts that managers have a duty to both the…

    • 4849 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stakeholder theory defines the main objective of each and every organization. It is to be able to maximize the wealth of the firm by increasing its stock price. By defining the wealth of the firm, it is also defining the stockholder who own shares of the company. The parallelism of the stock price’s value and the stockholder can be seen in this theory. As the stock price goes up, so does the individual owner’s net worth.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mcdonalds Ethical Criticism

    • 4844 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Svoboda, S. and Hart, S. (1995). ‘Case A: A McDonald’s Environmental Strategy’, Pollution Prevention in Corporate Strategy, March. Retrieved from http://www.p2pays.org/ref/12/11858.pdf on 12/10/2005.…

    • 4844 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The goal of a firm and a financial manager should involve maximizing the wealth of a firm’s shareholders through achieving the highest possible value for the firm (Block 13). It is a vital task to oversee properly as a financial manager, and while the manager cannot directly control the firm’s stock price, it can act consistently with the desires of the shareholder. Accounting, financial and other irregularities can erode consumer confidence that says the system will operate in the best interests of shareholders, taxpayers and other constituents (Hintzen 2003). Therefore, ethical practices must be upheld to convey confidence to your clients.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate social responsibility has been a controversy topic for many economists. Some think that a corporate does not have any social responsibility while others believe a corporate does have some social responsibility as it exists in the society and is using the resources of the society. Milton Friedman and Charles Handy are the two typical representatives for these two contrast ideas which are reflected through the two famous articles “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit” by Milton Friedman and “What’s a business for” by Charles Handy.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    nvnvn

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The idea of the stockholder theory does not matches with the idea of corporate social responsibility at the cost of the stakeholder. Some may argue that goods provided to society in a time of need builds further allegiance to a corporation.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leal GG, Fa MC, Pascola JV. 2003. Using environmental management systems to increase firms’ competitiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility…

    • 5842 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Drivers of Csr

    • 5620 Words
    • 23 Pages

    References: Abelson, P. (2002). Lectures in public economics 4th ed. Sydney: Applied Economics. Adams, C.A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2), 223–250. Bansal, P., and Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Review 13(4), 717–736. Berle, A.A., and Means, G.C. (1968 [1932]). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Biddle, D. (2000). Recycling for profit. In Harvard Business Review on business and the environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Firing back against the tyranny of the market. New York: The New Press. Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press. Daly, H.E. (1997). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press. Deetz, S. (1991). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: New York State University of New York Press.…

    • 5620 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Find two examples of companies, products or organizations which display social responsibility: one which displays good social responsibility and one which displays poor social responsibility. For each, explain why you have this opinion of these firms.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    business ethics

    • 319 Words
    • 1 Page

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is now on the global agenda. The USA, the European Union (EU) and a number of developing countries are all looking to corporations to help address issues such as inequality, health and unemployment. CSR is based on the concept of ‘stakeholder democracy’, which is premised on the notion that organisations are made up of a number of different stakeholders with a multiplicity of interests, all of whom should have an influence over the organisation’s activities. This concept is supposed to preclude the privileging of any one interest above the rest (Zadek 2001). However, the question remains of how much influence different stakeholders will have in practice. Thompson & McHugh (1995) suggest that stakeholder democ- racy is fundamentally unrealistic about the distribution of decision-making power inside organisations, because it is the owners who hold the key ‘stakes’ in the organisation and ultimately it will be their interests that predominate. Zadek (1993) also argues that shareholder interests are always likely to predominate, favouring financial over non-financial outcomes, with markets tend- ing to reward bad rather than good behaviour,…

    • 319 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tony Fernandes, CEO of Kuala Lumpur-based Air Asia started a low-cost airline at a time when everyone thought he would fail. He placed high emphasis on his workforce and flexible HR strategies. During the past few years, Air Asia has become one of the best low-cost airlines in Asia and it has also boosted its CSR efforts. Fernandes' basic sense of CSR starts with his people: Air Asia was one of the first airlines in Asia to hire female pilots. He says that his staff are his best asset and that he constantly uses their suggestions to improve and innovate within the company.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a. Corporate Social Responsibility is a management concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders. CSR is generally understood as being the way through which a company achieves a balance of economic, environmental and social imperatives (“Triple-Bottom-Line- Approach”), while at the same time addressing the expectations of shareholders and stakeholders. In this sense it is important to draw a distinction between CSR, which can be a strategic business management concept, and charity, sponsorships or philanthropy. Even though the latter can also make a valuable contribution to poverty reduction, will directly enhance the reputation of a company and strengthen its brand, the concept of CSR clearly goes beyond that.…

    • 3759 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays