Group 4: Development of Civilization and a Person- Document 1 ( Freud thinks that as civilization progresses it affects the development of the person.)…
S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…
Freud also felt that religion was just an escape and a misleading notion which was an idea that should not be spread to people, that religion was a drug of the masses. His faith was fully in the minds ability to access its unconscious thoughts, thus avoiding any psychiatric disorder. Freud viewed the unconscious as a collection of images, thoughts and experiences that an individual refused to process, which led to psychiatric problems. (Wikipedia, 2010)…
Both Lewis and Freud have somewhat cut-and-dry theories with little room for adjustment. Both authors tenaciously argue for their personal beliefs while giving the reader no option to stand in between. To them it is simple—God or no God. Though Lewis and Freud disagree about whether or not God exists, they both stress the importance of the existence of a higher power and agree about the importance…
Religion has held an important role in society since the beginning of civilisation and it has such power over people’s minds and shape the way our world developed. Whilst some sociological theories such as functionalist sees religion as performing a positive function in society as it can lead to social solidarity, integrating people into society, other sociological theories such as Marxist and Feminist totally disagrees with this and would argue that religion leads to instability and conflict in society.…
In “The Future of an Illusion” by Sigmund Freud, Freud disagrees with the notion that the masses accept and should accept the renunciation of their instincts in order to form a society, while the leaders who impose these limits on instincts are not constrained (Freud 8). The idea that the individual has to give up some aspect of their behavior, whether it be their instincts like Freud suggests, is additionally proposed in theories of creating a government. The idea of a social contract, which is the notion that the individual has to give up certain rights in order to form a society as a whole, is similar to Freud’s proposition. These limits, though bemoaned by Freud, can be seen as necessary to form a society. Without certain constraints on…
Freud and Nietzsche doesn’t believe there is a god. Nietzsche once said “God is dead.” and he believed God never existed. Freud believed that religion is created for someone to believe they are protected.…
Freud, S. 1930. ‘Civilization and Its Discontents’ M. Hechter and C. Horne (eds) 2003. Theories of Social Order: A Reader. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press: 101-11…
Freud thinks that man created religion to keep order from chaos. Contrarily, Hitchens thinks religion creates, and actually is, chaos. Hitchens points out all the wars that were caused by religion in his book in order to support his theory. Freud’s general viewpoint of religion is that it was there to help people to go about their daily lives, in a moral and ethical way. Freud believed that without religion in place people would go around committing crimes, because if there was no fear of the possibility of hell, or a losing a chance at heaven, nothing would stop them from doing unmoral things. Throughout the book, God is Not Great, Hitchens talks about Freud, and clearly holds him in high regard; much like he does with Marx. “Freud made the obvious point that religion suffered from one incurable deficiency: it was too clearly derived from our own desire to escape from or survive death.” (God Is Not Great, 103). Hitchens seems to agree with Freud, further supporting the fact that religion was human mad. So Freud believes that religion has done its work and has helped people, but it is now ready for a transition to a next step. The next step in Freud’s eyes is psychoanalysis. Furthermore, Freud never comes out right and says that he is an atheist, nor does he recognize the statement throughout his text. Contrarily, Hitchens openly states that he is an atheist.…
Every major school of thought has its authors, its influencers, and its divine chosen, if you will. These men and women influence everything from macro economics and political science to the physical sciences of the known universe. Without the contribution of these grand individuals, academics would be destined to their origins, they would cease to develop and many would not even exist. So it is on the existence of these great minds in which we invest our confidence for an ever-growing world. There is one topic in particular, though, whose existence and development is greatly attributed to these individuals: religion.…
Freud's view of civilization emerges from his understanding of the struggle between Eros and Death. Freud expresses the existence of two contrary instincts, Eros and Death, via starting from the speculations on the beginning of life and biological parallels. While Eros preserves the living substance and joins it into larger units, such as societies, Death dissolves these units and brings them back to their primeval state. The death drives appear to be regressive, striving for a return to a less differentiated, less organized state of tensionlessness. In contrast, Eros (which embraces sexual and life-preserving instincts) is progressive in seeking ever more differentiated forms of organized life and even the widening of differences in it as between the organism and its surroundings. Freud explains the life as concurrent or mutually opposing action of, and therefore balance between Eros and death instincts.…
Hill, P. C. (1999). Giving religion away: What the study of religion offers psychology. The…
Many theorists have taken interest in religion for their fascination of its power to influence and shape human personality, behavior and action. Thomas Hobbes is one philosopher who attributed people’s clinging to religion as a logical alternative to find an acceptable explanation for things that are beyond their comprehension such as creation, the nature of things and ethics among others. Earlier philosophers adhered that the conception of religion is an inherent predilection of rational beings such that if lions and oxen have hands and feet, they too would conceive of a god that would look like a lion or an ox.…
When I was getting older, I’ve always had my doubt about religion. I have a question that how people have and choose their religion. Even though Korea have provided a background for Confucianism for many thousands of years, most of people believe in the Christian religion and very popular with it. There are also lots of pseudo-religions that are trying to cheat other people in order to get money. So while living for about 20 years in Korea, most of people who are on the wrong way forced me to believe in God, or you will go to hell that makes me unpleasant and distrusting about them and God. Nevertheless, there are many devout Christians in Murray who never force me to believe in God so I’m still interested in religion, especially Christianity. I realized that I have a serious prejudice against them. To put it extremely, I thought the person who has a faith in God is weird although most of Christians are devout and nice more than anybody else. My goal in the paper is to reestablish the definition of “religion" to judge whether it is essential or not and resolve my curiosity in my heart. Before you read this paper, I want you to know that this paper is in the side of Christianity although my general topic is “religion.”…
God to answer to or to even have in our lives. Freud is essentially saying we don't…