Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…
The reason type of companies such as brand new companies, family-owned companies, and long-standing companies would need a financial forecast is to develop projected financial statements; a series of pro forma. The information developed by a series of pro forma provide a sort of estimate on inventory, payables, receivables as well as what would be required for profit and borrowing. A projected financial statement provides a kind of advantage in any of the companies listed above as it gives the firm an insight on operations. A pro forma would help guide companies in deciding how to best operate and succeed.…
Michael Huck was discriminated because he was on a wheelchair and didn’t get the same benefit as other humans who are in the back rows. He didn’t have the choice of seats which was available to others so basically for him to watch a movie; he would have to sit in the front row of the theatre. They also said if he wanted to sit at the back rows, he would have to get up but he’s a disability person. He didn’t have the opportunity like others.…
The plaintiffs, Carol and Gary allege that on September 13, 1998, Carol Allen was injured while participating in a recreational softball game, while she was running to first base. She was hit in the head by the shortstop of the opposing team. This game was an adult and slow pitch softball tournament. The teams that were playing in this tournament were part of the Dover Co-Recreational Softball League, (league) and were sponsored by the Amateur Softball Association Inc. (ASA). The games were played on a softball field that was owned by defendant Martel-Roberge American Legion Post #47 (American Legion). The teams were sponsored by defendant Daniel’s Sports Bar and Grill (Daniel’s) and defendant Thompson Imports (Thompson) who also provided t-shirts for the players. Defendant Bollinger Fowler Company (Bollinger) provided liability insurance for the league, ASA, the American Legion, the Daniel’s team and the Thompson team. The plaintiff was playing for the Daniel’s team, and was using a smaller softball made for women to be able to hit more competitively when playing with men, this was an official rule set forth by the ASA. The defendants did not recommend, require, or provide the use of helmets. The ASA official rules are that there be five men and five women for each team, this game consisted of seven men and three women on each team. When Carol Allen was batting for the first time, she hit a ball towards the shortstop. The male player for the Thompson team threw the ball toward first base in order to get the runner Carol Allen out, but instead the ball struck Carol in the head. This caused her cognitive deficiencies including impaired speech.…
The discovery of facts that demonstrate that a valid warrant was unnecessarily broad does not retroactively invalidate the warrant.…
Facts: Maryland police arrested a man named Alonzo Jay King, in 2009 for first and second degree assault charges and booked into the Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where booking personnel took a cheek swab (“buccal swab”) to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA collection Act. The swab was matched up to an unsolved 2003 rape case. The police had collected the 2003 DNA sample from the rape victim who underwent a sexual assault forensic exam. A police detective presented the matching 2009 and 2003 DNA to a grand jury, the grand jury indicted King for first-degree rape. Later in 2009, the detective obtained a search warrant and collected a second DNA sample from King that also matched the 2003 sample.…
The court decided that the removal of the cameras that were placed in the park to collect footage of the deer culling was not in violation of the First Amendment. The reason that it did not violate the First Amendment is because although the park is a public area for all to see and visit, the recordings took place during times that the park was closed to the public. This means that S.H.A.R.K. has not right to the access of the video footage of the deer culling. The court also came to the…
1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…
FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…
* Refers to the ability of reported earnings (income) to predict a company’s future earnings.…
a. Firstly, investors tend to invest in companies with stable earnings rather than one with volatile earnings. With stable earnings, there will be more likely an issuance of dividends and investors could easily predict the company’s future earnings compared to one with unstable earnings. With consistent earnings generated, it gives investors a secured feeling that it will again generate earnings as predicted. Confidence in the growth of rate of earnings is crucial because stable earnings growth further may increase further business prospective and are translated into higher stock and dividend returns. It is also crucial to have stable earnings as the growth in stock price is closely dependent on the growth of its earnings per share, a main indicator which investors used to invest in a company.…
References: Burns, W.J, Merchant, K.A. (2012) The Dangerous Morality of Managing Earnings, retrieved on November 11, 2012, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/sjh11/ACCTG211/HuddartCoursepacketSPRING2009/BrunsMerchant.pdf…
Tony Beasley and Jim Keane, University of Gloucestershire Each year UK companies publish and issue an annual report and audited accounts, which are sent to numerous shareholders and other users. The process may take as long as three months from the end of the companies accounting period. This delay could create problems: investors would be without up to date information and the probability of insider trading is therefore increases the longer the delay between the data being prepared and the accounts being published. For these two reasons the London Stock Exchange requires listed companies to issue Preliminary Profit Announcements or ‘Prelims’. Prelims are brief (usually only about four pages long) announcements, made by companies to the financial markets. They give estimates of the financial performance of the company during the year, and should, in principle at least, represent a summary of the information to be included in the subsequent full annual report and accounts. Tony and Jim had a good knowledge of the literature. Previous research had shown that the release of Prelims had a significant impact on the share price of a company and that stock market analysts ranked Prelims as their most important source of information. Yet, despite this Prelims were relatively lightly regulated by the stock market. They hypothesised that the content of Prelims was more likely to differ from that in the annual accounts the greater the time period between the time that they were released and the publication of the annual accounts. A large sample survey of current company practice was therefore planned. Companies have to issue their Prelims through the Stock Exchange Regulatory News Service (RNS) which controls the dissemination of price-sensitive information to the financial markets. Many large…
Second approach – Forecasting future changes based on company announcements of quarterly earnings that were significantly different from the consensus of analysts’ expectations. After a company announced unexpectedly high or low quarterly earnings, analysts would make revisions to their estimates within the next few days. Numeric considered an earnings surprise significant if the difference between the actual and the consensus forecast of earnings per share was significant if analysts’ estimates were all clustered within three pennies per share. Numeric would look at the significance of an earnings surprise by looking at the reaction of the company’s stock price to the announcement. If it increases, it would signal that the earnings were indicative of good future outcomes for the company.…
1. How is the policy portfolio of Harvard determined? What are the three major asset classes in the portfolio as of May 1999? Internally, by the HMC. The Board of the corp determined the Pol Port, but the mgmt. was permitted to make short-run decisions within certain constraints. HMC, considered 3 things when looking at asset classes: expected future rel returns, volatility of real returns, and the correlation of the real return on each asset class w/ the real return on all other asset classes.…