There are several ways through which internet can be
There are several ways through which internet can be
According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…
The net neutrality debate is examined by first being placed in current day context, followed by an examination of both the affirmative and negative arguments. Focus is placed on defining net neutrality, and analyzing the role market competition plays in ensuring net neutrality. Possible impacts on future innovations involving the internet and its openness are also considered. Based on these examinations, possible government policies and actions that can be implemented are recommended.…
Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…
Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…
The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…
The internet has already changed the way that the world operates today. Presently, everyone has access to the internet everywhere in the world. The internet is used through a variety of purposes, from academia research to business transactions and contacting family. Considering the freedom that the internet provides us, a group of people threatens that freedom of access to the Internet by conflicting with the Net Neutrality. Analyzing this issue from a deontological versus a utilitarian point of view, this paper will show why it is important to keep all the users equal in the Internet. Before we start, we must understand that ethic is all in a matter of perspectives. The interest of the user and content providers versus the interest of the telecommunication companies are different making their priorities opposite. This paper will taking this issue from the viewpoint of the end users of the Internet, not the viewpoint of corporations and Telecommunications Company. We will first discuss deontological views on restrict network neutrality, then utilitarian’s view on open network neutrality comparing it to our present-day applications to prove why utilitarian is a better solution for the present day internet.…
Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…
“In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…
Parker, Clifton B. "Greater Regulation Not Necessary for Internet, Stanford Scholar Says." Stanford News. N.p., 08 Apr. 2016. Web. 13 Feb. 2017.…
With as many parties that are in favor of net neutrality, there are an equal number who are against it. While net neutrality regulations allow for open, unrestricted access to the internet, it could also be said that restriction is an option that needs to be allowed to Internet service providers in order for them to recoup initial investments costs if they deem it necessary. It’s also a valid point that because there has been limited government oversight since the mid 1990s, that the internet has become what it is today because of the private sector and the investment and advancements the made to the industry. Many are concerned that with government oversight at this point in the game, can limit the forward progress…
Over the last decade or so, the net neutrality debate has got all the more intense, particularly with numerous countries contemplating the idea of introducing a legislation about the same. With certain regulations prohibiting practices like child pornography or gambling in place, people are pressing for even more severe regulations which would completely ban the unethical practices involved in Internet access and transmission of data on the Internet.…
Net Neutrality is a legal concept that has recently been the focus of numerous media headlines. Let me make this clear. Net Neutrality is not simply another meandering piece of legislature, rather it is philosophical idea woven into law. Now that this philosophy has been written into law by the United States government the true nature of its framework coming to light ("What the heck is net neutrality? - The Washington Post," n.d.). Net Neutrality has been a leading topic of discussion in the field of technology for quite some time, yet few know exactly what the term means. This is very unfortunate because the subject matter has the potential to significantly impact us all. The following text will explain the ins and outs of Net Neutrality and…
Technology is expanding everyday. Our society has grown and expanded and has become extremely powerful because of new technologies. People are learning how to use computers in place of their tasks. The Internet is a prime example is of expanding technology. One can obtain yesterday’s and today’s news, listen to music, talk to a friend over seas, view pornography, and countless other things in the privacy of one’s home via the Internet. There is no way to really regulate what is on the Internet. Essentially, the government has no place on the Internet.…
" In the past decade the use of the internet has increased exponentially in everyday life. We see the use of internet and media a lot in the United States now. All this new technology has made it almost effortless for someone to get access to the web. However in recent years the internet has been the center of intense controversies, one being “to what extent in the U.S. does the federal, state, and local government have the duty to monitor internet content?â€. Many may say the the government should do more to monitor the internet, but I however strongly disagree.…
The Internet was created in the late 1960s so that U.S. Department of Defense researchers could share information with one another and with other researchers. The scientists and academics who created the internet soon saw the power of the new technology: Wires linking computer terminals together in a "web" of networks allow people anywhere in the world to communicate over the computer. Even though it was developed by the government, the Internet is not government run. The Internet Society, a volunteer organization, addresses usage and standards issues. The term NEA was created by Authors Doc Searls and David Weinberger which is an acronym that stands for: No one owns it, Everyone can use it, and Anyone can improve it. Therefor it is not in any government’s power to regulate what can and cannot be viewed on the internet. It cannot be owned by any government or corporation because the internet in itself is classified as an agreement, not a thing. It is a communication source where the whole world can stay connected. Countries such as China and Egypt, as well as many other countries in Asia and Europe, continued to have their rights taken away by their government and are blocked from going on news sites that would keep them up to date on world news. Although there are people who would use the internet as a tool to illegal means, censoring the internet for all citizens is not going to prevent a determined person from saying what needs to be said. It only makes it illegal to do so. Governments that regulate and restrict informational websites end up making themselves look even worse than if they were to just let their citizens have free roam of the world wide web.…