Preview

Henry Fayol Theory Still Stay Relavant in Today Management Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Fayol Theory Still Stay Relavant in Today Management Essay Example
ENRY FAYOL’S THEORY I MANAGEMENT STILL STAY RELEVANT IN TODAY’S MANAGEMENT
Henri Fayol (Istanbul, 29 July 1841 – Paris, 19 November 1925) and his management theory have been in the greatest debate over time for its relevance for both the classic and contemporary management. To begin our exploration profoundly into the debate, we may borrow Fayol’s conclusion “without principles we are working in dark and chaos, without experience and judgment we are still working under great difficulties, even with the best principles. The principles is the lighthouse, which enable us to get our bearings, but it can only help those who know the way into port. Fayol (1949, p.42))” and other judgments of others theorists such as Forlett, Mintzbaerg, Taylor, and Porter to reveal our view of Fayol’s theory’s relevance in today’s management. Although there are limitations, disadvantages and improvements in need, Fayol’s theory has stood the test of time to be the foundation of all later theories in management. We will elaborately go through the exploration by profoundly going into Fayol’s theory of management, comparing and contrasting it with other theories under the provision of other theorists, identifying limitations and disadvantages associated, then claim our judgment that Fayol’s theory is still relevance for today’s business management. First and foremost, we will briefly go over Fayol’s life, work, achievements and his theory to know more about the foundation for the birth of the theory and its details. Henry Fayol was born in 1841 in Istanbul, Ottoman Empire. His father is an engineer, and after returning to France in 1847, he got his academic degree in mining in Saint-Etienne in 1860. He joined the company "Compagnie de Commentry-Fourchambeau-Decazeville" as a nineteen-year-old engineer and, became the manager director in 1888, and held this position for more than 30 years. In 1916, he gave born for the book "Administration Industrielle et Générale", which became

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    HRM Essay

    • 1805 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4) Mindtools.com, (2014). Henri Fayol 's Principles of Management: Early Management Theory. Retrieved 26 November 2014, from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/henri-fayol.htm…

    • 1805 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fayol first publicised his ideas and discoveries (in 1916), titled ‘Administration Industrielle et Générale’; but it wasn’t until 1949 that it was translated into English. This shows us that his work was not well renowned until later on in his life, this could be due to its coincidence with both world wars, and the fact that many people were very concerned, rather than noticing Fayols work. When the Second World War had ‘finished’ there was much rebuilding and recovery to be done. As businesses began to recuperate they needed capable leaders to help bring cities back to life, this could have been when Fayols book was noticed and translated into English 4 years after the ‘end’ of World War II. His five defining roles of management, along with 14 principles of management allowed managers to initiate a fresh approach to their leadership of their company and its…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henri Fayol (1841-1925) was a mining engineer who later in his life preached concepts of management that could stem from his experience. One of them that is extensively applied in contemporary business management is the idea that “technical expertise can be destroyed by defective administration”. This in turn is understood and perceived that many organizations require a form of hierarchy, and degrees of command and accountability to function efficiently and effectively.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was one of the first theorists to define functions of management in his 1916 book “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Henri Fayol theorized that these functions were universal, and that every manager performed these functions in their daily work.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henri Fayol was a French mining engineer and was a key figure in the turn of the century school of management theory. His book General and Industrial Management which was first published in 1916, is the foundation of the classical organisation theory.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the language of Fayol, “control appears as one of the universal activities of all organizations and managing” (Broadbent and Otley: 1995). Control was one of five functions that Fayol decided management consisted of. The other four were, organizing, directing, co-ordinating and prevoyance, which is French for forecasting, which basically includes planning, and determining objectives. Fayol believed that management was a specfic activity that can be studied and developed. This is an accurate point, as management can be developed through study, and with ideas being accumulated, new management styles can be formed in order to suit the type of organization and its employees. However, even though Fayol was right in the sense that management can be developed, he was still heavily criticised as being idealist and ignoring the reality of management, and condoning impersonality…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We then reiterate to the theories of Henri Fayol, an Industrialist who sub-divided management into six basic groupings: technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting and managerial activities.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Fayol’s management theories were attained through experience in the management discipline, Mintzberg’s management theories on the contrary were attained through research as an academician. Tripathi, Tripathi & Reddy (2008) argue that the two authors have differing views on management but, not competing. In short, they both have contributed valuable theories in management. Additionally, Wook Yoo, Lemak & Choi, (2006) posit that Mintzberg’s work in this discipline was to elaborate and reaffirm Fayol’s managerial concepts. However, not all authors agree to the fact that Fayol and Mintzberg’s work were complementary. Indeed, Golden Pryor & Taneja (2010) holds a different view by stating that Mintzberg’s work was very critical of Fayol’s work often disregarding Fayol’s concepts on management as ‘folklore’ in comparison to findings by Mintzberg attained through systemic research. This is a clear indication of the differing opinions various authors have on Fayol’s…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management and Daniel A. Wren

    • 11014 Words
    • 45 Pages

    Among modern scholars and students there is an increasing distance between the fundamental thoughts of early management writers and contemporary, often secondary, accounts of how these pioneers developed their ideas. This shortcoming can be remedied by seeking original sources from when a pioneer 's ideas were being formulated and from the context within which this occurred. We examine examples of how others have furthered our understanding of management history by the discovery and translation of pioneering writings and present a rare, out-of-print translation and a previously untranslated and unpublished presentation from the French pioneer, Henri Fayol. These presentations to his colleagues in the mineral industry reveal Fayol 's early reflections as they would later evolve into his classical book, Administration Industrielle et Ge Ârale. Âne…

    • 11014 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay outlines the main contributions of Taylor, Fayol and Mayo to the study of management. It then evaluates the contribution of these writers to management as it is practiced today. It does this by discussing in turn their work, explicitly and implicitly drawing comparisons between them. It argues that the various contributions reflect the differing circumstances and needs of the theorists, and are complementary in their contributions to modern management.…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henri Fayol

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fayol was born in 1841 in a suburb of Istanbul, Ottoman Empire. His father (an engineer) was appointed superintendent of works to build the Galata Bridge, which bridged theGolden Horn.[1] The family returned to France in 1847, where Fayol graduated from the mining academy "École Nationale Supérieure des Mines" in Saint-Étienne in 1860.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managing Change

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 2 Images of Managing Change Learning Objectives • • • • • Understand the importance of organizational images and mental models. Identify different images of managing and of change outcomes. Outline six different images of managing change. Identify the theoretical underpinnings of these six change management images. Understand the practical implications of the six images and how to use them.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slide Henri

    • 7730 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Purpose – Fayol’s theories were the original foundation for management as a discipline and as a profession. Also Fayol was the first to advocate management education. Yet he has critics who revile him (or at least disparage his work) as well as followers who respect and revere him. This paper intends to enlighten today’s practitioners and academicians about the relevance and value of Fayol’s theories today. Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses Fayol’s contributions as well as the disparagement and the reverence. It compares Fayol’s work with that of Follett, Mintzberg, Taylor, and Porter. In addition, it demonstrates the original and current interpretation and application of his theories. Finally, it indicates the alignment of Fayol’s theories with strategic leadership and management. Findings – Fayol’s theories are valuable and relevant for organizational leaders because Fayol was a practitioner who documented theories that worked best for him and his co-workers. While there are those who criticize Fayol’s theories, there are many others who respect them and find them useful as academicians and as practitioners. The theory of management functions aligns well with strategic leadership and management models and theories. Originality/value – The paper is the first to integrate Fayol’s theories with a strategic leadership model. Keywords Management theory, Management history, Leadership Paper type General review…

    • 7730 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays