Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is one of the primary measures used to gauge the state of a nation’s economy. It is a representation of all the goods and services produced by that nation over a specific time period. Normally GDP is compared on a quarterly or annual basis. For example if a nations GDP has risen by 2% in a period of time, then it is thought that that nation’s economy has grown by 2%. However, a recession is also identified if GDP drops for 2 consecutive quarters.
As a measure of economic well-being, GDP should not be the only measure taken into account. While GDP is a good measure of the size of the actual economy, it does not accurately measure the well-being of the people of that nation. GDP includes many items that do not help well-being: depreciation, income going to foreigners, and regrettables like security expenditure, Healthcare and Insurance. These items are called regrettables because if people had a choice then this would not be how they would want to spend their money.
Using GDP as a measure of well-being has many issues which may affect its accuracy. In this assignment I will explain some of the reasons against using GDP to measure economic well-being and offer some alternatives which may give a more accurate picture of economic well-being within a nation.
Issues which effect GDP
While GDP can be used to measure the state of the economy of a nation, there are a number of factors which must be taking into account as to why it does not give a true picture of the well-being of that nation.
GDP does not take into account or place any value to leisure. A workforce that spends more time working will have a higher GDP but this may not necessarily lead to a great well-being for that workforce. The non-paid sector is another area not taken into account when calculating GDP. Areas such as the volunteer sector, black market and household chores are not included.