Preview

How Far Was Wolsey's Foreign Policy Defensive? Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1539 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Was Wolsey's Foreign Policy Defensive? Essay Example
How far was Wolsey’s foreign policy defensive?

Wolsey was Henry VIII’s chief adviser for fifteen years (1914-1929). He planned the French invasion in which Tournai and Therouanne were seized. He organized ‘the field of the cloth of gold’ and major peace treaties. Though to fully understand Wolsey’s foreign policies we need to know how the country was left by Henry VII to his son, Henry VIII. Henry VII was a cautious king, he spent more time writing his accounts of his expenses than he did ruling. This made him a wealthy king; he did receive help on this front though by his foreign diplomacy. In 1491 Henry launched a half hearted attack on France he wasn’t looking for glory though. It was a campaign designed to achieve three things; to save face over the loss of Breton independence, to obtain a sizeable pension from the French King and to receive a promise that France would not support Yorkist rebels. On these counts he was successful. The rest of his diplomacy rested on influential marriages the most notable being the marriage between his eldest son Prince Arthur and the daughter of the joint Spanish monarchs Catherine of Aragon. This tie between the Spanish Crown and the English Crown nearly fell apart after Arthur’s death in 1502 but after Pope Julius II granted it to be a twelve year old Henry was granted to hand of Catherine, once again the link with Spain was restored. So when his father died in 1509 the to be crowned Henry VIII had cause to be grateful to his father on four counts; the Crown’s finances were in good health, the localities were by and large under control, the authority of the Crown had been restored after the War of the Roses and the Yorkist uprisings and finally a ready-made marriage and alliance awaited.

Henry VIII’s was influenced by the legendary King Arthur and his ancestor Henry V this would cause problems for Wolsey in his attempts at uniting the dominant forces in Europe. In 1511 Henry sent an unsuccessful force of troupes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How did Henry IV bring peace to France after years of religious fighting and conflict?…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco-Dutch War Analysis

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Louis XIV considered himself to be appointed by God as an absolute ruler of France, the “Roi-Soleil” (5). He lived lavishly at Versailles, and pacified the nobility and foreign diplomats by including them in his indulgent lifestyle (5). Louis aspired to make France the most powerful state in Europe; he was, as Voltaire stated, “passionné pour la gloire” of France. Likely from a point of patriotic pride, he especially wished to recover former land holdings that had belonged to France under Charlemagne. He likewise aimed to control territory along the Rhine for the purpose of strategic defense of French borders (3). Louis’ wife, Maria Theresa, was a Spanish monarch who had surrendered her right to inherit Spanish territory on the condition that a dowry be paid to Louis. Spain never paid the dowry, and Louis believed that she was, therefore, entitled to territory in the Spanish Netherlands.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was also very annoyed at Wolsey his adviser at the time for not being able to get him a divorce so he fired him and had him beheaded but he died on the way to execution.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes of Wolsey's Fakk

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is possible to argue that the main cause of Wolsey’s fall was opposition from ‘an aristocratic party’. The line that reads ‘There can be no doubt that for long an aristocratic party, led by the dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, had been hoping to… dispossess him’ clearly supports the above statement. Both Norfolk and Suffolk come from nobility, and at that time it was the nobles who had a lot of influence. However, following Wolsey’s rise to authority, he did not hesitate to use his power against the nobles. This resulted in him having many enemies along the way, with the majority being those from noble backgrounds. On the other hand, it is possible to argue that Wolsey’s failure to secure the annulment of Henry’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon also contributed to his fall. Source 6 consists of a letter written by Anne Boleyn to Wolsey that explains how he couldn’t live up to his ‘fine promises about divorce’, and she ends it by expressing how it brought her ‘much sorrow’. This is a significant factor as it was this that led Henry to the realization that Wolsey cannot actually give him everything he wanted, and made him appear inefficient. Furthermore his inability to annul the marriage angered Anne Boleyn, resulting in her disliking Wolsey even more than she did before. This was highly unbeneficial for Wolsey as at the time she had a lot of power over Henry’s decisions.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All three sources only partly agree that Woley’s rise to power was a result of luck. Source C seems to suggest that the rise of power was due to luck, within the source it tells us that one of Wolsey’s main critics, Surrey, was too old to argue against him and his son too young to do so also. Warham has retired and therefore a position of power has opened up because of this Wolsey can now manoeuver his friends into other positions of power to help him, therefore this would suggest that Wolsey at this time had a lot of fortune on his side. Although within all these sources, luck may not remain the main theme it reoccurs throughout each, whether small or large. Source D reflects that’s Wolsey had a fortunate place with the King as Henry was easily bribed with gifts ‘beautifully fashioned dish, a jewel, or gifts of that sort’. Wolsey’s had his very own biographer which was his first servant and hence this creates a bias account as the information Cavendish will be collecting will be from Wolsey and this could be twisted into unreliable information, although most points also have element of Wolsey’s skilfulness it could be argued that King Henry simply favoured Wolsey, or that it was Wolsey’s personality rather than his skill that made the king acceptant of him.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the extreme economic struggle of the Great Depression during the 1930s, the United States tried its hardest to stay out of the battles and tensions of World War II. Many Americans were very concerned about the internal issues happening rather than the rising dangers and crumbling democracies around them as the war unfolded. However, as the conditions continued to worsen and even the strongest of countries began to fall, attention finally turned towards the issue of foreign affairs The American foreign policy changed throughout the early to mid twentieth century as Americans acknowledged the rising threat of fascism in Europe and the endangerment of American democracy, ending the ideal of isolationism and began the era of interventionism.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays