Preview

I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional
Is The Current Administration’s Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional? On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy. First of all, there is no judicial oversight regarding the actions taken by the president and his executive branch. The amount of information available to the public is determined entirely by the current administration and its intelligence agencies. When it comes to making decisions on who lives and who dies, the president is basically judge, jury and executioner. The president should not, and indeed, does not, have this authority under the Constitution. Under the Bill of Rights, U.S. citizens have the right to due process. While a full-fledged trial for a militant in the Mideast may not be realistic, a U.S. citizen should at least have the right to judicial review, rather than the right to prove their innocence post-mortem. The increase in the number of strikes has resulted in more civilian deaths and the alienation of many potential allies overseas. Pakistan has withdrawn their support for


Cited: Bachman, Jeff. “Growing Opposition to US Drones Program.” Thehill.com. Web. 19 Oct. 2012. Bergen, Peter. “Drone is Obama’s Weapon of Choice.” CNN.com. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. Crabtree, Susan. “Congress Gets Obama Data on Use of Drones.” Washingtontimes.com. 6 Feb. 2013. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. Elliot, Philip. “Gates Backs Lawmakers’ Oversight of Drone Program.” USNews.com. 11 Feb. 2013. Web. 19 Sept. 2012. “Graham-Paul Split On Us Drone Strikes Impact.” Foxnews.com. 17 Feb. 2013. Web. 19 Oct. 2012. Gur, Haviv Rettig. “US Drone Program Needs More Transparency.” Timesofisrael.com. 11 Feb. 2013. Web. 19 Sept. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knott Case Summary

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Katz v. United States (1967) guides our inquiry, and that case renders the drone surveillance consistent with the Fourth Amendment. In Katz, the Court held that covertly recording calls made in a public telephone booth violates the Fourth Amendment. Katz is relevant to the instant case because it sets forth…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    General Atomics Drones

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jones, H. J. (2013, January 10). Drone Business Bif Economic force locally. San Diego Tribune, pp. 1-2.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Increased security threats caused by heightened global terror activities, for instance, sectarian groups or Mexican drug empires, has prompted the development of decisive technologies, which will respond directly to the increased sophistication of these radical groups. A reliable technology is the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) commonly known as a drone. The drone not only investigates a terror environment but also conducts aerial strikes. The commencing research will analyze in detail the positive impacts of the drone to homeland security.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the 911 terror attacks congress passed a law to start using the predator drones/…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones Dbq Analysis

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The American society in which we grew up is one that prides itself on the advancements we continuously make in the technological field. Though there is some value in the use of devices to aid our lazy American culture, the sacrifices of opening our skies to the new drone age greatly outweighs the benefits of making life easier than it already is. While many companies shift to now offer drone delivery right to our doorsteps, the administrators in charge are not paying attention to the laundry list of determinants that can result from our growing reliance and dependence on something which stands as a want as opposed to a necessity. Drones should not be regarded as the top technological success…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to emphasize Harrington’s point Lev Grossman pours more light on criminal activities possible through drones. In addition to the information provided by the previous source, Grossman points out the positive and negative use of drones. For instance in the article “Drone Home,” Lev Grossman makes these comparisons through real life examples. He states that “Drones will carry pizzas across towns and drugs across borders. They’ll spot criminals on the run and naked celebrities in their homes” (Grossman 33). These comparisons provided by the author prove that drones can be both helpful and harmful. While these devices have the potential to help catch criminals they also have the power to do illegal acts that can cause an increase in crime rate.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the tragedy of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush used his powers as Commander in Chief and established a means to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States. On November 13, 2001, Bush issued a military order (M.O.) which allowed the President’s to “identify terrorists and those who support them” and bring them to justice by way of “military tribunals.” President Bush argues that it is his duty to “protect the United States and its citizens.” The M.O. makes this possible by delineating the rules and procedures for military tribunals held during the war on terror.…

    • 14798 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones Civil Liberties

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The issue of who controls these drones and has access to the data they collect is of deep concern. The multinational company Google just recently settled a law suit over their Google maps divisions’ data collection during their street level collection. The suit was based on Google’s use of data they acquired via recording devices while they drove around…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Balko, R. (2012). U.s. drone policy: Standing near terrorists makes you a terrorist. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/29/drone-attacks-innocent-civilians_n_1554380.html…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama's drone program came under fire since last week's Senate hearing regarding counterterrorism adviser John Brennan's nomination to become director of the CIA. Will Obama use tme to justify the administration's policy of deploying unmanned drones to kill Americans suspected of being Al-Qaeda allies?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays