Instructor's Solutions Manual

INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL TO ACCOMPANY

FACILITIES PLANNING
THIRD EDITION

JAMES A. TOMPKINS Tompkins Associates, Inc. JOHN A. WHITE University of Arkansas YAVUZ A. BOZER University of Michigan J. M. A. TANCHOCO Purdue University

PREFACE
The Instructor's Manual provides answers to the questions and solutions to the problems at the end of the chapters in the Third Edition of Facilities Planning. When a question or problem is open-ended, either no answer is provided or guidance is provided relative to the response intended. Due to human error, it is possible that mistakes exist in the responses provided. Several changes were made to end-of-chapter questions and problems during the production process. Consequently, it is possible that responses are provided in the Instructor's Manual in anticipation of changes to the manuscript that did not occur. If you encounter an error in the Instructor's Manual, the authors request that you bring it to the attention of Dr. James A. Tompkins, who was coordinating author for this edition of Facilities Planning. Correspondence should be sent to Dr. James A. Tompkins, President and CEO, Tompkins Associates, Inc.,8970 Southall Road, Raleigh, NC 27616. If more convenient, you can communicate errors via email using the address: [e-mail]. This electronic version of the Instructor's Manual is available to faculty who adopt Facilities Planning. To prevent widespread dissemination of answers and solutions to end-of-chapter questions and problems, the authors and publisher require that you use password-protected access to course websites containing solutions to problems for students. Further, passwords must be changed after each offering of the course. Many instructors do not want students to have access to the Instructor's Manual. Hence, it is important for access to be limited. To prepare the Third Edition of Facilities Planning, coordinating authors were assigned for each chapter. Dr. Tompkins had coordinating responsibility for Chapters 1, 7, 9, and 12; Dr. White had coordinating responsibility for Chapters 2, 3, and 11; Dr. Bozer had coordinating responsibility for Chapters 4 and 6; Dr. Tanchoco had coordinating responsibility for Chapters 5 and 8; and Drs. Bozer and White shared coordinating responsibility for Chapter 10. Hence, depending on the nature of questions you have regarding material in a chapter, you might wish to contact directly the coordinating author. Contact information for each author is provided on the following page. To assist you in finding material for a particular chapter, the page numbering in the Instructor’s Manual incorporates the chapter number. In this way, we believe you will be able to turn more quickly to the response of interest to you. We are pleased to acknowledge the assistance of a number of individuals in developing the material for the Instructor’s Manual. In particular, we express our appreciation to David Ciemnoczolowski (University of Michigan), Ronald Gallagher (Tompkins Associates), E. Harjanto (Purdue University), Mark Rukamathu (University of Arkansas), and S. Sugiarta (Purdue University).

Thank you for adopting Facilities Planning. We trust it measures up to your expectations and you view it as an improvement over the previous editions. We have endeavored to respond to all feedback we received from instructors who used the previous editions of the text. And, as in the past, we welcome your suggestions for ways to improve the book. James A. Tompkins John A. White Yavuz A. Bozer J. M. A. Tanchoco

Authors’ Addresses
James A. Tompkins President and CEO Tompkins Associates, Inc. 8970 Southall Road Raleigh, NC 27616 919-876-3667 (B) 919-872-9666 (F) [e-mail] John A. White Chancellor and Distinguished Professor of Industrial Engineering University of Arkansas 425 Administration Building Fayetteville, AR 72701 479-575-4148 (B) 479-575-2361 (F) [e-mail] Yavuz A. Bozer Professor Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 734-936-2177 (B) 734-764-3451 (F) [e-mail] J. M. A. Tanchoco Professor School of Industrial Engineering Purdue University Grissom Hall West Lafayette, IN 47907 317-494-4379 (B) 317-494-5448 (F) [e-mail]

Table of Contents
Chapter Part One 1 2 3 4 Part Two 5 6 Part Three 7 8 9 Part Four 10 Part Five Title Defining Requirements Introduction Product, Process, and Schedule Design Flow, Space, and Activity Relationships Personnel Requirements Developing Alternatives: Concepts and Techniques Material Handling Layout Planning Models and Design Algorithms Facility Design for Various Warehouse Functions Warehouse Operations Manufacturing Systems Facilities Systems Developing Alternatives: Quantitative Approaches Quantiative Facilities Planning Models Evaluating, Selecting, Preparing, Presenting, Implementing, and Maintaining Evaluating and Selecting the Facilities Plan Preparing, Presenting, Implementing, and Maintaining Facilities Planning 9 4 80 14 4 9 7 28 16 44 9 8 No. of Pages

11 12

PART ONE

DEFINING REQUIREMENTS

Chapter 1 Introduction

1-1

Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 1 1.1a To plan for a football game, a visiting head football coach must: • Make sure that his players and coaches understand the game plan • Prepare his players physically and mentally for the game • Study opposing team game films • Understand strengths and weaknesses of the opponent • Maintain the discipline of his players To operate the team during a football game, a visiting head coach must: • Continuously update his game plan based upon what the opposing team does • Communicate these updates with his coaches and players • Keep players physically ready to play • Replace injured players with other quality players if at all possible • Call the best plays that will score the most points and make victory most likely 1.1b To plan for a football game, the home team quarterback must: • Practice drills and fundamentals • Become familiar with pass receivers skills and abilities • Understand role in game plan • Assume leadership role of team The operating activities that a home team quarterback must do are: • Operate coaches’ game plan on the field • Lead team against opposition • Use skills learned in practice • Minimize mistakes • Relay plans from sidelines to all players in the huddle • Win the game 1.1c To plan for a football game, the manager of refreshment vending must: • Make sure all food, beverages, condiments, and paper supplies are ordered and stocked • Hire employees to work the vending locations • Pay suppliers • Understand what refreshments field personnel will need during the game The operating activities that a manager of refreshment vending must do are: • Serve customers as efficiently and professionally as possible • Restock vending locations whenever necessary

1-2

• Keep fans updated on game activities with televisions at vending locations • Solve customer problems 1.1d To plan for a football game, the ground crew manager must ensure that: • Lines are painted on the field • Grass is mowed • Damaged turf is replaced • Necessary equipment for the teams is in its proper place • Locker rooms are prepared for the teams The operating activities that a ground crew manager must do are: • Replace damaged turf, if possible, during the game if weather is bad • Be ready for any grounds problems that may arise during the game 1.1e To plan for a football game, the stadium maintenance manager must: • Examine plumbing fixtures to make sure they are operational • Clean the stadium and pick up trash from the previous event • Repair any seats or bleachers that are damaged • Clean bathrooms • Repair and replace any necessary audio or video equipment for the stadium The operating activities that a stadium maintenance manager must do are: • Respond to any equipment breakdown • Respond to any plumbing breakdown • Respond to any power outage 1.2 Ten components of a football facility are: • The stadium structure • Parking lots around the stadium • Vendor selling areas • Maintenance components • Grounds-keeping equipment and personnel • Security • Customers • Athletic team personnel • Locker rooms • Vending equipment and supplies

1.3a Activities that would be involved in planning the location of an athletic stadium are: • Marketing analysis: Is there a fan base to support the teams or events that will occupy the facility?

1-3

• Determining a suitable plot of land for the facility and its associated parking lots in terms of size and levelness • Determine by what routes suppliers will supply the facility • Determine if there are other facilities that will interact with the stadium and how the location of the facility will affect those interactions • Determine if existing structures will need to be demolished to accommodate the new stadium and how those people or businesses will be compensated • Determine the stability of the land that will be used to hold this structure 1.3b Activities that would be involved in planning the design of an athletic stadium are to determine the facility layout and systems and the material handling systems that are necessary to operate the facility. Items that need to be determined within the fa cility layout are as follows: • Number of people it will need to hold • Equipment is necessary to run this facility. • How the facility can host multiple types of sports—the design must accommodate all of them • Whether the stadium be an outdoor stadium or a domed stadium • Artificial or natural turf • Materials of the track surface be • How and where upper-deck access will be • Vending locations in the facility • Where administrative offices of the facility will be • How many restrooms there will be and their locations • Where the locker rooms will be Facilities systems that need to be examined are: • Structural and enclosure elements. • Power and natural gas requirements • Lighting requirements • Heating, ventilation and air conditioning requirements • Water and sewage needs Handling systems that need to be examined are: • Material handling system • Personnel required to operate the stadium • Information systems required to operate the stadium • Equipment needed to support the stadium 1.3c Activities that would be involved in facilities planning for an athletic stadium are determining the facility location and design, explained in

1-4

greater detail in 1.3a and 1.3b, plus the ongoing maintenance and improvement of the facility. 1.4 Customers in the transportation, communication, and service sectors do have a need for facilities planners. Service facilities such as hospitals, restaurants, athletic facilities, and retail shopping establishments all can and do use facilities planners to optimize the facility layout, handling systems, and facility systems on a continuous basis. The communications industry uses the world as its facility. Communication networks can be thought of as the handling systems of a communications customer. Due to the rapidly changing technologies found in the communications industry, these networks have to be continuously updated and improved, or new ones have to be created. Also, the equipment and personnel required to run multiple communication networks have to be considered as well as where the communication points within the network will be located. Finally, the facilities required to house a communication hub or hubs must be located and designed, and a facilities planner is the optimal person to do this job. Just like the communications industry, the transportation industry uses the world as its facility. Facilities planners can play an integral role in determining where airports, train terminals, bus depots, truck depots, and shipping docks are located and in designing them to accommodate the traffic that travels through them. Also, facilities planners can assist in determining the equipment and layout of those facilities as well. Service industries such as retail shopping establishments, restaurants, hospitals, and athletic facilities all use facilities planners to lay out their buildings. Also, retail establishments and restaurants generally have warehouses in which product is stored before it comes to its point of use. Facilities planners play a large role in the location and design of warehouses of all types. 1.5 Use the following criteria for determining the optimal facilities plan: • Does the facility provide for the company’s future storage requirements? • Is there cost justification for the facility? • Is the facility centrally located for suppliers or customers if it is a manufacturing facility; for manufacturing centers if it is a shipping warehouse; for fans if it is an athletic facility, etc.? • Does it minimize receiving and putaway times while providing enough spaces for those functions? • Does the product from the manufacturing operations flow smoothly through the facility? • Are there enough dock doors for shipping and receiving functions?

1-5

• Is the material handling equipment proper for the product that is being moved? Is there enough space for the equipment to maneuver around the facility? • Is the lease cost, property cost, or building cost cheaper than other alternatives? • Can the manufacturing or warehouse facility accommodate sales forecasts? • Does the plan minimize the cost of operation in terms of labor and equipment? • Will scrap be minimized with this plan? • Can the facility be expanded easily to accommodate growth? • Is space being utilized to the highest extent? 1.6 This answer will vary from campus to campus, but some things of which the student should be aware are: • Traffic patterns on campus • Whether administration offices are easily accessible • Handicapped accessibility to all buildings • Whether areas mix high vehicle and pedestrian traffic • What it would take to remove dilapidated buildings • The locations of certain buildings or functions if they are related to one another, e.g. financial aid should be close to the cashier’s office • Maintenance facilities should be hidden from the main traffic areas • Whether there are adequate parking facilities for students, faculty, and staff • Whether there are adequate eating establishments, restrooms, etc. • Whether adequate computer facilities are accessible to all students • Whether there are adequate recreational facilities • If there is room to expand in the future • If there is room on or near campus for all students to live • Whether there adequate security on campus

1-6

1.7a Facilities Planning Process for a Bank

Phase 1

1. Define (or redefine) the objectives of the bank

Phase 2

2. Specify the processes required to accomplish the bank’s objectives

3. Determine the interrelationships among departments

4. Determine the space requirements for all activities

5. Generate alternative facilities plans

6. Evaluate the alternative facilities plans

7. Select a facilities plan

Phase 3

8. Implement the facilities plan

9. Maintain and adapt the facilities plan

1.7b Facilities Planning Process for a University

Phase 1

1. Define (or redefine) the objectives of the university, the majors it wishes to offer, and the students it wishes to admit

Phase 2

2. Specify facilities and personnel needed to accomplish the university’s objectives

3. Determine the interrelationships among facilities

4. Determine the space requirements for all activities

5. Generate alternative facilities plans

6. Evaluate the alternative facilities plans

7. Select a facilities plan

Phase 3

8. Implement the facilities plan

9. Maintain and adapt the facilities plan

1-7

1.7c Facilities Planning Process for a Warehouse

Phase 1

1. Define (or redefine) the objectives of the warehouse

Phase 2

2. Specify facilities and personnel to accomplish the warehouse’s objectives 5. Generate alternative facilities plans

3. Determine the interrelationships among activities

4. Determine the space requirements for all activities

6. Evaluate the alternative facilities plans

7. Select a facilities plan

Phase 3

8. Implement the facilities plan

9. Maintain and adapt the facilities plan

1.7d Facilities Planning Process for a Consulting Office

Phase 1

1. Define (or redefine) the objectives of the office

Phase 2

2. Specify facilities and personnel required to accomplish the office objectives

3. Determine the interrelationships among departments

4. Determine the space requirements for all activities

5. Generate alternative facilities plans

6. Evaluate the alternative facilities plans

7. Select a facilities plan

Phase 3

8. Implement the facilities plan

9. Maintain and adapt the facilities plan

1-8

1.8

The first task that needs to be accomplished is to determine the site of the library on the campus. Questions such as do existing structures need to be demolished, do roads need to be rerouted, do possible sites meet federal, state, and local codes need to be asked. Next, a determination of office space, book storage space, storage rack layout, and student study areas must be made so that the structural design of the facility can be created. Also, the power, gas, heat, ventilation, security, plumbing fixtures, and maintenance issues must be settled. Finally, material handling issues such as how to transport supplies and books, how to reshelve books, how to get from floor to floor, the information systems required to keep track of the locations of all of the books, and the personnel who will be required to maintain the library must be resolved. Facilities planning is never completed for an enterprise. If facilities planners believed this, then numerous enterprises would be doomed to failure. New technologies, different enterprises would be doomed to failure. New technologies, different packaging methods, better storage methods, and more advanced material handling equipment make the process of updating and continuously improving facilities a must, or else the company will be left behind with antiq uated structures, information systems, and storage and material handling mechanisms.

1.9

1.10 Certain items to look for from this paper are that an architect is more involved with the design of the structure of the facility, the materials that will go into the structure, and the location of items such as plumbing, lighting, HVAC systems, and electrical systems. The facilities planner will be consulted on the above issues, but is more likely to plan the material flow within the facility, how materials will be handled within the facility, how materials will be stores, how materials will be manufactured, the location of storage areas, the location of shipping and receiving docks, the location and types of manufacturing equipment, the types of material handling equipment required in the facility. 1.11 The IIE description of Industrial Engineering is: Industrial engineering (IE) is about choices. Other engineering disciplines apply skills to very specific areas. IE gives an opportunity to work in a variety of businesses. The most distinctive aspect of industrial engineering is the flexibility that it offers. Industrial engineers figure out how to do things better. They engineer processes and systems that improve quality and productivity. They work to eliminate waste of time, money, materials, energy, and other commodities. Most important of all, IEs save companies money. Industrial Engineering draws upon specialized knowledge and skills in the mathematical, physical and social sciences together with the principles and methods of engineering analysis and design to specify,

1-9

predict, and evaluate the results to be obtained from such systems. “Facilities planning” could easily be substituted for the worlds “industrial engineering.” Clearly, facilities planning is concerned with the design, improvement, and installation of tangible fixed assets to achieve an activity’s objectives. While designing, improving, and installing these assets, the impacts on people, material, information, equipment, and energy are very important. It is also clear that facilities planning draws upon sciences, together with the principles and methods of engineering analysis and design to specify, predict, and evaluate the results on an activity’s tangible fixed assets. Therefore, it is clear that the profession most able to perform facilities planning is the profession of industrial engineering. 1.12 The articles read should relate to the strategic planning process and should draw parallels to the facilities planning process. An awareness of the true meaning of strategy should be demonstrated. 1.13a Strategic uses for an airport that must be addressed in facilities planning include: • Location • Types of planes that will be flying into the airport • Type of air traffic control system • Location of air traffic control tower • Location of baggage carousels • Location of ticket counters • Number of hangars required for servicing airplanes and for safety inspections • Employee skill levels for servicing airplanes between arrivals and departures and for maintaining airpla nes • Number of employees required to run vending services, ticketing, baggage claim, etc. • Location of parking lots • Many other items, including security control 1.13b Strategic issues for a community college that must be addressed include: • Location of classroom facilities • Location of administrative facilities • Skill level of faculty in each major • Majors that will be offered • Location of roads and sidewalks through campus • Skill level of students that will be admitted • Financial aid distribution to students • Services to be provided to the students and the fees charged to the students • Level of athletic focus, if any • Level of maintenance and the location of facilities

1-10

1.13c Strategic issues for a bank that must be addressed include: • Types of services provided • Skill levels of different types of employees • Security system and personnel • Interest rates for loans • Types of loans granted • Minimum borrower qualifications • Interest rates for savings and money market accounts • ATM machine on premises? • How many drive-thru windows? • Accounting procedures • Vault size 1.13d Strategic issues for a grocery store chain that must be addressed include: • Types of products to sell • Arrangement of shelves within the store • Locations of items on those shelves • Parking area required • Accounting procedures • Skill level of employees • Freshness qualifications for open-air food such as produce • Amount of warehouse space where customers do not shop • Location of grocery stores throughout the country • Should stores have the same layout or should they vary? • Number of shopping carts required • Number of docks required for receiving purposes • Unpacking methods • Predicted sales volume • Product pricing considerations 1.13e Strategic issues for a soft drink bottler and distributor that must be addressed include: • Location of bottling facilities • Distribution routes • Number of trucks required for distribution • Types of equipment required for bottling • Number of bottles shipped per day • Number of SKUs that have to be bottled • Methods of conveyance through the facility • Methods of loading and unloading trucks • Material composition of bottles • Location and type of liquid components of beverage to be bottled • Skill level of employees

1-11

• Automation level • Inventory control methods • Storage requirements 1.13f Strategic issues for a library that must be addressed include: • Location of the library • Number of books that the library can contain • Number and location of shelves to hold the books • Skill level of employees • Types of magazine and newspaper subscriptions • Manual or automated system for finding items • Types of reference materials • From where will funding come? • Amount of study area required • Number of computers needed for public use • Size of children’s section within the library • Types of annual special events 1.13g Strategic issues for an automobile dealership that must be addressed include: • Parking area required • Level of knowledge of automobiles that employees must have • Number of salespeople • Sales tactics, professionalism of salespeople • Types of automobiles to sell • Sales trends in the automobile industry • Relationship with automobile manufacturer • Service levels offered at the dealership • Parts for cars offered at the dealership • Number of service bays • Storage area required for service parts • Elegance of automobile showroom • Relationships with lending institut ions 1.13h Strategic issues for a shopping center that must be addressed include: • Types of shops to be included in the center • Number of shops and their sizes • Location of shopping center • Lease rates for tenants • Public facilities for customers • Parking area for customers, should it be decked parking, etc. • Security • Shopping center design, how elegant should it be? • Will it be a strip mall or an enclosed shopping center?

1-12

• Finding possible investors in the shopping center 1.13i Strategic issues for a public warehousing firm that must be addressed include: • Size of the warehouse • Location of the warehouse • Level of automation within the warehouse • Number of warehouses • Types of products that can be stored in the warehouse • Material handling mechanisms within the warehouse • Rental rates • Policies for unclaimed product • Number of racks required for the storage of the product • Number of docks required for shipping and receiving of the product • Will there be crossdocking capability? • Skill level of employees 1.13j Strategic issues for a professional sports franchise that must be addressed include: • How does the ownership manage the franchise? • Location of a facility in which to play • Rent a facility or own one • Team colors, name, logo • Advertising methods • Determining the makeup of the fan base • Ticket prices • Revenues from luxury suites • Training facilities • Selection criteria for choosing players and coaches • Salaries for players and coaches • Revenues from licensed sportswear sales • Player and coach discipline if they break the rules • Management’s role in determining the direction of the team 1.14a When there are many critical short-term problems that a company has to solve at once, it is generally due to a lack of good strategic planning. Many times, critical problems such as not enough storage space, too few material handlers, improper storage techniques, and too much work-in-process inventory all result from poor strategic facilities planning. Strategic facilities planning is important when there are many “critical” problems to solve because planning itself will generally solve many of the problems. 1.14b Everyone needs to have a say in the strategic planning process. However, if critical individuals are too busy to do some sound strategic facilities planning, they will always remain too busy because the problems that result

1-13

from poor strategic planning will keep these individuals busy attacking short-term problems. Furthermore, there are consulting firms that specialize in this type of work, so not as much time would have to be taken by these individuals who are too busy, but their input would still be required while the consultants are working on the problem. 1.14c A good facilities plan will be flexible enough to change with future events. For example, a company that supplies the automobile industry builds a warehouse during a downturn in automotive sales. If good strategic planning has occurred, the company will not build the warehouse based on the storage requirement of the sales volume during the downturn; instead, the company will build on some large percentage of the maximum sales volume they had during an upswing in the economy and on the forecast of automotive sales over some time frame. Otherwise, the supplier could run out of storage space in the new facility and have to add on or build another warehouse before it has the financial capacity to do so. 1.14d This is a response of laziness. It takes much work and research to determine what alternatives are available besides the one the company is using. Data collection is needed to determine product throughput, production flow, storage capacities, and inventory control procedures so that the proper facility size and alternative control systems can be determined. Development of labor standards and evaluation of material handling methods is needed to look at different alternatives. If this information is gathered and certain types of vendors are brought in to look at the problem, numerous alternatives for a facility can be generated. Those that apply must meet scientific and financial criteria that are determined at the beginning of the project. 1.14e Strategic facilities planning is an ongoing process. Technologies come and go, and a good facilities plan will enable a company to adapt to rapidly changing technologies as well as to discard those that will not help the company achieve its goals. A strategic plan is a plan for the future, not the present. Do not incorporate technologies into a facility for the present product mix—incorporate those technologies that can be used to produce the future product mix. However, a facilities plan cannot take into account technologies that have not yet been created; if a company creates a strategic facility plan that incorporates technologies that have not been created, there is no guarantee that the technology will be available when the company is ready to implement the facilities plan and it will be doomed to failure. 1.14f One cannot get an exact dollar figure on the cost of a strategic plan implementation and the savings it will generate. However, examination of past trends and the prices of different types of technologies can give the strategic planner a good estimate of the costs and the savings. The only way to get exact costs is to get quotes from vendors, and the only way to

1-14

determine the exact savings is to implement the facility plan. This should not stop a company from doing strategic planning, however. Sometimes the plan may be infeasible and may not be implemented, but a company that does not engage in strategic planning will not get a return on an investment because the investment will never be made, or there will never have been a determination on how much money the investment would make or lose. 1.15 Doing facilities planning for a manufacturing facility is a positive exercise for a company in terms of its competitiveness. The production flow can be examined by simulation, and potential bottlenecks can be smoothed. Also, a facilities plan for a manufacturing facility outlines the skill levels of employees required to operate the equipment on the manufacturing floor, and it discovers the latest and best equipment to make the product. Companies that do not engage in facilities planning usually end up having uneven production flows, improper labor skills, too much or too little labor on the floor, and outdated equipment that must be heavily maintained. These problems as well as many others that could be eliminated by facilities planning cause companies to lose their competitive edge. 1.16 Using strategic planning to assist with your career allows you to evaluate where you are compared with the goals you set for yourself. If you have fallen short of your goals, it allows you to easily evaluate why and determine how you intend to correct the shortcoming, if it is possible. Furthermore, it can show you if your career is at a dead end and where you need to go to make a change in your career. Strategic planning gives you a path to follow once the plan is in place. However, this plan should be continuously updated just like any other strategic pla n or you will lose your competitive edge over others on the same career path. 1.17 Automation, if planned properly, can have a positive impact upon facilities planning. If there is a large product throughput, automation can reduce costs by reducing labor requirements, improving quality, and perhaps improving product throughput. However, many things could go wrong, and a facilities planner needs to be aware of them. First, the automation may not justify itself. If the throughput required to meet sales is 1,000 units per day and automation equipment is purchased that can produce 20,000 units per day, cost justification probably will not occur. Also, is the automated equipment flexible enough to handle changes in product design or production methods? While the first example showed the automation that could produce 20,000 units per day had too much excess capacity and therefore was not cost-justifiable, when a process is automated, there needs to be extra capacity built into it so that it is not obsolete when the manufacturing requirement increases to meet future sales. Also, the automated process needs to be able to make product of higher quality than if it was made manually or with a cheaper automated process. It does no good to have a machine that can produce 5,000 units per hour to meet production

1-15

requirements of 4,000 units per hour when only half of the pieces pass a quality inspection. Finally, it is necessary to examine how the automated process will fit within the existing facility and how much rearrangement will have to occur so that production will continue to flow smoothly. Automation is a wonderful way to improve the quality and throughput of a product, but only if it is done properly. Automation that does not do what it is supposed to do ends up giving manufacturing personnel more problems than the process it replaced. 1.18 Issues that should be addressed during strategic planning for warehousing/distribution include: • Number of shipping and receiving docks • How the product will be shipped from the warehouse to the customer • Product that will be stored • Number of SKUs • Size of the product that will be stored • Storage cube requirement • Pallet rack, flow rack, bulk storage, conveyor requirements • Inventory turns per a specific time • Warehouse staffing levels • Inventory investment levels • Material handling procedures and equipment • Building size • Will refrigeration be necessary? • Inventory control methods • Inventory control equipment • Building and rack layout • Power requirements The primary customer service consideration for a warehouse/distribution strategic plan is that the faster the turnover from receipt of an order to shipment to the customer, the better. Also, proper product storage and product shipment will reduce the amount of damaged product that a customer receives. Finally, the better the inventory control system, the easier it is to determine when there are stockouts and where all of the inventory is, thereby making it easier to fill a customer’s order in less time. Cost implications are that if excess inventory has to be carried due to inaccurate inventory control data, then a larger facility has to be built, more rack has to be installed, more labor has to be used to find the inventory in a larger building, capital is tied up in inventory rather than earning money or being used in a more productive way, and more inventory will have to be thrown away because it is outdated. Facilities planning can reduce or eliminate all of these problems, thereby reducing a company’s warehousing

1-16

costs, which can result in product being shipped at a cheaper price to customers, which will result in more sales and revenues. 1.19 All of the requirements for success in Supply Chain Synthesis are directly linked to the facilities planning process. A proper facilities plan will enable a company to achieve synthesis much more quickly than a competitor who does not use facilities planning. Strategic facilities issues in manufacturing such as smoothing the production flow, eliminating bottlenecks, using the proper amount of labor that has the appropriate skill level, using the proper equipment that can meet or exceed throughput at a high level of quality will help reduce manufacturing costs, enable manufacturing and marketing to work together to achieve sales goals, reduce lead-times, reduce setup times and production lot sizes, reduce work- in-process inventories, simplify process, balance the production flow, adapt to changing product and technologies, reduce uncertainty, increase quality, and reduce process failures. Also, reducing problems in the manufacturing process will increase the number of happy employees and encourage them to become team players. This will allow every part of the manufacturing process to become integrated and facilitate not only a greater understanding by the emp loyees of the entire manufacturing process and how to achieve synthesis, but also an understanding of the company’s goals and directions. 1.20 The main difference between strategic planning and contingency planning is that strategic planning is a proactive process in which problems are being eliminated before they occur, while contingency planning is a reactive process in which plans are made to eliminate problems as or after they occur. 1.21 Facilities planning is not a thing that can be rushed or done halfway because the personnel have “more important things to do.” If facilities planning is done that way, the cost of implementation will increase because all alternatives may not have been examined, or errors will have been made in calculations. In order for facilities planning to be done properly, sufficient lead-time in the implementation project must be granted. The amount of lead-time is never the same for two different projects because each project has a different level of complexity.

Chapter 2 Product, Process, and Schedule Design

2-1 Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 2

2.1 Identify the banking functions and departments to be incorporated in the facilities plan. Identify the key entities for which flow requirements will be needed, e.g., people, coin and currency, paperwork, vehicular movement. Identify the various criteria that will be used to evaluate the alternative facilities plans generated, e.g., customer service, security, ease of expansion, cost. Determine the time period over which the facilities requirements will be estimated. Estimate space and flow requirements and determine activity relationships. Generate alternative facilities plans. 2.2 It is important for the various design decisions to be integrated so that all critical issues have been considered before product and process designs are finalized. Using a linear or series approach can result in multiple re-starts of the design process because of “down stream” consequences of “up stream” design decisions that are made. Overall optimization is the goal, rather than piecewise optimization. Knowledgeable representatives from each of the activities or functions need to be involved in the design process. Several concurrent engineering techniques can be used to improve the design process. Quality Function Deployment is one technique that can prove extremely beneficial. However, all of the approaches described in Section 2.5 should receive serious consideration. Since the text is devoted to facilities planning, every technique presented in the text is a candidate for use in a specific application. 2.3 Research question. Depending on the comprehensiveness of the collection of periodicals and manuscripts in the university library, it might be more helpful to the students to modify the assignment and encourage them to use the Internet in performing the assigned search. 2.4 Research question. Depending on the comprehensiveness of the collection of periodicals and manuscripts in the university library, it might be more helpful to the students to modify the assignment and encourage them to use the Internet in performing the assigned search. 2.5 Research question. Depending on the comprehensiveness of the collection of periodicals and manuscripts in the university library, it might be more helpful to the students to modify the assignment and encourage them to use the Internet in performing the assigned search.

2-2 2.6 Research question. Depending on the comprehensiveness of the collection of periodicals and manuscripts in the university library, it might be more helpful to the students to modify the assignment and encourage them to use the Internet in performing the assigned search. 2.7 The assigned chart submitted for a cheeseburger will vary depending on the assumptions regarding ingredients, e.g., mayonnaise, mustard, catsup, onions, pickles, lettuce, tomato, multiple beef patties, multiple slices of cheese, intermediate layer of bread. Likewise, the chart submitted for a taco will vary depending on the ingredients included. It is important to verify that the student follows the steps described in Section 2.3. 2.8 The assembly chart shows only the operations and inspections associated with the assembly of the product. The operation process chart includes all operations and inspections, fabrication and assembly operations and processing times, and purchased materials. 2.9 OB = 3,000 F= H= F=

3 IB = lOB/(1-PB)m = l3,000/(1-0.05)m = OA = QB 3 IA = l3,158/(1-0.02)m = 3,223 = QA

lSA(QA)/[(EA)(H)(RA)] + SB(QB)/[(EB)(H)(RB)] + 30(QA)/[(500)(H)]m 5 days/wk(18 hrs/day)(60 min/hr) = 5,400 min/wk l3(3,223)/[0.95(5,400)(0.95)] + 5(3,158)/[0.95(5,400)(0.90)] + 30(3,223)/[500(5,400)]m = l5.4398m = 6 milling machines

2.10 Follow the instructions provided in Section 2.5 for each of the 7 M&P tools. 2.11 The number of units of each product to be produced by each machine is determined as follows (note: lxxm means the smallest integer $ xx). OX = 111,000 3 IXC = lOX/(1-PXC)m = l111,000/(1-0.03)m = 114,433 IXB = lIXC/(1-PXB)m = l114,433/(1-0.04)m = 119,202 IXA = lIXB/(1-PXA)m = l119,202/(1-0.05)m = 125,476 OY = 250,000

3 IYC = lOY/(1-PYC)m = l250,000/(1-0.03)m = 257,732
IYA = lIYC/(1-PYA)m = l257,732/(1-0.05)m = 271,297 IYB = lIYB/(1-PYB)m = l271,297/(1-0.04)m = 282,602

Setup times are identical for machines A, B, and C for a particular product. The setup time for product X, regardless of the machine, is 20 mins; the setup time for product Y is 40 mins., regardless of the machine. A critical piece of information needed to determine the number of machines required is the length of production runs between setups. If a single setup is needed to

2-3 produce the annual requirement of a product on a machine, then the number of machines required is determined as follows: FA = l0.15(125,443)/[0.90(1600)(0.90)] + 20/[60(1600)] + 0.10(271,297)/[0.90(1600)(0.90)] + 40/[60(1600)]m FA = l35.4529m = 36 machines of type A FB = FB = FC = FC = l0.25(119,170)/[0.90(1600)(0.90)] + 20/[60(1600)] + 0.10(282,602)/[0.90(1600)(0.90)] + 40/[60(1600)]m l44.7944m = 45 machines of type B l0.10(114,403)/[0.95(1600)(0.95)] + 20/[60(1600)] + 0.15(257,732)/[0.95(1600)(0.95)] + 40/[60(1600)]m l34.6960m = 35 machines of type C

If setups occur more frequently, then additional machines might be required due to the lost production time consumed by setups. 2.12 S = 15, S/E = 20, P = 0.2, R = 7/8 = 0.875, H = 8(60) = 480 O = 750 3 I = lO/(1-P)m= l750/(1-0.2)m = l937.5m = 938 parts = Q F = l(S/E)(Q/HR)m = l20(938)/[480(0.875)]m = l44.67m = 45 machines 2.13 I1 = lO6/[(1-P1)(1-P2)(1-P3)(1-P4)(1-P5)(1-P6)m 2.14 Shown below is the probability mass function for number of good castings produced (x), based on Q castings scheduled for production.

2-4 Shown below is the matrix of net income for each combination of Q and x.

For a given value of Q, multiplying the net income in the column by the probability of its occurrence and summing over all values of x yields the following expected profits for each value of Q.

Based on the results obtained, scheduling 29 castings for production yields the maximum expected profit of $11,050.

2-5 2.15 Shown below is the probability mass function for number of good castings produced (x), based on Q castings scheduled for production.

Shown below is the matrix of net income for each combination of Q and x.

For a given value of Q, multiplying the net income in the column by the probability of its occurrence and summing over all values of x yields the following expected profits for each value of Q.

2-6

Based on the results obtained, scheduling 25 castings for production yields the maximum expected profit of $8,338. 2.16 Shown below is the probability mass function for number of good castings produced (x), based on Q castings scheduled for production.

Net incomes for feasible combinations of Q and x are shown below.

For a given value of Q, multiplying the net income in the column by the probability of its occurrence and summing over all values of x yields the

2-7 following expected profits for each value of Q. Based on the results obtained, scheduling 21 castings for production yields the maximum expected profit of $22,663.

2.17 Shown below is the probability mass function for the number of good custom-designed castings produced (x), based on Q castings scheduled for production.

Net incomes for feasible combinations of Q and x are shown below.

a. For a given value of Q, multiplying the net income in the column by the probability of its occurrence and summing over all values of x yields the following expected profits for each value of Q. As shown, the optimum number to schedule is 5, with an expected net profit of $35,335.

2-8 b. The probability of losing money on the transaction is the probability of the net income being negative when Q equals 5. From above, a negative net cash flow occurs if less than 4 good castings are produced. The probability of producing less than 4 good castings equals 0.0005 + 0.0081 + 0.0729, or 0.0815. c. Using Excel it is easy to perform the sensitivity analysis. By varying the cost parameter, it is found that a cost of $22,044.96 yields an expected profit of zero for Q = 5. Likewise, when the cost of producing a casting is reduced to $7,873.19, the optimum number to schedule increases to 6. We could not find a cost that would reduce the optimum production batch to 4 and still have a positive expected profit. d. Again, using Excel it is easy to perform sensitivity analyses. For example, if the probability of a good casting is reduced to 0.84248 then the optimum production batch increases to 6; likewise, if the probability of a good casting increases to 0.963781, then the optimum batch production quantity decreases to 4. 2.18 Shown below is the probability mass function for number of good highprecision formed parts (x), based on Q parts scheduled for production.

Shown below is the matrix of net income for batch sizes of 10, 11, and 12. Also shown below is the expected profit based on batch sizes of 10, 11, and 12, as well as the probability of losing money. A batch size of 12 yields the smallest expected profit. Based on the probability of losing money, the least attractive alternative is a batch size of 10.

2-9

2.19 Shown below is the probability mass function for the number of good wafers (x) resulting from a production batch size of Q.

Shown below is the matrix of net profit resulting from combinations of Q and x.

2-10

Shown below are the expected profits and probabilities of losing money for various batch sizes. The optimum batch size is 7, with a 0.0129 probability of losing money.

2.20 Shown below is the probability mass function for the number of good die castings (x) in a production batch of size Q.

Shown below is the matrix of net profits resulting from various combinations of Q and x.

2-11

Shown below are the expected profits and probabilities of losing money for various values of Q, the batch size. From the results obtained, the optimum batch size is 28. The probability of losing money, which is the probability of less than 25 die cast parts being acceptable, equals 0.0022.

2.21 a. Shown on page 2-12 are the probability mass function for the number of good castings (x) produced when Q castings are produced, based on a probability of 0.85 that an individual casting is good. Also shown on page 2-12 is a matrix of net profits resulting from the combination of Q and x. Finally, the expected profit is shown for various values of Q. Based on the results obtained, the optimum lot size is 65, with an expected profit of $55,925. b. Shown on page 2-13 are the probability mass function for the number of good castings (x) produced when Q castings are produced, based on a probability of 0.98 that an individual casting is good. Also on page 2-13 is a matrix of net profits resulting from the combination of Q and x. Finally, the expected profit is shown for various values of Q. Based on the results obtained, the optimum lot size is 56, with an expected profit of $64,315.

2-12 2.21 a.

2-13 2.21 b.

2.22 In Example 2.5, a = 2 min, b = 1 min, t = 6 min, n’ = 2.67, Co = $15/hr, and Cm = $50/hr. Without other constraints the optimum number of machines to assign to an operator was shown to equal 2. Since 2 < n’ < 3, the economic choice was between 2 and 3 machines. Hence, two groups of 2 would be less costly, on a cost per part produced basis, than one group of 4 machines. Here, 11 machines are required to meet the production requirements. How should they be assigned? One of the alternatives being considered is to assign 2 machines to each of 4 operators and then assign 3 machines to one operator; the alternative assignment being considered is to assign 2 machines to each of 5 operators and then assign 1 machine to one operator.

2-14 To calculate the cost per unit produced for each scenario, it is useful to evaluate each alternative using a length of time equal to the least common multiple of the cycle times for each machine-operator assignment in the scenario. For example, with the {2, 2, 2, 2, 3} scenario, Tc = 8 min for m = 2 and Tc = 9 min for m = 3; therefore, a time period equal to 72 minutes will be used. During a period of 72 mins. each 2-machine combination will perform 9 cycles and produce 18 parts; likewise, over the same time period, the 3machine assignment will perform 8 cycles and produce 24 parts. Hence, over a 72 min. period, a total of 4(18) + 24, or 96 parts will be produced. The total cost per unit produced over a 72 min. period equals [(5 op)($15/hr-op) + (11 mach)($50/hr-mach)](72 min/60 min/hr.)(1/96) parts), or $7.81/part. For the {2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1} scenario, Tc = 8 min for both m = 1 and m = 2. During an 8 min. time period a total of 11 parts are produced. The total cost per unit produced over an 8 min. period equals [6(15)+11(50)](8/60)(1/11), or $7.76/part. Hence, the least cost alternative, in terms of cost per unit produced, is the {2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1} scenario. Are there other scenarios that are less costly than the two considered? No! From Example 2.5, n* = 2. Hence, any scenario involving multiple assignments of single machines will be more costly than assignments of 2 machines per operator. Likewise, from the analysis performed above, any scenario involving a 3-machine assignment will be more expensive than one with a 2- machine and a 1-machine assignment. Further, any scenario having a 4-machine assignment will be more costly than one that substitutes two 2machine assignments for the 4-machine assignment. From the analysis performed above, a 5-machine assignment will be more expensive than a {2, 2, 1} assignment. By similar analyses, there are no other scenarios that need to be considered for the assignment of 11 machines. 2.23 For the optimum assignment in Example 2. 5 to remain unchanged, M < 1. Recall, in Example 2.5, n’ = 2.67, Co = $15/hr, Cm = $50/hr, and , = Co/Cm = 15/Cm. Therefore, for M < 1, (, + n)(n’) < (, + n + 1)(n), or (, + 2)(2.67) < (, + 3)(2), or (15 + 2Cm)(2.67) < (15 + 3Cm)(2), or (15)(2.67 - 2) < (6 - 5.33)Cm, or Cm > $15/hr. Hence, for a machine cost of $15 or more per machine-hour, the optimum assignment will be 2 machines per operator.

2-15 2.24

2-16 2.24 (continued)

2-17 2.24 (continued)

2-18 2.24 (continued)

2-19 2.24 (continued)

2-20 2.24 (continued)

2-21 2.24 (continued)

2-22 2.24 (continued)

2-23 2.24 During 7 hours of work for the operator between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., 136 units were produced by the 3 machines. In steady state conditions, the repeating cycle is 9 minutes. Hence, in steady state conditions a total of 140 units are produced. Transient conditions due to start-up and shut-down for breaks, lunch, and beginning/ending of the shift diminish the production by only 4 units. If replacement labor is provided to keep the machines working during the entire 8-hour shift and 3 shifts operate per day, then steady state production will result in 160 units being produced per 8-hour shift. 2.25 The problem statement was overly simplified, assuming sufficient demand exists to keep 5 machines busy and sales prices of the products are such that the calculation of cost per unit produced can be performed by summing the units produced for both products. Also, it is assumed that a machine is dedicated to producing either product 1 or product 2 and cannot be assigned to produce a combination of the two products due to changeover times. From Example 2.5, we know that two machines producing product 1 should be assigned an operator to minimize the cost per unit produced. For product 2, the optimum number of machines to assign an operator is obtained as follows for producing product 2: n2' = (2.5 + 8)/(2.5 + 1.5) = 2.625; , = 0.3; and M = (2.3/3.3)(2.625/2) = 0.9148 < 1; therefore, n2* = 2. Hence, it appears that 2 machines should be assigned to produce product 1 and 2 machines should be assigned to produce product 2; however, that leaves 1 machine unassigned. From the solution to Problem 2.22, we know that {2, 1} is less costly than {3} for product 1. The alternatives to be evaluated are as follows: assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator and 3 machines producing product 2 to an operator; assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator, 2 machines producing product 2 to an operator, and 1 machine producing product 2 to an operator; assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator, 1 machine producing product 1 to an operator, and 2 machines producing product 2 to an operator. Assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator and 3 machines producing product 2 to an operator. From Example 2.5, for product 1 the repeating cycle is 8 minutes. The repeating cycle is 3(2.5 + 1.5), or 12 min., for product 2. Hence, in 24 minutes, the 2 machines producing product 1 perform 3 repeating cycles and produce 6 parts, and 6 parts are produced by the 3 machines making product 2 while performing 2 repeating cycles. The total hourly cost of 2 operators and 5 machines is $280. During a period of 24 minutes, the cost will be $112.00; hence, the cost per unit to produce 12 parts in 8 minutes is $9.33/part.

2-24 Assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator, 2 machines producing product 2 to an operator, and 1 machine producing product 2 to an operator. The repeating cycle for product 2 is 10.5 minutes. Hence, in 168 minutes there will be 21 repeating cycles for machines producing product 1 and 16 repeating cycles of machines producing product 2. The total hourly cost of 3 operators and 5 machines is $295. During a period of 168 minutes, the cost will be $826; hence, the cost per unit to produce 90 parts (42 of product 1 and 48 of product 2) in 168 minutes is $9.18/part. Assign 2 machines producing product 1 to an operator, 1 machine producing product 1 to an operator, and 2 machines producing product 2 to an operator. As in the previous case, the repeating cycles are 8 and 10.5 minutes. Hence, over a 168 minute time frame, there will be 21 repeating cycles of the 3 machines producing product 1 and 16 repeating cycles of the 2 machines producing product 2. The cost per unit to produce 63 units of product 1 and 32 units of product 2 is ($295)(168)/(60)(95), or $8.69/part. Since this is the least cost option, it would be recommended. As noted, a simplified approach was used to arrive at a preference in the assignment of the 5 machines to the 2 products. With more information regarding sales prices, demands, changeover times, etc., a more informed decision could be made. The underlying objective in presenting the machineassignment problem was to provide students with experience in using simple mathematical models in making decisions regarding the assignment of machines to operators. 2.26 a. a = 6 + 4 = 10; b = 6; and t = 30. n’ = (10 + 30)/(10 + 6) = 2.5. No more than 2 mixers can be assigned without idle mixer time. b. Co = $12/hr, Cm = $25/hr, and , = Co/Cm = 0.48. Therefore, M = (, + n)(n’)/[(, + n + 1)(n)] = 2.5(2.48)/[3.48(2)], or M = 0.89 < 1. Hence, 2 mixers should be assigned an operator. 2.27 The multiple activity chart is provided on the following page. The length of the repeating cycle is given by the maximum of the following values: (aA+bA+aB+bB+aC+bC); (aA+tA); (aB+tB); (aC+tC), or max (11, 9, 10.5, 12),or 12. The repeating cycle is determined by machine C. As shown, the operator will have 1 minute of idle time during a repeating cycle, machine A will have 3 minutes of idle time, machine B will have 1.5 minutes of idle time, and machine C will have no idle time during a repeating cycle.

2-25

2.28 a = 5 min; b = 1 min; t = 20 min; Co = $12/hr, and Cm = $30/hr. a. n’ = (5 + 20)/(5 + 1) = 4.167 ˆ 4 is the maximum number of machines that can be assigned an operator without creating machine idle time during a repeating cycle. b. , = Co/Cm = 0.4. Therefore, M = (, + n)(n’)/[(, + n + 1)(n)] = 4.4(4.167)/[5.4(4)], or M = 0.8488 < 1. Hence, 4 machines should be assigned an operator. c. TC(m = 4) = [12 + 4(30)](5 + 20)/[(60)(4)] = $13.75/unit. d. For n* = 4, either M < 1 when n = 4 or M > 1 when n = 3. I) M < 1 case: M = (0.4 + 4)(n’)/[(0.4 +5)(4)] < 1 or M = [4.4(a + 20)]/[(a + 1)(5.4)(4)]| (4.4a + 88) < (21.6a + 21.6). Hence, 17.2a > 66.4, or a > 3.86 min. ii) M > 1 case: M = [3.4(a + 20)]/[(a + 1)(4.4)(3)]. Thus, (3.4a + 68) > (13.2a + 13.2). Hence, 9.8a < 54.8, or a < 5.59 min. Hence, for 3.86 min < a < 5.59 min. e. Consider the alternatives: {5, 5, 5}, {4, 4, 4, 3}, and {4, 5, 6}. i) {5, 5, 5} case: Tc = 30 min. TC{5, 5, 5} = [3($12) + 15($30)](30/60)(1/15) = $16.20/unit. ii) {4, 4, 4, 3} case: Tc = 25 min.

2-26 TC{4, 4, 4, 3} = [4($12) + 15($30)](25/60)(1/15) = $13.83/unit. iii) {4, 5, 6} case: Tc(4) = 25 min., Tc(5) = 30 min., Tc(6) = 36 min.In 2,700 minutes, 1,332 units will be produced: 4(108), or 432, by the 4machine assignment; 5(90), or 450, by the 5-machine assignment; and 6(75), or 450, by the 6-machine assignment. TC{4, 5, 6} = [3($12) + 15($30)](2700/60)(1/1332) = $16.42/unit. The least costly assignment of 15 machines is {4, 4, 4, 3}. We do not need to consider {3, 3, 3, 3, 3} since it has the same repeating cycle as {4, 4, 4, 3} and requires an additional operator. Likewise, there is no reason to consider an alternative involving a {3, 5} combination since we know from part a) that {4, 4} is less costly. 2.29 a = 4 min; b = 5 min + 3 min = 8 min; and t = 40 min ˆ n’ = (4 + 40)/(4 + 8) or n’ = 3.67 and 3 is the maximum number of automatic palletizers on operator can be assigned without creating idle time for the palletizers. 2.30 The problem statement does not mention retrievals by the S/R; hence, no travel between the P/D station and the outbound conveyor is required. It is assumed that the travel between the P/D station of one S/R aisle and the inbound conveyor for another S/R aisle also requires 0.5 minute. For the problem, there is no concurrent activity. As long as a load is at the P/D station, the S/R machine will retrieve it automatically. Hence, for the problem, b = 0.5 min to travel to the P/D station + 0.5 min to travel from the P/D station = 1.0 and t = 4 min to store a load and return to the end-of-theaisle. (In Chapter 10, we define this as a single command cycle for the S/R machine.) With b = 1 and t = 4, n’ = 4. Hence, as shown on page 2.-27, one lift truck operator can service 4 S/R machines; the operator and the S/R machines will be busy 100% of the time. For 5 S/R machines, 2 lift truck operators will be required. 2.31 a = 0.25 min; b = 0; and t = 1.0. Therefore, n’ = 1.25/0.25 = 5.0. An operator can tend 5 carousels without creating idle time for the conveyors; the operator will also be 100% occupied. 2.32 The solution depends on the recipe chosen. 2.33 The solution depends on the recipe chosen. 2.34 a. Board for part shortages b. Board for back-orders c. Feedback from material handlers when part has low physical inventory d. Feedback from operator handlers when part has low physical inventory

2-27

2.35

2-28 2.36

2.37 - 2.40

The answers to these questions depend on choices made and course specifics. See Section 2.5 for details on each of the 7 M&P tools.

2-29 Additional Material for the Instructor On this and the following pages drawings are provided for a variety of valves that can be given to students with assignments of developing appropriate precedence diagrams, assembly charts, and operations process charts. It is also recommended that they be asked to visit a Home Depot, Wal*Mart, or similar store and purchase a product that requires assembly; then, ask them to develop precedence diagrams, assembly charts, and operations process charts for the products selected.

Female Boiler Drain Valve

2-30

2-31

2-32

2-33 Male Boiler Drain Valve

2-34

2-35

2-36

2-37 Gate Valve

2-38

2-39

2-40

2-41 Stop/Waste Release Valve

2-42

2-43

2-44

Chapter 3 Flow, Space, and Activity Relationships

3-1 Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 3

3.1 A material management system for a bank refers to the flow process into the bank. The subjects of this system might include, but are not limited to, coin, currency, checks, other monetary instruments, deposit and withdrawal forms, loan documents, customers, suppliers, employees, banking supplies, and equipment required to operate the bank. The material flow system for a bank refers to the movement of materials, supplies, equipment, and personnel within the bank. The physical distribution system at a bank describes the flow of money and information, including loan and other documents, out of the bank. 3.2 A group technology layout is a candidate for consideration when a medium volume of a medium variety of products are to be produced. It is used when families of products can be grouped according to physical characteristics or production sequence information. 3.3

3-2 “Flow between,” expressed in equivalent loads/day, is depicted below. As noted, 90 equivalent loads move weekly between Marriage Licences and the Lab (60 + 30). Given the differences in numerical values a closeness rating was assigned, as shown in the activity relationship chart. Flow Between Chart

Activity Relationship Chart

3-3 The basic layout of the hospital will depend on “who moves” and “who remains fixed” in location. Actually, all subjects are candidates for movement, except for the most expensive diagnostic equipment; it cannot always be taken to the patient. However, advances in medical technology are such that more and more the technology is being brought to the patient via distance medicine. If it is desired that patients not be transported around the hospital to the various x-ray, cat-scan, and MRI facilities, then either remote sensing methods must be provided or the diagnostic equipment must be duplicated. Likewise, if the movement of medical personnel is to be minimized, then patients can be assigned to rooms/beds that are designated for particular doctors and nurses; the down-side of such an assignment is the likelihood of empty beds existing, since not all doctors will always have the maximum number of patients in the hospital at all times. Hospitals are often designed using group technology layouts, where the grouping is based on the medical services provided the patients. 3.5 A fixed position layout would be recommended when the product is very large, awkward, or expensive to move. It is also a candidate when low or sporadic volume of low variety production occurs. 3.6 Group technology layout using manufacturing cells is popular in JIT facilities because cellular layout encourages small lots, kanbans, simple material handling systems, short setup times, cross trained personnel, teamwork, and quality at the source. 3.7 Process layouts can result in complex flows, excessive handling, large inventories, and long production lead-times. 3.8

3-4 3.9

3.10

3.11

3-5 3.11 (continued)

3.12 Research Question: answer depends on the local fast-food restaurant chosen for study. 3.13 Research Question: answer depends on the components in the kitchen and the eating habits of the person for whom the kitchen is designed. 3.14 Backtracking results in excessive flow or travel, longer lead-times, and complications in scheduling. Backtracking may be avoided by duplicating machines, redefining the process plans to complete the machining in consecutive steps, specifying the use of another machine not requiring backtracking, or redesigning the product to eliminate the processing requiring backtracking. 3.15 Pros: Cons: simpler material handling equipment, shorter travel distances, less complex flow duplication of equipment, more discipline to monitor inventory and quality, more complex logistics to distinguish deliveries and shipments at different docks

Considerations should include evaluation of aisle requirements, outside accessibility for trucks, requirements for receiving inspection, delivery lot sizes, delivery/shipment unit load sizes, frequency of deliveries/shipments, and required paperwork and communications.

3-6 3.16 Top Management: Alternative issues and strategies to consider in the analysis such as layout classification, storage-handling strategies, organizational structure, and environmental policy. Product Designer: components and their dimensions and quantities per unit. Process Designer: machines and their specifications and product routings. Schedule Designer: lot sizes, production control method (e.g., kanbans), and production volume. Modern Manufacturing Approaches: kanbans, standardized containers, total productive maintenance, short set-ups, small lots, manufacturing cells, quality at the source, delivery to points of use, visual management, total quality management, multi-functional employees, decentralized storage, and team-based environments. 3.17 Benefits: reduction of inventories, space, machine breakdowns, rework, paperwork, warranty claims, storage and handling equipment, employee turnover and absenteeism, production lead-times, cost, and stockouts; simplification of communication, handling, and production scheduling; and improvement of productivity, flexibility, inventory turnover, quality, customer satisfaction, and employee morale. 3.18 Research Question: answer depends on problem statement. 3.19 A kanban is a signal, typically a card, that indicates to the supplying workstation that the consuming workstation requests more parts. There are two types of kanbans: a production card that is used to authorize production of more parts and a withdrawal card that is used to authorize delivery of more parts or components. The benefits of kanbans include simplified production control, reduced inventories, increased visibility, improved quality, reduced material handling, and reduced lead-times. Kanbans are a reminder that each employee has a customer, i.e., someone who depends on the employee doing her or his job well; in this case, kanbans come from internal “customers” and serve a similar function to a customer’s order for material. Kanbans are important in cellular manufacturing because of the limited space and need for better production control to prevent excessive work-in-process (WIP). 3.20 Benefits of U-shaped flow in manufacturing cells include, but are not limited to, enhanced visibility, improved communication, improved teamwork, simplified flow, reduced travel distance, improved quality, reduced WIP, reduced space, reduced handling, and improved control over input/output to the cell.

3-7 3.21 The impact includes delivery of small lots, the elimination of paperwork due to electronic data interchange (EDI), receiving material in decentralized storage areas, by-passing incoming inspection since suppliers have been certified, reduced movement of material, and simpler material handling equipment alternatives. The overall impact to the logistics systems includes shorter lead times, lower cost, and better quality. 3.22 a) b) c) d) e) Process improvement and quality activities Training for improved cross-functionality Production coordination Performance measures tracking Material handling

The new roles impact resources (less people, less inventories, less space) and change the structure of traditional activity relationships (storage at points of use, training and continuous improvement). 3.23 Logistics encompasses the arrival and departure of parts and products, including the quantities of each. Material handling and storage are extremely important for the facilities planner. In fact, some define manufacturing as production processes located strategically in a logistics system. 3.24 Research Question: answer depends on the restaurant visited. 3.25 Parallel parking advantages: space utilization and flow in one direction; okay if last-in, first-out arrival and departure is used Parallel parking disadvantages: excessive vehicular movement required; poor if first-in, first-out arrival and departure is used

3-8 Perpendicular parking advantages: none come to mind Perpendicular parking disadvantages: flow in two directions, excessive movement, and requires more open spaces

Diagonal parking advantages: requires less vehicular movement Diagonal parking disadvantages: requires more space

3-9 3.26 Research Question: answer depends on the individual. 3.27 a. b. c. d. 100' + 75' + 75' + 25' + 25' = 300' 175' + 75' + 150' + 25' + 25' = 450' 300' + 25' + 25' + 75' + 75' + 100' + 300' = 900' 175' + 100' + 175' + 150' + 50' = 650'

3.28 When streets are not at right angles, turning of vehicles can be more problematic. In such instances, wider turning lanes might be required, particularly for delivery trucks. 3.29 Research Question: answer depends on assumptions made. 3.30 A6 C 8 9 D7 B 3.31 Research Question: answer depends on student and professor. 3.32 Research Question: answer depends on services provided by and the organization of the bank. 3.33 Research Question: answer depends on student’s perspective and the degree to which the student interacts with the various activity areas listed. 3.34 Research Question: answer depends on student’s perspective of the professor and the various roles played by the professor in question.

Chapter 4 Personnel Requirements

4-1 Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 4 4.1 A well-fed employee is not necessarily a happy employee. Likewise, a happy employee is not necessarily a productive one. These two statements relate to pervasive philosophies held by some companies, and they are not universally accepted. Because of particular company philosophies, facilities planners must adapt their plans to conform with them. Generally, if the location of the facility is in a cold environment, the employee may bring a coat to work. Also, the employee may bring a lunch, a change of clothes if working in a dirty or hot environment, and some personal toiletries. These items can all fit into a locker. When parking spaces are assigned, there must be a 1:1 ratio between the number of spaces and the number of employees that work in the facility, and the parking space utilization will be low depending on whether or not some personnel are not at the facility during the day. If there is a random parking philosophy at the company, then anywhere between a 1:1.25 to a 1:3 ratio of parking spaces to employees is required, depending on whether or not the facility is serviced by public transportation. Consequently, only 33%-80% of the space required for an assigned space parking lot is necessary for a random space parking lot. Standard cars (8’6”), 90° (because a perpendicular alignment has the best utilization of space), W2: Module width (from Table 4.1) = 66’0” First, determine how many modules the depth of the parking lot can hold: (370’/66’) = 5.606 modules (round down to 5.5, because each module has two rows in it.). Next, determine the number of cars that can be parked per module: (400’/8’6”) = 47 cars/row * 2 rows/module = 94 cars/module Finally, multiply the number of cars/module by the number of modules in the parking lot: 94 cars/module * 5.5 modules/parking lot = 517 cars/parking lot Note: If a 9’ standard car width is used, then 484 cars can be parked in the lot. If a 9’6” standard car width is used, then 462 cars can be parked in the parking lot.

4.2

4.3

4.4

4-2 4.5 Answers vary depending on the specific parking lot analyzed. The user should try various parking angles and pay attention to best placement of aisles and cross-aisles relative to entry and exit points in the lot. The primary advantage of parking decks over surface lots is that parking decks can accommodate more cars per square foot of land, which is significant when land is expensive or unavailable. Also, parking decks provide shelter against the elements (rain, snow, UV rays from the sun) for the users and their vehicles. However, parking decks are more expensive than comparable surface lots and take longer to construct. They may require elevators, adding to the expense. Many drivers have difficulty navigating parking decks and may take longer to find a parking spot and exit later. Finally, a parking deck leaves fewer options for future expansion than a surface lot that could be more easily built over. There must be two restrooms, one for males and one for females. There must be a minimum of three water closets and three lavatories in each restroom (from Table 4.2). In the men’s restroom, one urinal can be substituted for a water closet. Consequently, only l6 ft2 of space is required for the urinal. For each lavatory, 6 ft2 of space should be designated. For each water closet, 15 ft2 of space should be included. Also, 15 ft2 of space should be allocated for the entrance. Since there are fewer than 100 females employed in the facility, only one bed or cot should be provided. For each bed, 60 ft2 of space should be provided. The summation of space required for each gender’s restroom is as follows: Men: Urinal (1 @ 6 ft2) Water Closet (3 @ 15 ft2) Lavatories (3 @ 6 ft2) Entrance (1 @ 15 ft2) Subtotal 40% allowance Total =6 = 30 = 18 = 15 = 69 = 28 = 97 ft2 = 45 = 18 = 60 = 15 = 138 = 55 = 193 ft2

4.6

4.7

Women: Water Closet (3 @ 15 ft2) Lavatories (3 @ 6 ft2) Bed or Cot (1 @ 60 ft2) Entrance (1 @ 15 ft2) Subtotal 40% allowance Total

4-3 4.8 Since an employee typically spends the first third of his lunch break preparing to eat and obtaining his meal, for a one-hour lunch break, dining shifts may begin every 40 minutes (rounded up to 45 minutes because shifts must begin and end on 15 minute increments). Consequently, 2 lunch shifts can be included in the 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. time frame. The following table shows the shift timing for each lunch break. Beginning of Lunch Break 11:00 A.M. 11:45 A.M. 4.9 Time Sat Down in Chair 11:20 A.M. 12:05 P.M. End of Lunch Break 12:00 Noon 12:45 P.M.

If 800 employees eat during one shift at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with 36 in2 tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a vending machine and cafeteria food service: Vending Machine Area (800 people @ 1 ft2 per person) Cafeteria Area (800 people @ 13.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 800 = 10,800 = 11,600 ft2

If 400 employees eat during two shifts at a commercial facility that has a cafeteria with 42 in2 tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a vending machine and cafeteria food service: Vending Machine Area (400 people @ 1 ft2 per person) Cafeteria Area (400 people @ 17.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 400 = 7,000 = 7,400 ft2

If 200 employees eat during four shifts at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with rows of 10 foot long rectangular tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a vending machine and cafeteria food service: Vending Machine Area (200 people @ 1 ft2 per person) Cafeteria Area (200 people @ 12 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 200 = 2,400 = 2,600 ft2

4-4 4.10 If 800 employees eat during one shift at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with 36 in2 tables, and lunch breaks are one hour, then the following space requirements are necessary for a serving line and cafeteria food service: Serving Line Area (6 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Cafeteria Area (800 people @ 13.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 1,800 = 10,800 = 12,600 ft2

The reason why six serving lines are required with a one-hour lunch break for 800 employees is that a serving line can serve 7 employees per minute. In a 20-minute time frame, one line can serve 140 employees. If five lines are utilized only 700 employees will be served in twenty minutes. Consequently, size lines are required. If 400 employees eat during two one-hour shifts at a commercial facility that has a cafeteria with 42 in2 tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a serving line and cafeteria foot service: Serving Line Area (3 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Cafeteria Area (400 people @ 17.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 900 = 7,000 = 7,900 ft2

If 200 employees eat during four one-hour shifts at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with rows of 10 foot long rectangular tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a serving line and cafeteria food service: Serving Line Area (2 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Cafeteria Area (200 people @ 12 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement 4.11 = 600 = 2,400 = 3,000 ft2

If 800 employees eat during one shift at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with 36 in2 tables, and lunch breaks are one hour, then the following space requirements are necessary for a full kitchen and cafeteria food service: Serving Line Area (6 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Kitchen Area for 800 people (from Table 4.5) Cafeteria Area (800 people @ 13.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 1,800 = 2,400 = 10,800 = 15,000 ft2

If 400 employees eat during two one-hour shifts at a commercial facility that has a cafeteria with 42 in2 tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a full kitchen and cafeteria food service:

4-5 Serving Line Area (3 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Kitchen Area for 800 people (from Table 4.5) Cafeteria Area (400 people @ 17.5 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement = 900 = 2,400 = 7,000 = 10,300 ft2

If 200 employees eat during four one-hour shifts at an industrial facility that has a cafeteria with rows of 10 foot long rectangular tables, then the following space requirements are necessary for a full kitchen and cafeteria food service: Serving Line Area (2 lines @ 300 ft2 per line) Kitchen Area for 800 people (from Table 4.5) Cafeteria Area (200 people @ 12 ft2 per person) Total Area Requirement 4.12 = 600 = 2,400 = 2,400 = 5,400 ft2

The space requirement in the health services are for the employment of two nurses and a part-time physician are as follows: Waiting Room (1 @ 100 ft2) First Aid Room (2 Nurses @ 250 ft2 per nurse) Examination Room (1 Physician @ 150 ft2 per physician) Total Health Services Area Requirement = 100 = 500 = 150 = 750 ft2

4.13 4.14

Answers will vary depending on the campus. In office facilities, the restrooms must be the same size for the same amount of people. However, due to the fact that office personnel tend to have longer lunch breaks, the food services are does not need to be as large as it would for a production facility, because office personnel tend to go out to lunch for more than production personnel. Also, office workers tend not to get injured as much as production personnel, so the health services area does not need to be as large in an office facility as they do in a production facility. Finally, production workers that work in hot environments need more locker space and shower stalls than those people in an office environment. It is important to consult personnel such as the human resources department industrial relations department, or personnel department on the types of personnel requirements necessary for the facility. However, these people may not understand the cost effectiveness of their decisions, so the facilities planner should only gain insight from them, not use them to make final facilities decisions.

4.15

4-6 4.16 In a multi-level facility, there have to be more personnel service locations than in a single-level facility because a multi-level facility is much more decentralized. There have to be more restrooms because each level has to have one for men and women. Also, there should be more vending facilities in a multi-level facility than a single-level facility because it is more difficult for people to walk stairs to vending locations on different levels. if it is a multi-level production facility, health services need to be located on several, if not all floors. Furthermore, on top of health service, food service and restrooms that must comply with ADA regulations in a multi-level facility, ADA compliance also must occur so that all disabled employees can reach all levels of the facility. The ADA implications on: a. The classroom building in which this class is taught must have tables at which disabled students can sit. Also, if the classroom is above the ground floor, then ADA regulations state that the student must be able to access the room by other means than stairs. The elevator control panel must be at a height that is accessible to disabled students. All doors leading to the classroom must be wide enough to accommodate a wheelchair. The fire alarm and electric switches must be at a height where someone in a wheelchair can reach it. The room between aisles of decks in the classroom must be at least three feet. For any sight impaired students, Braille instructions should be placed on the door so the student can determine where the classroom is. b. The upper decks of the football stadium should have ramped access to them and all decks should have areas in which people in wheel chairs can enjoy the game without someone standing in front of them impeding their view. Also, vending locations should be low enough so that people in wheelchairs can reach the service shelf and cash register without having to strain themselves. Finally, all restroom facilities should have doors that are wide enough for disables individuals and Braille instructions for sight-impaired individuals. c. The school’s student center should have access to all levels for disabled personnel. Sight-impaired individuals should have Braille instructions and Braille labels throughout the center, as well as seeingeye dog access. Wheelchair-bound individuals should have their campus mailbox at a level where they can reach it. Any activities within the student center, such as bowling alleys, cafeteria, game rooms, movie theaters, and student organization offices should have wheelchair access. The entrances and exits to the center should have ramp access, if necessary. All aisles within the facility should be wide enough to contain two wheelchairs side by side.

4.17

4-7 4.18 Individual employees can give valuable input to verify and refine office requirements. This can be accomplished through personal interviews when the number of employees is small. When the number of employees is large, survey can be used to get feedback on things to consider for employees to be more productive. It is important for employees to feel that they are part of the process of making the entire organization more efficient. Advantages of open office structure: Improved communications Improved supervision Better access to common files and equipment Easier to illuminate, heat, cool, and ventilate Lower maintenance cost Reduce space requirements due to space flexibility Disadvantages of open office structure: Lack of privacy Lack of status recognition Difficulty in controlling noise Easy access for interruptions and interference. 4.20 Campus office concept gives higher level of personal satisfaction. Every employee is provided with the same employee services and facilities, which put everyone in an equal “status”. No one feels being treated unfairly. When moving to a larger cluster/new office, everything remains the same, where as in the traditional office concept; the employee may have to readjust to the new environment. Additional features: Computers at every workstation Vending Machines Child care services List of criteria to evaluate office plans can be looked at from different perspective: a. Employee Size Noise Proximity of facilities Proximity of colleague Supporting features such as computer, internet, phone line, etc

4.19

4.21

4.22

4-8 b. Manager Visibility for supervision Productivity c. Company Maintenance cost Impact to business operation Proximity to supporting facility such as postal service.

Chapter 5 Material Handling

5-1 Answers to Questions at the End of Chapter 5 5.1 Work principle. The measure of work is material flow (volume, weight, or count per unit of time) multiplied by the distance moved. The work principle promotes minimizing work whenever possible. Materials movement should be in as practically large amount as possible and material-handling devices should be fully utilized by carrying loads at its capacity. Ergonomic principle. Ergonomics is the science that seeks to adapt work or working conditions to suit the abilities of the worker. Human capabilities and limitations must be incorporated into material handling equipment and procedures designed for effective interaction with the people using the system. As an example, for humans picking in a warehouse, do not store any items above the top of the head. The optimum picking zone in order to minimize stooping and stretching is from the hips to the shoulder. 5.2 Unit Load principle. A unit load is one that can be stored or moved as a single entity at one time, such as pallet, container, etc, regardless of the number of individual items that make up the load. In this principle, product should be handled in as large a unit load as practical. As an example, instead of moving individual products, a number of products can be palletized and move as a single load. However, the size of the load must be considered as excessive unit load can reduce the visibility of the forklift driver or may not be practical in utilizing truck space. Moving as large a unit load as practical must be exercised in the context of just-intime delivery. There is no point in moving materials if it will not be used for a long duration. Space Utilization principle. Space in material handling is three dimensional and therefore is counted as cubic space and effective utilization of all cubic space is the essence of this principle. If products are stored in a container, the product should fill up the container. In storage application, the storage dimension should be designed to fit a unit load with some tolerance for storage and retrieval. 5.3 An illustrative example is given below. Environmental principle. Environmental consciousness stems from a desire not to waste natural resources and to predict and eliminate the possible negative effects of our daily action to the environment. Practical application to this principle is to replace combustion engine forklift to electric forklift.

5-2 Standardization principle. Standardization means less variety and customization in the methods and equipment employed. With unit load standardization, a common material handling device can be employed to move different products. Higher space utilization can also be attributed to unit load standardization. Storage space is the same across all products; therefore there is no need for differentiating the storage area. By doing this, space wasted from excess storage space dedicated to each product can be eliminated due to the pooling effect. 5.4 An illustrative example is given below. Bridge Crane. A bridge crane can be classified into two basic types: top running and under running, both with single or multiple girders design. The girders which functions as a bridge beam may support one or multiple trolley and hoist. The bridge travels along the runway on wheeled carriages called end trucks, which are mounted to each bridge end. The hoist body is either mounted on top of the bridge or suspended from it. The hoist moves along the bridge on a trolley. Bridge crane operates on three axes of movement and a swivel that rotates the load around the vertical axis is regularly featured. An operator standing on the floor using a pendant, remote radio, or infrared control unit can do the controlling. The operator may also be in a self-contained control cab in larger and faster cranes. Finally, automation is the last control option. Jib Crane. The main configuration of a jib crane is a horizontal beam that pivots along a vertical axis. A trolley and hoist may be perched from the beam. Jib cranes have three degrees of freedom - vertical, radial and rotary. Jib cranes may be attached to a vertical wall member, or mounted to a mast attached to the floor, and some may be constructed to move along a wall. Jib crane is economical; uses little floor space, and pivots in a pie-shaped area. However, it cannot reach into corners and it doesn't lift objects outside the circular area. Another disadvantage is the lack of portability. Typical application includes localized activity like in a machine shop. Gantry Crane. A gantry crane is a bridge crane using a horizontal beam that is supported at each end. There are two versions of gantry crane: single leg and double leg both with provisions for the legs to travel along rails. Gantry cranes are used when overhead runway are not practical. It can be built on wheels for portability, is economical, and is able to lift heavy loads. Its major disadvantage is the limited reach since it cannot expand much beyond the inside span. 5.5 Attributes for comparing sorting conveyor: ! Maximum number of sorting capacity per minute ! Load range

5-3
! ! ! ! ! !

Load size Minimum distance between spurs Diverter impact on load Safety Initial cost Maintenance cost.

5.6

Attributes for comparing automated guided vehicles systems: ! Weight capacity ! Safety ! Travel speed ! Throughput capacity ! Vehicle Cost ! System cost per vehicle ! Operating costs Attributes for comparing unit load storage system: ! Cost per position ! Potential storage density ! Load Access: the ease to load/unload the materials stored ! Throughput capacity - the rate of which materials can flow through ! Inventory and location control - visibility permitting for easier inventory control/counting ! FIFO maintenance - storage arrangement so that the first material that is stored will also be the first one that is retrieved ! Ability to house variable load sizes ! Ease of installation Attributes for comparing unit load retrieval technologies: ! Vehicle cost ! Lift height capacity ! Aisle width - aisle width required for vehicle to operate ! Weight capacity ! Lift speed - the speed in the vertical axis ! Travel speed - speed of the vehicle Attributes for comparing small part storage alternatives: 3 ! Gross system cost - initial cost/purchased ft 3 ! Net system cost - initial cost/available ft 3 2 ! Floor space requirements - ft of inventory housed per ft of floor space ! Human factors - ease of retrieval ! Maintenance requirements ! Items security ! Flexibility - ease of reconfigure ! Pick rate - order lines per person-hour

5.7

5.8

5.9

5-4
!

Key

5.10

Attributes for comparing automated data collection systems: ! Real time - data collected will be straight recorded in the database ! Hands free ! Eyes free ! Cost Attributes for comparing bar code readers: ! Range - the range where the bar code can still be read ! Depth of field - orthogonal distance to read the bar code ! Scan rate ! Resolution ! Price Attributes for comparing bar code printers: ! Print Quality 2 ! Throughput (in / sec) ! Typical price range ! Relative ownership cost a. A pallet truck is used to lift and transport pallet loads of material for distance preclude walking. Platform truck is a version of industrial truck. A platform truck uses a platform for supporting the load. It does not have lifting capabilities and used for transporting. The main difference is that a platform truck needs another device to load and unload the material while a pallet truck doesn’t need one. b. A reach truck is mostly used on double deep rack. A reach truck has the capability to extend its forks for easier storage/retrieval on deep racks. A turret truck is mostly used on narrow aisle. A turret truck has a pivot point on the fork and a constant mask for more maneuverability along narrow aisles.

5.11

5.12

5.13

5.14

a. Drive-in rack extends the reduction of aisle space that begun with the double deep rack. Drive-in rack allows a lift truck to drive in to the rack several positions and store or retrieve a unit load. A drive-thru rack is a drive-in rack that is accessible from both sides of the rack. It is staged for a flow-thru fashion where load is loaded at one end and retrieve at the other end. Both racks have the same design considerations. b. Push back rack is a carrier with rail guide for each pallet load. Push back rack provides a last-in-first-out storage system. A mobile rack is a single deep selective rack on wheels/tracks that permits the entire row of racks to move on adjacent rows.

5-5

5.15

An illustration is given below. Bridge Crane vs. Stacker Crane. Bridge Crane is a bridge that spans a work area. The bridge is mounted on tracks. The bridge crane and hoist can provide 3 dimensional coverage of the department. A stacker crane is similar to a bridge crane, but instead of using a hoist, a mast is supported by the bridge. The mast is equipped with forks or a platform, which are used to lift unit loads.

5.16

The first dimension of pallet size correspond to the length of the stringer board and the second dimension correspond to the length of the deck board.

48

40 48
40

40x48

48 x 40

5-6

5.17

Two-way pallet - fork entry can be only on 2 opposite sites of the pallet and is parallel to the stringer board. Four-way pallet - fork entry can be on any side of the pallet. A two-way pallet:

A four-way pallet:

5.18

This is an independent study question.

5.19

This is an independent study question.

5.20

This is an independent study question.

5-7 5.21 A-F-E-D-C-B-A-F There are several different answers depending on the assumption. Two different cases will be presented in these examples: The vehicle is assumed to stop at point F. Case 1: Unit load size = 50, so assuming for every 100 loads the vehicle will make the following trip: A-F-A-F-E-F-E-D-E-D-C-B-A-F A F E D C B A F

Number of trips = 13 There are 13 trips for every 100 loads. Since we have 2000 pieces, then the total number of trip is 2000/100 * 13 = 260 trips Case 2: Unit load size 50, so assuming for every 100 loads the vehicle will make the following trip: A-F-E-D-A-F-E-D-C-B-A-F A F E D C B A F

Number of trips = 11 There are 11 trips for every 100 loads. Since we have 2000 pieces, then the total number of trips is 2000/100 * 11 = 220 trips These two examples are just two possible answers available. There are many other possibilities depending on the assumption.

Chapter 6 Layout Planning Models and Design Algorithms

6-1 Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 6 6.1 Several important factors such as: a. Product type, b. Manufacturing, c. Marketing Distribution, d. Management Distribution, e. Human resource plans will be impacted by and will impact on the facility layout. The material handling decisions can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of a layout. For example: a. Centralized vs. decentralized storage of WIP, tooling, and supplies. b. Fixed path vs. variable path handling. c. Single vs. bi-directional material handling equipments. d. The handling unit (unit load) planned for the system. e. The degree of automation used in handling. f. The type of level of inventory control, physical control, and computer control of materials a. Fixed Product Layout: It should be used when the product is too large or cumbersome to move through the various processing steps, e.g. shipbuilding industry, aspects of the aircraft industry, and the construction industry. b. Product Layout: It is used when high-volume production conditions exist. The product volume must be sufficient to achieve satisfactory utilization of the machine. c. Group Layout: It is used when production volumes for individual products are not sufficient to justify product layouts, but by grouping products into logical product families, a product layout can be justified for the family. d. Process Layout: It is used when there exist many low-volume, dissimilar products to be planned. 6.4 Manufacturing Situation a. Soda Bottler b. Printing Shop c. Meat-Process Plant d. Furniture Manufacturing Plant e. Computer Chip Maker f. Shipyard g. Refinery Plant h. College Campus Primary Layout Design Product Layout Group Layout Fixed Product Layout Group Layout Product Layout Fixed Product Layout Product Layout Group Layout

6.2

6.3

6-2 6.5 The construction type of facility layout procedure involves developing a new layout from scratch. The improvement procedure generates layout alternatives based on an existing layout. All three layout procedures provide a systematic step-by-step methodology in designing a facility layout. All of them take the activity interrelationship, space requirements, and etc. into account. All of them are based on the construction type of facility layout procedure and improved upon the initial layout with consideration of other constraints. Apple puts more emphasis on the material handling aspect of the layout. Reed concerns more about the equipment selection and requirements. Muther's procedure is dependent on the material flow aspects of the layout problem. 6.7 Flow-Between Diagram A B C D A - 375 125 365 B - 400 620 C - 400 D Relationship Diagram Activity Relationship Chart A B C D A I O I B E A C E D -

6.6

A

D

B

C

6-3 Space Relationship Diagram

A D

B

C

Block Layout A D C B

6.8

6 Departments (A, B, C, D, E, and F); 10 Products (1-10) a. Construct From-To Chart Dept. A B A — 13,320 B 0 — C 0 6,600 D 0 3,000 E 0 5,400 F 0 0 C 1,800 11,400 — 1,200 7,800 0 D 0 6,600 2,400 — 1,200 0 E 0 4,920 4,200 5,040 — 0 F 0 5,400 3,600 960 5,160 —

6-4 b. SLP Approach Since we do not have the activity relationship chart, we base our closeness rating on the material flow information. Construct Flow-Between Chart A B C A — 13,320 1,800 B — 18,000 C — D E F Rank flow values 1. B-C 2. A-B 3. C-E 4. B-E 5. B-D 6. D-E 7. B-F 8. E-F 9. C-D 10. C-F 11. A-C 12. D-F 13 A-D 14. A-E 15. A-F 18,000 13,320 12,000 10,320 9,600 6,240 5,400 5,160 3,600 3,600 1,800 960 0 0 0 A A E E E I I I O O U U U U U D U E O E U E E I F U I O U I D 0 9,600 3,600 — E 0 10,320 12,000 6,240 — F 0 5,400 3,600 960 5,160 —

Activity Relationship Chart A B C A A U B A C D E F

6-5 Relationship Diagram

F

A

B

C

D Block Layout

E

F C

A

B

D

E

6-6 6.9 a. Construct From-To Chart
Dept A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O A — B 500 — C 440 500 — D 0 500 1000 — E 0 940 0 640 — F 0 440 1140 1140 700 — G 0 0 0 0 0 0 — H 0 0 0 1140 0 0 0 — I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 — J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 150 — K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 — L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 150 — M 0 0 0 0 0 0 630 0 0 0 0 0 — N 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 280 — O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1450 —

b. SLP Approach Rank flow values N-O 1,450 A C-F 1,140 A D-F 1,140 A D-H 1,140 A C-D 1,000 E B-E 940 E E-F 700 E D-E 640 E G-M 630 E G-N 550 I A-B 500 I Activity Relationship Chart A B C D E F A - I O U U U B - I I E O C - E U A D - E A E - E F G H I J K L M N O B-C B-D A-C B-F H-J H-K H-L M-N H-I I-J K-L G U U U U U U H U U U A U U U 500 500 440 440 400 300 300 280 250 150 150 I U U U U U U U O J U U U U U U U O O K U U U U U U U O U U I I O O O O O O O O O L M U U U U U U U U U U U U U E O U U U U U O U - U N U U U U U U I U U U U U O O U U U U U U U U U U U U U A -

6-7 Relationship Diagram A B

C

F

E

I

G

M

D

H

J

N

O

L Block Layout A B E C F D O N G 6.10

K

J H M

I K L

Given: Activity Relationship Chart, Space Requirement a. SLP Approach i) Relationship Diagram

A

G F

C

B

D

E

6-8 ii) Space Relationship Diagram

A

G F

C B D E

b. Block Layout using SLP A C B D G F E 6.11 Given: Activity Relationship Chart, Space Requirements a. SLP Approach Relationship Diagram

Recv.

Press

Rivet

Robot

Saw Draw Form Bend

6-9

Space Relationship Diagram

Receive

Press

Robot

Saw

Form

Bend

Block Layout

Receive

Press

Saw
Robot

Form

6.12

∑

( i , j ) ∈F

f ij = 20 ,

∑(

i , j )∈F

f ij = −10 ,

∑(

i , j )∈F

f ij xij = 14 ,

∑(

i , j )∈F

fij (1 − xij ) = −4 ;
14 − ( −4) = 18 = 0.60 . 30

by equation (6.4) we have z =

20 − ( −10)

Draw

Bend

Rivet

Draw

Rivet

6-10
6.13

A to PD #3B to PD #2 C to PD #5 Cost = 5(120) + 30(180) + 10(90) + 25(210) + 25(210) + 5(120) + 5(150) + 20(60) + 5(270) = 21,300 A to PD #2 B to PD #3 C to PD #5 Cost = 5(210) + 30(270) + 10(240) + 25(120) + 25(120) + 5(210) + 5(60) + 20(150) + 5(60) = 22,200 A to PD #5 B to PD #2 C to PD #3 Cost = 5(210) + 30(60) + 10(210) + 25(90) + 25(120) + 5(240) + 5(270) + 20(60) + 5(180) = 14,850 A to PD #3 B to PD #5 C to PD #2 Cost = 5(240) + 30(180) + 10(210) + 25(120) + 25(90) + 5(210) + 5(150) + 20(270) + 5(60) = 21,450 A to PD #2 B to PD #5 C to PD #3 Cost = 5(90) + 30(270) + 10(120) + 25(210) + 25(240) + 5(120) + 5(60) + 20(270) + 5(210) = 28,350 A to PD #5 B to PD #3 C to PD #2 Cost = 5(120) + 30(60) + 10(120) + 25(240) + 25(210) + 5(90) + 5(270) + 20(150) + 5(60) = 19,950 Final Assignment A to PD #5 B to PD #2 C to PD #3

6.14

Create Flow-Between Chart Machine A B C D A 200 3300 700 B 200 2800 C 1200 D Arrangements/Costs A B C D: 30(200 + 200 + 1200) + 60(3300 + 2800) + 90(700) = 477,000 B A C D: 30(200 + 3300 + 1200) + 60(200 + 700) + 90(2800) = 477,000 C B A D: 30(200 + 200 + 700) + 60(3300 + 2800) + 90(1200) = 507,000 D B C A: 30(2800 + 200 + 3300) + 60(1200 + 200) + 90(700) = 336,000 Switch A and D B D C A: 30(2800 + 1200 + 3300) + 60(200 + 700) + 90(200) = 291,000 C B D A: 30(200 + 2800 + 700) + 60(1200 + 200) + 90(3300) = 492,000 A B C D: 30(200 + 200 + 1200) + 60(3300 + 2800) + 90(700) = 477,000

6-11 Switch B and D C D B A: 30(1200 + 2800 + 200) + 60(200 + 700) + 90(3300) = 477,000 A D C B: 30(700 + 2800 + 200) + 60(3300 + 2800) + 90(200) = 495,000 Final Arrangement
6.15

BDCA D 700 2800 1200 —

Construct Flow-Between Chart CELL A B C A — 200 3300 B — 200 C — D

Arrangements/Costs A B C D: 200(30) + 3300(45) + 700(75) + 200(15) + 2800(45) + 1200(30) = 372,000 B A C D: 200(30) + 3300(15) + 700(45) + 200(45) + 2800(75) + 1200(30) = 342,000 C B A D: 200(30) + 3300(75) + 700(15) + 200(45) + 2800(45) + 1200(90) = 507,000 D B C A: 200(60) + 3300(45) + 700(105) + 200(15) + 2800(45) + 1200(60) = 435,000 Switch A and B A B C D: 200(30) + 3300(45) + 700(45) + 200(15) + 2800(75) + 1200(30) = 372,000 C A B D: 200(30) + 3300(45) + 700(45) + 200(75) + 2800(15) + 1200(90) = 351,000 D A C B: 200(60) + 3300(15) + 700(45) + 200(45) + 2800(105) + 1200(60) = 468,000 Final Arrangement
6.16

BACD D 70 65 85 — E 0 85 45 90 — F 80 0 80 70 10 —

Construct Flow-Between Chart M/C A B C A — 15 90 B — 75 C — D E F

Find all machine arrangement combinations. 1. ABC-DEF: 30(15 + 0 + 75 + 45 + 90 + 10) + 60(90 + 80 + 85 + 70) = 26,550

6-12 2. ABC- DFE: 10(45) + 20(80 + 70) + 30(15 + 90 + 10) + 40(80) + 50(90) + 60(90 + 85) = 25,100 3. ABC-EDF: 10(65) + 20(85 + 85 + 70) + 30(15 + 75 + 85 + 90) + 40(70) + 50(45 + 10)+ 60(90 + 80) = 29,150 4. ABC-EFD: 10(0) + 20(85 +80 + 70) + 30(15 + 75 + 10 +65) +40(80) + 50(90 + 45) + 60(90 + 70) = 29,200 5. ABC-FDE: 10(65 + 45) + 20(70 + 70 + 85) + 30(15 + 50 + 75) + 40(85) + 50(10) + 60(90 + 80) = 23,900 6. ABC-FED: 10(85 + 85) + 20(10 + 65) +30(15 + 90 + 75) + 40(45) + 50(70 + 70) + 60(90 + 80) = 27,600 7. ACB-DEF: 10(45) + 20(90 + 85 + 85) + 30(90 +75 + 10) + 40(80) + 50(15 + 65) +60(80 + 70) = 27,100 8. ACB-DFE: 20(90 + 85 + 80 + 70) + 30(75 + 45 + 10) + 50(15 + 65 + 90) = 18,900 9. ACB-EDF: 10(45 + 65) + 20(90 + 85 + 70) + 30(90 + 75) + 40(70 + 85 + 80) + 50(15 + 10) + 60(80) = 26,400 10. ACB-EFD: 10(45 + 65) + 20(90 + 80 + 70) + 30(10 + 75) + 40(80 + 85 + 85) + 50(15 + 90) + 60(70) = 27,900 11. ACB-FDE: 20(90 + 70 + 45 + 70) + 30(75 + 45 + 65 + 90) + 50(15 + 10) = 15,000 12. ACB-FED: 10(45 + 65) + 20(90 + 80 + 85) +30(10 + 75 + 90) +40(65) + 50(15) +60(70 + 70) = 23,200 13. BAC-DEF: 10(65) + 20(85 + 90 + 80) +30(90 + 15 + 10) + 40(70) + 50(75) + 60(85 + 70) = 25,050 14. BAC-DFE: 10(65 + 45) + 20(70 + 80 + 90) +30(15 + 10) + 40(70 + 85 + 80) + 50(90 + 75) + 60(85) = 29,400 15. BAC-EDF: 20(90 + 80 + 85 +70) + 30(15 + 65 + 90) +50 (75 + 45 + 10) = 18,100 16. BAC-EFD: 20(90 + 80 + 85 +70) + 30(10 + 15) +50 (75 + 45 + 65 + 90) = 20,700 17. BAC-FDE: 10(65 + 45) + 20(70 + 70 + 90) +30(15 + 90) + 40(80 + 85 + 85) + 50(10 + 75) + 60(80) = 27,900 18. BAC-FED: 20(85 + 90 + 70) + 30(10 + 15 + 45 + 90) +40(80) + 50(75 + 65) + 60(80 + 70) = 28,900 Final Arrangement
6.17

ACB-FDE

Construct Flow-Between Chart based on routing information Dept A B C D E A — 0 450 500 600 B — 700 0 250 C — 0 850 D — 200 E —

6-13 Construct Distance Matrix 1 2 3 1 (A) — 20 70 2 (B) — 50 3 (C) — 4 (D) 5 (E) Arrangements/Costs ABCDE: 450(70) + 500(120) + 600(140) + 50(700) + 250(120) + 850(70) + 200(20) = 304,000 BACDE: 450(50) + 500(100) + 600(120) + 700(70(120) + 250(140) + 850(70) + 200(20) = 292,000 CBADE: 450(70) + 500(50) + 600(70) + 700(20) + 250(120) + 850(140) + 200(20) = 265,500 DBCAE: 450(50) + 500(120) + 600(20) + 700(50) + 250(120) + 850(70) + 200(140) = 247,000 EBCDA: 450(50) + 500(20) + 600(140) + 700(50) + 250(20) + 850(70) + 200(120) = 240,000 ACBDE: 450(20) + 500(120) + 600(140) + 700(50) + 250(70) + 850(120) + 200(20) = 311,500 ADCBE: 450(70) + 500(20) + 600(140) + 700(50) + 250(20) + 850(120) + 200(120) = 291,500 AECDB: 450(70) + 500(120) + 600(20) + 700(70) + 250(120) + 850(50) + 200(100) = 245,000 ABDCE: 450(120) + 500(70) + 600(140) + 700(100) + 250(120) + 850(20) + 200(70) = 304,000 ABEDC: 450(140) + 500(120) + 600(70) + 700(120) + 250(50) + 850(70) + 200(500) = 331,000 ABCED: 450(70) + 500(140) + 600(120) + 700(50) + 250(100) + 850(50) + 200(20) = 280,000 Final arrangement EBCDA

4 120 100 50 —

5 140 120 70 20 —

6-14
6.18

Construct Flow-Between Chart based on routing information Dept A B C D E A — B 350 — C 250 350 — D 250 0 0 — E 0 400 50 450 —

1. Determine the departments with largest weight: D & E ; weight = 450 2. Select the third department to enter: B ; weight = 400 A B C D 250 0 0 E 0 400 50 Total 250 400 50

3. Select the next department to enter: C ; in Face D-E-B ; weight = 750 A C D 250 0 E 0 400 B 350 350 Total 600 750

4. Decide which face to locate Dept. A A C 250 B 350 B 350 D 250 C 250 C 250 E 0 E 0 D 250 Total 500 Total 600 Total 850

A

A

Dept. A should be located in Face B-C-D ; weight = 850 Adjacency Graph D 250 250 C E 400 400 A 350 B 0 350

450

0

6-15 Block Layout D C A B E

6.19

1. Departments with largest weight : A and B ; weight = 9 2. Select the third department to enter : C ; weight = 11 Note: Both C and E have weights of 11. C is arbitrary chosen 3. Select the next department to enter : G ; weight = 14 4. Select the next department to enter : E ; in Face A-B-G ; weight = 11 5. Select the next department to enter : D ; in Face A-B-E ; weight = 16 6. Select the next department to enter : F ; in Face A-B-D ; weight = 10 7. The last department to enter is H ; in Face B-C-G ; weight = 8 Adjacency Graph B 9 F 5 8 5 D 5 1 A Block Layout G B E D F A H C 7 8 E 0 0 G 6 C 0 0 6 7 0 H 4

6-16
6.20

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Departments with largest weight : B and C ; weight = 504 Select the third department to enter : E ; weight = 488 Select the next department to enter : H ; weight = 416 Select the next department to enter : G ; in Face B-C-H ; weight = 474 Select the next department to enter : A ; in Face B-E-H weight = 370 Select the next department to enter : F ; in Face B-G-H ; weight = 366 The last department to enter is D ; in Face B-C-G ; weight = 276 B

Adjacency Graph

504 180

20 G

56 154 F 188 296

40 24 H 302 68 282

136

76 C

D 122

A

94

0 E

352

Block Layout

G F

D

H A E

B C

6-17
6.21

Given: Material Flow Matrix Construct Flow-Between Chart From/To A B C A — 0 5 B — 45 C — D E D 55 35 60 — E 35 55 35 10 —

1. Department with largest weight : C and D ; weight = 60 2. Select the third department to enter : B ; weight = 80 A B C C 5 45 35 D 55 35 10 Total 60 80 25

3. Select the next department to enter : E ; weight = 100 A E A 5 35 D 55 10 B 0 55 Total 60 100

4. Which face should department A be located? A C 5 B 0 B 0 D 55 C 5 D 55 E 35 E 35 E 35 Total 95 Total 40 Total 90

A

A

A should be located in Face C-D-E

6-18 Adjacency Graph C 60 A D 55 10 35 5 35 45

35 E

55 B

Block Layout B C E
6.22 Given: Material Flow Matrix

D A

Construct Flow-Between Chart From/To A B C D E F G H I J — 0 12 212 132 16 172 220 20 24 A — 176 136 216 180 144 128 168 124 B — 240 140 184 156 32 28 196 C — 36 188 236 40 164 120 D — 108 192 204 104 160 E — 248 228 156 116 F — 112 224 152 G — 148 108 H — 200 I — J 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Departments with largest weight : F and G ; weight = 248 Select the third department to enter : D ; weight = 424 Select the fourth department to enter : C ; weight = 580 Select the next department to enter : B ; in Face C-F-G ; weight = 500 Select the next department to enter : H ; in Face B-C-F ; weight = 576 Select the next department to enter : E ; in Face B-C-H ; weight = 560 Select the next department to enter : I ; in Face B-F-G ; weight = 548 Select the next department to enter : J ; in Face B-C-E ; weight = 480 A enter the graph ; in Face C-D-G ; weight = 396

6-19 Adjacency Graph F
22

H
204 12

180 248

22

E

156 B 144

124 I 224 176 156 172 G

16 0

18

188

J 196 C 12 A 236 212 D 240

Block Layout

G A I F B C H E J D

6- 20 6.23 a. b. c. d. E = 10 , and K = 28 . . E = 10 , and K = 42 . . E = 0.5 , and K = 42 . The two measures are not consistent! See (b) vs (a) and (b) vs (c).

6.24

a. BC, BD, and CD. b. 26 units. c. The layout obtained by exchanging departments C and D is optimum, since d ij = 1 for all f ij > 0 . The layout cost, as computed by CRAFT, will be equal to zero units since the centroids of all the departments overlap. In general, the centroid-tocentroid distance measure can give unrealistic results when the centroid of a department lies outside the department. Note that this may happen with L-shaped departments, which are legal in CRAFT. a. If all departments are the same size, the estimated layout cost for exchanging departments will always be equal to the actual layout cost after the departments have been exchanged. b. The initial layout cost is 93 units, and the estimated layout cost of exchanging B and C is 75 units; however, the actual layout cost after B and C have been exchanged is 111 units.

6.25

6.26

6.27

The following estimated layout costs are computed for the initial layout: Exchange: AB AC AD BC CD CE DE Est. Cost: 54 53.5 64.5 67.5 54 66 48 The lowest estimated layout cost is 48 units with departments D and E exchanged. Since the initial layout cost is 66 units, CRAFT exchanges departments D and E and obtains the layout shown below. The actual cost of this new layout is 48 units.

A A A B B B A A A C C C A A A C C C E E E D D D E E E D D D
Next, CRAFT repeats the same procedure as above to compute the following estimated layout costs: Exchange: Est. Cost: AB 48 AC 53.5 AE 57.5 BC 49.5 CD 48 CE 54 DE 66

6-21

Since none of the estimated layout costs is lower than 48 units (the current layout cost), CRAFT stops and the above layout is the final layout. 6.28 a. The areas of the departments are A = 48 , B = 40 , C = 85 , D = 40 , and E = 62 unit squares. Note that the area of department B is equal to the area of department D. Therefore, CRAFT would consider exchanging department pairs AB, AE, BC, BD, CE, and DE. b. Let d ij be the distance between departments i and j in the current layout; let d ijAE be the estimated distance between departments i and j if departments A and E are exchanged. Given the flow and cost data, we have: Pair AC AE BC BD CD DE f ij 5 5 6 2 3 7 cij 1 1 1 4 3 1 d ij 20 11 12 22 10 7 d ijAE

8 11 12 22 10 18

Thus, the estimated cost of exchanging departments A and E is ∑ f ij cij d ijAE = 559 units. f ij > 0

6.29

a. The areas (in unit squares) of the departments are A = 4 , B = 8 , C = 6 , D = 6 , E = 8 , and F = 4 . Note that department pairs A and F, C and D, and B and E have the same area of 4, 6, and 8, respectively. Therefore, department pairs AD, AE, BF, and CF will not be considered for exchange by CRAFT. b. The cost of the initial layout is values are equal to 1.0.) c. Using the procedure shown in Problem 6.28 (b), we first compute the estimated distance d ijEF for all f ij > 0 . The estimated layout cost assuming that departments E and F are exchanged is units. (Again, all the cij values are equal to 1.0.) d. In general, given the same problem data, we would expect MULTIPLE to obtain a lower layout cost than CRAFT since MULTIPLE considers

∑f f ij > 0

ij

d ij = 1040 units. (All the cij

∑f f ij > 0

ij

d ijEF = 1090

6- 22 a larger set of (2-way) department exchanges at each iteration; i.e., MULTIPLE considers a larger number of possible department exchanges and therefore explores a larger “neighborhood” of the current solution. However, both MULTIPLE and CRAFT are “path dependent” heuristics. That is, the final solution obtained by either algorithm depends on the starting point and the particular set of departments exchanged in arriving at the final solution. Therefore, there is no guarantee that MULTIPLE will always outperform CRAFT because the two algorithms may follow a different path and CRAFT may ultimately stop at a lower-cost solution. If the layout or departmental areas are such that all departments are either adjacent or equal in area, both CRAFT and MULTIPLE will consider the same (2way) exchanges at each iteration. Therefore, both algorithms (using two-way exchanges only) will follow the same path and terminate at the same solution. 6.30 a. Principal weaknesses of CRAFT: 1. no control over department shapes; 2. only adjacent or equal-area departments will be exchanged; 3. inter-departmental distances are measured between department centroids (which can sometimes lead to unrealistic distances); and 4. when evaluating possible exchanges, CRAFT uses estimated distances obtained by swapping the department centroids. Principal strengths of CRAFT: 1. CRAFT can capture the details of the initial layout, such as fixed departments, unusable space, and obstacles; 2. CRAFT can generate many alternative layouts in a short period of time. b. True. Both CRAFT and NEWCRAFT are “path dependent” heuristics. Since the two programs will not necessarily follow the same path, they will most likely terminate with different layouts, and there is no guarantee that the cost of a layout generated by NEWCRAFT will be less than that obtained with CRAFT. 6.31 Flow Between Chart A B C D E A 0 9 0 3 0 B 0 0 9 5 C 0 0 4 D 0 1 E 0 F G H F 10 0 0 4 0 0 G 0 0 4 20 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 7 0 0 20 0 Relationship Chart A B C D A - I U U B - U I C - U D E F G H E U O U U F I U U U U G U U U A U U H U U U O U U A -

6-23 a. The efficiency rating =

6.32

A+ E + A 25 = = 0.6757 . A + E + I − X + A 37

b. The distance matrix for the given layout is computed as follows:

1 2 3 4 5

1 -

2 3 -

3 6 3 -

4 5 8 5 -

5 9 6 3 4 -

Thus, the REL-DIST score = A × 3 + E × 5 + I × 6 + X × 3 + A × 4 = 30 + 25 + 12 − 30 + 40 = 77 .
c. False. BLOCPLAN uses three bands; if two non-adjacent or unequalarea departments are exchanged, it simply recomputes the width of the two bands affected by the exchange. (If the two departments are in the same band, the band width remains the same.) d. Advantages: A rectangular shape is often the preferred shape for a department; also, with rectangular departments it is straightforward to measure and control department shapes. Limitations: If fixed departments or obstacles are present, it may be difficult or impossible to maintain rectangular department shapes; also, in some cases an Lshape may be acceptable or preferable for some departments. 6.33

To avoid unrealistic department shapes, we set Ri equal to two for all the departments. We obtain the results shown in the following Table by using the linear MIP model given by equations (6.21) through (6.37): Dept . A B C D E

xi " (feet)

xi ' (feet)

yi " (feet)

yi ' (feet)

Area (req.) 19,200 16,000 34,000 16,000 24,800

189.47 10.325 213.14 115.16 337.62 189.47 220 115.16 486.4 337.62 220 0 337.62 199.8 115.16 0 199.8 0 115.16 0

Area (model ) 17,553 15,532 32,732 15,871 23009

Error (%) 8.58 2.92 3.73 0.0 7.22

6- 24
(0,220) (0,213.14) (10.325,220) (189.47,220) (500,220)

A E

B C D
(199.8,0) (337.62,0) (500,0) (486.4,0)

(0,115.16)

(0,0)

The objective value we obtained from the model is 14,929.74 units.
6.34

To avoid unrealistic department shapes, we set Ri equal to two for all the departments. We obtain the results shown in the following Table by using the linear MIP model given by equations (6.21) through (6.37): Dept . A B C D E F

xi " (feet)
20.30 20 60 37.32 57.32 34.44
(0,60)

xi ' (feet)
3.73 0 34.44 20 37.32 20.30
(20,60)

yi " (feet)
23.43 60 23.43 57.55 60 25.88

yi ' (feet)
0 23.43 0 25.88 23.43 0.02

Area (req.) 400 800 600 600 800 400

Area (model ) 388.21 731.38 598.85 548.51 731.38 365.71
(57.32,60) (60,60)

Error (%) 2.94 8.58 0.19 8.58 8.58 8.57

(37.32,60) (37.32,57.55)

B

D

E

(37.32,25.88) (0,23.43) (60,23.43)

A
(0,0) (3.73,0) (20.30,0)

F

C
(34.44,0.02) (34.44,0) (60,0)

The objective value we obtained from the model is 2,130.70 units.

6-25
6.35

Using LOGIC to exchange departments B and F we obtain the following layout:
200' 60' 160'

A F C H
100' 100'

G D E B

75'

60'

75'

60' 20'

50'

6.36

Using LOGIC to exchange departments D and H we obtain the following layout:
230' 52.17' 34.79' 37.68' 75.36' 130'

A B C D
159.23'

G H E
70.77'

92.31' 15.38' 92.31'

F
130'

6.37

Using LOGIC to exchange departments G and H we obtain the following layout:
230' 52.17' 34.79' 37.68' 80'

A B C G
159.23'

H
32.14'

25'

D E
70.77'

70'

62.86'

75.36'

F
150'

80'

6- 26
6.38
A A A A

(a)
B A A A B C C D B C C D A A A A D A A A

(b)
D C C B C C B B

c. A spacefilling curve “maps” or translates a two-dimensional problem (i.e., the layout problem) into a single dimension (i.e., the layout vector or the fill sequence). Therefore, any two departments can be exchanged (or more general exchange routines such as those implemented within simulated annealing can be used) and the resulting layout can be constructed rapidly. However, department shapes are affected by the spacefilling curve; sometimes it may be difficult to ensure “good” department shapes and massaging will be necessary. Spacefilling curves should not visit fixed departments or obstacles. Otherwise, a fixed department may “float” (see MICRO-CRAFT) or a department may be placed over an obstacle. Note that all the empty space (if any) will automatically appear at the end of the spacefilling curve. If one wishes to “insert” empty space at locations other than the end of the curve, then one must use dummy departments and place them in the appropriate position in the layout vector. 6.39 a. Assuming a 1 x 1 grid for simplicity and using the data given for Problem 6.28, we first enter the initial layout and MULTIPLE computes its cost:
2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4

INITIAL LAYOUT COST OF INITIAL LAYOUT: 541.26 UNITS

Note that department labels (A through E) have been replaced by department numbers (1 through 5).

6-27
ITER. NO. 1 - SWAP DEPARTMENTS 4 AND 5 TO OBTAIN FOLLOWING LAYOUT WITH COST 433.69 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5

ITER. NO. 2 - SWAP DEPARTMENTS 2 AND 3 TO OBTAIN FOLLOWING LAYOUT WITH COST 399.59 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5

NO TWO-WAY EXCHANGES LEAD TO A FURTHER REDUCTION IN THE LAYOUT COST. THEREFORE, THE ABOVE LAYOUT IS TWO-OPT. LAYOUT COST 399.59 UNITS; LAYOUT SEQUENCE: 13245

b. Using a conforming spacefilling curve may result in irregular department shapes, especially if some departments in the initial layout have irregular shapes. In part (a), for example, department 4 (D) attains a "long-and-narrow" L-shape primarily due to the shape of department 5 (E) in the initial layout.

6- 28
6.40

Assuming a 1 x 1 grid for simplicity and using the data given for Problem 6.29, we first enter the initial layout and MULTIPLE computes its cost:
1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 6

INITIAL LAYOUT

COST OF INITIAL LAYOUT: 104.00 UNITS

Note that department labels (A through F) have been replaced by department numbers (1 through 6).
ITER. NO. 1 - SWAP DEPARTMENTS 1 AND 3 TO OBTAIN FOLLOWING LAYOUT WITH COST 94.00 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 6

NO TWO-WAY EXCHANGES LEAD TO A FURTHER REDUCTION IN THE LAYOUT COST. THEREFORE, THE ABOVE LAYOUT IS TWO-OPT. LAYOUT COST 94.00 UNITS; LAYOUT SEQUENCE: 231465

Chapter 7 Warehouse Operations

7-1

Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 7 7.1 A project to evaluate existing dock area, including receiving and shipping, will allow the determination of those aspects that can potentially prove economically advantageous. The following is a partial list of such aspects that warrant attention. a. Eliminate the receiving area. For some materials, e.g., large and bulky ones, drop shipping (having the vendor ship to the customer directly) can save the time and labor associated with receiving and shipping. b. Reduce or eliminate staging in the receiving and shipping area. Determine the location assignment and product identification prior to receiving the product so that materials are stored as soon as they arrive, reducing the need for large staging area. c. Employ the fastest and most productive receiving process possible, i.e., crossdocking or shipping directly from the receiving dock. Palletized materials with a single SKU per pallet, floor-stacked loose cases, and backordered merchandise are excellent candidates for crossdocking. d. Bypass receiving staging and put materials away directly to primary picking locations, essentially replenishing those locations from receiving. In direct putaway systems, the staging and inspection activities are eliminated, saving the time, space, and labor associated with those operations. e. Minimize the floor space required for staging by providing storage locations for receiving staging. f. Prepare shipping from the time the materials are received, thus reducing the area for shipping. g. Ship materials in larger quantities and preferably in unit loads, i.e., pallets with one SKU per pallet. h. Ship directly from storage and without the need for staging, having prepared the shipping information prior to picking. i. Reduce the number of docks, if possible. For example, can receiving and shipping be modified so that less frequent visits to docks are necessary? This will save more space in and around the receiving and shipping areas. j. Modify docks to 90-degree docks. Finger docks should be eliminated, if possible. Otherwise, can the largest angle finger docks be used? This will allow shrinking of maneuvering and staging areas inside the receiving and shipping areas. k. Eliminate dock levelers by requiring uniform- height carriers for loading and unloading, thus reducing or eliminating dock maintenance costs. l. Remove dock shelters in favor of a more streamlined dock, if dock shelters exist. Again, maintenance costs will be reduced or eliminated. 7.2 This problem sho uld not be assigned if the students have not been exposed to either Monte Carlo simulation or queueing theory. In Chapter 10, we provide queueing models to address problems of this type. The instructor might want to assign this problem before covering the material in Chapter 10 to motivate the students to learn the material on queueing theory.

7-2

Based on the material in Chapter 10, we provide the following solution to the dock design problem. Let ? denote the arrival rate of trucks and µ denote the service rate at the docks. Since arrivals occur at a Poisson rate and service times are exponentially distributed, the problem is of the class (M|M|c):(GD| ∋| ∋). The problem reduces to determining the smallest value of c (number of docks) such that the average time trucks spend in the system (W) is less than 50 minutes. The relationship between W and the expected number of trucks in the system (L) is given by L = λ W. Hence, sinte it is desired that W < 50/60 hr., then it is desired that L/λ < 50/60. Since λ= 20/8, or 2.5 trucks per hour, then the problem reduces to determining the smallest value of c such athat L < 2.0833. From figure 10.28, we can determine the value of c. The utilization factor, ?, is given by ? = ?/(cµ). With µ= 60/40 = 1.5 trucks per hour, we find that for c equal to 3, ? = 2.5/[3(1.5)] = 0.5556; from Figure 10.28, L < 2.0833. For c = 2, ? = 0.8333 and, form Figure 10.28, L > 2.0833. Therefore, 3 docks are required to ensure that the average amount of time spent waiting and being loaded or unloaded is less than 50 minutes.

7-3

7.3

7-4

7.4 The impact on space requirement of this proposal is that 90-degree docks require greater apron depth but less bay width, both impacting outside space requirements, as well as requiring greater outside turning area. Finger docks, however, require greater inside maneuvering area. Because inside space costs considerably more to construct and maintain than outside space, finger docks should be used as little as possible. If outside space is sparse, then finger docks should be used, although keeping the angle closer to 90 degrees. If 45-degree finger docks are utilized, the bay width is increased from the width of the truck to about 45 feet. Furthe rmore, the dock width will increase from about the width of the truck to about 40 percent more than the width of the truck. That is, assuming that the old dock width is about 10 feet, then the new dock width would have to be around 14 feet to accommodate a 45-degree finger dock. 7.5 Permanent, adjustable dockboards are fastened to the dock and are not moved form position to position. Therefore, the dock board may be longer and wider than portable dockboards. The extra length results in a smaller incline between the dock and the carrier. This allows easier and safer handling of hand carts, reduced power drain on electrically powered trucks, and less of a problem with fork and undercarriage fouling on the dockboard. The greater width allows for safer and more efficient carrier loading and unloading. Permanent, adjustable dockboards also eliminate the safety, pilferage, and alignment problems associated with dockboards. For these reasons, permanent adjustable dockboards should always be given serious consideration, despite their high installation costs. 7.6 A survey of the receiving areas on a typical campus shows that most dock and carrier height differences are handled by portable dockboards. In many areas, however, the problem is solved by walking up or down a step to accommodate the difference in carrier and dock height. Because surveys indicate that the campus has scattered receiving docks with minimal carrier visits, it is not justified to invest in expensive dock shelters. The bookstore docking area, ho wever, may benefit from a dock shelter because more frequent stops are made at this location in delivering and shipping more valuable products. 7.7 Increases in the length of trucks imply that more space will be needed to maneuver trucks around shipping and receiving docks. Furthermore, certain access roads about the plant/warehouse may need to be modified to better accommodate longer trucks/trailers. Increases in both width and height of trucks and trailers imply that docks may have to be modified to accept taller and, in many cases, wider trucks and trailers. Some of the changes can be handled by using permanent adjustable dockboards whose dynamic ranges can accept taller or wider trucks. Redesigning the dock area as well as the inside of the shipping and receiving areas may nevertheless be required

7-5

should the width and height of the new vehicles fall outside of the current equipment’s dynamic ranges. 7.8 About 55% of all operating costs in a typical warehouse can be attributed to order picking 7.9 a. Strict order picking, i.e., each batch is an order, or single-order-pick (SOP), b. Batch picking two or more orders, or sort-while-pick (SWP), c. Batch picking two or more (partial) orders with progressive assembly across zones, and d. Batch picking two or more orders with downstream sorting, or pick-and-sort (PAS) 7.10 a. Traveling to, from, and between pick locations, b. Searching for pick locations, c. Documenting picking transactions, d. Reaching (and bending) to access pick locations, and e. Extracting items from storage locations 7.11 a. Simple ranking of SKUs based on the ratio of pick frequency (the number of times a SKU is requested) to shipped cube (the product of unit demand and unit cube) establishes a baseline for an intelligent stock assignment planning. SKUs with high rankings should be assigned to the most accessible locations. b. A distribution illustrating SKUs ranked by popularity and the portion of total picking activity they represent is the ABC or Pareto plot used in intelligent stock assignment planning. More popular SKUs with the highest picking activity are distributed closer to the input/output point. c. Correlated stock assignment planning ranks SKUs by popularity as well as considering the correlations between various items in storage. A small picking zone dedicated to high-density, high-throughput order picking is used for SKUs with high correlations. 7.12 a. Popularity of items or SKUs b. Similarity of items or SKUs c. Size of items or SKUs d. Characteristics of SKUs, such as perishability, and e. Space utilization of SKUs, i.e., maximizing space used in the layout to store SKUs. 7.13 travel time per line item picked … sorting

7-6

7.14 By reducing the amount of stock in the forward picking area, forward picking costs (b) decrease and the cost to replenish the forward picking area (c) increases. 7.15 a. Activity b.Quantity, and c. Size 7.16 a. Pick frequency (the number of times the item is requested) and b. Shipped cube (the product of unit demand and unit cube). 7.17 travel times … productivity 7.18 a. Introduction of Just-in-time operating program b. Introduction of cycle time reduction operation program c. Introduction of quick response operating program, and d. Introduction of micro-marketing and megabrand strategies 7.19 a. Wrong SKU is picked, or b. Wrong quantity of the SKU is picked. 7.20 the same or nearby locations 7.21 Visiting a typical warehouse may bring about the following discoveries: a. Both dedicated and randomized storage schemes are used. b. The main mode of transporting materials within the warehouse is counterbalanced lift trucks, also known as fork lift truck. c. In some areas of the warehouse pallet jacks are also used. d. During order picking materials are transported using lift trucks, pallet jacks, or order picking carts. e. Although the warehouse is rather new, the condition of some of the equipments is not good because not all equipment was purchased new when the warehouse was constructed. f. The bar code symbols used are the familiar “three-of-nine” code, though some parts of the warehouse have abandoned the use of bar codes. g. Hand-held optical bar code readers are used in areas where the technology is still being exploited. h. Receiving and shipping are on the same side of the warehouse, though in opposite corners. i. Both receiving and shipping areas employ three 90-degree docks with adjustable permanent dock levelers, but without any shelters. j. The pallets used are all 42 in. x 42 in. double- faced, non-reversible type. k. The warehouse is mostly clear of clutter, but the item pick area could benefit from a better empty case (carton) removal system.

7-7

l. Most of the warehouse, e.g., 75%, is dedicated to storing the materials in pallet racks, giving ample space to aisles for order picking using counterbalanced lift trucks and walk-behind order picking carts. m. Receiving and shipping areas consist of about 10-15% of the warehouse, while the remaining 10-15% of the warehouse is used for other functions, such as office space. n. The aisles represent 25-30% of the total floor space of the warehouse. o. More than 35% of the pallet rack openings are empty. p. Since most of the loads are partial loads, stored product represents less than 2025% of the rack face. q. The storage space (cube) utilization factor within a storage opening is about 1520%. r. The overall cube space utilized in the warehouse is less than 15%. 7.22 a. Total cube demand for item A = ( 100 units ) x ( 1 ft3 / unit A ) = 100 ft3 Total cube demand for item B = ( 50 units ) x ( 0.5 ft3 / unit B ) = 25 ft3 Total cube demand for item C = ( 200 units ) x ( 2 ft3 / unit C ) = 400 ft3 b. ( 400 ft 3 / Year ) / ( 20 ft3 / Replenishments ) = 20 Replenishments / Year. c. Item A: [ ( 100 units / 50 weeks ) x ( 1 ft3 / unit A ) ] = 2 cubic ft / week. ( 2 / 10.5 = 19.0% of forward pick area.) Item B: [ ( 50 units / 50 weeks ) x ( 0.5 ft3 / unit B ) ] = 0.5 ft3 / week. ( 0.5 / 10.5 = 4.8% of forward pick area. ) Item C: [ ( 200 units / 50 weeks ) x ( 2 ft3 / unit C ) ] = 8 ft3 / week. ( 8 / 10.5 = 76.2 % of forward pick area. ) d. Item A: ( 25 Requests / 50 weeks ) = 0.5 requests / week = Rank 1 Item C: ( 16 Requests / 50 weeks ) = 0.32 requests / week = Rank 2 Item B: ( 5 Requests / 50 weeks ) = 0.1 requests / week = Rank 3. 7.23 a. When product volume is low and/or product is to be stored for short periods of time, i.e., work in process, storing the product directly on the floor is practiced

7-8

frequently. For example, liquid products in barrels (55 gallon drums) are often stored directly on the floor. b. When product volume is high and/or product mix is low, e.g., large production runs of palletized and uniform products in cases (cartons), storing the product in block storage or block stacking is quite advantageous. In particular, tight-block stacking wastes the least amount of storage space and thus has a high storage space utilization. c. Pallet racks are mostly used when product mix is high and accessibility to a particular product must be quick for faster order-processing. d. Pallet flow racks provide good storage space (cube) utilization and allow products to be processed in first- in, first-out (FIFO) fashion. They are very good for dated products with high product mix, but lower volume. e. Drive- in racks allow large pallet counts (product volume) of high product mixes to be stored and still obtain good storage space (cube) utilization. Drive- in racks are best used along the walls of plants or warehouses. f. Drive-through racks can be used the same as drive-in racks, but they also allow accessing the product from both sides of the rack. They are thus used for areas in the middle of the plant or the warehouse. g. Placing cases directly on the flow rack is used when the warehouse operation is geared toward full or partial broken case (carton) order picking. It also allows for faster replenishment, but it does lower the storage space (cube) utilization (factor). h. Storing in cantilever racks provides long, unobstructed storage spans. They are mostly helpful in sorting self- supporting long stock, such as bar stocks, pipes, and lumber. i. Portable racks are mostly good for loads (open stock), such as pipes, that need to be protected against crushing and other damage. Portable racks result in flexibility and good space utilization of bulk storage, and are also useful for crushable materials and allow access to materials on all levels. j. Smaller SKUs and/or SKUS that require various protections from damage and loss are usually stored in bin shelving. Orders that require picking items, rather than cartons or pallets, use bin racks or shelving systems. 7.24 A detailed approach to storage space planning for the 1200 different SKUs this warehouse would have to receive, store, and ship is not possible with the data given. However, the informa tion from the shipping and receiving analysis chart and the storage analysis chart can be used to determine the space requirement of the 1200 SKUs. As part of the storage space planning, certain inventory parameters would have to be determined. For example, determining the safety stock and knowing the order quantity are crucial in determining the average quantity to be stored for each of the 1200 SKUs. The average quantity to be stored will then help in choosing among dedicated storage, randomized storage, and class-based dedicated storage.

7-9

The main difference between dedicated storage and randomized storage is it implication for what happens when a storage location becomes empty or available. In randomized storage, the closest-available-slot is designated as the storage location; retrievals are performed on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, which provides a uniform stock rotation policy. The closest-available-slot storage policy can yield results that are similar to the “pure” randomized storage policy if the storage level remains fairly constant and the level of utilization is high. Dedicated storage locations (and class-based dedicated storage locations) remain active even after stock has been removed from that location and the location is empty. This is partly due to the fact that the number of openings assigned to an SKU must accommodate its maximum inventory level. The planned quantity of unit loads to be stored for dedicated storage is thus equal to the sum of the openings required for each SKU. With randomized storage, however, the planned quantity of unit loads to be stored in the system is the number of openings required to store all SKUs. Since typically all SKUs will not be at their maximum inventory levels at the same time, randomized storage will generally require fewer openings than dedicated storage. As part of the storage space planning, consideration must be given to throughput as well. For example, when using dedicated storage, SKUs should be assigned to storage locations based on the ratio of their activity to the number of openings or slots assigned to the SKU. The SKU having the highest ranking is assigned to the preferred opening, with the lowest-ranking SKU assigned to the least-preferred openings. Because fast movers are up front and slow movers are in back, throughput is maximized. Finally, in ranking SKUs, it is important to define activity as the number of storage/retrieval actions per unit time, not the quantity of materials moved. Also, it is important to think of “part families” as well. “Items that are ordered together should be stored together” is a maxim of activity-based storage. 7.25 The receiving/shipping ratios (the ratio of the trips to receive and the trips to ship a material) for each of the products A-N are calculated and given in the following table. A receiving/shipping ratio of 1.0 indicates the same number of trips are required to receive as to ship. Therefore, for products B, G, I, and L, the travel distance will be the same no matter where along the main aisle the products are stored. A receiving/shipping ratio less than 1.0 indicates that fewer trips are required to receive the product than to ship it. Therefore, products having ratios less than 1.0 should be located closer to shipping. Products A, C, D, J, and M should be closer to shipping.

7-10

Product

Monthly Throughput High Low Low High High Low High High Low High Low High High Low

Quantity per Receipt 300 pallets 200 cartons 10 pallets 400 pallets 6000 cartons 40 cartons 200 cartons 9000 cartons 50 pallets 500 pallets 80 pallets 400 pallets 7000 cartons 700 cartons

Trips to Receive 30 50 10 400 1000 40 200 2250 50 500 80 400 1167 140

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N

Average Customer Order Size 2.0 pallets 4.0 pallets 0.2 pallets 0.5 pallets 10.0 cartons 2.0 pallets 1.0 pallets 5.0 cartons 1.0 pallets 0.7 pallets 2.0 pallets 1.0 pallets 3.0 cartons 7.0 cartons

Trips to Ship 150 50 50 800 600 20 200 1800 50 715 40 400 2334 100

Receiving/ Shipping Ratio 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.5 1.67 2.0 1.0 1.25 1.0 0.69 2.0 1.0 0.5 1.4

Similarly, a receiving/shipping ratio greater than 1.0 indicates that fewer trips are required to ship than to receive. Therefore, products having ratios greater than 1.0 (i.e., E, F, H, K, and N) should be located closer to receiving. The layout shown is typical of an aisle-based system. Products are distributed according to throughput, quantity receipt, and the ratio of receiving to shipping trips. In Chapter 10, we provide guidelines for minimizing travel distances.

7-11

7.26 Minimum Total Cube Requirement : [(4 ft x 4 ft x 4.5 ft)/load]x[300 loads/product]x[30 products] = 648,000 ft3 Max Usable Height Requirement : [(4.5 ft/load)x(4 loads)] = 18 ft Minimum Total Floor Space Requirement : [648,000 cubic ft]/[18 ft] = 36,000 ft2 Approximate Dimensions of Block Stacking Area: [36,000 ft 2 ]0.5 = 190 ft (width or depth of stacking area) Minimum Aisle Width and Maximum No. of Lanes per Product: Minimum aisle width = 13 ft. Maximum no. of lanes per product = 2 Practical Dimensions of Block Stacking Area: [30 products]x[3 load widths/product]x[4 ft/load width] = 360 ft (width) {[300 loads]/[4 loads high]/[3 loads wide]}x[4 ft/load depth] = 100 ft (depth) Add [30 products]x[13 ft –3 x 4 ft] = 30 ft to 260 ft Therefore, the practical dimensions for the block stacking storage area are 390 ft wide by 300 ft deep. Layout for the Warehouse: A rectangular block stacking area of 390 feet wide by 100 feet deep, minimum dimensions. Each product will be stacked in three lanes, each containing 25 stacks of four loads high, for a total of [ 25 + 25 + 25 ] x 4 = 300 loads per product. The 30 products will be stacked in 90 side-by-side lanes (30 aisles), with one foot separating each product aisle.

7-12

This scheme tries to reduce the pick face of the stacks, which increases congestion and the time it takes to empty a (deep) lane. Addressing those issues requires a more rectangular block stacking area at the expense of cube utilization. A typical layout is depicted below.

7.27 Cube utilization increases as products are more densely stored in a warehouse. Thus, cube utilization and product accessibility are inversely proportional. For example, in block stacking storage scheme, cube utilization increases as lane depth increases. This makes accessing (deep) product(s) more difficult. 7.28 The slightest advantage that layout (a) has over layouts (b) and (c) of Figure 7.36 is that certain conditions may exist to make the overall travel distance somewhat less. In general, however, layouts (b) and (c) are preferred over (a) because they allow more stock accessibility. Layout (c) is preferred over layout (b) because it allows the most accessibility of all layouts. The disadvantage of layout (c) is that it uses more aisle space and its overall storage space utilization (factor) will be slightly less. The overall preference is thus (c) over (b), which are both preferred over (a). 7.29 Storage space utilization Load cubic volume Storage area cubic volume Load height Load width Load depth = (load cubic volume)/(storage area cubic volume) = (load height)x(load width)x(load depth) = (area height)x(area width)x(area depth) = 5x(pallet height + product height) = 5x(5”+46”) = 255” = 2x(pallet width) = 2x(48”) = 96” = full pallet depth + half- full pallet depth = (41”)+(20.5”) = 61.5”

7-13

Storage area (rack) height

Storage area (rack) width

Storage area depth

Storage Space Utilization

= bottom support height + 5x(pallet height + product height + product height clearance + top support height) = 4 + 5 x (4”+5”+46”+4”+4”) = 319” = half left beam width + left product clearance + left pallet width + pallet-to-pallet clearance + right pallet width + right product clearance + half right beam width = (4/2)”+5”+48”+5”+58”+5”+(4/2)” = 115” = half flue spacing + second pallet depth + first pallet depth + half aisle width = (12”/2)+41”+41”+(8.5’x12ipf/2) = 139” = [255”x96”x61.5”]/[319”x115”x139”] = 0.2952 = 29.52%

7.30 Storage space utilization Load cubic volume Storage area cubic volume Load height Load width Load depth Storage area (rack) height = (load cubic volume)/(storage area cubic volume) = (load height)x(load width)x(load depth) = (area height)x(area width)x(area depth) = 4x(pallet height + product height) = 4x(6”+48”) = 216” = 3x(pallet width) = 3x(42”) = 126” = full pallet depth = 1x(36”) = 36” = 4x(pallet height + product height + product height clearance + top support height) = 4x(6”+48”+3”+4”) = 244” = half left beam width + left product clearance + left pallet width + pallet-pallet clearance + middle pallet width + pallet-pallet clearance + right pallet width + right product clearance + half right beam width = (3/2)”+4”+42”+4”+42”+4”+42”+4”+(3/2)” = 145” = half flue spacing + single pallet depth + half aisle width = (15/2)”+36”+(8.5’x12ipf/2) = 94.5” = [216”x126”x36”]/[244”x145”x94.5”] = 0.2930 = 29.30%

Storage area (rack) width

Storage area depth

Storage Space Utilization

7-14

7.31 Storage space utilization Load cubic volume Storage area cubic volume Load height Load width Load depth Storage area (rack) height = (load cubic volume)/(storage area cubic volume) = (load height)x(load width)x(load depth) = (area height)x(area width)x(area depth) = 6x(pallet height+product height) = 6x(6”+40”) = 276” = 2x(pallet width) = 2x(42”) = 84” = full pallet depth = 1x(36”) = 36” = 6x(pallet height + product height + product height clearance + top support height) = 6x(6”+40”+4”+4”) = 324” = half left beam width + left product clearance + left pallet width + pallet-to-pallet clearance + middle pallet width + pallet-to-pallet clearance + right pallet width + right product clearance + half right beam width = (3/2)”+4”+42”+4”+42”+4”+(3/2)” = 99” = half flue spacing + single first pallet depth + half aisle width = (12/2)”+36”+(10’x12ipf/2) = 102” = [276”x84”x36”]/[324”x99”x102”] = 0.2551 = 25.51%

Storage area (rack) width

Storage area depth

Storage Space Utilization

Chapter 8 Manufacturing Systems

8-1 Answers to Questions at the End of Chapter 8 8.1 To some extent, the automatic factory is still valid today. There are three components in an automatic factory – manufacturing, material handling, and the information system. In terms of manufacturing, some decisive factors to justify automation are: ! Volume of production. Economics of scale can be achieved by mass production and the financial benefit can compensate the high capital cost of an automatic factory ! Expensive machinery. Some industries, such as semiconductor, require expensive machinery. By automating, these machines can be fully utilized to reduce production cost. ! Variability reduction. Manual machining, while still within tolerance, often produce parts with high variability. This variability can be reduced significantly by automation. From a material handling perspective, automation is desirable to reduce cost in time due to savings in labor cost. In addition to cost saving, some product may require careful handling; therefore automation is an alternative to prevent product damage. In addition, the declining costs of computing and data storage continue to fuel the desire to invest in automation. 8.2 The semiconductor industry would be a good target for the automatic factory. Machinery for semiconductor production cost dearly and should be fully utilized. Product value is also very high; material-handling automation is needed to avert damage. Another sector would be continuous flow manufacturing such as chemical products. 8.3 Advantages of automatic warehouse: ! High throughput ! Reduced labor cost ! Elimination of human error ! Reduced material damage ! Greater security Disadvantages of automatic warehouse: ! High initial capital cost ! Downtime or reliability of equipment ! Software related problems ! Backup is needed to cover the risk of complete reliance on automation if a disaster should strike. ! User interface and training ! Obsolescence

8-2
! !

Lack of flexibility Risk of having all eggs in one basket if a disaster should strike the warehouse

8.4

A cross docking facility can be totally automated. A list that is required for a fully automate cross docking facility with respect to the material handling aspect: ! Software for warehouse management. Software must be provided for a fully automated cross-docking facility since there is no man-labor available to make the arrangement to unload/load. ! Automatic material transport equipment for moving the materials. For example: conveyors, racks that is designed to accommodate cross docking facility, i.e. multi-lane directional conveyor lines from receiving dock to the shipping dock. ! Industrial vehicles for transporting from the dock to storage or storage to dock. For example: automatic crane/hoist to load/unload material to/from trucks/containers. This device will allow automated retrieval of loads from truck. Criteria for comparing transfer line and FMS: ! Volume of production ! Number of products manufactured ! Production of families of work parts ! Reduced flexibility in processing orders because of long production line ! Manufacturing lead time ! Machine utilization ! Direct and indirect labor ! Management control

8.5

8.6

Criteria for comparing FMS and SSMS: ! Part transportation requirement ! Number of setup ! Tool allocation and management ! Flexibility ! Capital cost

8.7

Tool management problem in: a. FMS In a FMS environment, tool sharing among machines is common. This trend is perpetuated by limited tool magazine size and more importantly; keeping a complete set of tools in a magazine may not be economically feasible since tools are generally expensive. Tools can be categorized into

8-3 two types: resident, which reside in a machine permanently and transient, which is shared among machines and kept in central tool storage. Determining how many resident and transient tools is the problem. This also translates to how to allocate the transient tools among machines and how many transport devices is needed. Given the machining schedule, usually based on order priority, the required tool sequence can be known. Simulation or integer programming can be used to find the optimal solution. In practice, keeping active inventory of all tools in the cell with their size, type, number and location, improving tool forecasts and warnings of tools changes, reducing delays in the system, and improving tool information reliability are the core of a tool management system. b. SSMS SSMS essentially faced the same tools management problems as in FMS. Tools are still separated into resident tools and transient tools; however the proportion of resident tools is considerably higher than in a FMS setting. This can be attributed to the nature of SSMS where part only visit a machine once; thus more resident tools are needed. This arrangement is more costly; in return it offers more versatility, more machine utilization, easier part scheduling and higher throughput. 8.8 Alternatives for moving part as shown: ! Spurs can be removed so that the system will have an on-track upload/offload. An on-track unload/offload system will allow queueing on tracks. If the system has many AGVs and the process of uploading/offloading takes a significant amount of time, then having spurs is more favorable since it allows an off-track upload/offload system. ! Instead of using AGVs, conveyors can be used for transporting materials. When using conveyors, a spine layout can also be implemented. When using a spine layout, there is no more loop around the system. This is a research question. This is a research question. JIT and lean manufacturing have essentially the same objectives. Both strive for eliminating or minimize waste, produce only what is demanded, minimize the use of time and space resources, and manufacture in the shortest cycle time possible. Different companies have different name for JIT, at Hewlett-Packard it is called Stockless Production, Material as Needed at Harley-Davidson, Continuous Flow Manufacturing at IBM.

8.9 8.10 8.11

8-4 8.12 It is not applicable to all types of manufacturing systems. Mass production is still the best process to use for high volume, repetitive products. JIT may also be difficult to implement to very low volume or unique products such as in a job shop environment unless there is flexibility in reordering the machine. This is a research question. This is a research question. In a straight line-balancing problem, the set of assignable tasks is limited to that task whose predecessors have been assigned. In a U line balancing problem, the set of assignable task is enlarge by those tasks whose successors have been assigned, therefore U line balancing problem is more complex since now task grouping not only move in forward or backward direction as in a straight line, but it can also move in both directions at the same time. In practice, rebalancing of the line is done quite often following demand changes. Rebalancing involves adding or removing machine from on the line or changing the standard time bases on new layout configuration; it also involves determining the number of operators required and assigning the machines that each operator tends.

8.13 8.14 8.15

Chapter 9 Facilities Systems

9-1

Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 9 9.1 Step 1: Determine the Level of Illumination From Table 9.5, for a regular office environment, the minimum level of illumination is 100 foot-candles Step 2: Determine the Room Cavity Ratio Using Equation 9.8: RCR = ( 5 ) ( 10 – 3 ) ( 250 + 150 ) = 0.373 (250) (150) Step 3: Determine the Ceiling Cavity Ratio Since the lights are ceiling mounted, the reflective property of the ceiling will not be impacted by the luminaries’ mounting height. Step 4: Determine the Wall Reflection (WR) and the Effective Ceiling Reflectance (ECR) From Table 9.6, since the walls and ceiling are painted white, the WR and the base ceiling reflectance (BCR) are 80%. Since the lights are ceiling mounted, BCR = ECR = 80%. Step 5: Determine the Coefficient of Utilization (CU) From Table 9.8, since the ECR and the WR are 80%, one can extrapolate from the table for an RCR value of 0.373. The CU is approximately 0.68 and will be the va lue utilized. Step 6: Determine the Light Loss Factor (LLF) From Table 9.10, for fluorescent lamps in prismatic lens fixtures and six months between cleanings, the LLF = 0.92 Step 7: Calculate the Number of the Laps and Luminaries From Table 9.9, Lamp output at 70% of rated life for an 85-watt lamp is 5,400 lumens. Using Equation 9.10: Number of Lamps = (100) (250) (150) = 1,110 Lamps (0.68) (0.92) (5,400) If there are 2 lamps per luminary, then 555 luminaries are required for the facility. Step 8: Determine the Location of the Luminaries From Table 9.8, Column 2, the spacing between banks of luminaries is equal to 1.2 times the mounting height, or 12 feet between banks. In a 250’X150’ office, 20 banks of luminaries space 12 feet apart can be mounted along the length of the facility. Since each fluorescent lamp is 4’ long, 37 luminaries per bank can be placed along the width of the facility

9-2

for a total of 740 luminaries, exceeding the required amount of 555 luminaries determined in step 7. 9.2 The changes in the facility would be that the minimum level of illumination would be 150 foot-candles. This would make the number of lamps and luminaries change as well, as shown in the following equation: Number of Lamps = (150) (250) (150) = 1,665 Lamps (0.68) (0.92) (5,400) Number of Luminaries = 1,665/2 = 833 luminaries The spacing between banks of luminaries must be reduced from 12 feet to 10.5 feet to get the required 833 luminaries within the facility. This will allow 851 luminaries to be placed within the facility. 9.3 From equation 9.8, the RCR changes from 0.373 to 0.64. This result changes the coefficient of utilization in Table 9.8 slightly to 0.67. This changes the number of lamps, as shown in the following equation: Number of Lamps = (100) (250) (150) = 1,127 Lamps (0.67) (0.92) (5,400) Number of Luminaries = 1,127/2 = 564 luminaries The spacing between banks of luminaries can remain 12 feet to get the required 564 luminaries within the facility, and must not exceed the 12foot spacing. This result yields 750 luminaries that can be placed within the facility. 9.4 The Ceiling Cavity Ratio (CCR) would have to be determined because the luminaries are no longer mounted on recessed into the ceiling. From Equation 9.8: CCR = (5) (0.373) (7) = 0.266

Because the CCR has to be considered in this problem the ECR is no longer equivalent to the BCR. The ECR is determined by examining Table 9.7 and by interpolation is found to be 0.78. Since the ECR changed, this affects the coefficient of utilization slightly. The CU decreases to 0.67 by extrapolation using Table 9.8. As in Problem 9.3, the number of luminaries required is 564, and 12-foot spacing between banks with 37 luminaries per bank will allow 750 luminaries to be placed within the facility.

9.5

If the walls and ceiling were painted a medium color, then the WR and ECR would change to 50% instead of 80%. This changes the value of the CU to 0.62, using extrapolation from Table 9.8. This changes the number of lamps required to: Number of Lamps = (100) (250) (150) (0.62) (0.92) (5,400) Number of Luminaries = 1,217/2 = 609 The number of luminaries required is 609, and 12- foot spacing between banks with 37 luminaries per banks will allow 750 luminaries to be placed within the facility. = 1,217 Lamps

9.6

If the fixtures were cleaned once every 36 months instead of once every six months, the LLF value changes from 0.92 to 0.78. This changes the number of lamps to: Number of Lamps = (100) (250) (150) (0.62) (0.78) (5,400) Number of Luminaries = 1,436/2 = 718 The number of luminaries required is 718, and 12- foot spacing between banks with 37 luminaries per banks will allow 750 luminaries to be placed within the facility. = 1,436 Lamps

9.7

QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QF = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QR = 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr QD = (6) (24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QD = 0.0098 x 106 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )][0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(ºF)] (72ºF - 12ºF) QW = 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr QI = [(120,000 ft 2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QI = 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr Using equation 9.1, the total heat loss may be calculated as follows: QH = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr + 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.0098 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr H Q = 8.11 x 106 Btu/hr

9.8

QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF)

9-4

QF = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QR = 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr QD = (6) (24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F - 12o F) QD = 0.0098 x 106 Btu/hr QG = (20)(32 ft2 )[0.63 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(oF)](72o F - 12o F) QG = 0.024 x 106 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2)-(20)(32 ft2 )] [0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72ºF - 12ºF) QW = 0.64 x 106 Btu/hr QI = [(120,000 ft 2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QI = 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.1, the total heat loss may be calculated as follows: QH = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr + 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.0098 x Btu/hr + 0.024 x 106 + 0.64 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr QH = 8.12 x 106 Btu/hr 9.9 QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QF = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QR = 0.94 x 106 Btu/hr QD = (6)(24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QD = 0.0098 x 106 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )] [0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72ºF - 12ºF) QW = 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr QI = [(120,000 ft2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QI = 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.1, the total heat loss maybe calculated as follows: QH = 5.83 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.94 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.0098 x Btu/hr + 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr QH = 7.61 x 106 Btu/hr 9.10 QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.55 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](72ºF - 12ºF) QF = 3.96 x 106 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QR = 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr QD = (6)(24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QD = 0.0098 x 106 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )][0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](72ºF - 12ºF) QW = 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr

QI = [(120,000 ft2 )+(28,000 ft 2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(o F)](72o F – 12o F) QI = 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.1, the total heat loss maybe calculated as follows: QH = 3.96 x 106 Btu/hr + 1.44 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.0098 x Btu/hr + 0.65 x 106 Btu/hr + 0.18 x 106 Btu/hr QH = 6.24 x 106 Btu/hr 9.11 QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](98ºF - 78ºF) QF = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QR = 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr QD = (6)(24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QD = 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )][0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98ºF - 78ºF) QW = 2.17 x 105 Btu/hr QI = [(120,000 ft 2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QI = 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr QS = {[(3)(24 ft 2 )][110 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(o F)] + [(3)(24 ft 2 )] [55 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)]}(98o F – 78o F) QS = 2.37 x 105 Btu/hr QL = (700)(60 watt)[4.25 Btu/(hr)(watt)] QL = 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr QP = (50)(1,500 Btu/hr)+(60)(700 Btu/hr) QP = 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.3, the total cooling load may be calculated as follows: QC = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr + 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr + 2.17 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr + 2.37 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr QC = 32.32 x 105 Btu/hr 9.12 QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](98ºF - 78ºF) QF = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QR = 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr QD = (6)(24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QD = 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr QG = (10)(32 ft2 )[0.63 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QG = 0.040 x 105 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )-(10)(32 ft2 )] [0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98ºF - 78ºF) QW = 2.15 x 105 Btu/hr

9-6

QV = [(120,000 ft2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QV = 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr QS = {[(3)(24 ft 2 )+(5)(32 ft2 )][110 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)] + [(3)(24 ft2 ) +(5)(32 ft2 )][55 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)]}(98o F – 78o F) QS = 7.65 x 105 Btu/hr QL = (700)(60 watt)[4.25 Btu/(hr)(watt)] QL = 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr QP = (50)(1,500 Btu/hr)+(60)(700 Btu/hr) QP = 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.3, the total cooling load may be calculated as follows: QC = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr + 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.040 x 105 Btu/hr + 2.15 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr + 7.65 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr QC = 37.62 x 105 Btu/hr 9.13 QF = (120,000 ft2 )[0.81 Btu/(hr)(ft 2 )(ºF)](98ºF - 78ºF) QF = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr QR = (120,000 ft2 )[0.20 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QR = 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr QD = (6)(24 ft 2 )[1.13 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QD = 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr QG = (10)(32 ft2 )[0.63 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QG = 0.040 x 105 Btu/hr QW = [(2)(8,000 ft2 )+(2)(6,000 ft2 )-(6)(24 ft2 )-(10)(32 ft2 )] [0.39 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)]*(98ºF - 78ºF) QW = 2.15 x 105 Btu/hr QV = [(120,000 ft2 )+(28,000 ft2 )][0.02 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)](98o F – 78o F) QV = 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr QS = {[(3)(24 ft 2 )+(5)(32 ft2 )][110 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)] + [(3)(24 ft2 ) +(5)(32 ft2 )][55 Btu/(hr)(ft2 )(o F)]}(0.3)(98o F – 78o F) QS = 2.30 x 105 Btu/hr QL = (700)(60 watt)[4.25 Btu/(hr)(watt)] QL = 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr QP = (50)(1,500 Btu/hr)+(60)(700 Btu/hr) QP = 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr Using Equation 9.3, the total cooling load may be calculated as follows: QC = 19.4 x 105 Btu/hr + 4.80 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.033 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.040 x 105 Btu/hr + 2.15 x 105 Btu/hr + 0.59 x 105 Btu/hr + 2.30 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.79 x 105 Btu/hr + 1.17 x 105 Btu/hr QC = 37.27 x 105 Btu/hr If blinds are used, the cooling load required would be QC = 35.26 Btu/hr

9.14

The required fire protection in a building, which is governed by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). There are 20 classifications or groups of buildings governed by the UBC.

9.15a Maximum Population = 120 ft x 200 ft = 1200 people 20 sf/person 9.15b Minimum Number of Exits (from Table 9.12) = 4 9.15c Minimum Distance Between Exits = ((200)2 + (120)2 )0.5 / 2 = 117 feet 9.16 The major bene fit of using a sprinkler system is that it is a very effective means of extinguishing or controlling a fire in its early stages and it can provide protection when the building is not occupied. 1. Safety of regular building occupants 2. Safety of firefighters 3. Salvage of the building 4. The goods and equipment in the building The main purpose of face sprinklers in an in-rack sprinkler system is to oppose vertical development of fire on the external face of the rack. The purpose of a trap in a sewage system is to prevent odor from passing back into the facility. Vent stacks can be used to improve water-seal integrity and to provide assurance that smells are effectively removed from the facility and vented to the atmosphere. The statement, “The grid structure should defer to the function of the facility” is true. Some reasons why this is so are: • In a warehouse facility, the grid spacing should be dictated by the rack dimensions and access aisles between racks • In a parking garage, the grid element should be a multiple of the car bay width and length and the circulation needs • As long as the structural integrity is not compromised, the dimensions of the building grid are secondary to the optimal layout of the facility • Specific structural members other than 20’ and 40’ lengths can be obtained without much of a penalty cost The thermal performance of a facility can be improved by making better use of solar gain. This will greatly reduce the building’s dependence on artificial atmospheric systems. Using double-paned windows with a

9.17

9.18

9.19

9.20

9.21

9.22

9-8

reflective glass member can reduce the solar transmission through windows from 90% to 25% A good roof design will also help thermal performance. A membrane layer to prevent water penetration, an insula tion layer to assist with thermal comfort, and a vapor check to stop vapor migration are all requirements of a good roof. The floor should have integral water-proofing and an applied membrane to seal the floor against water migration. The primary purpose of an enclosure system for a manufacturing facility is to keep out undesirables. 9.23 Allocate the mechanical equipment room space Total Gross Area = 120 ft x 180 ft = 21,600 ft2 Assume the system will be roof- mounted Determine the air-handling requirements Air supply = 21,600 ft2 x 1.0 ft3 /min- ft2 = 21,600 ft 3 /min (CFM) Air exhaust = 21,600 ft2 x 0.3 ft2 /min- ft2 = 6,480 ft 3 /min (CFM) Determine Louver Supply and Exhaust sizes Louver Supply = 21,600 CFM / 1,000 ft/min = 21.6 ft2 Louver Exhaust = 6,480 CFM / 2,000 ft/min = 3.24 ft2 Determine Main Duct Sizing 2 main ducts, each covering a half of the building’s area, times the air supply rate: 0.5 x 21,600 ft2 x 1.0 ft3 /min- ft2 = 10,800 ft3 /min (CFM) 10,800 CFM / 1,800 ft/min = 6 ft2

PART FOUR

DEVELOPING ALTERNATIVES: QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES

Chapter 10 Quantitative Facilities Planning Models

10-1 Answers to Questions and Problems at the End of Chapter 10

10.1 Using the half-sum method: half of the sum of the weights equals 35 x-coord wi 3wi y-coord wi 0 15 15 5 30 5 25 40>35 10 35 10 30 70 15 5 (x*,y*) = (5,10), which is the location of existing facility 2 3wi 30 65>35 70

f(10,10) = 15(|10-0|+|10-10|) + 20(|10-5|+|10-10|) + 5(|10-5|+|10-15|) + 30(|10-10|+|10-5|) f(10,10) = 450

10-2 10.2 Using the half-sum method: half of the sum of the weights equals 15 x-coord -5 -3 1 2 3 wi 8 3 4+3=7 7 5 3wi 8 11 18>15 25 30 y-coord -3 -1 0 5 6 8 wi 3 8 4 7 3 5 3wi 3 11 15=15 22 25 30

x* = 1, y* = [0,5] Any point on the defined line segment is an optimum location. 10.3 Using the half-sum method: half of the sum of the weights equals 3 x-coord wi 3wi y-coord wi 0 1 1 0 1 20 1 2 20 1 30 1 3=3 40 1 60 1 4 70 1 70 1 5 80 1 90 1 6 90 1 x* = [30,60], y* = [40,70] Any point in the defined square is an optimum location. 3wi 1 2 3=3 4 5 6

10.4 It is desired to determine the unweighted minimax location, i.e., it is important that the farthest house be as close as possible, regardless of the monetary value of the house. a 20 25 13 25 4 18 b 15 25 32 14 21 8 a+b 35 50 45 39 25 26 -a+b -5 0 19 -11 17 -10

c1 = 25, c2 = 50, c3 = -11, c4 = 19 c5 = max (c2-c1, c4-c3) = max (25, 30) = 30 The minimax locations are all the points on the line segment joining the points: (x1*, y1*) = ½(c1-c3, c1+c3+c5) = ½(36,44) = (18,22) (x2*, y2*) = ½(c2-c4, c2+c4-c5) = ½(31,39) = (15.5,19.5)

10-3 10.5 a. Since the weights are uniformly distributed over the indicated regions, the optimum x-coordinate location will be the point at which no more than half the weight is to the left of the point and no more than half the weight is to the right of the point; likewise, the optimum y-coordinate is the point at which no more than half the weight is below the point and no more than half is above the point. Show below are plots of the cumulative weights along each axis.

10-4 10.5 b. Since the minimax location is to be determined with all points equally weighted, the rectangular regions can be represented by their corners. Hence, a 2 2 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 b 2 4 6 10 12 2 4 10 12 a+b 4 6 10 14 16 8 10 16 18 -a+b 0 2 2 6 8 -4 -2 4 6 a 8 8 10 12 12 12 12 14 14 14 b 4 8 10 4 8 12 14 2 12 14 a+b 12 16 20 16 20 24 26 16 26 28 -a+b -4 0 0 -8 -4 0 2 -12 -2 0

c1 = 4, c2 = 28, c3 = -12, c4 = 8 c5 = max (c2-c1, c4-c3) = max (24, 20) = 24 The minimax locations are all the points on the line segment joining the points: (x1*, y1*) = ½(c1-c3, c1+c3+c5) = ½(16,16) = (8,8) (x2*, y2*) = ½(c2-c4, c2+c4-c5) = ½(20,12) = (10,6) Hence, the optimum location is inside region A4. 10.6 Since there are only 3 sites to consider, enumeration is the quickest means of solving the problem. f(50,50) = 600(|50-20|+|50-25|) + 400(|50-36|+|50-18|) + 500(|50-62|+|5037|) + 300(|50-50|+|50-56|) + 200(|50-25|+|50-0|) = 80,700 f(30,45) = 600(|30-20|+|45-25|) + 400(|30-36|+|45-18|) + 500(|30-62|+|4537|) + 300(|30-50|+|45-56|) + 200(|30-25|+|40-0|) = 70,500 f(65,28) = 600(|65-20|+|28-25|) + 400(|65-36|+|28-18|) + 500(|65-62|+|2837|) + 300(|65-50|+|28-56|) + 200(|65-25|+|28-0|) = 76,900 (x*,y*) = (30,45) 10.7 a. Using the half-sum method: half of the sum of the weights equals 1200 x-coord wi 3wi y-coord wi 3wi 5 200 200 5 300 300 15 400 600 10 200 500 25 500 1100 15 400 900 30 600 1700>1200 20 400 1300>1200 35 300 2000 25 500 1800 50 400 2400 30 600 2400 (x*, y*) = (30,20)

10-5 b. Shown below is a partial contour line which passes through the location for Building 2. Since Building 1 is located inside the contour line and Building 3 is located outside the contour line, the least cost location is Building 1 at (20,20).

10-6 10.8 The contour line passing through (1,5) is shown below.

10-7 10.9 a. By introducing nonnegative pjk, qjk and rji, sji, we can formulate a linear program (LP). i) LP for x-coordinate Min f(x,y) = 4(p12 + q12) + 8(r11 + s11) + 6(r12 + s12) + 5(r13 + s13) + 4(r14 + s14) + 3(r15 + s15) + 2(r21 + s21) + 3(r22 + s22) + 4(r23 + s23) + 6(r24 + s24) + 6(r25 + s25) subject to: x1 – x2 + p12 – q12 = 0 x1 – r11 + s11 = 10 x1 – r12 + s12 = 10 x1 – r13 + s13 = 15 x1 – r14 + s14 = 20 x1 – r15 + s15 = 25 all p’s, q’s, r’s and s’s ≥ 0 ii) LP for y-coordinate Formulation in i) above can be used for the y-coordinate problem by replacing the x’s and a’s by y’s and b’s, respectively. Note: Problem (a) can also be formulated as follows: Min f(x) = 4|x1-x2| + 8|x1-10| + 6|x1-10| + 5|x1-15| + 4|x1-20| + 3|x1-25| + 2|x2-10| + 3|x2-10| + 4|x2-15| + 6|x2-20| + 6|x2-25| Min f(y) = 4|y1-y2| + 8|y1-25| + 6|y1-15| + 5|y1-30| + 4|y1-10| + 3|y1-25| + 2|y2-25| + 3|y2-15| + 4|y2-30| + 6|y2-10| + 6|y2-25| b. Min f(x1,x2) = 4[(x1-x2)2 + (y1-y2)2]1/2 + 8[(x1-10)2 + (y1-25)2]1/2 + 6[(x1-10)2 + (y1-15)2]1/2 + 5[(x1-15)2 + (y1-30)2]1/2 + 4[(x1-20)2 + (y1-10)2]1/2 + 3[(x1-25)2 + (y1-25)2]1/2 + 2[(x2-10)2 + (y2-25)2]1/2 + 3[(x2-10)2 + (y2-15)2]1/2 + 4[(x2-15)2 + (y2-30)2]1/2+ 5[(x2-20)2 + (y2-10)2]1/2 + 5[(x2-25)2 + (y2-25)2]1/2 x2 – r21 + s21 = 25 x2 – r22 + s22 = 15 x2 – r23 + s23 = 30 x2 – r24 + s24 = 10 x2 – r25 + s25 = 25

10-8 10.10 (ai) = (0, 5, 10, 5, 20, 5) (bi) = (10, 0, 0, 10, 10, 20)

wij 1 j 2 3

i 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 10 4 0 0 10 5 5 10 2 6 5 1 5

vjk j 1 2 3 1 0 5 1

k 2 5 0 4

3 1 4 0

a. Min f(x) = 5[|x1-x2| + |y1-y2|] + 1[|x1-x3| + |y1-y3|] + 4[|x2-x3| + |y2-y3|] + 4[|x1-0| + |y1-10|] + 2[|x1-10| + |y1-0|] + 5[|x1-20| + |y1-10|] + 5[|x1-5| + |y1-20|] + 10[|x2-20| + |y2-10|] + 1[|x2-5| + |y2-20|] + 10[|x3-10| + |y3-0|] + 10[|x3-5| + |y3-10|] + 2[|x3-20| + |y3-10|] + 5[|x3-5| + |y3-20|] b. Min f(x) = 5[(x1-x2)2 + (y1-y2) 2]1/2 + 1[(x1-x3) 2 + (y1-y3) 2] 1/2 + 4[(x2-x3) 2 + (y2-y3) 2] 1/2 + 4[(x1-0) 2 + (y1-10) 2] 1/2 + 2[(x1-10) 2 + (y1-0) 2] 1/2 + 5[(x1-20) 2 + (y1-10) 2] 1/2 + 5[(x1-5) 2 + (y1-20) 2] 1/2 + 10[(x2-20) 2 + (y2-10) 2] 1/2 + 1[(x2-5) 2 + (y2-20) 2] 1/2 + 10[(x3-10) 2 + (y3-0) 2] 1/2 + 10[(x3-5) 2 + (y3-10) 2] 1/2 + 2[(x3-20) 2 + (y3-10) 2] 1/2 + 5[(x3-5) 2 + (y3-20) 2] 1/2

10-9 10.11 P1 P2 P3 P4 No. of People/Day 50 30 70 60 Coffee Shop Visitors (70%) 35 21 49 42
(50,100)

(20,70)

(30,40) (90,30)

Case I: One Coffee Shop The problem reduces to a 1 facility location problem ai 20 30 50 90 wi 35 21 42 49 Σ wi 35 56 98 147 bi 30 40 70 100 wi 49 21 35 42 Σ wi 49 70 105 147

(x*,y*) = (50,70) TC(1) = 5,000(1) + 0.25[35(30) + 21(50) + 49(80) + 42(30)] = 6,820 Case II: n Coffee Shops (n ≥ 2) When we have more than one coffee shop, the total cost TC(n ≥ 2) = 5,000(n) + travel cost ≥ 10,000 Which is greater than TC(1) = 6,820, therefore it does not make sense to have more than one coffee shop.

10-10 10.12
(30,25) (20,20)

(0,10)

(15,10)

(0,0)

TC (n ) = 5,000 n + ∑∑10 f i x j − ai + y j − bi z ij i =1 j =1

5

n

(

)

m = # of maintenance machines fi = maintenance requirement frequency zij = {0,1} a. For n = 1: 1 facility location problem ai 0 15 20 30 wi 26 5 12 8 Σ wi 26 31 43 51 bi 0 10 20 25 wi 10 21 12 8 Σ wi 10 31 43 51

(x*,y*) = (0,10) TC(1) = 5,000(1) + 12(10)[10(10) + 16(0) + 8(45) + 5(15) + 12(30)] = 112,400/year = 9,366.7/month b. For n = 2: Alternate location-allocation method Assume initial locations X1 = (0,0), X2 = (30,25) i. Allocation X1 {P1, P2, P4} X2 {P3, P5} ii. Location X1 = (0,10), X2 = (20,20) by half-sum method

10-11 iii. Allocation X1 {P1, P2, P4} X2 {P3, P5} The result is the same as the initial locations. Assign {P1, P2, P4} to X1 at (0,10) and {P3, P5}to X2 at (20,20) TC(2) = 5,000(2) + 12(10)[10(10) + 16(0) + 8(15) + 5(15) + 12(0)] = 45,400/year = 3,783.3/month 10.13 Assume the rental cost is incurred monthly. a. 1 distribution center Total Cost A 23,100 B 22,600 C 33,500 D 28,700 E 43,000

B is chosen with TC = 22,600 b. 2 distribution centers We need to select one more facility in conjunction with B. Additional Facility A C D E Customer Served 2 2,3 2,3 Net Savings (monthly) 4,200 – 5,000 = -1,800 600 + 300 – 6,000 = -5,100 4,800 + 3,500 – 2,000 = 6,300 -8,000 = -8,000

Locate second facility at D TC = 22,600 – 6,300 = 16,300 c. 3 distribution centers Net Savings NS(A) = 0 – 5,000 = -5,000 NS(C) = 0 – 6,000 = -6,000 NS(E) = 0 – 8,000 = -8,000 No addition center is justified. The distribution centers will be located at B and D with total cost $16,300.

10-12 10.14 The monthly rental costs for facilities A, B, D, and D are $4,167, $6,250, $6,000, and $3,750, respectively. a. 1 warehouse Sites Total cost per month A 159,167 B 162,250 C 88,000 D 212,750

Select site C, TC = 88,000/month = 1,045,000/yr. b. 2 warehouses Additional Facility A B C Customer Served 1 Monthly Net Savings 3,000 – 4,167 = -1,167 0 – 6,250 = -6,250 0 – 3,750 = -3,750

No additional warehouse is justified. Locate warehouse at site C, total monthly cost is $88,000. 10.15 Customer 1 2 3 4 Construction Cost Total Annual Cost A 25,000 72,000 42,000 8,000 120,000 339,000 B 15,000 108,000 42,000 80,000 75,000 320,000 C 20,000 96,000 210,000 112,000 70,000 508,000

Locate manufacturing facility at site B. 10.16 a. Order the values in V and D in a decreasing and increasing order, respectively. v = (9,8,7,6,6,5,4,3,2,1), d = (28,35,45,47,57,62,62,70,71,91) Lower Bound = vd’ = 2,472 b. Suppose that department i is located at site i in the current layout design Material Handling Cost = 4(70) + 8(45) + 6(62) + 15(35) + 3(57) + 7(47) + 9(91) + 2(28) + 1(71) + 6(62) =3,005

10-13 10.17 Assuming rectilinear distance a. Decreasing order of flow rate v = (250,200,150,150,150,100,50,30,20,10,10,0,0,0)

A B D= C D E

A B C 1 1 2

D E 2 2 1 3 1 1 2

F 3 2 2 1 1

Increasing order of distance d = (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3) Lower Bound = vd’ = 1,190
b. 1) Largest flow rate v35 = 250 Smallest distance VAB = VAC = VBD = VCD = VCE = VDF = VEF = 1 Assign cell 3 to site C and cell 5 to site D

2) Next largest flow rate v13 = 200 Next smallest distance VAB = VAC = VBD = VCE = VDF = VEF = 1 Since cell 3 is already assigned to site C, assign cell 1 to site A 3) Next largest flow rate v14 = v25 = v36 = 150 Next smallest distance VAB = VBD = VCE = VDF = VEF = 1 Considering the assignments from 1) and 2), assign cell 4 to site B, cell 2 to site F, and cell 6 to site E i) Initial Layout A(1) C(3) B(4) D(5) E(6) F(2)

ii) Total Material Handling Cost TC = 100(3) + 200(1) + 150(1) + 20(2) + 10(2) + 150(1) + 30(2) + 250(1) + 150(1) + 50(3) + 10(2) =1,490

10-14
c. Iteration 1 Pairwise Exchange 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6

Pairwise Savings -470 -440 -30 -100 0

Pairwise Exchange 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-6 3-4

Pairwise Savings -200 0 -120 -130 -50

Pairwise Exchange 3-5 3-6 4-5 4-6 5-6

Pairwise Savings -440 -400 -470 -250 100

When we interchange cells 5 and 6, the savings are $100. New Layout A(1) C(3) B(4) D(6) E(5) F(2)

Total material handling cost = 1,490 – 100 = $1,390 Iteration 2, after a few exchanges we find a solution at the lower bound Pairwise Total Exchange Cost 1-2 1,860 1-3 1,830 1-4 1,520 1-5 1,790 1-6 1,190 Final Layout A(6) C(3) B(4) D(1) E(5) F(2)

Total Cost = 1,190

10-15
10.18 Initial Layout Cell A P/D 30

B 110

C 220

D 305

A V =B C D

A B C D 0 2,100 1,100 1,000 0 400 1,300 0 2,700 0

A D=B C D

A B C D 0 80 190 275 0 110 195 0 85 0

TC = VD’ = 1,179,000 i) Make pairwise interchange Exchange A&B Cell B P/D 50 TC = 1,071,000 Savings = 108,000 A 130 C 220 D 305

Exchange B&C Cell A C P/D 30 100 TC = 1,475,000 Savings = -296,000 Exchange C&D Cell A P/D 30 TC = 978,000 Savings = 201,000 B 110

B 230

D 305

D 185

C 270

Best interchange is C and D where TC = 978,000

10-16 ii) Make pairwise interchange again Exchange A&B Cell B P/D 50 TC = 870,000 Savings = 108,000 Exchange B&D Cell A P/D 30 TC = 1,233,000 Savings = -255,000 A 130 D 185 C 270

D 85

B 160

C 270

Best interchange is A and B where TC = 870,000 iii) Make pairwise interchange again Exchange A&D Cell B D P/D 50 125 TC = 1,004,000 Savings = -134,000 A 180 C 270

No additional savings. Solution is the layout given in ii) B-A-D-C

10-17
10.19

A A B V =C D E F 0

B

C

D

E

F

75 150 0 75 150 0 75 75 0 75 0 150 75 0 0 75 150 0 75 0

TC = VD’ = 165,000 i) Make pairwise interchange. (Due to the structure of the problem, it is not necessary to consider all possible pairs. For example, interchanges directly “across the aisle” need not be considered, since exchanging A&D in the original layout will not change any distances between any pairs.) A&B interchange A&C interchange A&F interchange B&C interchange C&D interchange D&E interchange E&F interchange BAC-DEF CBA-DEF FBC-DEA ACB-DEF FBC-DEA ABC-EDF ABC-DFE TC = 143,250 < 165,000 TC = 153,000 > 143,250 TC = 104,250 < 143,250 lowest TC = 166,875 > 104,250 same as A&F TC = 157,000 > 104,250 TC = 148,125 > 104,250

The best pairwise interchange is either A&F or C&D. Since we considered A&F first, it will be taken to give the first improved layout: FBC-DEA ii) Make pairwise interchange again B&F interchange B&C interchange D&E interchange A&E interchange BFC-DEA FCB-DEA FBC-EDA FBC-DAE TC = 114,250 > 104,250 TC = 145,500 > 104,250 TC = 117,250 > 104,250 TC = 138,500 > 104,250

No savings derived form further interchanges. The layout with the lowest total cost ($104,250) is FBC-DEA

10-18 10.20 a. Average distance item i travels between dock k and its storage region, Ri = 3 dk j / Ai j 0 Ri b. Average cost of transporting item i between dock k and its storage region, Ri = wi k3 dk j / Ai j 0 Ri c. Integer programming formulation m p Minimize 3 3 wi k (3 dk j / Ai) i = 1 k = 1 j 0 Ri subject to: m 3 Ai = n i=1 n 3 xij = Ai œ i j=1 m 3 xij = 1 œ j i=1 xij = 0, 1

10-19 10.21 Product Area #Bays Load Rate (j) (ft 2) (Sj) (Tj ) A 4,375 7 500 B 7,500 12 600 C 1,500 3 700 D 6,250 10 200 Product Ranking: C > A > B > D Tj / Sj 500/7 = 71.43 600/12 = 50.00 700/3 = 233.33 200/10 = 20.00

(multiple optimum layouts exist)

10-20 10.22 Product Area #Bays Load Rate (j) (ft 2) (Sj) (Tj ) 1 2,400 6 600 2 3,200 8 400 3 2,000 5 800 4 2,800 7 400 5 4,000 10 400 6 1,600 4 800 Product Ranking: 6 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 2 > 5 Tj / Sj 100 50 160 57.14 40 200

(multiple optimum layouts exist)

10-21 10.23 Product #Bays Load Rate Tj / Sj (j) (Sj) (Tj ) A 15 1 0.0667 B 5 1 0.20 C 16 1 0.0625 Product Ranking: B > A > C

10-22

(multiple optimum layouts exist) 10.24 Distances to/from storage bays are determined by summing the distance traveled from the receiving door (A) to the center of the storage bay and from the center of the storage bay to the shipping door (B). Consider the shaded storage bay, shown below. Travel from the receiving door to the midpoint of the cross-aisle is 92'; travel up the cross-aisle to the center of the two-way aisle is 52'; travel along the two-way aisle to the center point of the storage bay is 54'; travel from the mid-point of the aisle to the mid-point of the storage bay is 14'. Hence, a total of 212' is required to storage a load in the storage bay. Travel from the storage bay to the shipping door requires 14' from bay to aisle, 202' along the aisle to the mid-point of the farthest oneway aisle, 52' down the aisle to the mid-point of the center aisle, and 4' to the shipping door for a total distance of 272'. The total distance traveled to/from the storage bay is 488', as shown. We do not compute the distance traveled by the lift truck after storage and before retrieval since we do not know its destination and origin points, respectively. Once the distance is known for one storage bay, the other distances can be easily calculated.

10-23 The distances to/from storage bays located along the center aisle are determined as follows: the distance from from door A to door B is 244'; the distance from the mid-point of the center aisle to the mid-point of a storage bay is 18'. Hence, the total distance equals 244' + 18' + 18', or 280'.

Product Area #Bays Load Rate Tj / Sj (j) (ft 2) (Sj) (Tj ) X 6,400 16 300 300/16 = 18.75 Y 8,800 22 400 400/22 = 18.18 Z 2,400 6 500 500/6 = 83.33 Product Ranking: Z > X > Y

10-24 10.25 Create Distance Matrix:

10-25 10.26 a. Shown below is an Excel spreadsheet solution of the problem. To compute the number of storage rows required to accommodate the designated inventory level the ROUNDUP Function is used, e.g., if the inventory level is shown in cell D6 and the row depth is given in cell F5, then if the product is stacked 4 levels high, the following entry would be entered: =ROUNDUP(D6/(4*F5),0).

10-26 10.26 (continued)

To determine the average number of storage rows required over the life of a storage lot (0), the value obtained using the SUM function over the range of storage rows required is divided by the number of entries, e.g., =SUM(F6:F65)/60. Likewise, to determine the average amount of floor space required during the life of the storage lot (S), the following was used: =F69*(K1+M1)*(F5*I1+0.5*O1), where F69 is the value of 0, K1 is the value of W, M1 is the value of c, F5 is the value of x, I1 is the value of L, and O1 is the value of A. Alternately, the following equation can be used to compute the value of SBS: SBS = y(W + c)(xL + 0.5A)[2Q - xyz + xz]/2Q, where y is obtained

10-27 using the ROUNDUP function. Shown below is an Excel solution to the problem. In enumerating over x, SBS is minimized with x equal to 5.

b. Using a continuous approximation, xcBS = [AQ/2Lz]½ = [144(60)/2(48)(4)]½ = 4.74 Therefore, rounding off the value to the nearest integer gives xcBS = 5. 10.27 L = 42", W = 48", c = 4", r = 6", f = 12", A = 96", z = 7 a. Q = 300 xcDLSS = [(A + f)(Q)/2L]½ = [(96 + 12)(300)/2(42)]½ = 19.64 xcDLSS = 20 Using Excel to solve by enumerating over x gives the same result, as shown below.

b. Q = 35, s = 0 Using Excel to solve by enumerating over x gives the following result.

10-28 10.28 L = 40", W = 48", c = 8", A = 156", z = 5 a. Q = 300 xcBS = [AQ/2Lz]½ = [156(300)/2(40)(5)]½ = 10.82 Therefore, rounding off the value to the nearest integer gives xcBS = 11. Using Excel to solve by enumeration gives x*BS = 10, as shown below.

Excel’s SUMPRODUCT function was used to calculate the value of 0; the values in the percentage column were multiplied by the number of storage rows required to accommodate the inventory level; the sum of the products is displayed in the 0 row. Knowing the value of 0, S is easily determined by multiplying by the size of the foot-print of a row, (W + c)(xL + 0.5A). Developing a spreadsheet allows analyses of changes in inventory profiles over lifetimes of production lots to be performed easily. 10.29 Q = 30, L = 48", W = 40", c = 4", r = 4", f = 12", A = 96", z = 7 a. SSD = (W + 1.5c + 0.5r)[L + 0.5(A + f)](Q + 1)/2z SSD = (40 + 6 + 2)[48 + 0.5(96 + 12)](31)/2(7) SSD = 10,841.14 sq. in. b. SDD = (W + 1.5c + 0.5r)[2L + 0.5(A + f)](Q + 2)/4z SDD = (40 + 6 + 2)[96 + 0.5(96 + 12)](32)/4(7) SDD = 8,228.57 sq. in. c. STD =