``Interests'' and Accounting Standard Setting in Malaysia

AAAJ 12,3

``Interests ' ' and accounting standard setting in Malaysia
Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords Accounting profession, Malaysia, Standards Abstract This paper offers insights into the conflicts and tensions within the Malaysian accounting profession and the power struggle therein to dominate the accounting standard setting process, within the context of a rapidly developing country. It shows how interest groups and parochial interests, along with issues of self-protection, affected the process of standard setting, which was controlled by different interests over the period under study. At one time the profession dominated. But far from being a monolithic body, it was in turn split according to various interests: the Big Six behind the Malaysian Association of Certified Public Accountants (MACPA) and the smaller firms behind the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA). At other times big business prevailed. These conflicts and power struggles are revealed through an analysis of the case of the Goodwill Accounting Standard.

Selvaraj D. Susela

358

Introduction This paper offers an understanding of the struggle within the accounting profession for control of the standard setting process, in the context of a developing nation. The focus on standard setting is specially geared to reveal the impact of that process on the profession, market, state and community, and vice versa. Susela (1996) illustrates that because standards clearly impact on practitioners (the profession), it is hardly surprising that they develop ``interests ' ' around standard setting, whether expressed through accounting associations or firms. The standard setting arena is here viewed as a site of struggle between interest groups, both within the profession and outside it. To date, no such study has been done of the Malaysian accountancy and standard setting domains. In particular, there has been very little scholarly

References: Chua, W.F. (1986), ``Radical developments in accounting thought ' ', The Accounting Review, Vol. LXI No. 4, October, pp. 601-32. CIC (1991), Guidelines for the New Issues of Securities and the Valuation of Public Listed Companies, Capital Issues Committee, Kuala Lumpur. Cooper, D.J. and Sherer, M.J. (1984), ``The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting ' ', Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 20732. De Freitas, G. (1992), ``Malaysian accountancy: waking the sleeping tiger ' ', Certified Accountant, June, pp. 12-5. FPLC (1993), ``Memorandum of the Federation of Public Listed Companies to the Malaysian Institute of Accountants ' ', unpublished. Haring, J.R. (1979), ``Accounting rules and the `accounting establishment ' ' ', Journal of Business, October, pp. 507-19. Hines, R. (1988), ``Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality ' ', Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 251-62. Hindess, B. (1988), Choice, Rationality and Social Theory, Allen & Unwin, London. Hindess, B. (1989), Political Choice and Social Structure: An Analysis of Actors, Interests, and Rationality, E. Elgar Pub., Aldershot. Jesudason, J.V. (1990), Ethnicity and the Economy: The State, Chinese Business and Multinationals in Malaysia, Oxford University Press, Singapore. MACPA (1974), MACPA Annual Report 1973, MACPA, Kuala Lumpur. MACPA (1980), MACPA Annual Report 1979, MACPA, Kuala Lumpur. MACPA (1992), MACPA Annual Report 1991, MACPA, Kuala Lumpur. MACPA Technical Committee (1971), ``Minutes ' ', 13 October. McKee, A.J., Bell, T.A. and Boatsman, J.R. (1984), ``Management preferences over accounting standards: a replication and additional test ' ', The Accounting Review, October, pp. 647-59. MIA (1987), Malaysian Institute of Accountants: 1987 Report and Accounts, MIA, Kuala Lumpur. Price Waterhouse (1992), The Goodwill Debate: Forming a View, Price Waterhouse, Kuala Lumpur. Puxty, A.G., Willmott, H.C., Cooper, D.J. and Lowe, T. (1987), ``Modes of regulation in advanced capitalism: locating accountancy in four countries ' ', Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 273-91. Robson, K. (1993), ``Accounting policy making and `interests ': accounting for research and development ' ', Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 3, pp. 1-27. Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C. (1985), ``Community, market, state and associations? ' ' in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C. (Eds), Private Interest Government and Public Policy, Sage Publications, London. Susela, S.D. (1996), ``Accounting standard setting in Malaysia ' ', PhD Dissertation, University of Waikato, Waikato. Susela, S.D. and Veerinderjeet, S. (1992), ``Segmental reporting in Malaysia: relevance, extent of compliance and disclosure ' ', Akauntan Nasional, April, pp. 12-20. Tan, L.T. (1991), ``Anomalies in accounting for intangible assets ' ', Malaysian Accountant, August, pp. 3-8. Tan, K.S. (1981), ``Mergers for growth and expansion ' ', The Malaysian Accountant, July, pp. 8-10. Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1978), ``Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards ' ', Accounting Review, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 112-34. Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1986), Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice Hall, New York, NY. Whitley, R. (1988), ``The possibility and utility of positive accounting theory ' ', Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 631-45. Further reading Benjamin, C., Craig, R.J. and Clarke, F.L. (1994), ``An educational profile of Australia 's industrial relations practitioner ' ', Work and People, Vol. 15 No. 1, July. MACPA (1993), 1958 to 1993. Ulang Tahun 35, MACPA, Kuala Lumpur. MACPA (1994), MACPA Annual Report 1993, MACPA, Kuala Lumpur. Appendix (1) What is your view on the role of accounting in economic development? Do you, for instance, see a role for accounting in the economic development of Malaysia? (2) Malaysia is a centrally planned democratic capitalist economy. To what extent is the centrally planned nature of Malaysia 's economic development being reflected in the accounting regulatory process? (3) The proposal for a merger of MIA and MACPA is again being pursued. Why do you think this issue is currently being pursued in spite of failures of such attempts in the past? Do you consider that circumstances have changed now? (4) Accounting standard setting in Malaysia is currently carried out by the MIA and the MACPA. What groups or people do you think have important influence on the accounting standard setting process? What changes would you like to see in the standard setting process? (5) To what extent do you think the state is involved in the standard setting process? How do you see the role of the state (government) in accounting development? (6) What are your feelings about the Goodwill Standard issue? Accounting standard setting in Malaysia 387