Preview

John Rawls' Theory of Justice: Contribution to Solve Some Political Issues in the Philippines

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Rawls' Theory of Justice: Contribution to Solve Some Political Issues in the Philippines
John Rawls is perhaps the most significant intellectual in philosophical ethics to have written in the past hundred years. It is nearly impossible to address ethics in contemporary philosophy without saying something about John Rawls. Central to his theory of justice are the concepts of fairness and equality from behind what he terms a "veil of ignorance".
Rawls's veil of ignorance is a component of the way people can construct society. He refers to an "original position" in which a person is attempting to determine a fair arrangement for society without any preconceived notions or prejudices.
In this original position, people are behind what Rawls calls a "Veil of Ignorance" and do not know where they will fall in the social hierarchy in terms of race, class, sex, disability, and other relevant factors. Rawls is a Kantian liberal in that he believes that principles of justice should be universalizable, and so the only way to ensure that people will select fair principles of justice is to be certain that they do not know how the principles they select might affect them as individuals. A person behind the "veil of ignorance" does not know which side of a social contract he or she will be on, does not know his or her race, class, sex, or status in society. A person who does not know what privileges he or she will be born with (or without ) is, in Rawls' view, more likely to construct a society that does not arbitrarily assign privilege based on characteristics that should have no bearing on what people get. Rawls believes that a society cannot be just without fairness and equality and believes this veil of ignorance both reveals the biases of current society and can help to prevent biases in establishing future social arrangements.
Rawls is often thought of as a liberal philosopher given his position emphasizing fairness regardless of social status. His philosophy can be used to justify programs like affirmative action but has also been used by the more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. True or false? Rawls' view of social justice includes people making choices to protect those who are in a lesser position in society.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Mudsill theory claims that there must be, and has always been, a lower class for the upper classes to rest upon. Hammond, also a wealthy southern plantation owner, used this theory to justify what he saw as “the willingness of the non-whites to perform menial work: their labor enabled the higher classes to move civilization forward” (Boundless). In this view, any efforts toward class or racial equality ran counter to this theory, and therefore ran counter to civilization itself. Southern pro-slavery theorists argued that slavery prevented any such attempted movement toward equality by “elevating all free people to the status of citizen and removing the landless poor from the political process entirely” (Boundless). That is, those who…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dalton 's essay presents the point of view with that I can only partially agree. I must say that author is probably right that in this country the opportunities are not equal for all people. Why they should be? This world is not a paradise; we cannot just overcome overnight all either what is bad in us or in our society, it a complicated and I assume time-consuming process. I would like to give an example: I could tell the…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the strongest people’s aberration is that all of us were born equal, that there is no difference between us. There are millions of people still believe, that the baby which was born in Sudan amount the tents and destitution is equal to the baby that was born in Manhattan with mommy and daddy who is working on the Wall-street. They have equal rights to live, but is it the thing that makes us equal? Is it truly doesn’t matter who your parents are or in what place on the Earth you were born? The short and tragic life of Robert Peace demonstrates, that the environment where you were born affect greatly on your future life. In my opinion, since the day you were brought into life you get your ceiling - you can’t jump higher. You can’t run off your roots.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. DiAngelo and Sensoy argue that we, in mainstream society, lack the ability to understand or discuss our intersecting identities to a certain degree and therefore should learn to be more aware of our positionality and how we regard others. As an example of the intersections of race and class, DiAngelo and Sensoy consider a white woman living in poverty; someone who faces both the barriers of poverty and sexism, yet no barriers of racism, but under her position of poverty is generalized under mainstream culture's idea of the "poor".…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aspects of a person’s life are not entirely determined by the circumstances he is born into – his decisions, the actions of others, and luck plays a large role as well. Since people are autonomous, they control how their lives turn out, but everyone’s life prospects are more “deeply shaped by a social structure that he or she did not choose” (page 130). This means that the poor are not entirely at fault for their living conditions; society’s structure may also affect their life outcomes. Not every citizen is granted equal opportunities, so not everyone should have the same social…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Similarly racism and classism were, and still are, justified with these ideas. It argues that peoples who were poor, marginalized or otherwise subjugated either legally or socially, were in fact lesser than those who were wealthy, and otherwise privileged. It argues that their privilege arose from them being better suited to fitting in and thriving within the society, and that those at the bottom of society are there because they are not suited to be at the top. This was a way of using science to justify prejudices that were already in place so as to appease the consciousness of those societies. These ideas enforced, segregation and marginalization of “lesser” members of society.…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have this idea that when we are emotionally charged because of what another person says, we can take that as a cue to explore the subject for a better understanding. DiAngelo and Sensory make it very clear that understanding is not the same as agreement. A person can explore why someone thinks something and see their point of view, but stick with their personal opinions. No one can take a student’s opinion away, but they have to be open minded to not overlook knowledge or ideas from others. This helps students grow as individuals and realize who they are by having the hard discussions with others on sensitive subjects. By exploring the perspectives of others and seeking to understand them, we gain more knowledge as individuals. In social justice, there is no black and white, and we as students can discover how there are actually so many gray areas. DiAngelo and Sensory show that we are all effected by inequality and bias in one way or another and at some point in our lives. By following our open mind and silencing offense to our own biases, we can then put ourselves in the shoes of the individual before us and gain knowledge and perception from…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ada and Affirmative Action

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Living in an equal opportunity society as before the early years, may not be so equally viewed by others. As humans, one is not able to determine how he or she is born. Of course one wants to be born to what society views as normal, but this is not always the case. Some are born with abnormalities that are no fault of their own. If one did have choice, he or she would probably choose the race, gender and culture to fit the views of society. Perhaps is this was to happen; maybe racism, prejudices, and discrimination would not have caused certain rights and acts to be implemented. As one reads the essay, he or she will briefly be aware on acts that were implemented to give each individual equal opportunity in society like ADA and Affirmative Action.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthem Essay by Ayn Rand

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The scene in Anthem where Equality is writing about his school lessons, he could never forget no matter how hard he tried illustrates the idea of how different he is from the others. The quote “We tried to forget out lessons, but we always remembered.” (Rand 21) is when Equality was talking about his struggle with his education; Equality always wanted to know more, but it was forbidden to ask questions. He was forced to conform to the laws that he only needed to know what he was taught. In addition to Equality being smarter, he is guilty of the great Transgression of Preference. Equality wanted to be a part of the Home of Scholars. Instead he was made a street sweeper because of his intelligence. It was like this with all of the citizens. In example, International was an exceptional artist, but only the artists are allowed to draw. Because of his talent, he was sent to the Home of Street Sweepers never drawing again.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our everyday lives we come across barriers, barriers of inequality, barriers of exclusion, barriers that prevent us from accomplishing our goals and ambitions. However, do we let these obstacles get in the way of our wants and desires or our basic rights and privileges? No, we do not. We work as individuals and together to encourage positive change in today’s society. People of the past and present have demanded equality and the right to be included in things rightfully owed to them, resulting in either an influential change that is usually beneficial or occasionally, a hindrance.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    St. Pierre, Allen . "Marijuana Legalization Zeitgeist In America To Continue Into 2010: Federal Government Lags Behind The States." norml.com. 23 Oct. 2009. 11 Dec. 2009. .…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays