Preview

Julius Caesar--Fate vs. Free Will Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar--Fate vs. Free Will Essay Example
Julius Caesar
Fate vs. Free Will

In Julius Caesar, two forces compete for dominance--fate and free will. Fate was portrayed as prophecies and omens. Free will was the character’s ability to overcome it--which they tried and didn’t. Caesar, Cassius, and Brutus have troubles overcoming their fate in the play. In the end of the play, all three of them fall to their fate--this is Shakespeare’s way of showing the fine line between the two. Caesar’s fate was the most obvious to him and the readers. In the beginning we see how Caesar uses his power over his own fate by ignoring the soothsayer in the crowd that warns him of the ides of March. On the ides of March, Caesar confronts the soothsayer and tells him that it is now the day he was warned of but he doesn’t what the rest of the day holds for him. Earlier that day, Calphurnia tells Caesar about her dream and how everyone went to his statue to bathe their hands in the blood coming out of the statue in her dream (Act 2, sc. ii, 13-26). Decius Brutus goes to Caesar’s home and when he finds out that Caesar would not be going, he retells Calphurnia’s dream as a blessing upon him. On Caesar’s way to the Senate, Artemidorus attempts to warn him and show him the exact plan of his murder, but Caesar refuses since he is filled with pride at the moment. Through all the times that Caesar’s free will could have helped him save his own life--he chose to ignore it, leading to his death. Cassius was very aware of his own fate up to the very end. He took the largest precautions to overcome it. Cassius believed in the Epicurean philosophy (gods do not involve themselves directly into the fate of man), which was highlighted when his famous fate quote was said to Brutus (Act 1, sc. ii, 139-141). Cassius thought that he could always do something to make his current position in life better. Cassius desire was to make sure that Caesar would not become emperor, but Caesar’s fate was to become the emperor. Because he was so driven

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In both Julius Caesar and Good Night and Good Luck, the composers use personalities of certain characters to express conflicting perspectives. These personalities may be representative the leaders in the society at the time or even the society at large. An important conflict of personalities to be considered in Julius Caesar is Cassius and Brutus’. Cassius is believed to be the main conspirator in charge of killing Caesar and in order to successfully do so, he persuades Brutus to be involved. Cassius’ manipulative personality is demonstrated when he discusses with Brutus that people can manifest their own destiny. “Men at some times are masters of their fates: the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves, that we are underlings.” Shakespeare uses the Roman Republic as a platform to comment on Elizabethan society. Superstition was a very serious topic in that era and people genuinely believed their fate was in the hands of the Gods. Cassius’ argument to Brutus disregards this concept and as a…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fortune, destiny, chance and the stars, there are many references to a larger power out of the character’s control. Although many of Shakespeare's mentions are one line, they come after powerful and relevant scenes and add depth to the character’s emotions and leave a greater impact. However they do not excuse the fact that the character is responsible for what they have wrought. For example Romeo after he had killed Tybalt yells, “O’ I am Fortune's fool!”(3.1-142) Here it is not fate that's pulling the lovers apart it is Romeo's foolishness. Romeo killing Tybalt after interfering with the Capulet and Mercutio fight was Romeo’s choice. It was out of his control that Tybalt sought him out, but his death is on Romeo’s head. The last scene of…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After viewing the video “Who Killed Julius Caesar” I have come up with mixed ideas of what might have happened. I believe the death had to do with both suicide and murder, but mainly murder. My reason starts by the describing the occurrences Caesar endured during his time of death. Some of the main points the movie stated was that he was a master a manipulating people, he had epilepsy, he screamed out “kill me now, I won’t resist!”, and that he was sick with diarrhea and drowsiness. Most of these actions, the investigator thought, were due to the epilepsy. I believe it, but I also believe all of this was what made Caesar want to commit suicide. But in my mind, he didn’t commit suicide, but instead asked others to do so. Why? I will now tell you what I believe what really happened the day of Julius Caesars death.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When being interviewed Brazilian, novelist and lyricist, Paulo Coelho claimed, “I can control my destiny, but not my fate. Destiny means there are opportunities to turn right or left, but fate is a one-way street. I believe we all have the choice as to whether we fulfil our destiny, but our fate is sealed”. In today's society, many people are conflicted on whether events in one’s lives are driven by one's choices or are simply meant to be. Coelho believes that both free will and fate play a role in one’s life, he says that one has the power to make certain choices, but in the end it all comes down to fate. The concept of fate versus free will can be seen in the fictional pieces, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, “Pyramus…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This continued and the Senators became very angry with Caesar's violent and un patient ways until they became so fed up they had to get rid of him. They plotted against him for weeks meeting separately. They planned on murdering him at the senate because they could hide their daggers in their togas and only Senators could enter. Caesar had been warned by a priest of the “Ides of March” which corresponds to the calendar as March 15th. The night before Caesar's wife had had a dream that Caesar had been stabbed to death. Caesar's friends had begged him not to go from hearing rumours that the Senate was plotting against him. His doctor also warned him not to go because of his medical condition of epilepsy or random seizures resulting in high fevers and mild memory loss, but Caesar claimed that “Only descendants from the Divine were blessed with the rare condition.” Caesar became annoyed with Calpurnia but choose to obey until Brutus convinced him otherwise. Caesar had instilled brotherly trust in the young Senator Brutus, for they had known each other for many years. He abided Caesar to not listen to Calpurnia's foolish dreams and…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes: There are many causes of Caesar's final decision. Many of these causes, though, may be better identified as warnings or signs against his attendance at the Senate meeting. At the beginning of the book, Caesar appears at a race in which he is confronted by a Soothsayer telling him, "Beware of the Ides of March."(1.2.21) He thinks nothing of it and tells the Soothsayer to move on.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus was one of the most important and influential characters in the play. He involved himself in many of the scandals entailing the conspirators, in hopes of fulfilling his duty as an honorable man. However, his impressionable personality would lead him to a fatal outcome, suicide. There were many different causes and factors that led to his death, along with the death of the other central characters. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar resulted in multiple tragedies, due to the actions and decisions made by Brutus and the other conspirators. Realistically, Brutus’ own decisions led to his death.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People say that fate is unavoidable, but, through my personal experiences, it has come to my realization that one’s fate is in their own hands. A person’s actions determine their fate, which is why I believe that life is essentially defined by a person’s free will. An instance in my life, when my fate was being defined by my actions was when I moved from Jersey City to Erie. Since I did not approve of this move, my thoughts made me believe that what was about to happen was just life being unfair, in other words, my fate. Now I have come to understand that this move could have been avoidable; I was given a chance to stay, if only I would have improved my grades and gotten into the high school that my parents wished for me to go to. Alas, I did not take that situation seriously, and I paid the consequences by having to leave my…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He could have been much more wary had he heeded to the multiple warnings. All the way in the beginning, a soothsayer warns him, "Beware the ides of March." (Shakespeare, pg. 15) Caesar's ego hides any pessimistic predictions for his future, and he pays little attention to the warning. There were many more signs, all pointing to the same fate, and Caesar did not listen, "Alas, my dear, your wisdom is consumed in confidence. Do not go forth today," (Shakespeare, pgs. 77-78) warns his wife on the day he was murdered. Caesar does not listen to her in the end. His murder was executed as forecasted, and if he had listened to all the warnings, he may have saved his own…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the three men, Caesar's fate seemed most obvious to him and to the reader. However, Caesar used his free will in many instances to in large part ignore his destiny, which fate has presented. On one occasion in the beginning of the play, a soothsayer warns Caesar to "Beware the ides of March" (I. i. 23). Caesar pays more attention to the appearance of the soothsayer then to the warning; and, finding the appearance not to his liking, Caesar ignores the warning and passes him off as a dreamer. Later, on the Ides of March, he confronts the soothsayer, and says that "the ides of March have come" (III. i. 1). Caesar was confident that the soothsayer was wrong that he did not even consider what the rest of the day had in store for him. Earlier that day, Caesar had almost made a choice to heed the omen of his fate presented to Calphurnia in her dream. However, his pride presented itself as Decius Brutus gave him an alternate way to interpret the dream. Instead of viewing it correctly as Calphurnia had shown him, he used the lame explanation provided by Decius so that he would not appear afraid before the Senate. Even on the trip to the Senate, he had an opportunity to see the exact plan for his death. But his patriotism, or possibly his false humility, propelled him to say "What touches us ourself shall be last served" (III. i. 8). Through all of these times where his free will could have…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, someone could argue that it was Caesar’s fate to die as the soothsayer warned him of the ides of March. Others could say that it was Caesar’s own fault for being stubborn and ignoring the soothsayer and his wife’s warnings. Perhaps it was Caesar’s ambition and lust that got him killed. These are all viable arguments, but Cassius is the main reason for…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays