Preview

Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
717 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay Example
Julius Caesar defeated Pompey! He returns to Rome - the question is will he become King? In the play Julius Caesar returns to Rome after defeating Pompey. Some Romans want to make him king, but others think he will become too powerful, and they kill him. After the killing of Caesar, they have to justify their motives to the people of Rome. Marcus Antony and Marcus Brutus both give a speech at Caesar’s funeral, they both try to persuade the audience to agree with them using rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, pathos) however; Marcus Anthony’s speech was more effective in moving the audience to action. In order to be a successful persuasive speaker you need to use the rhetorical appeal, logos. Logos uses inductive or deductive reasoning by citing statistics, facts, experts and evidence. The claim or thesis of each speaker of Brutus was that Caesar deserved to be killed while Antony’s claim was that Caesar was a respectable person and didn’t deserve to be killed. An example of Brutus using logos to persuade his audience is: “The question of his death is enrolled in the Capitol; his glory not extenuated, wherein he was worthy…” (108 line 33-34) A better example of a speaker using logos came from Antony’s speech: “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (112 line 91-92) Antony overall uses the rhetorical appeal, logos, better. Another tool used by a good speaker is called patos, which is another rhetorical appeal. This is when you appeal to the emotions of your audience by describing in detail the effect of a particular situation (try to arouse a strong sense of feelings in your audience such as fear, or sympathy). Brutus arouses the audience’s anger and fear which pushes them to think that Caesar would have been a bad king, so its a good thing he was killed. One line that Brutus used to try to persuade his audience was: “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses all three of the persuasive appeals to convince people to one side of an argument or another. However, the most common appeal used by Antony is logos. This can be seen when he talks at Julius Caesar’s funeral, when he convinces Brutus and Cassius not to kill him after Caesar’s death, and when he asks if anyone else would leave their estate to the Romans like Caesar did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if your mother suddenly has a terrible heart attack and now needs open heart surgery. Picture your son or daughter getting into car wreck and needs an emergency blood transfusion. Imagine a sibling having leukemia, and needs regular blood transfusions to survive. Not exactly what you want to think about on a Sunday afternoon, but these are the harsh realities of the world we live in. Many of you may have experience with these tragedies, and lost. If your thinking “I wish I knew of a way to help” well there is a way. With the simple donation of blood, platelets or plasma, you could save the life of a loved one or a complete stranger.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally the Pathos method of persuasion is used. Brutus uses the Pathos method to manipulate the Plebeians by using rhetorical devices such as the obvious questions that he asks the people in the crowd that are clearly relatable and significant to their general, Julius Caesar. Antony uses the Pathos method to persuade the people as well. When Antony manipulated the Plebeians he showed how great Caesar was by exaggerating Caesar’s positive actions and characteristics. By doing this, Antony tries to show the Plebeians how honorable and victorious Caesar was and how much they used to adore…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From what I observed in the speeches, Anthony is the more persuasive speaker. Anthony used ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech while Brutus only used pathos and logos, Anthony also connected with the crowd showing he had the same emotions as them while Brutus only challenged the crowd. Ethos is a persuasive speech tactic that speakers use when persuading the audience by using ethics. It focuses on the ethics of either the speaker or the audience.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appeal and Antony

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What examples of appeals to reason did Brutus use? What examples did Antony use? Who handled the appeal to reason better? Explain your answer. Brutus makes a speech that appeals to reason . but his appeal to reason is surpassed by Antony's cleverness who uses the emotions of the crowd . Antony suggests that Brutus and his fellow conspirators and not the honorable men they say they are .…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome were moved by both Brutus's and Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral. Persuasion can be ingenious in plentiful ways, Brutus and Antony swept the crowd in their own ways. However, by looking at the ethos, pathos, and logos in both Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Antony can be seen as more persuasive.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Brutus uses pathos is very strong. Brutus says how much he loved Caesar but he had to murder him for the better of Rome. Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Also, Brutus shows his sympathy over Caesar’s death. Brutus said, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant; I honor him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analyzing Brutus and Antony's speeches, it is clearly shown that Antony persuaded the crowd better than Brutus had. Both men used very persuasive statements containing many examples of ethos, pathos, and logos. Brutus uses his "nobleness" to persuade the crowd into thinking he has merely done this for the people of Rome. By using the way people look up to him, he told them that they should be thankful that he managed to assassinate Caesar for the good of Rome when they did. So of course the people believe him. Antony on the other hand is so persuasive that he had a speech about mourning over Caesar and by the end of his speech he has the crowd wanting the murder Brutus without him telling them that they should. He uses the most indirect persuasive statements.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The emotional appeal, pathos, is most used in both speeches. Brutus states about Caesars “tears, love, and ambition,” and also asks the audience theoretical questions that they could not answer, and took the silence as agreements. He makes the audience believe that he really loved Caesar, and had to assasinate him for the good of Rome. He says “its not that I love Caesar less, but I love Rome more” which causes the crowd to…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to my reading the power to kill Julius Caesar was persuasion How did conspirators convince others to help them overthrow Caesar. Over 40 people were involved in the conspiracy to kill Julius Caesar they were all bribed with gifts like Swisher Sweets, cigars and brown ale and emotionally made afraid of him. The main reasons why Julius was killed was because the perpetrators were afraid of Caesar gaining too much power and weakening political and economic positions. Unfortunately for Caesar his best friend Brutus was one of the perpetrators Being such a close friend to Caesar and then agreeing to the betrayal of his best friend Brutus said that he did all of this to protect Rome from being destroyed by the tyrannical ruler. So emotionally…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays