Preview

Jury Trial Analysis Paper Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
719 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Trial Analysis Paper Essay Example
Jury Trial Analysis Paper

Jury Trial Analysis Paper
On June 19, 1994 O.J Simpson the football hall of famer was arrested in California for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Simpson was arraigned in court two day later he pleaded not guilty to the charges and was held in the Los Angeles County jail. Jury selection began in October and the jury was sworn in on November 2, 1994. Mr. Simpson did have a jury of his peers, because the jury was twelve jurors some African American and white. The jurors were picked through the voir dire process. With each juror understanding that they could not have any personal bias pertaining to the case. A series of question were asked to the jurors to determine if the potential jurors had exposure to the context of the case. In the pretrial hear the credibility of evidence from detective Mark Fuhrman would be admitted at trial. Prosecutors said that they thought Mr. Simpson dropped the glove as he tried to quickly return to his home after committing the murders.
Opening Statements
In the opening statements the defense and the prosecution has the opportunity to present their case to the jury. Throughout the opening statements persuasive arguments are announced. During the opening statement evidence is never allowed. Judge Lance A. Ito presided over the case and on January 24, 1995. Before things got going, Judge Ito ruled that Simpson would not be heard by the jury until the defense gives the opening statements. The defense opening statements were lead by attorney Johnnie Cochran when said my client Mr. Simpson is innocent and wrongfully accused.
Witness Testimony
Eye witness an expert testimony helps reveal specific truths and accuracy in evidence. The Court bailiff will swear all witnesses to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Normally the prosecution questions their own witnesses to strengthen their side of the case. The defense then has the chance to cross examine. All

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    Orenthal James “O.J.” Simpson was accused of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goodman in 1995. Twenty years on, his case still remains controversial, but why? Simpson was a star athlete until 1979, where he pursued his dream of becoming an actor (Harris, 2008). O.J.’s alleged murder of his former wife and her friend thrust him into the spotlight, catching the public’s attention, as well as every news station in the U.S. One factor that makes this case so notorious is that there were many flaws during the investigative process, and a lot of them lead to the outcome of Simpson’s freedom from his charges. Many of these investigative errors could have been overcome with rigorous surveillance of officers on the…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order for someone to be considered an expert witness, courts take into consideration the persons education degrees, the number of experience that the person has in this certain field, any professional organizations that the person is either a member of or if their the leader in any organizations, and if that person has publishes any books or anything they have authored.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is one of the most famous cases of all time. It was nationally televised and seen by millions and millions of people. The main suspect in this trial was O.J Simpson who is a retired football star. He was accused of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her “friend” Ron Goldman. This case was highly controversial and many people believe that O.J did murder both of them even though he was found not-guilty. This case had a lot of evidence including forms of forensic evidence.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orenthal James Simpson, commonly known as O.J. Simpson, was tried for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown-Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman who were stabbed on the evening of June 12, 1994. He was acquitted of the murder charge in 1995, but I am going to explain why he explain should have been found guilty of the murder.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Oj Simpson Case

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    O.J simpson was acquitted of all charges of killing his ex-wife and her friend. On June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole brown ex wife of former football player and her friend Ronald Goldman were found outside Browns house. The crime scene was covered in blood, and there was also a black glove which had DNA evidence of Oj Simpson. O.J simpson at the time was out of town and was called by a detective to inform him of the death of his former wife. Later, when he arrived detectives noticed a cut on his finger due to a glass breaking.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have the ability to provide, compared to the other witnesses, their own opinions concerning facts of the case (Pozullo et al., 2016). Further, their role is to know not only their own testimony, but also be knowledgeable of how they fit in the court proceedings and what their presence implicates (Pozullo et al., 2016). For example, the expert witness must know what restrictions are applied to their behaviour in court (Pozullo et al., 2016). Through educating the trier of fact, these witnesses help them decide the sentence that is best suited for the accused, if said accused is found to be guilty. Expert witnesses, such as psychologists, help determine if the accused should be imprisoned (Pozullo et al., 2016).…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Criminal Trial

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1995 criminal trial of O. J. Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been called "a great trash novel come to life,".No one can deny the pull it had on the American public and the fans of the great O.J. Simpson. During the early reports of the murder of the wife of the ex-football star, and the cunning , head turning sports announcer had not caught people's full attention, Simpson's surreal Bronco ride on the day of his arrest most definitly did. Police accumulated enough evidence against Simpson to indicate that he was guilt of the murders and they sought and obtained a warrant for his arrest. But there was an agreement worked out with Simpson's attorney, Robert Shapiro that Simpson was to turn himself in…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As expected, the presiding judge ordered that Simpson be held without bail. The following day, a grand jury was called to determine whether to indict him for the murders. Two days later, on June 23, the grand jury was dismissed as a result of excessive media coverage, which could have influenced its neutrality. Rather than a grand jury hearing, a probable cause hearing was held to determine whether or not to bring Simpson to trial, which was a minor victory for Simpson's lawyers who would now be able to get to evidence as it was being presented by the prosecution to a grand jury hearing. For the defense case Simpson hired a team of high-profile lawyers, including F. Lee Bailey, Robert Kardashian, Robert Shapiro, Alan Dershowitz, Johnnie Cochran, Gerald Uelmen Carl E. Douglas and Shawn…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    OJ Simpson Essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    O.J's case consisted of a man named O.J Simpson who was said to have viciously slashed the throats of his wife, Nicole Brown, and a man named Ronald Goldman. This event took place in June 22, 1994 and the casualties that it contained are still very much spoken about today. O.J Simpson was said to have been violent in the past, therefore when the two bodies were found, police did not hesitate to confront Mr. Simpson. Police showed up in his home and certain evidence was found. Mr. Simpson officially became a suspect but because of some problems with how the evidence was found, he was claimed "not guilty".…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Charge Case Study

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Members of the jury, I will now give you many instructions that you should consider in deciding this case; all are equally important. Don’t pick out one and ignore the rest. Think about each instruction in the context of all the others. You must obey the instructions. You are not allowed to reach decisions that go against the law. In these instructions, the masculine gender he or him includes the feminine gender of she or her. You may take notes during the trial, but don’t overdo it, and don’t let it distract you from following the evidence. The lawyers will review important evidence in their closing arguments, and help you focus on that which is most relevant to your decision. I also caution you that any notes you may…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juror's Arguement Analysis

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To measure this, surveys were given to jurors who served on a jury that had come to a conclusion, whether it was to convict, acquit, or resulted in a hung jury. One particular question in the survey required participants to respond whether or not their individual verdict mirrored the final verdict of the group. Waters and Hans (2009) measured these one-person verdicts based on combining all counts, the first more severe count, and lesser included counts. They found, depending on the approach and severity of counts used to measure the dissent, that approximately 38 percent to 54 percent of the jurors who participated in the survey had disagreeing individual verdicts in comparison to the final verdict given by the group (Waters et al., 2009, p. 523). According to Waters and Hans (2009), approximately 6 percent of jury trials result in a hung jury; with the staggering percent of jurors holding dissenting individual verdicts provided in the results of their study, it can be concluded that the percentage of hung juries should be significantly…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Judgement Essay

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page

    According to British and Australian legislation, jury has no access to the criminal history. This is considered as safe-guarding the person accused. This avoids misinterpretation by the judge while dealing with any criminal cases. I strongly believe this method is flawless to give the correct judgement.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It was found that jurors with previous experience of jury work were more likely to convict. This could be due to experience as well as the young jurors would be naïve and easily influenced by other factors. Also, the race of a juror was found to be a factor that could influence the decision made as they would be most likely convict defendants of a different race due to their prejudice against certain traits. Jurors with authoritarian personalities are more likely to convict due to their support for convention, police authority and their dogmatic approach. They believe in structure, law and order…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Opening Statement Doc

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s court system it’s not what you know it’s what you can prove, this statement has assisted me with the choice of discussing the Opening Statement of a Trial. Open statements can be catastrophic in any trial process, I would like to think of opening statements as the seed that initiates doubt in the minds of the jury. Opening Statements are defined as the information presented to the jury by both the prosecution and the defense attorney; solely to advise the jury of what each side intends to prove and how they will provide that information. Opening statements are evidence or verdict, this process allows the prosecution to state what they are going to prove and how their proof relates to the case. For example the prosecutions opening statement would be: my intentions here today is to prove that the stand accused did in fact commit the nature of these crimes with the thought of consequence, lack of neither concern nor consideration for others. Today intend to prove that the nature of the crimes were in fact committed by the suspect at hand and at the time of the crime they were in their right frame of mind and should be found guilty of all crimes committed. This is also an excellent time for the prosecution to indirectly character assassinate without it directly being pointed at the defendant.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays