Preview

Market Economy vs Command Economy Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Market Economy vs Command Economy Essay Example
In my Economics class, we are discussing traditional, command, and market economies. Some say, "Well, it would be much better if we switched from Market to Command." All in all, there are many advantages and disadvantages to this. A command economy limits the personal freedom and individuality of a person, and the central government answers all the economic questions offered. Laissez-faire is predominant in a market economy, which has little government interference. Although we would like to think that we live in a laissez-faire based economy, this is not true at all. Whether we realize it or not, the government invades everything, whether it be social, economic, or political, every day. Would socialism be an effective idea? Well, everyone would be treated the same, right? The one thing that America thrives on is competition. If we had a socialist economy, there would be no competition. Workers with the same skills and responsibilities, whether it be more or less experienced, would receive the exact same pay. Is this fair? No, it is not fair. So, what do you all think? I have talked with many about this, and some say we would be better off in a socialist economy, but would you be willing to give up your freedom? I know that I would not be willing to give it up. Thanks for reading!Command economies look good in theory, free health care and all but it also encourages people to be lazy if someone can go to work sit and make the same amount as someone who actually works there is no motivation. Also there would be no motivation to go to college and acquire skills, so basically what you have is a country full of unskilled workers all doing minial jobs and making minimum wage. That is where a socialistic government makes all their money. Yes everyone makes the same but that "same" is very low. And not much changes for the people in a command economy there is nothing to thrive on. You would probably do the same thing your parents did. Okay... Command economies do not mean

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Despite how the trade economy expanded and the political status increased in Western Europe (600 - 1750 C.E.), there was much political disunity throughout Western Europe.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Command economies never work. “In a command economy the central government makes all economic decisions”. The reason Command economies never work is because there is no incentive. Owners of businesses don’t choose, what they make, how much it costs, or how much their employees get. Since they don’t get to choose how much their employees make, no matter how hard they work, they will still get the same amount of money. So someone who makes 100 computers a day, and someone who makes 1 computer a day make the same amount of money. That is why command economies never work.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Market vs Demand Economy

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Market vs. Demand. Now it is time for the final comparison between the two major economic systems which happen to be big ones in the world today – the capitalist free market economy and the communist/socialist command-based one. We shall go about this comparison by going through a list of basic topics and questions required for setting up an economy, and provide the typical demand and the typical market response for them – in the end, that is the true way to fully comprehend both systems. The first question that needs to be answered in the creation of an economy is "what shall be produced?" Every individual has a certain amount of needs and a certain amount of desires, which they are all in the end willing to work for – in a capitalist economy, the government leaves the meeting of these needs to the actual people. The theory is that anyone who wants to succeed in a capitalist world, driven by Adam Smith's "invisible hand", will eventually discover these needs that need to be met by the people and sell them, mainly for the good of the entrepreneur himself, but ideally (you'll hear that word a lot during this comparison) for the good of the consumers and the employees as well – basically, if you know that people want a certain product, you know that people will buy that certain product, so you can guarantee your own success as well as the fulfillment of those consumers in need (which is usually a secondary motive). Demand economies, on the other hand, do not believe in such private profiting – rather, they assign a branch of the government as a "central planning committee" which decides what goods and services the people are entitled to. In a perfect world, this would work perfectly, and everyone would end up getting what they wanted – unfortunately, in more cases than not this central planning committee is too disconnected from the laborers they are providing for to know exactly what is in demand and what is not needed – if, for…

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument still persists of which economy is better. These economies both try to look after their people in different ways. The command economy is more of a direct supervision of its people. It is similar to how a parent watches over a child. The government tries the best to ensure safety in the economic world for their civilians just like a parent protects their child. On the other hand, a market economy is similar to the moments of a bird. When the bird reaches a certain point, they must take a leap. This leap will either kill them, or let them prosper. The market economy is similar since individuals must take the risk to be successful. The risk though, even if possible, may not end as badly we’d like to think. Thousands of businesses flourish in these markets, all because of the risks people have taken to get there, and only some didn’t “flap their wings” like the bird should. This risk pushes people to do their best, so they can prosper like they want. Both economies try to help the very people of the nation, but because of the markets economies risk, there is also great prosperity. This is the very thing that command economies do not…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The major difference between a command economy and a market economy is that a command economy is told what to do by the government. A market economy does things for the people, the people decide what they want. The command economy is told what to produce, who to produce to, and how to produce by the government. The market economy is told is told what to produce, who to produce to, and how to produce by the people.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would say that the U.S. benefits would be better because it’s more opportunity and you progress more into your career versus getting benefits outside the U.S. I mean Arnold Swarzenegger said it better on 106 and Park. He said that’s how his career had started and had taken off ever since he was 21 when he had won Mr. Universe. With the capitalist system in the U.S. you have the right to own private property, the right to own a business and keep all that business’s profits, the right to freedom of completion, and the right to freedom of choice. Under capitalism most factors of production and distribution are owned by individuals. The capitalist system is the foundation of the United States. With the socialist economic system the system should be owned by the government and is based on premise and other businesses. The major benefit for a socialist economic system is social equality because the government takes income no matter if you are rich or poor. Also education can be free through college, free health care, and free child care. If you are in a socialist country you get longer vacations, less hours, and more employee benefits, but capitalism prevails. A Marxist society would have no private property rights and goods produced in it. It would be distributed among the citizens. The U.S. is taking baby steps on controlling socialism. Socialism creates more equality than capitalism and it tends to result in fewer inventions. I would…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socialism has been prevalent as a world system for many decades now but has failed to materialize in the United States. What is striking about this is not only our contempt for social and communal policies but our obvious hatred and distrust for those who do use social and communal policies around the world. It goes so deep that we would fight wars against those who consider themselves communist or socialist. Not only are U.S. policies against a more socialist system they are currently disintegrating those social welfare programs in place right now. (Burke 1997: 400-407) To understand these issues we must understand the meanings of these various systems. Socialism is defined as a system based on public ownership of the means of production and distribution of wealth. (Marrium-Webster 2005) This is not to be confused with communism, which will also be addressed in the coming paragraphs. Communism is an economic or political system based on the sharing of all work and property by the whole community. (Marrium-Webster 2005) However, unlike socialism the means of production are owned by the government not the society as a whole. The United States has always been a capitalist country with some socialist policies. Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned and controlled and it is characterized by competition and the profit motive. (Marrium-Webster 2005) However, the socialist policies, mentioned above, have generally benefited the…

    • 3660 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socialism -vs- Capitalism

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socialism vs. Capitalism Samantha Conti University of Phoenix Comm. /105 –January 12, 2008 The disadvantages of Communism are that people have to be willing to work for the greater good of society, not just themselves. They will not receive all the fruits of their labor, no matter hoe much you work you will always get the same salary. Why would you want to work so hard if you were going to make the same amount of money? Human rights abuses, lack of incentives for progress for individuals which results in a slow progressing society as a whole. Under Socialist theory the individual’s needs are determined and satisfied collectively. Dissent and venturing out on one’s own are not option. Everyone is an employee and tenant of the state. In Communism people have little rights, everything is run by the government resulting in enormous economic failures, including famine, militarism and propaganda to cover-up the systematic failures of the government. Capitalism was developed in Europe in the 19th and early 20th century. Capitalism is an economic arrangement in which people have the individual liberty and the right to own property and to do what they wish with their property as long as it does not harm anyone else. These freedoms set Capitalism apart from all other kinds of economic arrangements. The Capitalist system is based in giving each individual the freedom to better (or worse him or herself). Capitalism signifies means of production. The heart of Capitalism is the producer’s right to make what he wants and the consumer’s right to choose what to buy. A free market economy and free enterprise. The major benefit of Capitalism is private property, the concept that people have the right and privilege to control their possessions as they wish. In a Capitalism economy the role of the government reflect the desire and goals of its citizens. Capitalism societies suffer from poverty too, but in a different way as there is a vastly unequal distribution of wealth (a few…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the fact that there is currently no policy in Idaho that requires a Athletic trainer in a school's athletic programs, schools should have athletic trainers on hand to prevent athletes from injuring themselves even more. Having an athletic trainer should be required in all schools in Idaho. Clearly, there are too many athletes that are getting hurt, many are unable to compete after their injuries, which leads to risks, and having an athletic trainer would prevent injuries sooner. Athletic trainers are there to prevent athletes from getting hurt. and helping them with their way of living a healthy, and active lifestyle as well.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Globalization, generally speaking, refers to the integration of the global economy (Hanson, 2001) as economic resources, especially the means of production and capital, move freely across national boundaries, thanks to a regime of lower tariffs, reduced trade restrictions, greater access to information, and the enactment of laws and formulation of policies that offer various inducements to the foreign entity to re-locate to a destination outside the confines of national boundaries.…

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over the superior socioeconomic system has gone on for over 100 years, and there seems to never be any consensus. In fact, the debate has become so heated that wars have been fought in order to prove supremacy—i.e. the Cold War fought primarily between the USA and the USSR. On one end of this debate lies the communist party that’s goal is to eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor by creating social and economic equality between classes. The opposing party is the capitalists, who strive to for free market economy and individual enterprise. Socialism is the middle ground as it is a mix of both private corporations and government run facilities.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another con for socialism would be that it could make an entire country lazy and unproductive, this situation may benefit welfare programs and cause people to think they could stop working. People would expect the state to provide all their needs, if so where would the state get all the…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In free enterprise, reward comes naturally without restriction to workers who exceed the normal minimums. ( Investopedia) When there is excess production, the owner can freely keep it, and he has no commitment to share his blemish with anyone else. A capitalist environment facilitates competition, and the product is unlimited promoting opportunity. In current society, many countries have adopted pieces of socialism into their economic and political approach. For example, In the United Kingdom, markets are allowed to fluctuate rather freely, and workers have boundless earning possible based on their work. However, basic needs like health care are provided to everyone nonetheless of time or endeavor in their work. The welfare programs like food stamps in the United States are also forms of progressive policies that fit into an otherwise capitalist society. More often than not, in media and in discussing the concepts of Communism and Socialism are used interchangeably to refer to the essentially the same economic and political philosophy. In reality these are two different philosophies that while having some similarities also have some very evident differences. Appreciation the similarities and the differences can be useful in terms of appreciation the distinction of Communism vs. Socialism in discussions or publications. Communism and Socialism both appear in the situation of the Industrial Revolution and largely as a response to a time when business owners were becoming immensely affluent by exploiting their workers. Through different processes both philosophies looked at the current situation as being instability and eventually society pressures would result in drastic changes.(Jeffrey Glen) While there are surely key similarities in the philosophy of Communism and Socialism, there are differences that make considering them interchangeable mistaken. The most elemental difference is that under Communism individuals are provided for or recompense…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both systems have their positives and negatives, but a mixed system with an emphasis in capitalistic beliefs is the one that will thrive in the near future; take the United States of America. Socialism while good for promoting a stable economy, is no way capable of keeping up with the capitalist powerhouses in the world. “They've opened their public schools and health care to more competition, and Sweden partially privatized its pension system. They may not be free market quite yet, but they're no socialist—or even liberal—utopia,…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term industrial revolution refers means the strong transformation of a society- economically, socially, culturally and geographically. The Industrial revolution was a period from the 18th to the 19th century where major changes in manufacturing, agriculture, mining, transportation and technology had a profound effect on the social, cultural and economic conditions of the times.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays