Martin Luther King Jr. wrote this letter while being in Birmingham city jail, when he was aware that a statement was saying his activities were “unwise and untimely”. He stated that Birmingham unfortunate was the city of white power that left no alternatives towards the negro community for their actions. King indicated that he agreed why direct action, sit –ins marches or negotiation were a better path, but because he did not want any crisis. Due to not to having tension with the community, even though the community kept refused to negotiate. He stated that his community had built up resentment and frustration that they need a way to release their emotions. He said if they do not release their emotion in a non-violent way, they will seek a…
Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is one his many writings on segregation and racial inequality towards blacks in the southern American states. While his actions may not have had much success at first during the 1960’s what made his arguments so powerful was his use of pathos and logos.…
King there are two types of laws, you have just laws and unjust laws. “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust” (pg.3). Dr. King distinguishes between the two very clearly in his letter. He goes on to talk about each law, just and unjust, and gives thorough examples of each. He is of course talking about how discrimination and segregation is unjust. “For instance, I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust” (pg.3). This is a great example because Martin accepts the fact that he was arrested for “parading” without a permit. But this is unjust because the ordinance was used to preserve segregation. I found this ironic that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was getting this ticket when in fact the officer whom was writing the ticket should be thrown in jail for violating the first amendment. In my opinion, I agree with this letter in its entirety. I too believe that everyone has certain natural rights. In my opinion ‘moral law’ does exist. His examples of just and unjust laws are shared by many, and if not, they are at least shared by…
The first thing that Dr. King writes is what he thinks just and unjust laws mean. These two definitions gives us an idea of what he thinks just and unjust signify, before he goes deeper into the differences. Dr. King defines a just law as “any law that uplifts the human personality”. Dr. King is implying that if a law makes somebody feel good about themselves and makes them feel better, it is just. As used by Dr. King, just means reasonable, and…
In the pursuit of social justice and civil rights, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael, sought to amend a flawed system. To accomplish this task, these men entered the armory and chose to wield nonviolence as their weapon. Their goal: to combat violence with nonviolence, to fight hate with love, and to spread equality through peace. In the end they succeeded. Violence breeds violence, hate breeds hate, it is an ineffective approach and an archaic mean to resolving societies issues. Malcolm X and Carmichael were both extreme individuals but that does not make them violent. They attacked social justice and civil rights passionately and assertively, not violently. The methods used and arguments made by Martin Luther King Jr. in Letter from Birmingham Jail, Malcolm X in The Ballot or the Bullet, and Stokely Carmichael in Black Power, demonstrate the potency of nonviolence. These men address three separate issues in each of their works. King discusses social issues in regards to the nation as a whole in his letter. Malcolm X speaks to the political equality of black individuals in African American communities. Carmichael discusses white supremacy and its oppression of African American citizens in their own community. Fighting with peace, protesting with nonviolence, is the most effective measure when pursuing social justice and civil rights. I will show how Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael used passive methods and nonviolent means in conquering the issues they had at hand.…
I feel Dr. Martin Luther King’s use of facts and history was an effective argument because it not only gave reason to why he would be in Birmingham but also gave also made a convincing argument of why his cause was justified throughout history by giving examples of times in history where actions like his were necessary and actions of wrongdoing was justified through law.…
This paper will focus on Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King jr. because they are both strong representations of two different approaches to a common goal. Perhaps their different approaches of violence and nonviolence stem from their original opinions of how capable the whites are of being good.…
To start off, Dr. Martin Luther King’s view for an unjust law is “a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” (King 4) He believes that any law that degrades human personality is an unjust law. An unjust law is basically a code that inflicts on minority that is not binding itself. A concrete example of an unjust law is basically difference made legal. Another explanation of an unjust law by Dr. King is “An unjust law is a code inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating because it did not have that unhampered right to vote” (King 4). In King’s letter, he describes how the segregation law in Alabama was not democratically elected. He does this by stating that throughout the state of Alabama there are many methods used to prevent Negroes from voting, or even becoming registered voters. He also explains how there are some states and countries without a single Negro registered to vote despite the fact that Negroes constitute a majority of the population in most states and countries. Dr. King stated in his letter that he was arrested for a charge of parading without a permit. This is an example of a law that is just on its face and unjust in its application. Of course, the law is the law and there is nothing worng with the ordinance on parading without a permit, but when the ordinance is used to prevent just,…
Our world today is much different from the world Martin Luther King Jr. experienced. He had to go through some things that fortunately people my age will never have to face. Today we do not fight for the right to drink at certain water fountains nor do we have assigned seats on city buses. People do not worry about the Ku Klux Klan burning down their churches and killing their kids simply because they hate the color of that person’s skin. It is so sad to see how superficial those people were before, during, and after Martin Luther King’s impact on segregation. He states in the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” that time is valuable, complacency is just as bad as hatred, and sometimes extremism is a good thing.…
for a Baptist church. Just after he received his Ph.D. in 1955, King was asked…
Justice means the quality of being fair and reasonable. By using these words Martin Luther King Jr. meant that he wanted everybody to perform justice to everybody. He wanted everybody to get justice whether you were black or white. He believed that if a white man killed a black man the white man should be sentenced the same time as if he was a black man that killed a white man. This one word is a very important word that meant a lot during the civil rights movement.…
In April of 1963 Martin Luther King was arrested during a nonviolent demonstration in Birmingham, Alabama. While incarcerated, he came across a public statement, “A Call for Unity” made by eight white clergymen in attempt to criticize his work and ideas. It was then that Martin Luther King wrote his rebuttal “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, using rhetorical appeals to not only under mind the clergymen’s statement, but their moral sense and obligation in the eyes of God. Upon doing so; Dr. King quotes St. Augustine when he said, “I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal, but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust law.”( Bloom, Smith 499)…
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines unjust as "characterized by injustice: Unfair." At the same time it defines a law as "a binding custom or practice of a community." With both definitions in mind an unjust law can be described as "a binding custom or practice of a community characterized by injustice and unfairness." Today one can see unjust laws across the globe, many of which are overlooked by much of the world. At the same time, just laws are often enforced in an unjust manner. The fact that much of the world is corrupt is an obvious fact, however, the appropriate course of action to bring about change, is not always so easy to see. The proper guidelines for bringing about justice are different to different people. Nevertheless, if one observes the actions of Martin Luther King Jr. and compares them to the actions of other groups or individuals who have attempted to bring about social change, a simple conclusion can be reached. Nonviolent means of protest are the most effective way to bring about change, and also the best way to give others an understanding of why the change is necessary.…
One must consider where morals come from in order to determine if it is morally right to break or follow unjust and just laws. Everyone knows that morals vary from person to person. In order to understand why morals vary from person to person, one must know what morality is. According to Logical and Critical Thinking website, morality is the belief or recognition that certain behaviors are either “good” or “bad”. The website also stated that morals are very easy to accept and only the fringes of society might question or reject them. In King’s essay “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, he states “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” (218). He explains the reason by stating there are two types of laws, unjust and just. “Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (218). I believe this statement to be very accurate; the reason is because of how I personally grew up. Since I was young, I was always told to become a leader and not a follower. My grandmother would always tell me not to follow or listen to someone that I personally knew was immoral.…
King’s early involvement in human rights would have started from the moment he started preaching. This was before any boycotts or official civil rights movement.…