Preview

national power corporation v. tanfelix

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1073 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
national power corporation v. tanfelix
NATIONAL POWER G.R. No. 152093
CORPORATION,
Petitioner, Present: CORONA, C.J., CARPIO, VELASCO, JR., LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, BRION,
- versus - PERALTA, BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, ABAD, VILLARAMA, JR., PEREZ, MENDOZA, SERENO, REYES, and PERLAS-BERNABE, JJ.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and RODRIGO A. TANFELIX, Promulgated: Respondent. January 24, 2012 x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x DECISION ABAD, J.: It is difficult to accept that an odious act like rigging a public bidding can get the public officer responsible for it wholly absolved of liability just because he was not a member of the bids committee that chose the winning bid. The Facts and the Case On April 7, 1997 the President of petitioner National Power Corporation (NPC) filed an administrative action against respondent Rodrigo A. Tanfelix, a Supervising Mechanical Engineer, for rigging the bidding for the construction of the wind break fence of its thermal power plant’s coal storage in Calaca, Batangas. After hearing, the NPC’s Board of Inquiry and Discipline (BID) found Tanfelix guilty of grave misconduct for rigging the bidding to favor ALC Industries, Inc. (ALC), one of the five pre-qualified contractors. Two witnesses, the board chairman of one of the losing bidders, Ley Construction and Development Corp. (LCDC), and the head of the latter’s engineering department, testified that Tanfelix invited the pre-qualified bidders to a restaurant meeting and offered P1 million each to four of them in exchange for letting ALC win the bidding. He also built into the successful bid a P2 million fee for arranging the rig and for padding NPC’s price estimate so the winning bid could make it big. Days later, the heads of ALC and LCDC met and signed in Tanfelix’s presence a memorandum of agreement that embodied the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kimberly Ellerth worked in Burlington’s Chicago office from March 1993 through May 1994, first as a merchandising assistant and later as a sales representative. Theodore Slowik was a New York based Vice-President of sales and marketing, supervising Ellerth’s immediate supervisors. Slowik made primarily the decision as to Ellerth’s hire and subsequent promotion. Ellerth spoke with Slowik when he traveled to her Chicago office and when she traveled to business related conferences in New York and elsewhere. Ellerth was required to get Slowik’s approval of special sales to her customers. Soon after Ellerth began working for Burlington, Slowik began to subject Ellerth to harassing acts and comments, coupled with threats that her refusal to submit would result in retaliation. For example, in the summer of 1993, Slowik made a series of comments about Ellerth’s legs and breasts. Ellerth never gave Slowik’s any indication that she was interested in him. Nonetheless, he continued to subject her to unwanted touching of her body. Ellerth resigned soon after Slowik refused to authorize a special project for one of Ellerth’s customers. Three weeks after resigning, Ellerth informed Slowik’s supervisors at Burlington that she had resigned due to Slowik’s harassment. She testified that she did not complain about Slowik’s harassment while still employed by Burlington because she feared for losing her job.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Centralia Coal Mine No.5 blast was a tragic and preventable disaster that according to John Martin, “no one stopped.” With only 31 survivors a total of 111 hard working coal miners lost their lives on this dreadful day which to most of them was soon approaching. There were many factors that contributed to this tragedy and several alternatives that Driscoll Scanlan, the state inspector, could have focused on in order to help prevent this as well. Those alternatives included focusing on; the lack of efficient timing in responding to recommendations, the lack of follow through in holding some entity responsible when those recommendations did not get addressed, the lack of setting professional boundaries between the owners of the Centralia Coal Mine No.5 and government officials, and the lack of accountability on the managerial staff at the coal mine. I will also briefly address Scanlan’s motivation towards the Constitution and bureaucracy.`…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a procuring agency fails to adhere to the regulations and/or the terms listed within the solicitation, a bid protest may be filed (Nacke & Ralston 2011). A bid protest is a tool that a contractor can use to legally contest the process or result of a government contract award. In order to file a protest, one must be considered an interested party, meaning they are an offeror or prospective offeror who would be financially affected by either the award or the non-award of the contract. There are three different types of protests available to contractors. Each has differing procedures but they share the main requirement; In order to win, they must provide supporting information which would prove that they have been prejudiced by the government agency. The two most common forms of bid protest are the agency-level protest and the Government Accountability Office (“Bid Protests,” 2010).…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1950 case of P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, P. Lorillard Co., the makers of Old Gold cigarettes, were ordered to “cease and desist from making certain representations found to be false in the advertising of its tobacco products (Warner, et al., 2012, p. 950) From a practical perspective in the 1950’s caveat emptor, or “let the buyer beware” is not a fair or reasonable expectation. While the careful consumer could have looked at the article, the culture of the time was not anti-smoking as it is today. The careful consumer at the time was not savvy to the wealth of scientific data regarding smoking and health. The actual ad, see Figure 1: 1942 WW2 Era Old Gold Santa Cigarette Ad, states that the impartial tests were not done to boost sales or claim superiority of brand. The ad misleads the consumer to believe that it was impartially discovered that Old Gold had the stated attributes.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aren’t We Done Yet

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Q1, On the basis of the facts presented with the case overview, is Labco’s accounting policy for the revenue treatment of its construction contract reasonable?…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    July at the Multiplex

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The analysis for liability of fraud will explain in detail the offer, acceptance, and possible misrepresentation involved in the contract between Tommy and the Royal 16 Theater. The analysis will also cover the Cao and Cao v. Nguyen and Pham case and draw conclusions based on the prima facie case. Assuming that a…

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giere V. Eaton Corporation

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case that I selected was in the area of law concerning employee confidentiality agreements and trade secrets. My employer, Eaton Corporation, is the plaintiff in this case and was the second reason for its selection. I personally have been involved in trade secret discussions with colleagues regarding information that was deemed “trade secret” and I wanted to find out more about it which is the third reason for this topic to be selected.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The chronology of the case shows a progression of "appropriate" action within the existing law and according to organization or bureaucratic norms. On an organiza¬tional level, the players include the State of Illinois, the U.S. Government, the Centralia Coal Company, the United Mine Workers of America, and the miners themselves, who could hardly be said to have been well represented by any of the others.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only one of which is actually relevant to the legal action brought on by the City. The case of the Queen in right of Ontario et al. v. Ron Engineering in the Supreme Court of Canada in 1981, established that the tendering process consists of two contracts, Contract A and Contract B [1]. Contract A is a tendering agreement and while the Contract B is the actual contract to do work [2]. In this case, the City of Waterloo's call for tenders and the following bid by SoftX Programmers constitutes Contract A between the two parties. However, Contract B was never formed as it was never signed by SoftX. This might constitute a breach of Contract A; however, this idea will be explored further. In Contract A, it is an implied term that the contracting party can only accept a "compliant bid" and to treat all bidders "fairly and equally" [1]. As such, one could argue that the City of Waterloo did not properly follow tendering procedures because errors in a bid make it no longer compliant. Furthermore, depending on the judge's judgment, it may appear unfair to the other bidders to accept a bid that was neither compliant nor was the bid that the party would have made had they not made an…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of appellee subcontractor, finding that promissory estoppel was a viable cause of action in a bid construction case. The court found that the award of damages based on this theory was factually supported by the evidence, and that there was statutory authority for the award of attorneys' fees. The determination of the rate of prejudgment interest also was proper.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Saudi Arabia

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that Auger giving payment of $100,000 dollars to help ensure this contract is not legal in a business sense. I do not know this for sure but it seems that this type of “bribe” the minister has done before so it might have just become socially acceptable to put in words. But, as for an action being done in the United States this is something that would not even come to mind in a business world. I feel that is not fair to other companies when others use money to win contracts, I feel that it over-looks the companies that actually do good business instead of the companies that are not good, they just have money.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bacaltos Coal Mines vs

    • 1681 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I. GERMAN A. BACALTOS, of legal age, Filipino, widower, and residing at second street, Espina Village, Cebu City, province of Cebu, Philippines, do hereby authorize RENE R. SAVELLON, of legal age, Filipino and residing at 376-R Osmeña Blvd., Cebu City, Province of Cebu, Philippines, to use the coal operating contract of BACALTOS COAL MINES of which I am the proprietor, for any legitimate purpose that it may serve. Namely, but not by way of limitation, as follows:…

    • 1681 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Digest Election Law

    • 4564 Words
    • 19 Pages

    FILIPINAS ENGINEERING AND MACHINE SHOP, Petitioner, vs. HON. JAIME N. FERRER, LINO PATAJO et. Al.…

    • 4564 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anine (2014) says in his article that the Supreme Court yesterday ordered the groups that sled manila electrical corp. (MERALCO) for its controversial increase of 4.45 pesos per kilowatt-hour (kwh) to include the regulation of the country’s Electrical marker and six independent power producers.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    them as the Chairman of the Board. The Board will examine the notice of opposition along with the documents filed in relation thereof and submits a report to the Controller. The Controller, on the recommendation from the Board, will arrange for a hearing with a time period of minimum ten days. In such a hearing, if the Controller finds that the patent was obtained wrongfully, the patent will stand amended accordingly.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays