DUTY OF CARE & NEGLIGENCE
Both terms used in COMMON LAW.
Duty of Care
Exists between two individuals where there is an obligation on one party not to harm the other
Duty is personal - owed by one individual to another individual e.g. an employer owes a DOC to each one of his employees
There are several examples of where there is a recognised DOC - Employer/Employee; Doctor/Patient; Parent/Child; Teacher/Pupil
The standard of care which must be exercised by an employer is “the care which an ordinary prudent employer would take in all circumstances”
Breach of the DOC may give the individual who's been harmed the right to take out a CIVIL action for damages.
Negligence
A tort (a civil wrong)
Can be used as the basis for a CIVIL action for damages
Often used in health & safety where an employee has been injured at work
A test applies which needs to be demonstrated in court to successfully prove negligence
Duty of care existed
There was a breach of the duty of care
Damage resulted from the breach of the duty of care
Several defences exist against a claim in negligence: -
Denial of negligence
Injury was the sole fault of the employee
Contributory negligence
Causation - breach of duty of care did not cause the damage
Volenti non fit injuria - employee knowingly accepted the risk
Time limits - times set by Limitations Act 1980 have been exceeded
What might you be asked?
There are several possibilities: -
You may be asked to define either 'negligence' or a 'tort'. It is useful to give an example in these questions.
You may be asked to outline the defences to a case of negligence or outline the tests for negligence. Again, where possible use examples to illustrate your answer.
Also around this area of the syllabus, you may be asked to outline the employers common law duty of care, or there is the favourite outlining of the differences between civil and criminal law!