Preview

P&G and Godrej

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
P&G and Godrej
Why did Richard not able to jell with local conditions?
Answer: Richard found these government meetings frustrating. Even though he always phoned to make firm appointments, the bureaucrats usually kept him waiting for half an hour or more. Not only that, his meetings would be continuously interrupted by phone calls and unannounced visitors as well as by clerks bringing in stacks of letters and documents to be signed. Because of all the waiting and the constant interruptions, it regularly took him half a day or more to accomplish something that could have been done back home in 20 minutes.
What went wrong with the joint venture? Why did it break up within four years of its formation?
Answer: The major points to end the Joint Venture are as follows. 1. P&GG would become a fully owned subsidiary of P&G with Godrej selling it’s 49% stake to P&G. 2. P&G would retain most of the sales force and the distribution network which most of the sales force and distribution network which P&GG acquired from Godrej soaps. 3. The soap brands of Godrej which had been licensed to P&G would revert to Godrej soaps. 4. P&G would retain the detergent and scourer brands it had brought from Godrej.

Godrej gave the following explanations for the breakup of the joint venture. It would enable both the companies to pursue the business opportunities thrown open by liberalization. Strangely, the reasoning given for the alliance when it had been formed about four years ago was that it would enable them to exploit better the opportunities provided by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atherly case

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By doing this, the company’s other two division will be able to grow strong efficiently because they will have more money and resources to allocate to these 2 brands. By doing so, John will be able…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cambridge Labs Case Analysis

    • 5443 Words
    • 22 Pages

    This case analysis will determine if an alliance between these two firms is a sound strategy that fits the global objectives of both parties. The case was divide in the following sequence to retain the flow of these three phases; the central question; the strategic issues; the strategic objectives; the analysis; the mission, vision, core competencies, and competitive advantage; the industry and firm’s analysis; the country’s business environment; the country-specific entry strategies; the deal and management of the venture relationship; the alternative strategies, the recommendation, and an update on the case at hand.…

    • 5443 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Extra Credit for Final

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Bob’s Grocery merges with Pete’s Produce and becomes PB foods. The transaction is a:…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yincom and Yangnet case

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Market competition is strong, with the market leader in the dominant position. The two companies are new and still establishing themselves, if both cannot adjust, merge and work together harmoniously, it may lead to the demise of both companies if this critical transition does not go smoothly.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the issues listed, I don’t believe purchasing GSD would be profitable, as debt financing would have to be undertaken thus, going against Antonio’s way. However, Frank believes they must grow in order to stay competitive within the industry so the former opportunity should be undertaken.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MABE Case

    • 2784 Words
    • 10 Pages

    From the case, we see that the primary source of concern is what Mabe should do with its Joint Venture in Russia in spite of the opportunities, benefits and threats of doing business there. In a nutshell, Mabe is trying to decide whether or not to continue with the Joint Venture (JV hereafter) or seek ways to improve the JVs performance and gain more market share.…

    • 2784 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vertical Mergers

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mergers and Joint VenturesSharod L. Edwards, Derrick Hubbard, Oriel Frederick, Michael Thompson, Charles Barker, and Valerie Carpenter…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    G is the communication equipment firm since it has the lower profit margin and longer accounts receivable typical of a firm successfully bidding for government contracts.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration, working to increase their prospective shares of the Korean detergent market.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proctor And Gamble

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First, P&G boasts an enviable stable of successful products. With a clear focus to capture its market share, each brand…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We agree the decision “break up” made by AGI. As well as this, we support the specific decision to sell the communications business.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Joint Venture Failures

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A joint venture is a contractual agreement joining together two or more parties for the purpose of executing a particular business undertaking (InvestorWords, 2008). Some of the most significant benefits gained from joint venturing include, a reduced risk of both companies resulting from capital and resource sharing, the opportunity to increase sales, and enhance technological capabilities through research and development underwritten by one party (INC, 2009). Joint ventures also provide a mode for entering foreign markets because the partnering companies join complementary skills and knowhow with local firms (Qiu, 1984). Companies often jump into joint venture agreements blinded by these benefits and often fail to research the risks involved in joint ventures (Park, 1996). Research has shown that half of all companies that enter into a joint venture fail, and only forty four percent of joint ventures that remain operational report meeting profit expectations (Rod, 2009). To limit these risks a company considering entering into a joint venture should look at case studies of failed joint ventures which have similar circumstances as the joint venture the company is currently considering (Lyles, 1987). There are common patterns to joint venture failures (INC, 2009). The first pattern happens when the joint venture partner’s ownership and strategy of the joint venture, doesn’t represent their risk and contribution to the joint venture (Chalos, 2002). Another pattern in joint venture failure happens when companies enter into joint venture agreements without a good knowledge of the market they are entering into. This causes a lot of unforeseen risks in the joint venture project. Finally, another pattern of joint venture failure happens when companies neglect to higher skilled, experienced employees to oversee the joint venture. Because of the lack of skill and experience very large mistakes are often made in joint ventures (Lyles, 1987).…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Danone Case

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The relationship started as an ambitious project which would lead to a significant increase in growth and profits for both sides. However, the win-win situation soon started to crumble.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Zhong-Llan Knitting Company joint venture in China is one of the region's shining success stories. So why is generai manager Mike Gravesthinking about pulling the plug on it?…

    • 6013 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gucci Case

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    " PPR bought back the 20% stake that LVMH owned, acquired more brands and entered into…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics